Skip to content

Efficacy of Vakum Technology in Patients With Chronic Hypersecretion

Efficacy of Vakum Technology in Patients With Chronic Hypersecretion.

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01718067
Enrollment
100
Registered
2012-10-31
Start date
2013-01-31
Completion date
2016-04-30
Last updated
2014-12-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Bronchitis/Bronchiectasis, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Keywords

Chest physiotherapy, Rehabilitation, Chronic respiratory diseases

Brief summary

Mechanical devices to increase the individual's bronchial hygiene are commonly used to assist patients with chronic retention of secretions. VAKÜM technology has been recently developed with the aim to improve the respiratory condition in hypersecretive patients suffering from chronic respiratory diseases. The aim of this study is to assess the clinical efficacy of VAKÜM technology in patients with hypersecretion, and chronic respiratory diseases a clinical trial has been designed. Patients with chronic respiratory diseases, hypersecretion (sputum production \>30 mL/die), and reduced cough efficiency (Peak Cough Expiratory Flow \> 150 and \< 300 L\*min-1) referred to standard pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) will be included. Study design is a single-blind multicentre randomized trial with consecutive recruitment. Following a preliminary run-in period, group comparison will be made between Intervention group using VAKÜM system (Free Aspire, MPR, Legnano-I) added to the conventional manual ELTGOL technique, and Control group using manual ELTGOL alone over 10 daily sessions. Spirometric lung volumes, respiratory muscle strength, arterial blood gases, and quality of life will be recorded in both groups pre-to-post PR. Perceived dyspnea (by VAS scale), sputum volume and characteristics (on a semi-quantitative 3-point scale) and peak expiratory air flows (PEF and PCEF) will be registered on a daily basis over the study period. Primary outcome is the change in perceived dyspnea; in order to ensure 80% power to detect a 5 point (SD 5) group difference change in the primary outcome at the end of the study period as significant at the 0.05 level, at least 42 patients per group are needed. The minimum target sample size will be then fixed at 50 patients per group. An higher and faster significant reduction of the perceived dyspnea is supposed in the Intervention group. Additional benefits among the secondary outcomes are also hypothesised in the same group.

Interventions

DEVICEVAKÜM system

15 minutes, twice a day.

OTHERconventional manual ELTGOL technique

20 minutes twice a day

Sponsors

Villa Pineta Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients with chronic respiratory diseases * hypersecretion condition(sputum production \>30 mL/die) * reduced cough efficiency (Peak Cough Expiratory Flow \> 150 and \< 300 L\*min- 1) * patients admitted to standard pulmonary rehabilitation

Exclusion criteria

* not able to use the device * concomitant cardiovascular or neoplastic diseases * utilization of Non Invasive Ventilation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in perceived dyspneaBaseline and 10 daysVisual Analogic Scale (VAS)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in arterial blood gases exchangesBaseline and 10 daysPaO2, PaCO2, SatO2, pH
Change in spirometric lung volumesBaseline and 10 daysStatic and dynamic lung volumes
Change in peak expiratory air flowsBaseline and 10 daysPeak Expiratory Flow (PEF), Peak Cough Expiratory Flow (PCEF)
Change in sputum volume and characteristicsDaily over 10 daysVolume, Density (D) and Purulence (P) (D and P assessed on a semi-quantitative 3-point scale)
Change in quality of lifeBaseline and 10 daysQuality of life questionnaires (CAT, MRF 28)
Change in respiratory muscle strengthBaseline and 10 daysMaximal Expiratory Pressure (MEP), Maximal Inspiratory Pressure (MIP)

Countries

Italy

Contacts

Primary ContactEnrico M Clini, Prof.
enrico.clini@unimore.it

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026