Skip to content

Endoscopic Biliary Radiofrequency Ablation of Malignant Distal Common Bile Duct Strictures

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Endoscopic Biliary Radiofrequency Ablation of Malignant Distal Common Bile Duct Strictures.

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01721174
Enrollment
42
Registered
2012-11-05
Start date
2012-11-30
Completion date
2017-12-31
Last updated
2018-01-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cholangiocarcinoma, Pancreatic Cancer

Keywords

Pancreatic cancer, Cholangiocarcinoma, Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation

Brief summary

Malignant bile duct obstruction is a common sequela of pancreatic cancers or distal bile duct cancers, and its development can hinder the use of chemotherapy, decrease patient quality of life, and decrease survival. To relieve obstructive jaundice as a result of the obstruction, endoscopic stent placement is usually required. The use self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) have been shown to result in a longer patency times as compared with plastic stents. However, despite improvements in materials and stent design, stent obstruction still occurs in 13% to 44% of the patients. Tumor in-growth is the most common mechanism of stent obstruction. Recently, the use of endoscopic biliary radiofrequency ablation (EBRFA) have been described in patients suffering from inoperable malignant distal common bile duct (CBD) obstruction. The procedure uses heat energy to cause local tumour tissue death, resulting in re-opening of the bile duct lumen. The procedure has the potential of reducing the rate of stent obstruction after SEMS and also prolonging survival. The safety profile appears to be comparable that of placement of SEMS alone without added complications (\<10%). The aim of the current study is to compare the efficacy of EBRFA with the addition of SEMS to SEMS alone in a randomized controlled trial.We hypothesize that the application of EBRFA can reduce recurrent biliary obstruction after SEMS.

Interventions

PROCEDURESEMS only

The SEMS (Niti-S biliary uncovered metallic stent; Taewoong Medical, Korea) would be placed.

PROCEDUREEBRFA and SEMS

The radiofrequency ablation (RFA) catheter would be placed under fluoroscopic guidance across the biliary stricture. The Habib EndoHPB (EMcision UK, London, United Kingdom) radiofrequency ablation catheter is a bipolar RFA probe that is 8F (2.6 mm), 1.8 m long, compatible with standard (3.2-mm working channel) side-viewing endoscopes, and passes over 0.035-inch guidewires. The catheter has 2 ring electrodes 8 mm apart with the distal electrode 5 mm from the leading edge, providing local coagulative necrosis over a 2.5-cm length. Depending on the length of the stricture, sequential applications would be applied to complete treatment throughout the length of the stricture without significant overlap of treated areas. An uncovered SEMSs (Niti-S biliary uncovered metallic stent; Taewoong Medical, Gimpo City, Korea) would be placed after 2 sessions of EBRFA.

Sponsors

Chinese University of Hong Kong
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age ≥ 18 years old with informed consent 2. Histologically (preferred) or radiologically confirmed distal malignant bile duct tumors 3. Inoperability by staging, comorbidities or patient wishes 4. Distal tumors 2cm away from the portal hilum 5. Bilirubin \> 50umol/L at diagnosis

Exclusion criteria

1. Periampullary tumours 2. Multiple hepatic metastases with significant blockage of one or more liver segments (if no segment blockage, metastasis is not an

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Stent patency rate6 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Overall survival3 years
Serious adverse events30 day
Unscheduled readmission rates1 year

Countries

Hong Kong

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026