Skip to content

Vasopressin Versus Norepinephrine for the Management of Septic Shock in Cancer Patients

Vasopressin Versus Norepinephrine for the Management of Septic Shock in Cancer Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01718613
Acronym
VANCS II
Enrollment
250
Registered
2012-10-31
Start date
2012-11-30
Completion date
2018-05-31
Last updated
2018-05-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Septic Shock

Brief summary

Although arginine vasopressin has been used as an additional drug in refractory shock in worldwide clinical practice, there are no prospective studies using it as a first choice therapy in patients with cancer and septic shock. The aim of this study is assess if the use of arginine vasopressin would be more effective on treatment of septic shock in cancer patients than norepinephrine, decreasing the composite end point of mortality and organ failure in 28 days.

Interventions

DRUGVasopressin

Blinded Vasopressin will be started if there is persistent hypotension, characterized by mean arterial pressure \<65 mmHg after fluid replacement

DRUGNorepinephrine

Blinded Norepinephrine will be started if there is persistent hypotension, characterized by mean arterial pressure \<65 mmHg after fluid replacement

Sponsors

Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Solid neoplasm needing ICU * Septic Shock according standard criteria

Exclusion criteria

* Younger than 18 years; * Pregnancy; * Raynaud's phenomenon, systemic sclerosis or vasospastic diathesis; * Severe hyponatremia (Na\<130mEq/L); * Acute mesenteric ischemia; * Acute myocardial infarction; * Cardiogenic shock; * Current use of vasopressor before randomization * Expected ICU stay less than 24 hours * Enrolled in another study; * Refusal to consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
28-day mortality28-day from randomizationMortality from all causes in 28-day follow-up

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Days alive and free of mechanical ventilation28 days after randomizationDays alive and free of mechanical ventilation at 28-day follow-up
Days alive and free of vasopressors28 days after randomizationDays alive and free of any type of vasopressor agent at 28-day follow-up
90-days mortality90 days after randomizationMortality from all causes 90 days after randomization
SOFA score in 24 hours24 hours after ICU admissionSeverity of organ failure according to the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score during the first 24 hours after randomization.
SOFA score in 96 hours96 hours after randomizationSeverity of organ failure according to the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score during the first 96 hours after randomization.
Days alive and free of renal replacement therapy28 days after randomizationrequirement of dialysis of hemofiltration at 28-day follow-up

Countries

Brazil

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026