Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy Study of BondEase to Treat Traumatic Lacerations and Surgical Incisions

A Multi-Center, Prospective, Open-label, Randomized Study of the Safety and Efficacy of BondEase™ Topical Skin Adhesive for the Closure of Traumatic Lacerations and Surgical Incisions

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01716013
Enrollment
162
Registered
2012-10-29
Start date
2012-09-30
Completion date
2014-02-28
Last updated
2017-01-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Traumatic Lacerations or Surgical Incisions

Brief summary

To demonstrate that BondEase™ and conventional wound closure devices (CWCD) are the same in terms of cosmesis (appearance) of the repaired wound when these devices are used for closure of surgical and traumatic wounds . To demonstrate safety of BondEase™.

Detailed description

This is a two-phase, multi-center, prospective, randomized, parallel-group study, in which a total of 153 subjects (102 in the BondEase™ group and 51 in the CWCD group) with traumatic lacerations and incisions will be enrolled. Overall, eligible subjects will be randomized in a pre-defined 2:1 ratio to BondEase™ skin adhesive or CWCD. In Part 1 of the study 30 subjects will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio (BondEase™ : CWCD). This part of the study is designed to assess the feasibility and validate use of the device. Pediatric subjects younger than age 18 will not be included in this part of the trial. The results from these 30 subjects will be compiled and submitted to FDA for review and approval prior to proceeding with Part 2. Part 2 of the study will only be initiated after FDA indicates it is acceptable to begin. In Part 2 of the study a total of 123 subjects will be randomized, of which 82 subjects will be randomized to the BondEase™ group and 41 subjects to the CWCD group. This will result in 102 subjects in the BondEase™ group and 51 subjects in the CWCD group across the both parts of the trial.

Interventions

DEVICEBondEase

topical skin adhesive

PROCEDURECWCD

traditional closure methods of sutures, staples or adhesive strips

Sponsors

OptMed, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Male and female subjects at least 1 year of age (for Part 2 only) or at least 18 years of age (for both Part 1 and Part 2). 2. Has a wound requiring surgical repair, where the use of a tissue adhesive is appropriate 3. Is in good general health 4. Subject or the guardian understands and is willing to sign informed consent prior to study entry and agrees to be available for the Day 10, Day 28, and Day 90 (Part 1/pilot phase only) follow-up visits

Exclusion criteria

1. Significant or multiple traumas 2. Known peripheral vascular disease 3. Known diabetes mellitus type 1 or type 2 4. Known blood clotting disorder 5. Patient or family history of keloid formation or hypertrophy 6. Known HIV seropositivity or is immunocompromised 7. Been treated with an investigational drug or medical device in the past 30 days 8. A hypersensitivity or contraindication to any of the components of BondEase™ 9. Known pre-operative systemic or local infection 10. Any other diseases or conditions which might interfere with the wound healing process 11. The wound to be treated with the test device may not have any of the following characteristics: * A burst or stellate laceration * Heavily contaminated (Contaminated Wound: wounds that are grossly contaminated with foreign material requiring extensive cleansing. * Human or animal bite * Decubitus etiology * Evidence of active infection or gangrene * On mucosal surfaces or across mucocutaneous junctions (e.g., oral cavity, lips) * On an area which may be regularly exposed to body fluids or with dense natural hair, (e.g., scalp) * Under tension or over a joint

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
100% Wound Apposition at 10 Days10 daysPercentage of subjects in whom 100% wound edge apposition is achieved at 10 days (±3 days) post-procedure.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
≥ 50% Wound Apposition at 10 Days10 daysIncidence of wounds ≥50% apposed (10 ± 3 days)
Optimal Cosmetic Outcome at 28 Days (Score of 6)28 daysIncidence of wounds with an optimal cosmetic outcome (score of 6) at 28 days. One point was scored for the absence of, and no point was scored for the presence of, any of the following six items: * Stepoff of borders (edges not on the same plane) * Contour irregularities (wrinkled skin near wound) * Margin separation (gap between sides) * Edge inversion (wound not properly everted) * Excessive distortion (swelling or edema or infection) * Poor overall appearance. The overall cosmesis score was determined by adding the scores of each individual item. An overall score of six was considered an optimal score outcome. Any score below six was considered suboptimal.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Wound Dehiscence Requiring Treatment28 Days and 90 daysWound dehiscence requiring treatment; i.e., need for supplemental closure due to dehiscence at any time, from closure through follow-up

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
BondEase
Topical Skin Adhesive BondEase: topical skin adhesive
105
CWCD
Conventional Wound Closure Devices (CWCD) including: sutures, staples, or adhesive strips CWCD: traditional closure methods of sutures, staples or adhesive strips
54
Total159

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCWCDBondEaseTotal
Age, Continuous47.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.3
44.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.1
45.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.8
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
5 Participants21 Participants26 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
49 Participants84 Participants133 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Gender
Female
24 Participants49 Participants73 Participants
Gender
Male
30 Participants56 Participants86 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
7 Participants16 Participants23 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants4 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
46 Participants83 Participants129 Participants
Wound type
Injury (Laceration)
13 participants27 participants40 participants
Wound type
Surgical incision
41 participants78 participants119 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
14 / 1056 / 54
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1050 / 54

Outcome results

Primary

100% Wound Apposition at 10 Days

Percentage of subjects in whom 100% wound edge apposition is achieved at 10 days (±3 days) post-procedure.

Time frame: 10 days

Population: Per protocol population (primary analysis dataset)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BondEase100% Wound Apposition at 10 Days77.1 percentage of participants
CWCD100% Wound Apposition at 10 Days80.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

≥ 50% Wound Apposition at 10 Days

Incidence of wounds ≥50% apposed (10 ± 3 days)

Time frame: 10 days

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BondEase≥ 50% Wound Apposition at 10 Days93.3 percentage of participants
CWCD≥ 50% Wound Apposition at 10 Days96.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Optimal Cosmetic Outcome at 28 Days (Score of 6)

Incidence of wounds with an optimal cosmetic outcome (score of 6) at 28 days. One point was scored for the absence of, and no point was scored for the presence of, any of the following six items: * Stepoff of borders (edges not on the same plane) * Contour irregularities (wrinkled skin near wound) * Margin separation (gap between sides) * Edge inversion (wound not properly everted) * Excessive distortion (swelling or edema or infection) * Poor overall appearance. The overall cosmesis score was determined by adding the scores of each individual item. An overall score of six was considered an optimal score outcome. Any score below six was considered suboptimal.

Time frame: 28 days

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BondEaseOptimal Cosmetic Outcome at 28 Days (Score of 6)70.5 percentage of participants
CWCDOptimal Cosmetic Outcome at 28 Days (Score of 6)64.8 percentage of participants
Other Pre-specified

Wound Dehiscence Requiring Treatment

Wound dehiscence requiring treatment; i.e., need for supplemental closure due to dehiscence at any time, from closure through follow-up

Time frame: 28 Days and 90 days

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BondEaseWound Dehiscence Requiring Treatment0 percentage of participants
CWCDWound Dehiscence Requiring Treatment0 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026