Skip to content

PROspective Non-interventional Open laBEl Trial for TARGIN in Korean Patients With Cancer Pain

A 4-week, Open Label, Multi-center, Prospective, Single-arm, Non-interventional Phase IV Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Targin for the Treatment of Korean Patients With Cancer Pain Under Conditions of Daily Practice

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01719757
Acronym
PROBE
Enrollment
359
Registered
2012-11-01
Start date
2012-07-31
Completion date
2014-04-30
Last updated
2016-08-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cancer

Keywords

Targin, Cancer Pain

Brief summary

The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of TARGIN administration as an analgesic to Korean patients treated with opioid analgesics for moderate-to-severe cancer pain under conditions of daily practice.

Detailed description

An open-label, multi-center, nonrandomized, prospective, non-interventional, observational phase IV trial. At the first visit, a detailed medical history is taken, including previous analgesics and concomitant treatment. After inclusion, patients enter a 4-week observation period during which they will receive bid of TARGIN 10/5mg and/or 20/10mg. The dose adjustments of TARGIN as well as of analgesic co-medication, rescue-medication and other treatments (e.g. laxatives) can be performed at any time-point during the observation period by the physician in dependence of medical demand. The asymmetric dose is allowed during the observation period by the physician's judgment. (e.g. 10/5 mg in the morning and 20/10 mg in the evening). Data are gathered using interview-administered questionnaires at baseline (visit 1) and study end (visit 2). During the observation period, unscheduled visits are allowed after the first visit due to inadequate pain control or occurrence of adverse events.

Interventions

Twice daily

Sponsors

Mundipharma Korea Ltd
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Male or female cancer patients 20 years of age or older 2. Cancer related pain that requires treatment with continuous around-the-clock strong opioid analgesic 3. Moderate to severe pain intensity (NRS pain score \>=4) 4. Opioid naïve patients or patients not treated with strong opioids (Only except occasional PRN) within 13 months or patients who has been on weak opioids 5. Ability to communicate effectively with the study personnel regarding pain intensity, constipation assessment, final assessment of overall efficacy and tolerability 6. Subject who provide signed and dated written voluntary informed consent

Exclusion criteria

1. Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women 2. Have previously received treatment with Targin 3. Patient with evidence of significant structural/functional abnormalities of GI tract which is not appropriate for oral medicine administration 4. Any history of hypersensitivity to Oxycodone and Naloxone or any excipients 5. Patients with significant respiratory depression 6. Patients with acute or severe bronchial asthma or hypercarbia 7. Any patient who has or is suspected of having paralytic ileus 8. Severe Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pulmonary heart disease 9. Targin product contains lactose. Patients with rare hereditary problems of galactose intolerance, Lapp lactase deficiency or glucose-galactose malabsorption should not take 10. Patients with moderate and severe hepatic impairment 11. Abnormal aspartate aminotransferase (AST; SGOT), alanine aminotransferase (ALT; SGPT), or alkaline phosphatase levels (\>2.5 times the upper limit of normal, it is allowed \>5 times the upper limit of normal in case of transition in liver) or an abnormal total bilirubin and/or creatinine level(s) (greater than 1.5 times the upper limit of normal) 12. Any situation where opioids are contraindicated 13. With a life expectancy \< 1 month 14. Any situation where opioids are contraindicated 15. Mainly pain originated other than cancer or cancer related conditions (eg. Musculoskeletal pain, inflammatory pain, diabetic polyneuropathy) 16. Patients with known or suspected unstable brain metastases or spinal cord compression that may require changes in steroid treatment throughout the duration of the study 17. Patients with uncontrolled seizures 18. Requiring interventional treatment for pain such as neurodestructive procedure or regional infusion 19. With a history of alcohol abuse within 6 months of screening 20. With a history of illicit drug abuse within 6 months of screening 21. Patients with increased intracranial pressure 22. Having used other investigational drugs at the time of enrollment, or within 30 days.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Numeric Rating Scales (NRS) Score4 weeksPrimary objective: Change in numeric rating scales (NRS) such as score for average pain levels over the previous 24 hours, from baseline (visit 1) to study end (visit 2). NRS score was measured from 0 (No pain) to 10(worst pain imaginable).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group(ECOG) Performance Status4weeksIf ECOG P.S score is increased from baseline to visit2, the results mean that QOL was worse. ECOG P.S grade: 0=Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction, 1=Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light house work, office work,2=Ambulatory and capable of all selfcare but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours,3=Capable of only limited selfcare, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours,4=Completely disabled. Cannot carry on any selfcare. Totally confined to bed or chair,5=Death.
Change of Constipation Assessment From Baseline to Visit 2(End Visit)4 weeksConstipation assessment(5-point scale; 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=very severe, for the patient's judgment of the intensity of symptoms)
Overall Satisfaction Assessment About Efficacy and Tolerability of Oxycodone/Naloxone by the Investigator and Subject4 weeksThe overall satisfactions by investigators & subjects were assessed 5 steps such as Very good, Good, Satisfactory, Bad, Very bad.

Countries

South Korea

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Safety set: 359 ITT set: 304

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Oxycodone/Naloxone
Trade name is Targin. Oxycodone (10mg)/naloxone (5mg) or Oxycodone (20mg)/naloxone (10mg) tablets. Twice daily per oral. Dose adjustment and asymmetric dose are allowed up to 80/40mg per day Oxycodone/Naloxone: Twice daily
359
Total359

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event38
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up20
Overall StudyProtocol Violation1
Overall Studywell controlled pain27
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject15

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOxycodone/Naloxone
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
180 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
179 Participants
Age, Continuous67.73 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.07
Region of Enrollment
Korea, Republic of
359 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
134 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
225 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
227 / 359
serious
Total, serious adverse events
51 / 359

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Numeric Rating Scales (NRS) Score

Primary objective: Change in numeric rating scales (NRS) such as score for average pain levels over the previous 24 hours, from baseline (visit 1) to study end (visit 2). NRS score was measured from 0 (No pain) to 10(worst pain imaginable).

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: Intent to treat analysis set: 304

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oxycodone/NaloxoneChange in Numeric Rating Scales (NRS) Score-1.89 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.16
Secondary

Change of Constipation Assessment From Baseline to Visit 2(End Visit)

Constipation assessment(5-point scale; 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=very severe, for the patient's judgment of the intensity of symptoms)

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: Intent to treat analysis set(Last observational carried forward)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oxycodone/NaloxoneChange of Constipation Assessment From Baseline to Visit 2(End Visit)-0.03 scoreStandard Deviation 0.67
Secondary

Change of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group(ECOG) Performance Status

If ECOG P.S score is increased from baseline to visit2, the results mean that QOL was worse. ECOG P.S grade: 0=Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction, 1=Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light house work, office work,2=Ambulatory and capable of all selfcare but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours,3=Capable of only limited selfcare, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours,4=Completely disabled. Cannot carry on any selfcare. Totally confined to bed or chair,5=Death.

Time frame: 4weeks

Population: Intent to treat analysis set: 304

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oxycodone/NaloxoneChange of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group(ECOG) Performance Status0.08 ScoreStandard Deviation 0.52
Secondary

Overall Satisfaction Assessment About Efficacy and Tolerability of Oxycodone/Naloxone by the Investigator and Subject

The overall satisfactions by investigators & subjects were assessed 5 steps such as Very good, Good, Satisfactory, Bad, Very bad.

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: Intent to treat analysis set(Last observational carried forward)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Oxycodone/NaloxoneOverall Satisfaction Assessment About Efficacy and Tolerability of Oxycodone/Naloxone by the Investigator and SubjectGood80 participants
Oxycodone/NaloxoneOverall Satisfaction Assessment About Efficacy and Tolerability of Oxycodone/Naloxone by the Investigator and SubjectBad53 participants
Oxycodone/NaloxoneOverall Satisfaction Assessment About Efficacy and Tolerability of Oxycodone/Naloxone by the Investigator and SubjectSatisfactory146 participants
Oxycodone/NaloxoneOverall Satisfaction Assessment About Efficacy and Tolerability of Oxycodone/Naloxone by the Investigator and SubjectVery Bad1 participants
Oxycodone/NaloxoneOverall Satisfaction Assessment About Efficacy and Tolerability of Oxycodone/Naloxone by the Investigator and SubjectVery good24 participants
SubjectOverall Satisfaction Assessment About Efficacy and Tolerability of Oxycodone/Naloxone by the Investigator and SubjectVery Bad3 participants
SubjectOverall Satisfaction Assessment About Efficacy and Tolerability of Oxycodone/Naloxone by the Investigator and SubjectVery good12 participants
SubjectOverall Satisfaction Assessment About Efficacy and Tolerability of Oxycodone/Naloxone by the Investigator and SubjectGood78 participants
SubjectOverall Satisfaction Assessment About Efficacy and Tolerability of Oxycodone/Naloxone by the Investigator and SubjectSatisfactory156 participants
SubjectOverall Satisfaction Assessment About Efficacy and Tolerability of Oxycodone/Naloxone by the Investigator and SubjectBad55 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026