Skip to content

Single Long vs Two Short Overlapping Bioabsorbable Polymer DES

Randomized Study to Evaluate Segmental Late Loss Comparing Two PCI Strategies Using a Long Stent vs 2 Shorter Stents to Treat Long or Tandem Coronary Stenosis.

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01718106
Acronym
ROCCO
Enrollment
300
Registered
2012-10-31
Start date
2014-03-31
Completion date
2016-03-31
Last updated
2015-03-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease

Keywords

coronary artery disease, drug eluting stent, bioabsorbable polymer, percutaneous coronary intervention, restenosis, late thrombosis

Brief summary

Multiple overlapping drug-eluting coronary stents (DES) are usually needed to treat long coronary stenoses but this strategy is expensive and the response to overlapping DES has not been extensively studied. The recent availability of bioabsorbable polymer DES could allow treatment of long coronary stenoses without leaving gross burden of non-absorbable polymer in the vessel wall, even in case of overlapping stents. Thus we planned to evaluate which of the 2 strategies, namely using a single long biabsorbable DES or two shorter biabsorbable DES with minimal overlapping, is better in treating long coronary stenoses. The study is a spontanous randomized multicenter open-label study. A maximum of 300 patients with stable angina and at leat 1 coronary stenosis \>28mm and \<40mm of length will be randomized in 1:1 fashion by a Web-based electronic CRF. The long stent group (Group A) will be treated by a single 44mm Biomime DES (II generation DES with bioabsorbable polymer, Meril Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd., Gujarat, India). The short stent group (Group B) will be treated by 2 short Biomime DES positioned with minimal overlapping. The primary end-point of the study will be the 6 moth in-stent late lumen loss. Seconadry end-points will be 1, 6 and 12 month overall mortality, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, stent thrombosis and MACE (combination of the 3 previous clinical end-points). Patients will be evaluated by 6-month control coronary angiography and late lumen loss in the stented vessel will be measured in a quantitative coronary angiography Core Lab (Cardioimaging Centre, Novara, Italy)

Interventions

DEVICEimplantation of a bioabsorbable polymer DES

implantation in patients with long coronary artery stenosis of a single long or two shorter overlapped bioabsorbable polymer DES

Sponsors

Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Maggiore della Carita
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. De novo coronary artery stenosis in a major coronary artery branch (reference diameter 2.5-4.0 mm) with a lenght \>28mm and \<39mm 2. Symptoms or instrumental evidence of myocardial ischemia: * Chronic stable angina \[Canadian Cardiovascular Society Classification\] * Unstable angina with ECG changes or troponin release (Braunwald Class IB-C, IIB-C, or IIIB-C) * Stress ECG or myocardial perfusion imaging or stress echocardiography positive for inducible myocardial ischemia 3. Written informed consent to the study

Exclusion criteria

1. Pregnancy or lactation 2. Acute ST elevation myocardial infarction (primary angioplasty) 3. Cardiogenic shock 4. Known allergic reactions to aspirin, clopidogrel, prasugrel, heparin, enoxaparin, bivalirudin, steel, chromium, iodiate contrast medium 5. Platelets \<75.000/mm3 or \>700.000/mm3 or white blood cells \<3.000/mm3. 6. Partecipation to other studies. 7. Active or \<3 months peptic ulcer or gastrointestinal bleeding 8. Planned major surgery non delayable . 9. Comorbidities limiting life expectancy to \<1 year. 10. Unprotected left main disease as target lesion 11. Chronic total occlusion as target lesion 12. Bifurcation with side branch \> 2.5mm as target lesion 13. Restenosis as target lesion 14. saphenous vein graft as target lesion.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
follow up in-stent late lumen loss6-monthdifference between the in-stent coronary lumen measure obtained immediately after coronary percutaneous intervention and the in-stent coronary lumen measure at follow up

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
overall mortality1 yearmortality for all causes
Myocardial infarction1 yearMyocardial infarction (universal definition of myocardial infarction, ACC/AHA/ESC statement) in the territory of the treated coronary artery
target vessel revascularization1 yearrevascularization of the treated coronary vessel by repeated percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting due to restenosis and or symptoms or instrumental signs of myocardial ischemia
Stent thrombosis2 yearsCoronary stent thrombosis according to ARC definition
MACE (major coronary adverse event)1 yearcombined endpoint = presence of overall death or myocardial infarction or target vessel revascularization or stent thrombosis

Countries

Italy

Contacts

Primary ContactAlessandro Lupi, MD
lupialessandro1@tin.it+3903213733236

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026