Skip to content

Deferred Stent Trial in STEMI

Randomised Controlled Study to Assess Whether Deferred Stenting in Acute STEMI Patients Might Reduce the Incidence of No-reflow Versus Conventional Treatment with Immediate Stenting

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01717573
Enrollment
101
Registered
2012-10-30
Start date
2012-03-31
Completion date
2013-05-31
Last updated
2024-10-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Keywords

STEMI, No-reflow, Primary percutaneous intervention, Deferred stenting

Brief summary

During primary PCI, stent deployment and post-dilatation are associated with no-reflow. The mechanisms for no reflow include distal embolization of thrombus, enhanced thrombus formation and vascular spasm. No reflow is associated with risk factors such as prolonged duration of ischaemia, heavy thrombus burden, persistent ST elevation and long stent length. ACTIVE HYPOTHESIS: once normal antegrade flow has been re-established with initial aspiration thrombectomy and/or balloon angioplasty at the beginning of primary PCI, compared with usual care with direct stenting, a strategy of deferred stenting for 4 -16 hours to permit the beneficial effects of normalized coronary blood flow and anti-thrombotic therapies will reduce the incidence of no reflow in at-risk STEMI patients. DESIGN: In consecutive STEMI patients with risk factors for no reflow and who have given informed consent, when normal flow has been established (TIMI 3) by initial aspiration thrombectomy and/or balloon angioplasty, participants will be randomized to deferred stenting or usual care with direct stenting. All patients will receive dual anti-platelet therapy. Patients who are randomized to deferred stenting will receive intravenous glycoprotein IIbIIIa inhibitor and anti-coagulation with low molecular weight heparin. Patients who are screened and not eligible to be randomized will be prospectively entered into a registry. Study assessments for feasibility, safety and efficacy will be prospectively performed. An independent clinical event committee will review all serious adverse events. Study endpoints will be subject to core laboratory analyses. The study is intended to inform the design of a larger multicentre clinical trial.

Interventions

PROCEDUREConventional treatment

Sponsors

British Heart Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Glasgow
CollaboratorOTHER
Health Sciences Scotland
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Chief Scientist Office, Scottish Government
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
NHS National Waiting Times Centre Board
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Rescue PCI * Prolonged ischaemic time (\> 12hours) * Previous MI * Age \> 65 * Occluded artery (TIMI 0/1) at initial angiography * Thrombus burden (TIMI grade 2+) * Long plaque/ stent length (\> 24 mm) * Severe coronary artery disease (e.g calcified artery) * Small reference vessel diameter (\< 2.5 mm) * Persistent ST-elevation (\> 50%) following reperfusion * Index of microvascular resistance (IMR) \> 40

Exclusion criteria

* Absence of normal coronary flow (TIMI 3)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Incidence of angiographic no-reflow/ slow-reflow (TIMI flow grade < 3) in the deferred and conventional treatment groupsAsessed during the 1st (both groups) and 2nd procedures (deferred group) (0-16 hours)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Extent of late microvascular obstruction (MVO) assessed by cardiac MRIMRI 2-5 days post randomisation
Clinical events (hospitalisation for heart failure, re-infarction, cardiac death)Assessed at index admission and 6-months
Degree of ST-segment resolution on ECGECG in cath-lab prior to reperfusion and again 60 mins post-reperfusion
TIMI coronary arter flow gradeAt the beginning and end of the first procedure (for both groups) and at the beginning and end of the second procedure in the deferred group
Culprit vessel dimensions (QCA) and thrombus burdenInitial coronary angiogram (and 2nd angiogram in deferred group)
Change in LV ejection fractionCardiac MRI 2 days and 6-months post PCI
Degree of adverse remodelling (end-systolic and end-diastolic volume index)Cardiac MRI at 6-months
Final infarct size and myocardial salvageAssessed from cardiac MRI day 2-5 and cardiac MRI at 6months
Index of microvascular resistance (IMR)Assessed following stent deployment (initial procedure for the conventional group and 2nd procedure for the deferred group)
Corrected TIMI frame countAt the beginning and end of the first procedure (for both groups) and at the beginning and end of the second procedure in the deferred group
Angiographic tissue myocardial blush gradeAngiographic myocardial blush grade at the end of the first procedure (both groups) and at the end of the second procedure in the deferred group
Intra-procedural thrombotic eventsAsessed during the 1st (both groups) and 2nd procedures (deferred group) (0-16 hours)

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
BleedingIndex hospital admissionBleeding events related to vascular access or non-access site bleeding. Bleeding was defined according to the ACUITY criteria: major bleed = intracranial or intraocular bleeding; bleeding at the site of angiography requiring intervention; a hematoma of 5 cm in diameter; a reduction in hemoglobin level of at least 4 g/dL in the absence of overt bleeding or 3 g/dL with a source of bleeding; or transfusion.
Contrast nephropathyIndex hospitalizationContrast-induced nephropathy was defined as either a greater than 25% increase of serum creatinine or an absolute increase in serum creatinine of 0•5 mg/dL after a radiographic examination using a contrast agent.

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 21, 2026