Liver Carcinoma
Conditions
Keywords
HCC, RFA, Iodine-125, Recurrence
Brief summary
To prospectively evaluate whether use of combined radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and percutaneous iodine-125 (125I) seeds implantation results in better survival compared with use of RFA alone in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
Detailed description
This study was local ethical committee approved; all patients gave written informed consent. A total of 136 patients were randomly assigned to undergo RFA-125I (n = 68; 42 men, 26 women; mean age, 50.7 years; age range, 29-73 years) or RFA alone (n = 68; 47 men, 21 women; mean age, 48.9 years; age range, 30-74 years). Patients with viable tumors at computed tomography (CT) 4 weeks after treatment received additional treatment. Rates of local tumor progression and overall survival were evaluated by using Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests, respectively. The relative prognostic significance of variables in predicting overall survival and the time to tumor recurrence or metastasis were assessed with multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression and logistic regression analyses, respectively.
Interventions
PROCEDURERadiofrequency Ablation
For RFA, we used a commercially available system (RF 2000; Radio Therapeutics, Mountain View, Calif) and a needle electrode with a 15-gauge insulated cannula that had 10 hook-shaped expandable electrode tines with a diameter of 3.5 cm at expansion (LeVeen; Radio Therapeutics).The radioactivity per seed ranged from 0.5 to 0.6 millicuries (mCi)
RADIATIONiodine
The 125I seeds (0.8 mm in diameter and 4.5mm in length) were enclosed in a NiTinol capsule (China Institute of Atomic Energy, Beijing). These seeds could produce 27.4-31.5 keV X-ray and 35.5 Kev γ ray, with a half-life of 59.6 days. The radioactivity per seed ranged from 0.5 to 0.6 millicuries (mCi).
Sponsors
The Second People's Hospital of GuangDong Province
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
(a) age 18-75 years and refusal to undergo surgery; (b) a solitary HCC 7.0 cm in diameter or smaller or multiple (up to three) HCCs 3.0 cm in diameter or smaller; (c) lesions visible at ultrasonography (US), with an acceptable and safe path between the lesion and the skin seen on the US scan; (d) no extrahepatic metastasis; (e) no imaging evidence of tumor invasion into the major portal or hepatic vein branches; (f) no history of encephalopathy, ascites refractory to diuretics, or variceal bleeding; (g) a platelet count of more than 40 000 cells/mm3 and (h) no previous treatment for HCC except liver resection.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| recurrence rate | up to 6 years | The primary endpoint was the time to recurrence(TTR) was measured from the date of treatment to the time when the recurrent tumor was first diagnosed. At spiral CT after treatment, residual viable tumor tissue was considered to be present if enhancing areas were seen within the tumor on either arterial phase or portal venous phase images. Depending on the initial random treatment assignment, RFA-125I or RFA alone was repeated. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging was performed if there was uncertainty at CT as to whether residual viable tumor tissue was present. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| One-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year overall survival rates | up to 6 years | urvival time was defined as the interval between the first treatment and either death or last follow-up visit. |
| Complete Ablation | up to 6 years | At spiral CT 4 weeks after treatment, residual viable tumor tissue was considered to be present if enhancing areas were seen within the tumor on either arterial phase or portal venous phase images. |
Outcome results
None listed