Skip to content

Discharge Information and Support for Patients Receiving Outpatient Care in the Emergency Department

Discharge Information & Support for Patients Receiving Outpatient Care in the ED

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01717976
Acronym
DISPO ED
Enrollment
513
Registered
2012-10-31
Start date
2013-12-31
Completion date
2016-11-30
Last updated
2017-07-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multimorbidity

Keywords

emergency department use, Veterans

Brief summary

The Veterans' Health Administration (VHA) is committed to improving primary care through the implementation of Patient Aligned Care Teams (PACTs). Improving access to services and care coordination are among the primary goals of PACTs; however, there remain many unanswered questions about how best to use the limited time of PACT team members, such as nurse care managers, to accomplish this. This study will evaluate the effectiveness of a nurse-led telephone support program for Veterans who have been treated recently in the emergency department (ED) and are at high risk for repeat visits. The program's goals are to reduce the need for future ED use and improve satisfaction among Veterans by providing information and support related to the ED visit, enhancing chronic disease management and educating Veterans and family members about PACT and other VA and community services. If proven effective, this program could improve health and healthcare for a large, vulnerable group of Veterans and be cost saving for VHA.

Detailed description

Anticipated Impacts on Veteran's Healthcare More than 1 million Veterans receive care in Emergency Departments (EDs) in VA Medical Centers (VAMCs) annually. ED visits that do not result in hospital admission, commonly referred to as treat and release visits, account for 80% of all VAMC ED encounters. Nearly 1 in 5 Veterans treated and released from a VAMC ED receive additional unscheduled care in the ED or hospital within 30 days, a rate that is higher than non-VA settings. A large number of Veterans and the VA system would benefit from the development of interventions that reduce subsequent ED use in this vulnerable population. Project Background Failing to address unmet needs and difficulty navigating the health system are two primary forces driving repeat ED use. Unmet needs after an ED visit range from poorly controlled chronic diseases to incomplete understanding of new medications or follow-up instructions. Perceived barriers to access to primary care and other services are also cited as factors that lead Veterans back to the ED for ambulatory care. In a nationally representative sample of 15,263 Veterans with repeat ED visits, the investigators found that 71.7% did not see another VA outpatient provider between their original and return trip to the ED, Improving access to services and care coordination are among the primary goals of the Veterans' Health Administration's (VHA) ongoing reorganization of primary care. Patient Aligned Care Teams (PACTs) are being created in VAMCs across the country; however, there has been little focus on the interface between PACT and the ED. A key role for nurses within PACT will be telephone management of high risk populations, and Veterans treated and released from the ED represent one such high-risk group. However, no studies have examined both the Veteran and system-level impact of using nurse care managers to support Veterans after an ED visit. Project Objectives The overall goal of this study is to examine the impact of a primary care-based nurse telephone support program for Veterans treated and released from the ED who are at high risk for repeat visits. The investigators will test the following hypotheses: H1: Veterans who participate in a primary care-based nurse telephone support program after an ED visit will have fewer ED visits in the subsequent 30 days compared to usual care; H2: Veterans who participate in a primary care- based nurse telephone support program after an ED visit will have higher satisfaction compared to usual care; H3: Veterans who participate in a primary care-based nurse telephone support program will have lower VA costs for ED and hospital care in the 180 days following an ED visit, compared to usual care. Project Methods The proposed study is a two group randomized, controlled trial to evaluate a structured nurse telephone support program for Veterans treated and released from the ED who are at high risk for repeat visits. After informed consent is obtained, Veterans will be randomized to nurse telephone support \[DISPO ED\] or usual care. DISPO ED will consist of 2 calls from a study nurse (simulating the role of a PACT RN Care Manager) within 7 days of the index ED visit, with an option for a 3rd call within 14 days. The primary outcome is a dichotomous outcome defined as any ED use within 30 days or not. Secondary outcomes are patient satisfaction with VA health care at 30 and 180 days, and total VA costs within 180 days.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALDISPO ED

primary care based nurse telephone support

Sponsors

VA Office of Research and Development
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

To be included in the study, patients must meet all of the following: * Treated and released from the Durham VA ED; * Receive primary care from a Durham VAMC affiliated primary care clinic (at least one visit in a primary care clinic affiliated with the Durham VAMC within the previous 12 months); * At least one VAMC ED visit or hospital admission within the 6 months preceding the index visit; * Diagnosed with 2 or more chronic health conditions; and * Valid telephone number in the medical record; in the investigators' pilot studies, 98.7% of Veterans had a valid phone number in the medical record.

Exclusion criteria

Patients will be excluded if they meet any of the following: * Reside in a nursing home (or other institutional setting); * Unable to communicate on the telephone, and no proxy available; * Lacks decision-making capacity, and no proxy available; or * Returned to ED within 24 hours of discharge from initial visit. * Have a current Category 1 high-risk suicide flag on their CPRS medical record; or Visit the PEC (Psychiatric Emergency Clinic) within 24 hours of discharge from initial ED visit. * Enrolled in a study that prohibits cross-enrollment in other studies.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Experiencing Repeat ED Use30 daysNumber of Participants Experiencing Repeat ED Use

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Satisfied With Health CareBaselineSatisfaction with health care determined by 9 or 10 on the CAHPS
Total Costs to the VHA180 daysAssessment of VA and VA purchased care costs in 2016 dollars within 180 days from emergency department visit

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

514 participants were randomized and assigned to either DISPO ED or usual care. One participant (UC arm) was found to be ineligible post-randomization and thus not included in analyses.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Intervention
primary care based nurse telephone support DISPO ED: primary care based nurse telephone support
257
Control
usual care
256
Total513

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyProtocol Violation01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicInterventionControlTotal
Age, Continuous58.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.7
59.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.5
59.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1
Sex: Female, Male
Female
60 Participants54 Participants114 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
197 Participants202 Participants399 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
2 / 2573 / 256
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 2570 / 256
serious
Total, serious adverse events
18 / 25721 / 256

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants Experiencing Repeat ED Use

Number of Participants Experiencing Repeat ED Use

Time frame: 30 days

Population: 0 out of the 257 participants in the DISPO intervention group and 1 of the 256 participants in the Usual Care group were deceased at 30 days and not included in the primary outcome analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
InterventionNumber of Participants Experiencing Repeat ED Use64 Participants
ControlNumber of Participants Experiencing Repeat ED Use59 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Satisfied With Health Care

Satisfaction with health care determined by 9 or 10 on the CAHPS

Time frame: Baseline

Population: 0 out of 257 in intervention group and 2 out of 256 participants in the usual care group had missing data at baseline for satisfaction due to non-response.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
InterventionNumber of Participants Satisfied With Health Care110 Participants
ControlNumber of Participants Satisfied With Health Care117 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Satisfied With Health Care

Satisfaction with health care determined by 9 or 10 on the CAHPS

Time frame: 30 days

Population: 24 out of 257 in intervention group and 38 out of 256 participants in the usual care group had missing data at the 30 day interview for satisfaction due to missing the 30-day interview or non-response to the satisfaction question at the 30 day interview.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
InterventionNumber of Participants Satisfied With Health Care117 Participants
ControlNumber of Participants Satisfied With Health Care109 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Satisfied With Health Care

Satisfaction with health care determined by 9 or 10 on the CAHPS

Time frame: 180 days

Population: 26 out of 257 in intervention group and 33 out of 256 participants in the usual care group had missing data at the 180 day interview for satisfaction due to missing the 180-day interview or non-response to the satisfaction question at the 180 day interview.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
InterventionNumber of Participants Satisfied With Health Care115 Participants
ControlNumber of Participants Satisfied With Health Care106 Participants
Secondary

Total Costs to the VHA

Assessment of VA and VA purchased care costs in 2016 dollars within 180 days from emergency department visit

Time frame: 180 days

Population: 0 out of 257 participants in the DISPO intervention group and 1 of 256 in the usual care group were deceased at 30 days and not included in the cost analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionTotal Costs to the VHA38273.16 US DollarsStandard Deviation 57836.31
ControlTotal Costs to the VHA31696.00 US DollarsStandard Deviation 46294.63

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 2, 2026