Skip to content

Optimization of Treatment in Patients With Severe Peripheral Ischemia (Fontaine Stage IIb)

Optimization of Treatment in Patients With Severe Peripheral Ischemia (Fontaine Stage IIb), Unsuitable or Suitable to Surgical Revascularization / Endovascular With Reference to the Change of Pain-free Walking Distance and Other Endpoints

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01718288
Acronym
2bPILOT
Enrollment
150
Registered
2012-10-31
Start date
2006-11-30
Completion date
2012-04-30
Last updated
2012-10-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Peripheral Arterial Disease

Keywords

PAD; iloprost; walking distance; cardiovascular events

Brief summary

Evaluate the possibility of optimization of therapy with prostanoids (iloprost), in patients with Fontaine's stage IIb severe chronic ischemia, both in patients eligible for surgery both in patients for which it is only possible medical therapy

Detailed description

The management of patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) stage IIb and pain-free walking distance (PFWD) less than 100 meters is a major clinical problem, in view of the significant cooling of the quality of life and evolution often severe that characterizes the clinical course of these patients. Revascularization Surgery is the treatment of choice, but about half of patients with severe PAD IIb is not eligible for surgery or endovascular treatment. The usefulness of use of vasodilators or hemorheological is controversial, and medical treatment of these patients is therefore heterogeneous understanding the various pharmacologic options (for the correction of risk factors, prevention of cardiovascular events, improvement of claudication), and rehabilitative programs. Iloprost, a synthetic analogue of prostacyclin, is effective in the treatment of patients with chronic critical ischemia, and its pharmacological profile (effective vasodilator, anti-platelet, and leukocyte activation) is particularly suitable to modulate multiple components pathogenesis of peripheral arterial disease. Specifically, in the treatment of patients with PAD IIb severe, the current state is available only a retrospective study that compared the use of iloprost with that of vasodilators. Aim of the study FADOI-2bPILOT is to evaluate prospectively and for an observation period of 13 months, if you can get a benefit on the pain-free walking distance and on clinical outcome from anticipated and additional use of iloprost, in patients with severe IIb stage PAD treated according to current best medical practice.

Interventions

DRUGiloprost

The study, consists of two substudies, which deal with patients susceptible to medical therapy alone (substudy 1) or treated with classical surgical therapy (substudy 2). For each substudy, pts will be divided into two groups, one that will receive conventional treatments but not prostanoids, other conventional treatments with addition of iloprost. The 4 groups: 1A. Pts unsuitable to surgical or endovascular vascular therapy: conventional treatment 1. B. Pts unsuitable to surgical or endovascular vascular therapy: treatment with iloprost plus conventional treatment 2. A. Pts suitable to vascular surgical or endovascular therapy: conventional treatment 2B. Pts suitable to vascular surgical or endovascular therapy: treatment with iloprost plus conventional treatment

DRUGStandard Treatment (aspirin.....),

The standard treatment, as has already been explained in the submission is the best treatment that the guidelines suggest for that specific type of patient with those complications and with stage 2b severe PAD. correction of concomitant risk factors, physical exercise, antiplatelet, standard heparin /low molecular weight heparin, hemorheological/vasodilators such as pentoxifylline/buflomedil, propionyl-L-carnitine, Defibrotide) but not prostanoids

Sponsors

Fadoi Foundation, Italy
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

age \> 18 years; pain-free walking distance (PFWD) \<100 meters on two occasions 10 days apart, with \<25% difference between each other; ankle blood pressure (BP) \<70 mmHg; big toe BP \< 30 mmHg (in case of diabetic patient).

Exclusion criteria

pain at rest, trophic ulcers or gangrene (critical limb ischemia), if they were unable to cooperate, or one of the following conditions (contraindications or precautions for use of iloprost) was present: myocardial infarction or stroke in the previous 6 months; congestive heart failure NYHA class \>II; unstable angina; uncontrolled severe arterial hypertension (systolic BP \>180 mmHg or diastolic BP \>110 mmHg) or hypotension (systolic BP \<90 mmHg); hyperkinetic ventricular arrhythmia; acute pulmonary edema or pulmonary congestion; bleeding diathesis; platelet count \<80,000 or \> 500,000/mm3; renal failure requiring dialysis; liver cirrhosis; pregnancy or breast feeding; history of allergy, hypersensitivity or intolerance to iloprost or other prostanoids.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Measure of PFWD(pain-free walking distance)in patients with 2b stage PAD13 monthsAim of this multicenter, randomized, controlled study was prospectively evaluate the effects of iloprost, added to standard therapy, in patients with 2b stage PAD and PFWD (pain-free walking distance) less than 100 metres, eligible and non-eligible for surgical revascularization. A treadmill test 3-6-9-12 months (before iloprost cycle for patients group 1B and 2B). A final evaluation 13 months (for one month to the conclusion of the 12 months treatment of iloprost for patients group 1B and 2B, and after 13 months from enrolling for patients in the study group 1A and 2A)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assessing changes in endurance13 monthsA clinical evaluation 3-6-9-12 months (before iloprost cycle for patients group 1B and 2B). A final evaluation 13 months (for one month to the conclusion of the 12 months treatment of iloprost for patients group 1B and 2B, and after 13 months from enrolling for patients in the study group 1A and 2A)
The possible occurrence of major complications13 monthsThe study reported the number of events during all the study (13 months). The major complication were: Ischemic cardiopathy, critical limb ischemia, cerebrovascular event, critical limb ischemia
Quality of life13 monthsFor the Quality of life, the study used a specific questionnaire administrated to all patients enrolled in the study (13 months of observation): IQOLA (International Quality of Life Assessment),SF-36 Italian Version 1.6

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026