Skip to content

A Study To Evaluate Safety And Efficacy Of IV Sildenafil In The Treatment Of Neonates With Persistent Pulmonary Hypertension Of The Newborn

A MULTI-CENTRE, RANDOMIZED, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, DOUBLE-BLIND, TWO-ARMED, PARALLEL GROUP STUDY TO EVALUATE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF IV SILDENAFIL IN THE TREATMENT OF NEONATES WITH PERSISTENT PULMONARY HYPERTENSION OF THE NEWBORN (PPHN) OR HYPOXIC RESPIRATORY FAILURE AND AT RISK FOR PPHN, WITH A LONG TERM FOLLOW-UP INVESTIGATION OF DEVELOPMENTAL PROGRESS 12 AND 24 MONTHS AFTER COMPLETION OF STUDY TREATMENT

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01720524
Enrollment
59
Registered
2012-11-02
Start date
2013-08-05
Completion date
2020-09-28
Last updated
2021-08-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pulmonary Hypertension, Familial Persistent, of the Newborn

Keywords

persistent pulmonary hypertension, newborn, neonates, iv sildenafil, hypoxic respiratory failure and at risk of persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn

Brief summary

This study will evaluate whether IV sildenafil can reduce the time on inhaled nitric oxide treatment and reduce the failure rate of available treatments for persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn.

Interventions

DRUGplacebo

IV placebo or 0.9% sodium chloride or 10% dextrose. Infusion rate based on weight.

DRUGiv sildenafil

loading dose of 0.1 mg/kg over 30 minutes followed by maintenance dose of 0.03 mg/kg/h. To infuse minimum 48 hours and maximum of 14 days.

Sponsors

Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
0 Days to 4 Days
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Neonates with persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn * Age \<=96 hours and \>=34 weeks gestational age * Oxygenation Index \>15 and \<60 * Concurrent treatment with inhaled nitric oxide and \>=50% oxygen

Exclusion criteria

* Prior or immediate need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or cardiopulmonary resuscitation * Expected duration of mechanical ventilation \<48 hours * Profound hypoxemia * Life-threatening or lethal congenital anomaly

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time on Inhaled Nitric Oxide (iNO) Treatment After Initiation of Intravenous (IV) Study Drug For Participants Without Treatment Failure14 days from the initiation of IV study drug or hospital discharge, whichever occurs first (maximum of 14 days)Time in days, on iNO treatment, for participants without iNO treatment failure, was calculated 14 days from the initiation of IV study drug or hospital discharge, whichever occurred first. iNO treatment failure was defined as need for additional treatment targeting PPHN, need for extra corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), or death during the study.
Treatment Failure Rate14 days from the initiation of IV study drug or hospital discharge, whichever occurs first (maximum of 14 days)Treatment failure rate was defined as percentage of participants who needed additional treatment targeting PPHN, needed ECMO, or died during the study.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Individual Components of Treatment Failure14 days from the initiation of IV study drug or hospital discharge, whichever occurs first (maximum of 14 days)Percentage of participants with individual components of treatment failure (need to start additional treatment targeting PPHN, need to start ECMO, or death) were evaluated. Some participants could have had multiple qualifying events for treatment failure.
Change From Baseline in Oxygenation Index (OI) at Hours 6, 12 and 24 Post-InfusionBaseline, Hours 6, 12 and 24 after start of infusionOxygenation index was calculated as the product of fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) and mean airway pressure divided by partial pressure of oxygen dissolved in arterial blood (PaO2) \[(FiO2\*mean airway pressure)/PaO2\] measured in centimeter of water per millimeter of mercury (cmH2O/mmHg). FiO2 is the measure of oxygen concentration that is breathed. Mean airway pressure is defined as an average of the airway pressure throughout the respiratory cycle. PaO2 is the measure of oxygen level dissolved in the arterial blood.
Change From Baseline in Differential Saturation at Hours 6, 12 and 24 Post-InfusionBaseline, Hours 6, 12 and 24 after start of infusionDifferential oxygenation saturation is a simple way to detect the right-to left shunting at ductus arteriosus using 2 pulse oximeters. It is the difference between pre-ductal and post-ductal sites pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2). Where, pre-duct refers to right upper extremity and post-duct refers to lower limb. Oxygenation saturation is measured as percentage of hemoglobin binding sites occupied by oxygen in the blood.
Change From Baseline in Ratio of Partial Pressure of Oxygen in Arterial Blood to Fraction of Inspired Oxygen (P/F) at Hours 6, 12 and 24Baseline, Hours 6, 12 and 24 after start of infusionThe ratio of partial pressure of arterial oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen is a ratio between the oxygen level in the arterial blood and the oxygen concentration that is breathed. It helps to determine the degree of any problems with how the lungs transfer oxygen to the blood.
Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Sildenafil and Its MetaboliteLoading dose, Day 1: prior to the start of infusion, 5, 30 minutes after end of loading infusion; Maintenance dose: 48 to 72, 96 to 120 hours during infusion and immediately prior to end of maintenance infusion (up to maximum on Day 14)Cmax was obtained for Sildenafil and its major metabolite UK-103,320.
Total Plasma Clearance (CL) of Sildenafil and Its MetaboliteLoading dose: prior to the start of infusion, 5, 30 minutes after end of loading infusion on Day 1; Maintenance dose: between 48 to 72, 96 to 120 hours during infusion and immediately prior to end of infusion on Day 1CL is volume of the body fluid/ plasma from which the drug or the metabolite is completely removed per unit time. CL was obtained for Sildenafil and its major metabolite UK-103,320.
Central Volume of Distribution (Vc) of Sildenafil and Its MetaboliteLoading dose: prior to the start of infusion, 5, 30 minutes after end of loading infusion on Day 1; Maintenance dose: between 48 to 72, 96 to 120 hours during infusion and immediately prior to end of infusion on Day 1Vc is the hypothetical volume into which a drug or a metabolite initially distributes upon administration. It was determined by using a population-based analysis, non-linear mixed-effects modeling (NONMEM), version 7.4.0. Vc was calculated for Sildenafil and its major metabolite, UK-103,320.
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Baseline up to 31 days after end of study drug infusion (up to 45 days)An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a subject who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. A SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly; medically important events. Treatment-emergent are events between first infusion of study drug and up to 31 days after end of study drug infusion (up to 45 days) that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs included both SAEs and non-SAEs.
Number of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) According to SeverityBaseline up to 31 days after end of study drug infusion (up to 45 days)AE: untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE: AE resulting in any of the following outcomes: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly; medically important events. Treatment-emergent are events between first infusion of study drug and up to 31 days after end of study drug infusion (up to 45 days) that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs included both SAEs and non-SAEs. Severity criteria: mild=did not interfere with subject's usual function; moderate=interfered to some extent with participant's usual function and severe=interfered significantly with participant's usual function. Missing baseline severities were imputed as mild.
Number of Participants With Laboratory AbnormalitiesUp to 14 days from initiation of study drug infusionCriteria for laboratory values: Hematology: hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cell count \<0.8\*lower limit of normal (LLN), platelets\<0.5\*LLN, \>1.75\*upper limit of normal (ULN), white blood cells count \<0.6\*LLN, \>1.5\*ULN; Liver function: total and direct bilirubin \>1.5\*ULN, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase \>3.0\*ULN, total protein \<0.8\*LLN, \>1.2\*ULN; Renal function: blood urea nitrogen, creatinine \>1.3\*ULN; Electrolytes: sodium \<0.95\*LLN, \>1.05\*ULN, potassium, chloride, calcium, bicarbonate (venous) \<0.9\*LLN, \>1.1\*ULN.
Part B: Composite Scores of Cognitive, Language, and Motor Developmental Progress of Participants as Assessed by Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development Third Edition (Bayley-III)Month 12 and 24 after end of study treatment in Part A (Day 1 to 14)Bayley-III assesses infant and toddler development across five domains: cognitive, language, motor, social-emotional (SE), and adaptive behavior (AB). Assessments of the cognitive, language, and motor domains conducted using items administered to the child; assessments of the SE and AB domains conducted using the primary caregiver's responses to a questionnaire. Score ranges: cognitive scale 0-91, language scale 0-97 and motor scale 0-132, where higher scores indicated better cognitive function, communication and motor skills respectively. Raw scores of cognitive, language and motor domains were converted to composite scores. Composite scores of cognitive, language and motor developmental scales ranged from a scale of 40 to 160, where higher score indicated stronger skills and abilities. In this outcome measure composite scores for infants and toddlers were reported at month 12 and 24.
Part B: Composite Scores of Social-Emotional and Adaptive Behavior Questionnaire as Assessed by Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development Third Edition (Bayley-III)Month 24 after end of study treatment in Part A (Day 1 to 14)The Bayley-III assesses infant and toddler development across five domains: cognitive, language, motor, social-emotional (SE), and adaptive behavior (AB). Assessments of the cognitive, language, and motor domains conducted using items administered to the child; assessments of the SE and AB domains conducted using the primary caregiver's responses to a questionnaire. The questionnaire comprises the SE scale (35 items) and the AB scale (241 items). Raw scores of SE and AB were converted to composite scores. Composite scores for SE and AB scale ranged from 40 to 160, where higher scores indicated better social-emotional skills and adaptive behavior in child. In this outcome measure composite scores for parent/caregiver were reported at month 24.
Part B: Number of Participants With Eye Movement Disorders as Assessed by Eye ExaminationMonth 12 and 24 after end of study treatment in Part A (Day 1 to 14)Standard age-appropriate ophthalmological examinations were used to assess eye movement disorders (presence of amblyopia, strabismus, and nystagmus) at month 12 and 24. In this outcome measure, data have been reported for right and left eye separately. Rows according to eye movement disorder categories at specified time points are reported in this outcome measure, only when there was a non-zero data for at least 1 reporting arm.
Part B: Visual Acuity of Verbal Participants as Assessed by Ophthalmological AssessmentMonth 12 and 24 after end of study treatment in Part A (Day 1 to 14)Standard age-appropriate ophthalmological examinations were used to assess visual acuity (performed differently for children able of verbal interaction) through visual acuity chart (VAC) quantitative, counting finger (CF), hand motion (HM), light perception (LP), no light perception (NLP) and missing at month 12 and 24. In this outcome measure, data have been reported for right and left eye separately. Rows according to visual acuity categories at specified time points are reported in this outcome measure, only when there was a non-zero data for at least 1 reporting arm.
Time From Initiation of Intravenous (IV) Study Drug to Final Weaning of Mechanical Ventilation14 days from the initiation of IV study drug or hospital discharge, whichever occurs first (maximum of 14 days)Time in days, from initiation of IV study drug to final weaning of mechanical ventilation among participants achieving final weaning of mechanical ventilation for PPHN was evaluated. Kaplan-Meier method was used for estimation. For participants with mechanical ventilation beyond 336 hours (14 days) from initiation of IV study drug, data was censored at 14 days.
Part B: Visual Acuity of Verbal Participants as Assessed by LogMAR Through Visual Acuity ChartMonth 12 and 24 after end of study treatment in Part A (Day 1 to 14)Standard age-appropriate ophthalmological examinations were used to assess visual acuity (performed differently for children able of verbal interaction) at month 12 and 24. Visual acuity (VA) of verbal children was assessed for each eye using the Snellen method, where logarithm of minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) units were derived from the Snellen ratios. Participants had to read letters from the chart at a distance of 20 feet/6 meter or 4 meter. VA (Snellen ratio) = distance between the chart and participant, divided by distance at which participant was able to see/read chart without impairment; expressed as decimal, logMAR = log10 (1/decimal VA). In this outcome measure, data have been reported for right and left eye separately.
Part B: Visual Status of Participants With Abnormality as Assessed by Eye Examination of the Anterior and Posterior SegmentsMonth 12 and 24 after end of study treatment in Part A (Day 1 to 14)Standard age-appropriate ophthalmological examinations were used to assess examination of anterior and posterior chamber for abnormality in lids, conjunctiva, cornea, anterior chamber, lens, iris, pupil, extraocular muscle movement and eye movements at month 12 and 24. In this outcome measure, data have been reported for right and left eye separately. Rows according to visual status categories at specified time points are reported in this outcome measure, only when there was a non-zero data for at least 1 reporting arm.
Part B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Behavior Hearing Assessment Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestMonth 12 and 24 after end of study treatment in Part A (Day 1 to 14)Audiological evaluations of participants were recorded and reported using behavior hearing assessment through pure tone audiometry test which includes participants with normal, abnormal, incomplete/inconclusive behavior at month 12 and 24.
Part B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Bone Conduction Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestMonth 12 and 24 after end of study treatment in Part A (Day 1 to 14)Audiological evaluations of participants were recorded and reported by bone conduction assessment through pure tone audiometry test which included participants with sensorineural hearing loss, conductive hearing loss, mixed hearing loss, neural, and unspecified at month 12 and 24. Rows according to bone conduction categories at specified time points are reported in this outcome measure, only when there was a non-zero data for at least 1 reporting arm.
Part B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestMonth 12 and 24 after end of study treatment in Part A (Day 1 to 14)Audiological evaluations of participants were recorded and reported by air conduction via phones/headphones through pure tone audiometry test which included participants with hearing loss ranged from less than or equal to (\<=) 20 decibel hearing loss (DB HL), 21-40 DB HL, 41-70 DB HL, 71-90 DB HL, greater than (\>) 90 DB HL or no response, and missing at frequencies ranged from 500 Hertz (Hz) to 8000 Hz at month 12 and 24. In this outcome measure, data have been reported for right and left ear separately. Rows according to air conduction categories at specified time points are reported in this outcome measure, only when there was a non-zero data for at least 1 reporting arm.
Part B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Soundfield Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestMonth 12 and 24 after end of study treatment in Part A (Day 1 to 14)Audiological evaluations of participants were recorded and reported by air conduction via soundfield through pure tone audiometry test which included participants with hearing loss ranged from \<=20 DB HL, 21-40 DB HL, 41-70 DB HL, 71-90 DB HL, \>90 DB HL or no response, and missing at frequencies ranged from 500 Hz to 4000 Hz at month 12 and 24. Rows according to air conduction categories at specified time points are reported in this outcome measure, only when there was a non-zero data for at least 1 reporting arm.
Part B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Tympanometry Assessment (Peak Pressure) Through Immittance Audiometry TestMonth 12 and 24 after end of study treatment in Part A (Day 1 to 14)Audiological evaluations of participants were recorded and reported by tympanometry assessment through immittance audiometry test which included participants with peak pressure signs (+) and (-) at month 12 and 24. In this outcome measure, data have been reported for right and left ear separately.
Part B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Tympanometry Assessment (Static Acoustic Admittance) Through Immittance Audiometry TestMonth 12 and 24 after end of study treatment in Part A (Day 1 to 14)Audiological evaluations of participants were recorded and reported by tympanometry assessment through immittance audiometry test which included participants with static acoustic admittance at month 12 and 24. In this outcome measure, data have been reported for right and left ear separately.
Part B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Ipsilateral Stapedial Reflex Through Immittance Audiometry TestMonth 12 and 24 after end of study treatment in Part A (Day 1 to 14)Audiological evaluations of participants were recorded and reported by ipsilateral stapedial reflex through immittance audiometry test which included participants with presence of ipsilateral stapedial reflex at frequencies ranged from 500 Hz to 2000 Hz at month 12 and 24. Ipsilateral stapedial reflex measures are used to assess the neural pathway surrounding the stapedial reflex, which occurs in response to a loud sound (70 to 90 decibel above threshold). In this outcome measure, data have been reported for right and left ear separately.
Part B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Transient Evoked Emission Through Otoacoustic Emissions AssessmentMonth 12 and 24 after end of study treatment in Part A (Day 1 to 14)Audiological evaluations of participants were recorded and reported by transient evoked emission through otoacoustic emissions assessment which included participants with presence of transient evoked emissions from frequencies 1000 Hz to 4000 Hz at month 12 and 24. In this outcome measure, data have been reported for right and left ear separately.
Part B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Distort Product Through Otoacoustic Emissions AssessmentMonth 12 and 24 after end of study treatment in Part A (Day 1 to 14)Audiological evaluations of participants were recorded and reported by distort product through otoacoustic emissions assessment which included participants with presence of distort product at frequencies ranged from 2000 Hz to 8000 Hz at month 12 and 24. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) are generated in the cochlea in response to two tones of a given frequency and sound pressure level presented in the ear canal. Distort product otoacoustic emissions are an objective indicator of normally functioning cochlea outer hair cells. In this outcome measure, data have been reported for right and left ear separately.
Part B: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Deathsup to 24 months after end of study treatment in Part A (maximum up to 26 months)An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study medication without regard to possibility of causal relationship to it. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/ incapacity; congenital anomaly. AEs included both serious and all non-serious AEs.
Part B: Neurological Progress of Participants as Assessed by the Neurology Optimality ScoreMonth 12 and 24 after end of study treatment in Part A (Day 1 to 14)The Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination (HINE) was a standard scoring examination to assess development of cranial nerve; posture; movement; tone; and reflexes and reaction. HINE exam global score is a sum of subset (cranial nerve, posture, movement, tone, reflexes and reactions) scores, ranged from 0 to 78, where higher score represents better outcome. Here, the HINE global scores were reported at month 12 and 24.
Part B: Visual Acuity of Non-Verbal Participants as Assessed by Ophthalmological AssessmentMonth 12 and 24 after end of study treatment in Part A (Day 1 to 14)Standard age-appropriate ophthalmological examinations were used to assess visual acuity (performed differently for children unable of verbal interaction) through fixates and follows (included central, steady and maintained), light perception (wince to light), no light perception, and missing at month 12 and 24. In this outcome measure, data have been reported for right and left eye separately. Rows according to visual acuity categories at specified time points are reported in this outcome measure, only when there was a non-zero data for at least 1 reporting arm.
Time From Initiation of Intravenous (IV) Study Drug to First Treatment Failure14 days from the initiation of IV study drug or hospital discharge, whichever occurs first (maximum of 14 days)Time in days, from initiation of IV study drug to first treatment failure (defined as need for additional treatment targeting PPHN, need for ECMO, or death) for participants with treatment failure was evaluated. Kaplan-Meier method was used for estimation. For participants without treatment failure by the endpoint assessment date, data was censored at the endpoint assessment date.

Countries

Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study was planned in two parts Part A (double-blind phase) and Part B (long-term, non-intervention phase).

Pre-assignment details

Neonates with persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN) or hypoxic respiratory failure (HRF) and at risk of PPHN who were receiving inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) treatment were evaluated in this study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
IV Sildenafil
Part A: Participants received sildenafil intravenously based on their body weight at a loading dose of 0.1 milligrams per kg (mg/kg) for 30 minutes on Day 1 followed by a maintenance dose of 0.03 milligrams per kg per hour (mg/kg/hr), for a minimum of 2 days and maximum of 14 days. Infusion continuation was upon investigator discretion in view of participants' safety and well-being. Part B: Participants who started Part A (not necessarily completed Part A) and who were eligible and consented, continued to be followed up in part B of the study.
29
Placebo
Participants received placebo (0.9 % normal saline or dextrose 10%) at a rate matched to sildenafil infusion, intravenously, based on participant's weight, for a minimum of 2 days and maximum of 14 days. Infusion continuation was upon investigator discretion in view of participants' safety and well-being. Part B: Participants who started Part A (not necessarily completed Part A) and who were eligible and consented, continued to be followed up in part B of the study.
30
Total59

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Part AAdverse Event22
Part ADeath21
Part AInsufficient Clinical Response24
Part ALost to Follow-up01
Part AMissed 28 day follow-up visit11
Part AOther01
Part AWithdrawal by Subject01
Part BDeath02
Part BLost to Follow-up23
Part BNo longer willing to participate in study14
Part BOther20

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboTotalIV Sildenafil
Age, Continuous1.9 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.75
1.8 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.83
1.7 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
29 Participants52 Participants23 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants4 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
5 Participants7 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
7 Participants8 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants4 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants5 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
16 Participants35 Participants19 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
13 Participants26 Participants13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
17 Participants33 Participants16 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
2 / 291 / 300 / 272 / 26
other
Total, other adverse events
20 / 2919 / 3014 / 2715 / 26
serious
Total, serious adverse events
7 / 292 / 309 / 276 / 26

Outcome results

Primary

Time on Inhaled Nitric Oxide (iNO) Treatment After Initiation of Intravenous (IV) Study Drug For Participants Without Treatment Failure

Time in days, on iNO treatment, for participants without iNO treatment failure, was calculated 14 days from the initiation of IV study drug or hospital discharge, whichever occurred first. iNO treatment failure was defined as need for additional treatment targeting PPHN, need for extra corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), or death during the study.

Time frame: 14 days from the initiation of IV study drug or hospital discharge, whichever occurs first (maximum of 14 days)

Population: The intent-to-treat population (ITT) included all randomized participants treated with study treatment. Here Overall number of participants analyzed signifies number of participants without iNO treatment failure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
IV SildenafilTime on Inhaled Nitric Oxide (iNO) Treatment After Initiation of Intravenous (IV) Study Drug For Participants Without Treatment Failure4.1 days
PlaceboTime on Inhaled Nitric Oxide (iNO) Treatment After Initiation of Intravenous (IV) Study Drug For Participants Without Treatment Failure4.1 days
p-value: 0.98595% CI: [-2.08, 2.04]ANCOVA
Primary

Treatment Failure Rate

Treatment failure rate was defined as percentage of participants who needed additional treatment targeting PPHN, needed ECMO, or died during the study.

Time frame: 14 days from the initiation of IV study drug or hospital discharge, whichever occurs first (maximum of 14 days)

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants treated with study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
IV SildenafilTreatment Failure Rate27.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboTreatment Failure Rate20.0 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.493595% CI: [-14.1, 29.3]Chi-squared
Secondary

Central Volume of Distribution (Vc) of Sildenafil and Its Metabolite

Vc is the hypothetical volume into which a drug or a metabolite initially distributes upon administration. It was determined by using a population-based analysis, non-linear mixed-effects modeling (NONMEM), version 7.4.0. Vc was calculated for Sildenafil and its major metabolite, UK-103,320.

Time frame: Loading dose: prior to the start of infusion, 5, 30 minutes after end of loading infusion on Day 1; Maintenance dose: between 48 to 72, 96 to 120 hours during infusion and immediately prior to end of infusion on Day 1

Population: PK analysis set included all participants randomized and treated who had at least 1 concentration during whole treatment period.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
IV SildenafilCentral Volume of Distribution (Vc) of Sildenafil and Its MetaboliteSildenafil8.76 LitersStandard Deviation 1.8
IV SildenafilCentral Volume of Distribution (Vc) of Sildenafil and Its MetaboliteUK-103,32015.96 LitersStandard Deviation 11.2
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Differential Saturation at Hours 6, 12 and 24 Post-Infusion

Differential oxygenation saturation is a simple way to detect the right-to left shunting at ductus arteriosus using 2 pulse oximeters. It is the difference between pre-ductal and post-ductal sites pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2). Where, pre-duct refers to right upper extremity and post-duct refers to lower limb. Oxygenation saturation is measured as percentage of hemoglobin binding sites occupied by oxygen in the blood.

Time frame: Baseline, Hours 6, 12 and 24 after start of infusion

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants treated with study treatment. Here, 'Number analyzed' = Participants evaluable for this outcome measure at specified rows.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
IV SildenafilChange From Baseline in Differential Saturation at Hours 6, 12 and 24 Post-InfusionChange at Hour 61.5 percentage of hemoglobin
IV SildenafilChange From Baseline in Differential Saturation at Hours 6, 12 and 24 Post-InfusionChange at Hour 12-1.2 percentage of hemoglobin
IV SildenafilChange From Baseline in Differential Saturation at Hours 6, 12 and 24 Post-InfusionChange at Hour 241.2 percentage of hemoglobin
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Differential Saturation at Hours 6, 12 and 24 Post-InfusionChange at Hour 60.8 percentage of hemoglobin
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Differential Saturation at Hours 6, 12 and 24 Post-InfusionChange at Hour 126.7 percentage of hemoglobin
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Differential Saturation at Hours 6, 12 and 24 Post-InfusionChange at Hour 249.3 percentage of hemoglobin
Comparison: Hour 6p-value: 0.768695% CI: [-4.3, 5.8]ANCOVA
Comparison: Hour 12p-value: 0.111295% CI: [-17.8, 1.9]ANCOVA
Comparison: Hour 24p-value: 0.208995% CI: [-21.2, 4.8]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Oxygenation Index (OI) at Hours 6, 12 and 24 Post-Infusion

Oxygenation index was calculated as the product of fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) and mean airway pressure divided by partial pressure of oxygen dissolved in arterial blood (PaO2) \[(FiO2\*mean airway pressure)/PaO2\] measured in centimeter of water per millimeter of mercury (cmH2O/mmHg). FiO2 is the measure of oxygen concentration that is breathed. Mean airway pressure is defined as an average of the airway pressure throughout the respiratory cycle. PaO2 is the measure of oxygen level dissolved in the arterial blood.

Time frame: Baseline, Hours 6, 12 and 24 after start of infusion

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants treated with study treatment. Here, 'Number analyzed' = Participants evaluable for this outcome measure at specified rows.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
IV SildenafilChange From Baseline in Oxygenation Index (OI) at Hours 6, 12 and 24 Post-InfusionChange at Hour 12-4.1 cmH2O/mmHg
IV SildenafilChange From Baseline in Oxygenation Index (OI) at Hours 6, 12 and 24 Post-InfusionChange at Hour 24-11.6 cmH2O/mmHg
IV SildenafilChange From Baseline in Oxygenation Index (OI) at Hours 6, 12 and 24 Post-InfusionChange at Hour 6-4.2 cmH2O/mmHg
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Oxygenation Index (OI) at Hours 6, 12 and 24 Post-InfusionChange at Hour 6-8.0 cmH2O/mmHg
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Oxygenation Index (OI) at Hours 6, 12 and 24 Post-InfusionChange at Hour 12-8.2 cmH2O/mmHg
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Oxygenation Index (OI) at Hours 6, 12 and 24 Post-InfusionChange at Hour 24-9.5 cmH2O/mmHg
Comparison: Hour 6p-value: 0.498495% CI: [-7.5, 15.3]ANCOVA
Comparison: Hour 12p-value: 0.395695% CI: [-5.5, 13.7]ANCOVA
Comparison: Hour 24p-value: 0.424995% CI: [-7.6, 3.3]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Ratio of Partial Pressure of Oxygen in Arterial Blood to Fraction of Inspired Oxygen (P/F) at Hours 6, 12 and 24

The ratio of partial pressure of arterial oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen is a ratio between the oxygen level in the arterial blood and the oxygen concentration that is breathed. It helps to determine the degree of any problems with how the lungs transfer oxygen to the blood.

Time frame: Baseline, Hours 6, 12 and 24 after start of infusion

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants treated with study treatment. Here, 'Number analyzed' = Participants evaluable for this outcome measure at specified rows.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
IV SildenafilChange From Baseline in Ratio of Partial Pressure of Oxygen in Arterial Blood to Fraction of Inspired Oxygen (P/F) at Hours 6, 12 and 24Change at Hour 645.3 ratio
IV SildenafilChange From Baseline in Ratio of Partial Pressure of Oxygen in Arterial Blood to Fraction of Inspired Oxygen (P/F) at Hours 6, 12 and 24Change at Hour 1243.4 ratio
IV SildenafilChange From Baseline in Ratio of Partial Pressure of Oxygen in Arterial Blood to Fraction of Inspired Oxygen (P/F) at Hours 6, 12 and 24Change at Hour 2494.6 ratio
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Ratio of Partial Pressure of Oxygen in Arterial Blood to Fraction of Inspired Oxygen (P/F) at Hours 6, 12 and 24Change at Hour 68.1 ratio
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Ratio of Partial Pressure of Oxygen in Arterial Blood to Fraction of Inspired Oxygen (P/F) at Hours 6, 12 and 24Change at Hour 1216.9 ratio
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Ratio of Partial Pressure of Oxygen in Arterial Blood to Fraction of Inspired Oxygen (P/F) at Hours 6, 12 and 24Change at Hour 2414.7 ratio
Comparison: Hour 6p-value: 0.082995% CI: [-5, 79.5]ANCOVA
Comparison: Hour 12p-value: 0.180295% CI: [-12.7, 65.9]ANCOVA
Comparison: Hour 24p-value: 0.157695% CI: [-32.5, 192.2]ANCOVA
Secondary

Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Sildenafil and Its Metabolite

Cmax was obtained for Sildenafil and its major metabolite UK-103,320.

Time frame: Loading dose, Day 1: prior to the start of infusion, 5, 30 minutes after end of loading infusion; Maintenance dose: 48 to 72, 96 to 120 hours during infusion and immediately prior to end of maintenance infusion (up to maximum on Day 14)

Population: Pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis set included all participants randomized and treated who had at least 1 concentration during whole treatment period.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
IV SildenafilMaximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Sildenafil and Its MetaboliteMaintenance dose: Sildenafil78.12 nanogram per milliliterStandard Deviation 48.63
IV SildenafilMaximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Sildenafil and Its MetaboliteMaintenance dose: UK-10332021.65 nanogram per milliliterStandard Deviation 11.57
IV SildenafilMaximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Sildenafil and Its MetaboliteLoading dose: Sildenafil52.64 nanogram per milliliterStandard Deviation 27.91
IV SildenafilMaximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Sildenafil and Its MetaboliteLoading dose: UK-1033201.04 nanogram per milliliterStandard Deviation 1.68
Secondary

Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities

Criteria for laboratory values: Hematology: hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cell count \<0.8\*lower limit of normal (LLN), platelets\<0.5\*LLN, \>1.75\*upper limit of normal (ULN), white blood cells count \<0.6\*LLN, \>1.5\*ULN; Liver function: total and direct bilirubin \>1.5\*ULN, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase \>3.0\*ULN, total protein \<0.8\*LLN, \>1.2\*ULN; Renal function: blood urea nitrogen, creatinine \>1.3\*ULN; Electrolytes: sodium \<0.95\*LLN, \>1.05\*ULN, potassium, chloride, calcium, bicarbonate (venous) \<0.9\*LLN, \>1.1\*ULN.

Time frame: Up to 14 days from initiation of study drug infusion

Population: The safety population included all participants treated with study treatment. Here Overall number of participants analyzed signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
IV SildenafilNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities27 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities22 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a subject who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. A SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly; medically important events. Treatment-emergent are events between first infusion of study drug and up to 31 days after end of study drug infusion (up to 45 days) that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs included both SAEs and non-SAEs.

Time frame: Baseline up to 31 days after end of study drug infusion (up to 45 days)

Population: The safety population included all participants treated with study treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
IV SildenafilNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)AEs22 Participants
IV SildenafilNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs7 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)AEs19 Participants
Secondary

Number of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) According to Severity

AE: untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE: AE resulting in any of the following outcomes: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly; medically important events. Treatment-emergent are events between first infusion of study drug and up to 31 days after end of study drug infusion (up to 45 days) that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs included both SAEs and non-SAEs. Severity criteria: mild=did not interfere with subject's usual function; moderate=interfered to some extent with participant's usual function and severe=interfered significantly with participant's usual function. Missing baseline severities were imputed as mild.

Time frame: Baseline up to 31 days after end of study drug infusion (up to 45 days)

Population: The safety population included all participants treated with study treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
IV SildenafilNumber of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) According to SeverityModerate29 events
IV SildenafilNumber of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) According to SeverityMild49 events
IV SildenafilNumber of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) According to SeveritySevere12 events
PlaceboNumber of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) According to SeverityMild42 events
PlaceboNumber of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) According to SeverityModerate24 events
PlaceboNumber of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) According to SeveritySevere17 events
Secondary

Part B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry Test

Audiological evaluations of participants were recorded and reported by air conduction via phones/headphones through pure tone audiometry test which included participants with hearing loss ranged from less than or equal to (\<=) 20 decibel hearing loss (DB HL), 21-40 DB HL, 41-70 DB HL, 71-90 DB HL, greater than (\>) 90 DB HL or no response, and missing at frequencies ranged from 500 Hertz (Hz) to 8000 Hz at month 12 and 24. In this outcome measure, data have been reported for right and left ear separately. Rows according to air conduction categories at specified time points are reported in this outcome measure, only when there was a non-zero data for at least 1 reporting arm.

Time frame: Month 12 and 24 after end of study treatment in Part A (Day 1 to 14)

Population: Part B safety analysis set included all participants enrolled in Part B of the study for data analyses on developmental progress, audiological, neurological and ophthalmological assessment, and safety. Here 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'number analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for each specified row.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestLeft Ear, 500 Hz, <=20 DB HL: Month 123 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestRight Ear, 500 Hz, 21 - 40 DB HL: Month 122 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestRight Ear, 1000 Hz, <=20 DB HL: Month 124 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestRight Ear, 1000 Hz, 21 - 40 DB HL: Month 121 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestRight Ear, 2000 Hz, <=20 DB HL: Month 123 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestRight Ear, 2000 Hz, 21 - 40 DB HL: Month 122 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestRight Ear, 4000 Hz, <=20 DB HL: Month 124 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestRight Ear, 4000 Hz, 21 - 40 DB HL: Month 121 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestRight Ear, 8000 Hz, <=20 DB HL: Month 123 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestRight Ear, 8000 Hz, Missing: Month 122 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestRight Ear, 500 Hz, <=20 DB HL: Month 123 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestLeft Ear, 500 Hz, 21 - 40 DB HL: Month 122 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestLeft Ear, 1000 Hz, <=20 DB HL: Month 123 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestLeft Ear, 1000 Hz, 21 - 40 DB HL: Month 122 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestLeft Ear, 2000 Hz, <=20 DB HL: Month 123 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestLeft Ear, 2000 Hz, 21 - 40 DB HL: Month 122 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestLeft Ear, 4000 Hz, <=20 DB HL: Month 124 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestLeft Ear, 4000 Hz, 21 - 40 DB HL: Month 121 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestLeft Ear, 8000 Hz, <=20 DB HL: Month 123 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestLeft Ear, 8000 Hz, Missing: Month 122 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestRight Ear, 500 Hz, <=20 DB HL: Month 245 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestRight Ear, 500 Hz, 21-40 DB HL: Month 242 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestRight Ear, 1000 Hz, <=20 DB HL: Month 245 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestRight Ear, 1000 Hz, 21-40 DB HL: Month 241 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestRight Ear, 2000 Hz, <=20 DB HL: Month 246 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestRight Ear, 2000 Hz, 21-40 DB HL: Month 241 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestRight Ear, 4000 Hz, <=20 DB HL: Month 247 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestRight Ear, 8000 Hz, <=20 DB HL: Month 244 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestRight Ear, 8000 Hz, 21-40 DB HL: Month 241 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestRight Ear, 8000 Hz, Missing: Month 241 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestLeft Ear, 500 Hz, <=20 DB HL: Month 246 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestLeft Ear, 500 Hz, 21-40 DB HL: Month 241 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestLeft Ear, 1000 Hz, <=20 DB HL: Month 244 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestLeft Ear, 1000 Hz, 21-40 DB HL: Month 241 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestLeft Ear, 2000 Hz, <=20 DB HL: Month 246 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestLeft Ear, 2000 Hz, 21-40 DB HL: Month 241 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestLeft Ear, 4000 Hz, <=20 DB HL: Month 247 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestLeft Ear, 8000 Hz, <=20 DB HL: Month 243 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestLeft Ear, 8000 Hz, 21-40 DB HL: Month 241 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestLeft Ear, 8000 Hz, Missing: Month 241 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestLeft Ear, 8000 Hz, <=20 DB HL: Month 243 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestRight Ear, 500 Hz, <=20 DB HL: Month 124 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestRight Ear, 500 Hz, <=20 DB HL: Month 243 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestRight Ear, 500 Hz, 21 - 40 DB HL: Month 121 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestLeft Ear, 500 Hz, <=20 DB HL: Month 243 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestRight Ear, 1000 Hz, <=20 DB HL: Month 125 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestRight Ear, 500 Hz, 21-40 DB HL: Month 240 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestRight Ear, 1000 Hz, 21 - 40 DB HL: Month 120 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestLeft Ear, 2000 Hz, 21-40 DB HL: Month 240 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestRight Ear, 2000 Hz, <=20 DB HL: Month 124 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestRight Ear, 1000 Hz, <=20 DB HL: Month 242 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestRight Ear, 2000 Hz, 21 - 40 DB HL: Month 120 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestLeft Ear, 500 Hz, 21-40 DB HL: Month 240 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestRight Ear, 4000 Hz, <=20 DB HL: Month 125 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestRight Ear, 1000 Hz, 21-40 DB HL: Month 240 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestRight Ear, 4000 Hz, 21 - 40 DB HL: Month 120 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestLeft Ear, 8000 Hz, Missing: Month 240 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestRight Ear, 8000 Hz, <=20 DB HL: Month 124 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestRight Ear, 2000 Hz, <=20 DB HL: Month 243 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestRight Ear, 8000 Hz, Missing: Month 120 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestLeft Ear, 1000 Hz, <=20 DB HL: Month 243 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestLeft Ear, 500 Hz, <=20 DB HL: Month 123 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestRight Ear, 2000 Hz, 21-40 DB HL: Month 240 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestLeft Ear, 500 Hz, 21 - 40 DB HL: Month 121 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestLeft Ear, 4000 Hz, <=20 DB HL: Month 244 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestLeft Ear, 1000 Hz, <=20 DB HL: Month 125 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestRight Ear, 4000 Hz, <=20 DB HL: Month 243 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestLeft Ear, 1000 Hz, 21 - 40 DB HL: Month 120 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestLeft Ear, 1000 Hz, 21-40 DB HL: Month 240 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestLeft Ear, 2000 Hz, <=20 DB HL: Month 124 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestRight Ear, 8000 Hz, <=20 DB HL: Month 243 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestLeft Ear, 2000 Hz, 21 - 40 DB HL: Month 120 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestLeft Ear, 8000 Hz, 21-40 DB HL: Month 240 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestLeft Ear, 4000 Hz, <=20 DB HL: Month 125 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestRight Ear, 8000 Hz, 21-40 DB HL: Month 240 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestLeft Ear, 4000 Hz, 21 - 40 DB HL: Month 120 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestLeft Ear, 2000 Hz, <=20 DB HL: Month 242 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestLeft Ear, 8000 Hz, <=20 DB HL: Month 124 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestRight Ear, 8000 Hz, Missing: Month 240 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Phones/Headphones Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestLeft Ear, 8000 Hz, Missing: Month 121 Participants
Secondary

Part B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Soundfield Through Pure Tone Audiometry Test

Audiological evaluations of participants were recorded and reported by air conduction via soundfield through pure tone audiometry test which included participants with hearing loss ranged from \<=20 DB HL, 21-40 DB HL, 41-70 DB HL, 71-90 DB HL, \>90 DB HL or no response, and missing at frequencies ranged from 500 Hz to 4000 Hz at month 12 and 24. Rows according to air conduction categories at specified time points are reported in this outcome measure, only when there was a non-zero data for at least 1 reporting arm.

Time frame: Month 12 and 24 after end of study treatment in Part A (Day 1 to 14)

Population: Part B safety analysis set included all participants enrolled in Part B of the study for data analyses on developmental progress, audiological, neurological and ophthalmological assessment, and safety. Here 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'number analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for each specified row.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Soundfield Through Pure Tone Audiometry Test500 Hz, <=20 DB HL: Month 126 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Soundfield Through Pure Tone Audiometry Test500 Hz, 21-40 DB HL: Month 125 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Soundfield Through Pure Tone Audiometry Test500 Hz, 71-90 DB HL: Month 121 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Soundfield Through Pure Tone Audiometry Test1000 Hz, <=20 DB HL: Month 129 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Soundfield Through Pure Tone Audiometry Test1000 Hz, 21-40 DB HL: Month 121 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Soundfield Through Pure Tone Audiometry Test1000 Hz, 71-90 DB HL: Month 121 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Soundfield Through Pure Tone Audiometry Test2000 Hz, <=20 DB HL: Month 127 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Soundfield Through Pure Tone Audiometry Test2000 Hz, 21-40 DB HL: Month 123 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Soundfield Through Pure Tone Audiometry Test2000 Hz, Missing: Month 121 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Soundfield Through Pure Tone Audiometry Test4000 Hz, <=20 DB HL: Month 126 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Soundfield Through Pure Tone Audiometry Test4000 Hz, 21-40 DB HL: Month 124 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Soundfield Through Pure Tone Audiometry Test4000 Hz, 71-90 DB HL: Month 121 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Soundfield Through Pure Tone Audiometry Test500 Hz, <=20 DB HL: Month 246 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Soundfield Through Pure Tone Audiometry Test500 Hz, 21-40 DB HL: Month 242 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Soundfield Through Pure Tone Audiometry Test1000 Hz, <=20 DB HL: Month 246 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Soundfield Through Pure Tone Audiometry Test1000 Hz, 21-40 DB HL: Month 244 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Soundfield Through Pure Tone Audiometry Test2000 Hz, <=20 DB HL: Month 246 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Soundfield Through Pure Tone Audiometry Test2000 Hz, 21-40 DB HL: Month 242 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Soundfield Through Pure Tone Audiometry Test4000 Hz, <=20 DB HL: Month 245 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Soundfield Through Pure Tone Audiometry Test4000 Hz, 21-40 DB HL: Month 244 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Soundfield Through Pure Tone Audiometry Test2000 Hz, 21-40 DB HL: Month 244 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Soundfield Through Pure Tone Audiometry Test500 Hz, <=20 DB HL: Month 122 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Soundfield Through Pure Tone Audiometry Test4000 Hz, 21-40 DB HL: Month 124 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Soundfield Through Pure Tone Audiometry Test500 Hz, 21-40 DB HL: Month 126 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Soundfield Through Pure Tone Audiometry Test1000 Hz, 21-40 DB HL: Month 243 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Soundfield Through Pure Tone Audiometry Test500 Hz, 71-90 DB HL: Month 120 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Soundfield Through Pure Tone Audiometry Test4000 Hz, 71-90 DB HL: Month 120 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Soundfield Through Pure Tone Audiometry Test1000 Hz, <=20 DB HL: Month 123 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Soundfield Through Pure Tone Audiometry Test4000 Hz, 21-40 DB HL: Month 243 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Soundfield Through Pure Tone Audiometry Test1000 Hz, 21-40 DB HL: Month 125 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Soundfield Through Pure Tone Audiometry Test500 Hz, <=20 DB HL: Month 242 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Soundfield Through Pure Tone Audiometry Test1000 Hz, 71-90 DB HL: Month 120 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Soundfield Through Pure Tone Audiometry Test2000 Hz, <=20 DB HL: Month 243 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Soundfield Through Pure Tone Audiometry Test2000 Hz, <=20 DB HL: Month 122 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Soundfield Through Pure Tone Audiometry Test500 Hz, 21-40 DB HL: Month 245 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Soundfield Through Pure Tone Audiometry Test2000 Hz, 21-40 DB HL: Month 124 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Soundfield Through Pure Tone Audiometry Test4000 Hz, <=20 DB HL: Month 244 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Soundfield Through Pure Tone Audiometry Test2000 Hz, Missing: Month 120 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Soundfield Through Pure Tone Audiometry Test1000 Hz, <=20 DB HL: Month 246 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Air Conduction Via Soundfield Through Pure Tone Audiometry Test4000 Hz, <=20 DB HL: Month 124 Participants
Secondary

Part B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Behavior Hearing Assessment Through Pure Tone Audiometry Test

Audiological evaluations of participants were recorded and reported using behavior hearing assessment through pure tone audiometry test which includes participants with normal, abnormal, incomplete/inconclusive behavior at month 12 and 24.

Time frame: Month 12 and 24 after end of study treatment in Part A (Day 1 to 14)

Population: Part B safety analysis set included all participants enrolled in Part B of the study for data analyses on developmental progress, audiological, neurological and ophthalmological assessment, and safety. Here 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Behavior Hearing Assessment Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestNormal Behavioral Assessment: Month 1211 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Behavior Hearing Assessment Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestAbnormal Behavioral Assessment: Month 121 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Behavior Hearing Assessment Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestIncomplete/Inconclusive Behavioral Assessment: Month 124 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Behavior Hearing Assessment Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestNormal Behavioral Assessment: Month 2413 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Behavior Hearing Assessment Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestAbnormal Behavioral Assessment: Month 240 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Behavior Hearing Assessment Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestIncomplete/Inconclusive Behavioral Assessment: Month 243 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Behavior Hearing Assessment Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestAbnormal Behavioral Assessment: Month 242 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Behavior Hearing Assessment Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestNormal Behavioral Assessment: Month 128 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Behavior Hearing Assessment Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestNormal Behavioral Assessment: Month 248 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Behavior Hearing Assessment Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestAbnormal Behavioral Assessment: Month 124 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Behavior Hearing Assessment Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestIncomplete/Inconclusive Behavioral Assessment: Month 242 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Behavior Hearing Assessment Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestIncomplete/Inconclusive Behavioral Assessment: Month 120 Participants
Secondary

Part B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Bone Conduction Through Pure Tone Audiometry Test

Audiological evaluations of participants were recorded and reported by bone conduction assessment through pure tone audiometry test which included participants with sensorineural hearing loss, conductive hearing loss, mixed hearing loss, neural, and unspecified at month 12 and 24. Rows according to bone conduction categories at specified time points are reported in this outcome measure, only when there was a non-zero data for at least 1 reporting arm.

Time frame: Month 12 and 24 after end of study treatment in Part A (Day 1 to 14)

Population: Part B safety analysis set included all participants enrolled in Part B of the study for data analyses on developmental progress, audiological, neurological and ophthalmological assessment, and safety. Here 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'number analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for each specified row.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Bone Conduction Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestConductive Hearing Loss: Month 120 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Bone Conduction Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestUnspecified: Month 121 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Bone Conduction Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestUnspecified: Month 121 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Bone Conduction Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestConductive Hearing Loss: Month 121 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Bone Conduction Through Pure Tone Audiometry TestConductive Hearing Loss: Month 241 Participants
Secondary

Part B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Distort Product Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment

Audiological evaluations of participants were recorded and reported by distort product through otoacoustic emissions assessment which included participants with presence of distort product at frequencies ranged from 2000 Hz to 8000 Hz at month 12 and 24. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) are generated in the cochlea in response to two tones of a given frequency and sound pressure level presented in the ear canal. Distort product otoacoustic emissions are an objective indicator of normally functioning cochlea outer hair cells. In this outcome measure, data have been reported for right and left ear separately.

Time frame: Month 12 and 24 after end of study treatment in Part A (Day 1 to 14)

Population: Part B safety analysis set included all participants enrolled in Part B of the study for data analyses on developmental progress, audiological, neurological and ophthalmological assessment, and safety. Here 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'number analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for each specified row.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Distort Product Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment2000 Hz, Right Ear: Month 124 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Distort Product Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment2000 Hz, Left Ear: Month 125 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Distort Product Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment3000 Hz, Right Ear: Month 125 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Distort Product Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment3000 Hz, Left Ear: Month 125 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Distort Product Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment4000 Hz, Right Ear: Month 125 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Distort Product Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment4000 Hz, Left Ear: Month 125 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Distort Product Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment6000 Hz, Right Ear: Month 124 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Distort Product Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment6000 Hz, Left Ear: Month 125 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Distort Product Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment8000 Hz, Right Ear: Month 124 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Distort Product Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment8000 Hz, Left Ear: Month 125 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Distort Product Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment2000 Hz, Right Ear: Month 244 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Distort Product Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment2000 Hz, Left Ear: Month 244 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Distort Product Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment3000 Hz, Right Ear: Month 247 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Distort Product Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment3000 Hz, Left Ear: Month 246 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Distort Product Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment4000 Hz, Right Ear: Month 246 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Distort Product Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment4000 Hz, Left Ear: Month 246 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Distort Product Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment6000 Hz, Right Ear: Month 244 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Distort Product Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment6000 Hz, Left Ear: Month 245 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Distort Product Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment8000 Hz, Right Ear: Month 243 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Distort Product Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment8000 Hz, Left Ear: Month 244 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Distort Product Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment6000 Hz, Left Ear: Month 246 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Distort Product Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment2000 Hz, Right Ear: Month 124 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Distort Product Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment2000 Hz, Right Ear: Month 247 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Distort Product Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment2000 Hz, Left Ear: Month 123 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Distort Product Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment4000 Hz, Left Ear: Month 245 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Distort Product Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment3000 Hz, Right Ear: Month 124 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Distort Product Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment2000 Hz, Left Ear: Month 246 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Distort Product Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment3000 Hz, Left Ear: Month 123 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Distort Product Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment8000 Hz, Left Ear: Month 242 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Distort Product Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment4000 Hz, Right Ear: Month 124 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Distort Product Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment3000 Hz, Right Ear: Month 245 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Distort Product Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment4000 Hz, Left Ear: Month 123 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Distort Product Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment6000 Hz, Right Ear: Month 246 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Distort Product Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment6000 Hz, Right Ear: Month 124 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Distort Product Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment3000 Hz, Left Ear: Month 245 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Distort Product Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment6000 Hz, Left Ear: Month 124 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Distort Product Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment8000 Hz, Right Ear: Month 242 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Distort Product Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment8000 Hz, Right Ear: Month 122 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Distort Product Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment4000 Hz, Right Ear: Month 245 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Distort Product Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment8000 Hz, Left Ear: Month 122 Participants
Secondary

Part B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Ipsilateral Stapedial Reflex Through Immittance Audiometry Test

Audiological evaluations of participants were recorded and reported by ipsilateral stapedial reflex through immittance audiometry test which included participants with presence of ipsilateral stapedial reflex at frequencies ranged from 500 Hz to 2000 Hz at month 12 and 24. Ipsilateral stapedial reflex measures are used to assess the neural pathway surrounding the stapedial reflex, which occurs in response to a loud sound (70 to 90 decibel above threshold). In this outcome measure, data have been reported for right and left ear separately.

Time frame: Month 12 and 24 after end of study treatment in Part A (Day 1 to 14)

Population: Part B safety analysis set included all participants enrolled in Part B of the study for data analyses on developmental progress, audiological, neurological and ophthalmological assessment, and safety. Here 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'number analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for each specified row.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Ipsilateral Stapedial Reflex Through Immittance Audiometry Test500 Hz, Right Ear: Month 125 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Ipsilateral Stapedial Reflex Through Immittance Audiometry Test500 Hz, Left Ear: Month 126 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Ipsilateral Stapedial Reflex Through Immittance Audiometry Test1000 Hz, Right Ear: Month 125 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Ipsilateral Stapedial Reflex Through Immittance Audiometry Test1000 Hz, Left Ear: Month 126 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Ipsilateral Stapedial Reflex Through Immittance Audiometry Test2000 Hz, Right Ear: Month 125 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Ipsilateral Stapedial Reflex Through Immittance Audiometry Test2000 Hz, Left Ear: Month 126 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Ipsilateral Stapedial Reflex Through Immittance Audiometry Test500 Hz, Right Ear: Month 244 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Ipsilateral Stapedial Reflex Through Immittance Audiometry Test500 Hz, Left Ear: Month 244 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Ipsilateral Stapedial Reflex Through Immittance Audiometry Test1000 Hz, Right Ear: Month 244 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Ipsilateral Stapedial Reflex Through Immittance Audiometry Test1000 Hz, Left Ear: Month 245 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Ipsilateral Stapedial Reflex Through Immittance Audiometry Test2000 Hz, Right Ear: Month 244 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Ipsilateral Stapedial Reflex Through Immittance Audiometry Test2000 Hz, Left Ear: Month 244 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Ipsilateral Stapedial Reflex Through Immittance Audiometry Test2000 Hz, Right Ear: Month 242 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Ipsilateral Stapedial Reflex Through Immittance Audiometry Test500 Hz, Right Ear: Month 121 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Ipsilateral Stapedial Reflex Through Immittance Audiometry Test500 Hz, Right Ear: Month 242 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Ipsilateral Stapedial Reflex Through Immittance Audiometry Test500 Hz, Left Ear: Month 121 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Ipsilateral Stapedial Reflex Through Immittance Audiometry Test1000 Hz, Left Ear: Month 242 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Ipsilateral Stapedial Reflex Through Immittance Audiometry Test1000 Hz, Right Ear: Month 121 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Ipsilateral Stapedial Reflex Through Immittance Audiometry Test500 Hz, Left Ear: Month 242 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Ipsilateral Stapedial Reflex Through Immittance Audiometry Test1000 Hz, Left Ear: Month 121 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Ipsilateral Stapedial Reflex Through Immittance Audiometry Test2000 Hz, Left Ear: Month 242 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Ipsilateral Stapedial Reflex Through Immittance Audiometry Test2000 Hz, Right Ear: Month 121 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Ipsilateral Stapedial Reflex Through Immittance Audiometry Test1000 Hz, Right Ear: Month 242 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Ipsilateral Stapedial Reflex Through Immittance Audiometry Test2000 Hz, Left Ear: Month 121 Participants
Secondary

Part B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Transient Evoked Emission Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment

Audiological evaluations of participants were recorded and reported by transient evoked emission through otoacoustic emissions assessment which included participants with presence of transient evoked emissions from frequencies 1000 Hz to 4000 Hz at month 12 and 24. In this outcome measure, data have been reported for right and left ear separately.

Time frame: Month 12 and 24 after end of study treatment in Part A (Day 1 to 14)

Population: Part B safety analysis set included all participants enrolled in Part B of the study for data analyses on developmental progress, audiological, neurological and ophthalmological assessment, and safety. Here 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Transient Evoked Emission Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment1000 Hz, Right Ear: Month 123 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Transient Evoked Emission Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment1000 Hz, Left Ear: Month 122 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Transient Evoked Emission Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment1500 Hz, Right Ear: Month 123 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Transient Evoked Emission Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment1500 Hz, Left Ear: Month 122 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Transient Evoked Emission Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment2000 Hz, Right Ear: Month 125 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Transient Evoked Emission Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment2000 Hz, Left Ear: Month 125 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Transient Evoked Emission Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment3000 Hz, Right Ear: Month 124 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Transient Evoked Emission Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment3000 Hz, Left Ear: Month 124 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Transient Evoked Emission Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment4000 Hz, Right Ear: Month 126 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Transient Evoked Emission Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment4000 Hz, Left Ear: Month 125 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Transient Evoked Emission Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment1000 Hz, Right Ear: Month 243 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Transient Evoked Emission Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment1000 Hz, Left Ear: Month 242 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Transient Evoked Emission Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment1500 Hz, Right Ear: Month 242 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Transient Evoked Emission Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment1500 Hz, Left Ear: Month 242 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Transient Evoked Emission Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment2000 Hz, Right Ear: Month 247 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Transient Evoked Emission Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment2000 Hz, Left Ear: Month 246 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Transient Evoked Emission Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment3000 Hz, Right Ear: Month 246 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Transient Evoked Emission Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment3000 Hz, Left Ear: Month 244 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Transient Evoked Emission Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment4000 Hz, Right Ear: Month 247 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Transient Evoked Emission Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment4000 Hz, Left Ear: Month 245 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Transient Evoked Emission Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment3000 Hz, Left Ear: Month 243 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Transient Evoked Emission Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment1000 Hz, Right Ear: Month 122 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Transient Evoked Emission Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment1000 Hz, Right Ear: Month 242 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Transient Evoked Emission Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment1000 Hz, Left Ear: Month 121 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Transient Evoked Emission Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment2000 Hz, Left Ear: Month 243 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Transient Evoked Emission Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment1500 Hz, Right Ear: Month 122 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Transient Evoked Emission Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment1000 Hz, Left Ear: Month 242 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Transient Evoked Emission Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment1500 Hz, Left Ear: Month 122 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Transient Evoked Emission Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment4000 Hz, Left Ear: Month 243 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Transient Evoked Emission Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment2000 Hz, Right Ear: Month 122 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Transient Evoked Emission Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment1500 Hz, Right Ear: Month 243 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Transient Evoked Emission Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment2000 Hz, Left Ear: Month 122 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Transient Evoked Emission Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment3000 Hz, Right Ear: Month 243 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Transient Evoked Emission Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment3000 Hz, Right Ear: Month 122 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Transient Evoked Emission Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment1500 Hz, Left Ear: Month 243 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Transient Evoked Emission Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment3000 Hz, Left Ear: Month 122 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Transient Evoked Emission Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment4000 Hz, Right Ear: Month 243 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Transient Evoked Emission Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment4000 Hz, Right Ear: Month 122 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Transient Evoked Emission Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment2000 Hz, Right Ear: Month 243 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Transient Evoked Emission Through Otoacoustic Emissions Assessment4000 Hz, Left Ear: Month 123 Participants
Secondary

Part B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Tympanometry Assessment (Peak Pressure) Through Immittance Audiometry Test

Audiological evaluations of participants were recorded and reported by tympanometry assessment through immittance audiometry test which included participants with peak pressure signs (+) and (-) at month 12 and 24. In this outcome measure, data have been reported for right and left ear separately.

Time frame: Month 12 and 24 after end of study treatment in Part A (Day 1 to 14)

Population: Part B safety analysis set included all participants enrolled in Part B of the study for data analyses on developmental progress, audiological, neurological and ophthalmological assessment, and safety. Here 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'number analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for each specified row.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Tympanometry Assessment (Peak Pressure) Through Immittance Audiometry TestPeak Pressure for Sign (+), Right Ear: Month 1251.89 decapascalsStandard Deviation 63.024
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Tympanometry Assessment (Peak Pressure) Through Immittance Audiometry TestPeak Pressure for Sign (+), Left Ear: Month 125.07 decapascalsStandard Deviation 4.9
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Tympanometry Assessment (Peak Pressure) Through Immittance Audiometry TestPeak Pressure for Sign (+), Right Ear: Month 2444.00 decapascalsStandard Deviation 46.13
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Tympanometry Assessment (Peak Pressure) Through Immittance Audiometry TestPeak Pressure for Sign (+), Left Ear: Month 2442.71 decapascalsStandard Deviation 50.112
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Tympanometry Assessment (Peak Pressure) Through Immittance Audiometry TestPeak Pressure for Sign (-), Right Ear: Month 12149.3 decapascalsStandard Deviation 144.34
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Tympanometry Assessment (Peak Pressure) Through Immittance Audiometry TestPeak Pressure for Sign (-), Left Ear: Month 1279.89 decapascalsStandard Deviation 64.367
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Tympanometry Assessment (Peak Pressure) Through Immittance Audiometry TestPeak Pressure for Sign (-), Right Ear: Month 2498.00 decapascalsStandard Deviation 55.685
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Tympanometry Assessment (Peak Pressure) Through Immittance Audiometry TestPeak Pressure for Sign (-), Left Ear: Month 24102.2 decapascalsStandard Deviation 84.781
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Tympanometry Assessment (Peak Pressure) Through Immittance Audiometry TestPeak Pressure for Sign (-), Left Ear: Month 24135.0 decapascalsStandard Deviation 70.711
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Tympanometry Assessment (Peak Pressure) Through Immittance Audiometry TestPeak Pressure for Sign (+), Right Ear: Month 1227.33 decapascalsStandard Deviation 26.539
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Tympanometry Assessment (Peak Pressure) Through Immittance Audiometry TestPeak Pressure for Sign (-), Right Ear: Month 1267.75 decapascalsStandard Deviation 57.35
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Tympanometry Assessment (Peak Pressure) Through Immittance Audiometry TestPeak Pressure for Sign (+), Left Ear: Month 1273.75 decapascalsStandard Deviation 28.987
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Tympanometry Assessment (Peak Pressure) Through Immittance Audiometry TestPeak Pressure for Sign (-), Right Ear: Month 2483.67 decapascalsStandard Deviation 107.38
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Tympanometry Assessment (Peak Pressure) Through Immittance Audiometry TestPeak Pressure for Sign (+), Right Ear: Month 2433.50 decapascalsStandard Deviation 44.125
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Tympanometry Assessment (Peak Pressure) Through Immittance Audiometry TestPeak Pressure for Sign (-), Left Ear: Month 1246.80 decapascalsStandard Deviation 46.912
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Tympanometry Assessment (Peak Pressure) Through Immittance Audiometry TestPeak Pressure for Sign (+), Left Ear: Month 2435.00 decapascalsStandard Deviation 46.578
Secondary

Part B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Tympanometry Assessment (Static Acoustic Admittance) Through Immittance Audiometry Test

Audiological evaluations of participants were recorded and reported by tympanometry assessment through immittance audiometry test which included participants with static acoustic admittance at month 12 and 24. In this outcome measure, data have been reported for right and left ear separately.

Time frame: Month 12 and 24 after end of study treatment in Part A (Day 1 to 14)

Population: Part B safety analysis set included all participants enrolled in Part B of the study for data analyses on developmental progress, audiological, neurological and ophthalmological assessment, and safety. Here 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'number analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for each specified row.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Tympanometry Assessment (Static Acoustic Admittance) Through Immittance Audiometry TestRight Ear: Month 120.241 millimhoStandard Deviation 0.1403
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Tympanometry Assessment (Static Acoustic Admittance) Through Immittance Audiometry TestLeft Ear: Month 120.364 millimhoStandard Deviation 0.1513
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Tympanometry Assessment (Static Acoustic Admittance) Through Immittance Audiometry TestRight Ear: Month 240.273 millimhoStandard Deviation 0.0784
IV SildenafilPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Tympanometry Assessment (Static Acoustic Admittance) Through Immittance Audiometry TestLeft Ear: Month 240.295 millimhoStandard Deviation 0.0691
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Tympanometry Assessment (Static Acoustic Admittance) Through Immittance Audiometry TestLeft Ear: Month 240.585 millimhoStandard Deviation 0.5558
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Tympanometry Assessment (Static Acoustic Admittance) Through Immittance Audiometry TestRight Ear: Month 120.403 millimhoStandard Deviation 0.1691
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Tympanometry Assessment (Static Acoustic Admittance) Through Immittance Audiometry TestRight Ear: Month 240.400 millimhoStandard Deviation 0.1321
PlaceboPart B: Audiological Status of Participants as Assessed by Tympanometry Assessment (Static Acoustic Admittance) Through Immittance Audiometry TestLeft Ear: Month 120.330 millimhoStandard Deviation 0.1595
Secondary

Part B: Composite Scores of Cognitive, Language, and Motor Developmental Progress of Participants as Assessed by Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development Third Edition (Bayley-III)

Bayley-III assesses infant and toddler development across five domains: cognitive, language, motor, social-emotional (SE), and adaptive behavior (AB). Assessments of the cognitive, language, and motor domains conducted using items administered to the child; assessments of the SE and AB domains conducted using the primary caregiver's responses to a questionnaire. Score ranges: cognitive scale 0-91, language scale 0-97 and motor scale 0-132, where higher scores indicated better cognitive function, communication and motor skills respectively. Raw scores of cognitive, language and motor domains were converted to composite scores. Composite scores of cognitive, language and motor developmental scales ranged from a scale of 40 to 160, where higher score indicated stronger skills and abilities. In this outcome measure composite scores for infants and toddlers were reported at month 12 and 24.

Time frame: Month 12 and 24 after end of study treatment in Part A (Day 1 to 14)

Population: Part B safety analysis set included all participants enrolled in Part B of the study for data analyses on developmental progress, audiological, neurological and ophthalmological assessment, and safety. Here 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'number analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for each specified row.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
IV SildenafilPart B: Composite Scores of Cognitive, Language, and Motor Developmental Progress of Participants as Assessed by Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development Third Edition (Bayley-III)Cognitive Development: Month 2497.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.12
IV SildenafilPart B: Composite Scores of Cognitive, Language, and Motor Developmental Progress of Participants as Assessed by Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development Third Edition (Bayley-III)Language Development: Month 1299.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.86
IV SildenafilPart B: Composite Scores of Cognitive, Language, and Motor Developmental Progress of Participants as Assessed by Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development Third Edition (Bayley-III)Cognitive Development: Month 1297.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.14
IV SildenafilPart B: Composite Scores of Cognitive, Language, and Motor Developmental Progress of Participants as Assessed by Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development Third Edition (Bayley-III)Language Development: Month 2496.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.91
IV SildenafilPart B: Composite Scores of Cognitive, Language, and Motor Developmental Progress of Participants as Assessed by Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development Third Edition (Bayley-III)Motor Development: Month 1293.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.1
IV SildenafilPart B: Composite Scores of Cognitive, Language, and Motor Developmental Progress of Participants as Assessed by Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development Third Edition (Bayley-III)Motor Development: Month 2499.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.59
PlaceboPart B: Composite Scores of Cognitive, Language, and Motor Developmental Progress of Participants as Assessed by Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development Third Edition (Bayley-III)Motor Development: Month 1288.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.61
PlaceboPart B: Composite Scores of Cognitive, Language, and Motor Developmental Progress of Participants as Assessed by Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development Third Edition (Bayley-III)Cognitive Development: Month 2497.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.95
PlaceboPart B: Composite Scores of Cognitive, Language, and Motor Developmental Progress of Participants as Assessed by Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development Third Edition (Bayley-III)Language Development: Month 2495.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.7
PlaceboPart B: Composite Scores of Cognitive, Language, and Motor Developmental Progress of Participants as Assessed by Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development Third Edition (Bayley-III)Language Development: Month 1294.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.25
PlaceboPart B: Composite Scores of Cognitive, Language, and Motor Developmental Progress of Participants as Assessed by Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development Third Edition (Bayley-III)Motor Development: Month 24105.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24
PlaceboPart B: Composite Scores of Cognitive, Language, and Motor Developmental Progress of Participants as Assessed by Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development Third Edition (Bayley-III)Cognitive Development: Month 1294.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.18
Secondary

Part B: Composite Scores of Social-Emotional and Adaptive Behavior Questionnaire as Assessed by Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development Third Edition (Bayley-III)

The Bayley-III assesses infant and toddler development across five domains: cognitive, language, motor, social-emotional (SE), and adaptive behavior (AB). Assessments of the cognitive, language, and motor domains conducted using items administered to the child; assessments of the SE and AB domains conducted using the primary caregiver's responses to a questionnaire. The questionnaire comprises the SE scale (35 items) and the AB scale (241 items). Raw scores of SE and AB were converted to composite scores. Composite scores for SE and AB scale ranged from 40 to 160, where higher scores indicated better social-emotional skills and adaptive behavior in child. In this outcome measure composite scores for parent/caregiver were reported at month 24.

Time frame: Month 24 after end of study treatment in Part A (Day 1 to 14)

Population: Part B safety analysis set included all participants enrolled in Part B of the study for data analyses on developmental progress, audiological, neurological and ophthalmological assessment, and safety. Here 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
IV SildenafilPart B: Composite Scores of Social-Emotional and Adaptive Behavior Questionnaire as Assessed by Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development Third Edition (Bayley-III)Social-Emotional Development104.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.4
IV SildenafilPart B: Composite Scores of Social-Emotional and Adaptive Behavior Questionnaire as Assessed by Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development Third Edition (Bayley-III)Adaptive Behavior Development91.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.66
PlaceboPart B: Composite Scores of Social-Emotional and Adaptive Behavior Questionnaire as Assessed by Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development Third Edition (Bayley-III)Social-Emotional Development112.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.13
PlaceboPart B: Composite Scores of Social-Emotional and Adaptive Behavior Questionnaire as Assessed by Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development Third Edition (Bayley-III)Adaptive Behavior Development98.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.44
Secondary

Part B: Neurological Progress of Participants as Assessed by the Neurology Optimality Score

The Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination (HINE) was a standard scoring examination to assess development of cranial nerve; posture; movement; tone; and reflexes and reaction. HINE exam global score is a sum of subset (cranial nerve, posture, movement, tone, reflexes and reactions) scores, ranged from 0 to 78, where higher score represents better outcome. Here, the HINE global scores were reported at month 12 and 24.

Time frame: Month 12 and 24 after end of study treatment in Part A (Day 1 to 14)

Population: Part B safety analysis set included all participants enrolled in Part B of the study for data analyses on developmental progress, audiological, neurological and ophthalmological assessment, and safety. Here 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'number analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for each specified row.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
IV SildenafilPart B: Neurological Progress of Participants as Assessed by the Neurology Optimality ScoreNeurological Exam Global Score: Month 1269.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.97
IV SildenafilPart B: Neurological Progress of Participants as Assessed by the Neurology Optimality ScoreNeurological Exam Global Score: Month 2465.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.71
PlaceboPart B: Neurological Progress of Participants as Assessed by the Neurology Optimality ScoreNeurological Exam Global Score: Month 1275.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.45
PlaceboPart B: Neurological Progress of Participants as Assessed by the Neurology Optimality ScoreNeurological Exam Global Score: Month 2476.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.42
Secondary

Part B: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Deaths

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study medication without regard to possibility of causal relationship to it. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/ incapacity; congenital anomaly. AEs included both serious and all non-serious AEs.

Time frame: up to 24 months after end of study treatment in Part A (maximum up to 26 months)

Population: Part B safety analysis set included all participants enrolled in Part B of the study for data analyses on developmental progress, audiological, neurological and ophthalmological assessment, and safety.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
IV SildenafilPart B: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and DeathsAEs17 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and DeathsSAEs9 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and DeathsDeaths0 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and DeathsAEs17 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and DeathsSAEs6 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and DeathsDeaths2 Participants
Secondary

Part B: Number of Participants With Eye Movement Disorders as Assessed by Eye Examination

Standard age-appropriate ophthalmological examinations were used to assess eye movement disorders (presence of amblyopia, strabismus, and nystagmus) at month 12 and 24. In this outcome measure, data have been reported for right and left eye separately. Rows according to eye movement disorder categories at specified time points are reported in this outcome measure, only when there was a non-zero data for at least 1 reporting arm.

Time frame: Month 12 and 24 after end of study treatment in Part A (Day 1 to 14)

Population: Part B safety analysis set included all participants enrolled in Part B of the study for data analyses on developmental progress, audiological, neurological and ophthalmological assessment, and safety. Here 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'number analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for each specified row.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
IV SildenafilPart B: Number of Participants With Eye Movement Disorders as Assessed by Eye ExaminationStrabismus Present, Right Eye: Month 241 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Number of Participants With Eye Movement Disorders as Assessed by Eye ExaminationStrabismus Present, Left Eye: Month 120 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Number of Participants With Eye Movement Disorders as Assessed by Eye ExaminationStrabismus Present, Left Eye: Month 241 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Number of Participants With Eye Movement Disorders as Assessed by Eye ExaminationNystagmus Present, Left Eye: Month 240 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Number of Participants With Eye Movement Disorders as Assessed by Eye ExaminationStrabismus Present, Right Eye: Month 120 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Number of Participants With Eye Movement Disorders as Assessed by Eye ExaminationNystagmus Present, Left Eye: Month 241 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Number of Participants With Eye Movement Disorders as Assessed by Eye ExaminationStrabismus Present, Right Eye: Month 121 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Number of Participants With Eye Movement Disorders as Assessed by Eye ExaminationStrabismus Present, Left Eye: Month 121 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Number of Participants With Eye Movement Disorders as Assessed by Eye ExaminationStrabismus Present, Right Eye: Month 240 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Number of Participants With Eye Movement Disorders as Assessed by Eye ExaminationStrabismus Present, Left Eye: Month 240 Participants
Secondary

Part B: Visual Acuity of Non-Verbal Participants as Assessed by Ophthalmological Assessment

Standard age-appropriate ophthalmological examinations were used to assess visual acuity (performed differently for children unable of verbal interaction) through fixates and follows (included central, steady and maintained), light perception (wince to light), no light perception, and missing at month 12 and 24. In this outcome measure, data have been reported for right and left eye separately. Rows according to visual acuity categories at specified time points are reported in this outcome measure, only when there was a non-zero data for at least 1 reporting arm.

Time frame: Month 12 and 24 after end of study treatment in Part A (Day 1 to 14)

Population: Part B safety analysis set included all participants enrolled in Part B of the study for data analyses on developmental progress, audiological, neurological and ophthalmological assessment, and safety. Here 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'number analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for each specified row.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
IV SildenafilPart B: Visual Acuity of Non-Verbal Participants as Assessed by Ophthalmological AssessmentFixates and Follows, Right Eye: Month 1215 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Visual Acuity of Non-Verbal Participants as Assessed by Ophthalmological AssessmentLight Perception, Right Eye: Month 120 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Visual Acuity of Non-Verbal Participants as Assessed by Ophthalmological AssessmentMissing, Right Eye: Month 121 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Visual Acuity of Non-Verbal Participants as Assessed by Ophthalmological AssessmentFixates and Follows, Left Eye: Month 1215 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Visual Acuity of Non-Verbal Participants as Assessed by Ophthalmological AssessmentLight Perception, Left Eye: Month 120 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Visual Acuity of Non-Verbal Participants as Assessed by Ophthalmological AssessmentMissing, Left Eye: Month 121 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Visual Acuity of Non-Verbal Participants as Assessed by Ophthalmological AssessmentFixates and Follows, Right Eye: Month 245 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Visual Acuity of Non-Verbal Participants as Assessed by Ophthalmological AssessmentMissing, Right Eye: Month 247 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Visual Acuity of Non-Verbal Participants as Assessed by Ophthalmological AssessmentFixates and Follows, Left Eye: Month 245 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Visual Acuity of Non-Verbal Participants as Assessed by Ophthalmological AssessmentMissing, Left Eye: Month 247 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Visual Acuity of Non-Verbal Participants as Assessed by Ophthalmological AssessmentMissing, Right Eye: Month 243 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Visual Acuity of Non-Verbal Participants as Assessed by Ophthalmological AssessmentFixates and Follows, Right Eye: Month 1213 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Visual Acuity of Non-Verbal Participants as Assessed by Ophthalmological AssessmentMissing, Left Eye: Month 120 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Visual Acuity of Non-Verbal Participants as Assessed by Ophthalmological AssessmentLight Perception, Right Eye: Month 121 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Visual Acuity of Non-Verbal Participants as Assessed by Ophthalmological AssessmentMissing, Left Eye: Month 243 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Visual Acuity of Non-Verbal Participants as Assessed by Ophthalmological AssessmentMissing, Right Eye: Month 120 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Visual Acuity of Non-Verbal Participants as Assessed by Ophthalmological AssessmentFixates and Follows, Right Eye: Month 249 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Visual Acuity of Non-Verbal Participants as Assessed by Ophthalmological AssessmentFixates and Follows, Left Eye: Month 1213 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Visual Acuity of Non-Verbal Participants as Assessed by Ophthalmological AssessmentFixates and Follows, Left Eye: Month 249 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Visual Acuity of Non-Verbal Participants as Assessed by Ophthalmological AssessmentLight Perception, Left Eye: Month 121 Participants
Secondary

Part B: Visual Acuity of Verbal Participants as Assessed by LogMAR Through Visual Acuity Chart

Standard age-appropriate ophthalmological examinations were used to assess visual acuity (performed differently for children able of verbal interaction) at month 12 and 24. Visual acuity (VA) of verbal children was assessed for each eye using the Snellen method, where logarithm of minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) units were derived from the Snellen ratios. Participants had to read letters from the chart at a distance of 20 feet/6 meter or 4 meter. VA (Snellen ratio) = distance between the chart and participant, divided by distance at which participant was able to see/read chart without impairment; expressed as decimal, logMAR = log10 (1/decimal VA). In this outcome measure, data have been reported for right and left eye separately.

Time frame: Month 12 and 24 after end of study treatment in Part A (Day 1 to 14)

Population: Part B safety analysis set included all participants enrolled in Part B of the study for data analyses on developmental progress, audiological, neurological and ophthalmological assessment, and safety. Here 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'number analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for each specified row.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
IV SildenafilPart B: Visual Acuity of Verbal Participants as Assessed by LogMAR Through Visual Acuity ChartRight Eye: Month 120.45 LogMARStandard Deviation 0.394
IV SildenafilPart B: Visual Acuity of Verbal Participants as Assessed by LogMAR Through Visual Acuity ChartLeft Eye: Month 120.47 LogMARStandard Deviation 0.372
IV SildenafilPart B: Visual Acuity of Verbal Participants as Assessed by LogMAR Through Visual Acuity ChartRight Eye: Month 240.20 LogMARStandard Deviation 0.155
IV SildenafilPart B: Visual Acuity of Verbal Participants as Assessed by LogMAR Through Visual Acuity ChartLeft Eye: Month 240.20 LogMARStandard Deviation 0.155
PlaceboPart B: Visual Acuity of Verbal Participants as Assessed by LogMAR Through Visual Acuity ChartLeft Eye: Month 240.35 LogMARStandard Deviation 0.409
PlaceboPart B: Visual Acuity of Verbal Participants as Assessed by LogMAR Through Visual Acuity ChartRight Eye: Month 120.57 LogMARStandard Deviation 0.513
PlaceboPart B: Visual Acuity of Verbal Participants as Assessed by LogMAR Through Visual Acuity ChartRight Eye: Month 240.28 LogMARStandard Deviation 0.299
PlaceboPart B: Visual Acuity of Verbal Participants as Assessed by LogMAR Through Visual Acuity ChartLeft Eye: Month 120.57 LogMARStandard Deviation 0.513
Secondary

Part B: Visual Acuity of Verbal Participants as Assessed by Ophthalmological Assessment

Standard age-appropriate ophthalmological examinations were used to assess visual acuity (performed differently for children able of verbal interaction) through visual acuity chart (VAC) quantitative, counting finger (CF), hand motion (HM), light perception (LP), no light perception (NLP) and missing at month 12 and 24. In this outcome measure, data have been reported for right and left eye separately. Rows according to visual acuity categories at specified time points are reported in this outcome measure, only when there was a non-zero data for at least 1 reporting arm.

Time frame: Month 12 and 24 after end of study treatment in Part A (Day 1 to 14)

Population: Part B safety analysis set included all participants enrolled in Part B of the study for data analyses on developmental progress, audiological, neurological and ophthalmological assessment, and safety. Here 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'number analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for each specified row.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
IV SildenafilPart B: Visual Acuity of Verbal Participants as Assessed by Ophthalmological AssessmentLP, Right Eye: Month 121 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Visual Acuity of Verbal Participants as Assessed by Ophthalmological AssessmentMissing, Left Eye: Month 1213 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Visual Acuity of Verbal Participants as Assessed by Ophthalmological AssessmentVAC Quantitative, Left Eye: Month 122 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Visual Acuity of Verbal Participants as Assessed by Ophthalmological AssessmentVAC Quantitative, Right Eye: Month 246 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Visual Acuity of Verbal Participants as Assessed by Ophthalmological AssessmentHM, Right Eye: Month 120 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Visual Acuity of Verbal Participants as Assessed by Ophthalmological AssessmentHM, Right Eye: Month 241 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Visual Acuity of Verbal Participants as Assessed by Ophthalmological AssessmentHM, Left Eye: Month 120 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Visual Acuity of Verbal Participants as Assessed by Ophthalmological AssessmentMissing, Right Eye: Month 245 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Visual Acuity of Verbal Participants as Assessed by Ophthalmological AssessmentMissing, Right Eye: Month 1213 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Visual Acuity of Verbal Participants as Assessed by Ophthalmological AssessmentVAC Quantitative, Left Eye: Month 246 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Visual Acuity of Verbal Participants as Assessed by Ophthalmological AssessmentLP, Left Eye: Month 121 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Visual Acuity of Verbal Participants as Assessed by Ophthalmological AssessmentMissing, Left Eye: Month 246 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Visual Acuity of Verbal Participants as Assessed by Ophthalmological AssessmentVAC Quantitative, Right Eye: Month 122 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Visual Acuity of Verbal Participants as Assessed by Ophthalmological AssessmentMissing, Left Eye: Month 247 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Visual Acuity of Verbal Participants as Assessed by Ophthalmological AssessmentVAC Quantitative, Right Eye: Month 121 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Visual Acuity of Verbal Participants as Assessed by Ophthalmological AssessmentHM, Right Eye: Month 122 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Visual Acuity of Verbal Participants as Assessed by Ophthalmological AssessmentLP, Right Eye: Month 120 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Visual Acuity of Verbal Participants as Assessed by Ophthalmological AssessmentMissing, Right Eye: Month 1211 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Visual Acuity of Verbal Participants as Assessed by Ophthalmological AssessmentVAC Quantitative, Left Eye: Month 121 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Visual Acuity of Verbal Participants as Assessed by Ophthalmological AssessmentHM, Left Eye: Month 122 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Visual Acuity of Verbal Participants as Assessed by Ophthalmological AssessmentLP, Left Eye: Month 120 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Visual Acuity of Verbal Participants as Assessed by Ophthalmological AssessmentMissing, Left Eye: Month 1211 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Visual Acuity of Verbal Participants as Assessed by Ophthalmological AssessmentVAC Quantitative, Right Eye: Month 245 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Visual Acuity of Verbal Participants as Assessed by Ophthalmological AssessmentHM, Right Eye: Month 240 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Visual Acuity of Verbal Participants as Assessed by Ophthalmological AssessmentMissing, Right Eye: Month 247 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Visual Acuity of Verbal Participants as Assessed by Ophthalmological AssessmentVAC Quantitative, Left Eye: Month 245 Participants
Secondary

Part B: Visual Status of Participants With Abnormality as Assessed by Eye Examination of the Anterior and Posterior Segments

Standard age-appropriate ophthalmological examinations were used to assess examination of anterior and posterior chamber for abnormality in lids, conjunctiva, cornea, anterior chamber, lens, iris, pupil, extraocular muscle movement and eye movements at month 12 and 24. In this outcome measure, data have been reported for right and left eye separately. Rows according to visual status categories at specified time points are reported in this outcome measure, only when there was a non-zero data for at least 1 reporting arm.

Time frame: Month 12 and 24 after end of study treatment in Part A (Day 1 to 14)

Population: Part B safety analysis set included all participants enrolled in Part B of the study for data analyses on developmental progress, audiological, neurological and ophthalmological assessment, and safety. Here 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'number analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for each specified row.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
IV SildenafilPart B: Visual Status of Participants With Abnormality as Assessed by Eye Examination of the Anterior and Posterior SegmentsAnterior Segment (Lids), Right Eye: Month 120 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Visual Status of Participants With Abnormality as Assessed by Eye Examination of the Anterior and Posterior SegmentsAnterior Segment (Lids), Left Eye: Month 120 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Visual Status of Participants With Abnormality as Assessed by Eye Examination of the Anterior and Posterior SegmentsAnterior Segment (Extraocular muscle movements), Right Eye: Month 241 Participants
IV SildenafilPart B: Visual Status of Participants With Abnormality as Assessed by Eye Examination of the Anterior and Posterior SegmentsAnterior Segment (Extraocular muscle movements), Left Eye: Month 241 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Visual Status of Participants With Abnormality as Assessed by Eye Examination of the Anterior and Posterior SegmentsAnterior Segment (Extraocular muscle movements), Left Eye: Month 240 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Visual Status of Participants With Abnormality as Assessed by Eye Examination of the Anterior and Posterior SegmentsAnterior Segment (Lids), Right Eye: Month 121 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Visual Status of Participants With Abnormality as Assessed by Eye Examination of the Anterior and Posterior SegmentsAnterior Segment (Extraocular muscle movements), Right Eye: Month 240 Participants
PlaceboPart B: Visual Status of Participants With Abnormality as Assessed by Eye Examination of the Anterior and Posterior SegmentsAnterior Segment (Lids), Left Eye: Month 121 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Individual Components of Treatment Failure

Percentage of participants with individual components of treatment failure (need to start additional treatment targeting PPHN, need to start ECMO, or death) were evaluated. Some participants could have had multiple qualifying events for treatment failure.

Time frame: 14 days from the initiation of IV study drug or hospital discharge, whichever occurs first (maximum of 14 days)

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants treated with study treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
IV SildenafilPercentage of Participants With Individual Components of Treatment FailureDeath6.9 percentage of participants
IV SildenafilPercentage of Participants With Individual Components of Treatment FailureAdditional Treatment Targeting PPHN13.8 percentage of participants
IV SildenafilPercentage of Participants With Individual Components of Treatment FailureECMO10.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Individual Components of Treatment FailureDeath0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Individual Components of Treatment FailureAdditional Treatment Targeting PPHN10.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Individual Components of Treatment FailureECMO10.0 percentage of participants
Comparison: Additional Treatmentp-value: 0.706595% CI: [-15.2, 22.9]Fisher Exact
Comparison: ECMOp-value: >0.99995% CI: [-18.5, 18.5]Fisher Exact
Comparison: Deathp-value: 0.237395% CI: [-5.5, 22.8]Fisher Exact
Secondary

Time From Initiation of Intravenous (IV) Study Drug to Final Weaning of Mechanical Ventilation

Time in days, from initiation of IV study drug to final weaning of mechanical ventilation among participants achieving final weaning of mechanical ventilation for PPHN was evaluated. Kaplan-Meier method was used for estimation. For participants with mechanical ventilation beyond 336 hours (14 days) from initiation of IV study drug, data was censored at 14 days.

Time frame: 14 days from the initiation of IV study drug or hospital discharge, whichever occurs first (maximum of 14 days)

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants treated with study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
IV SildenafilTime From Initiation of Intravenous (IV) Study Drug to Final Weaning of Mechanical Ventilation8.3 days
PlaceboTime From Initiation of Intravenous (IV) Study Drug to Final Weaning of Mechanical Ventilation7.3 days
p-value: 0.9885Log Rank
Secondary

Time From Initiation of Intravenous (IV) Study Drug to First Treatment Failure

Time in days, from initiation of IV study drug to first treatment failure (defined as need for additional treatment targeting PPHN, need for ECMO, or death) for participants with treatment failure was evaluated. Kaplan-Meier method was used for estimation. For participants without treatment failure by the endpoint assessment date, data was censored at the endpoint assessment date.

Time frame: 14 days from the initiation of IV study drug or hospital discharge, whichever occurs first (maximum of 14 days)

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants treated with study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
IV SildenafilTime From Initiation of Intravenous (IV) Study Drug to First Treatment FailureNA days
PlaceboTime From Initiation of Intravenous (IV) Study Drug to First Treatment FailureNA days
p-value: 0.491Log Rank
Secondary

Total Plasma Clearance (CL) of Sildenafil and Its Metabolite

CL is volume of the body fluid/ plasma from which the drug or the metabolite is completely removed per unit time. CL was obtained for Sildenafil and its major metabolite UK-103,320.

Time frame: Loading dose: prior to the start of infusion, 5, 30 minutes after end of loading infusion on Day 1; Maintenance dose: between 48 to 72, 96 to 120 hours during infusion and immediately prior to end of infusion on Day 1

Population: PK analysis set included all participants randomized and treated who had at least 1 concentration during whole treatment period.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
IV SildenafilTotal Plasma Clearance (CL) of Sildenafil and Its MetaboliteSildenafil1.78 Liters/hourStandard Deviation 0.89
IV SildenafilTotal Plasma Clearance (CL) of Sildenafil and Its MetaboliteUK-103,3205.05 Liters/hourStandard Deviation 2.25

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 8, 2026