Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety Study of Abatacept to Treat Lupus Nephritis

A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of BMS-188667 (Abatacept) or Placebo on a Background of Mycophenolate Mofetil and Corticosteroids in the Treatment of Subjects With Active Class III or IV Lupus Nephritis

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01714817
Enrollment
695
Registered
2012-10-26
Start date
2013-01-22
Completion date
2018-05-30
Last updated
2021-02-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lupus Nephritis

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate (Abatacept) for treatment of lupus nephritis when used on a background of Cellcept (mycophenolate) and prednisone (corticosteroids)

Interventions

BIOLOGICALBMS-188667
DRUGMycophenolate mofetil
DRUGPrednisone
BIOLOGICALPlacebo matching with BMS-188667

Sponsors

Bristol-Myers Squibb
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

For additional information please contact the BMS Lupus Nephritis Clinical Trial Matching Service at 855-56-LUPUS. Please visit www.BMSStudyConnect.com for more information on clinical trial participation. Note: Subjects \> 16 are eligible for enrollment at selected centers Inclusion Criteria: * Potential subjects must have active lupus nephritis * Biopsy within 12 months prior to screening visit indicating active Class 3 or 4 proliferative lupus glomerulonephritis (lupus effecting your kidney) * Urine protein creatinine ratio (UPCR) ≥ 1 at Screening * Serum creatinine ≤ 3 mg/dL (ie, ≤ 265 micromol/L) * There must also be evidence of active disease within 3 months of Screening, based on at least one of the following: * Worsening of lupus nephritis OR * UPCR ≥ 3 at Screening OR * Active urine sediment OR * Biopsy within 3 months prior to screening visit indicating active Class 3 or Class 4 active proliferative lupus glomerulonephritis Inclusion Criteria for the Long-Term Extension Period: * Signed Written Informed Consent * Subjects who achieve a complete or partial renal response after completing 2 years of double-blind treatment

Exclusion criteria

* Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) must be the primary/main autoimmune diagnosis * Current symptoms of severe, progressive, or uncontrolled non-SLE related renal, hepatic, hematological, gastrointestinal, pulmonary, cardiac, neurological, or cerebral disease, or other concomitant medical conditions that, in the opinion of the Investigator, might place the subject at unacceptable risk for participation in this study * Significant active Central nervous system (CNS) lupus with the exception of fatigue or mild stable cognitive * Subjects who are diagnosed as end-stage renal disease or whose kidney damage is too significant and irreversible

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants in Complete Renal Response (CR) of Lupus Glomerulonephritis at Day 365 of the Double-blind PeriodDay 365Number of participants achieving CR was divided by the total number of participants in that arm and expressed as a percentage. CR defined as: eGFR is normal or no \<85% of the baseline; eGFR based on mean creatinine value from day 358 and 365. Proteinuria: UPCR\<0.5 mg/mg. Urine sediment: No cellular casts. Corticosteroid dose: Daily dose must be no \>10 mg prednisone or equiv. for at least 28 days prior to assessment. Participants with \>10mg/day prednisone or equivalent for non-renal disease within 28 days prior to day 365 will be imputed as having achieved CR if the following are true: Met all criteria for CR at day 337 and all criteria for CR except corticosteroid dose at day 365; Investigator confirms increase in steroid dose is not related to renal disease. Adjusted odds ratio is estimated from logistic regression model which includes treatment group, baseline ACEi/ARBs use (Yes/No), race (Asian/ Black/Caucasian/Other) and baseline UPCR as a continuous variable.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Urine Protein/Creatinine Ratio (UPCR) at Day 365 of the Double-blind Period in Nephrotic ParticipantsBaseline and Day 365Adjusted Mean Change from Baseline in UPCR at Day 365 of the double-blind period in nephrotic participants
Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in UPCR at Day 365 of the Double-blind Period in Overall PopulationDay 1 and Day 365Adjusted Mean Change from Baseline in Urine protein/creatinine ratio (UPCR) at Day 365 of the double-blind period in the overall population
Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in UPCR Over TimeDay 365; Day 729, includes data up to July 1st 2017 when double-blind therapy endedA repeated measure mixed model that included the baseline UPCR value, randomization stratification factors, time, and time by treatment interaction as fixed effects and subject as a random effect was used.
Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Disease Activity as Measured by BILAG 2004 Over Time During Year 1 of the Double-blind PeriodDay 1 to Day 365Adjusted mean change from baseline in British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) score over time during Year 1 of the double-blind period based on a repeated measure mixed model and presented at each visit in the first 12-month of the double-blind period. BILAG index measures disease activity in different organs/systems separately. BILAG score is calculated for each of 9 systems depending on the clinical features present and whether they are new (4 points), worse (3 points), the same (2 points), improving (1 point) or not present (0 points) in the last 4 weeks compared with previously. BILAG A represents the presence of serious features of lupus. BILAG B represents more moderate features of the disease. BILAG C includes only mild symptomatic features. BILAG D represents prior activity with no current symptoms due to active lupus. BILAG E represents an organ that has never been involved. Overall BILAG score ranges from 0-108, with higher scores reflecting a worse outcome.
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AEs) During Year 1 of the Double-blind PeriodFrom Day 1 up to 56 days post last dose in Year 1 of the double-blind periodAll AEs were coded and grouped into preferred terms (PT) by system organ class (SOC), using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA, version 21.0). Investigators determined the intensity of each AE as mild, moderate, severe, or very severe and assessed the relationship to study drug.
Percentage of Participants With Ranked Outcome of Complete Renal Response, Partial Renal Response (PR), and No Renal Response (NR) During the Double-blind PeriodDay 365, Day 729Complete Renal Response or Complete Response (CR): defined as meeting ALL of the following criteria: eGFR normal OR no less than 85% of the baseline value; UPCR \< 0.5; Urine sediment: No cellular casts; Daily corticosteroid dose must be no greater than 10 mg prednisone or equivalent for at least 28 days prior to assessment. Partial Renal Response or Partial Response (PR): defined as meeting ALL of the following criteria: Participant does not meet criteria for CR; eGFR no less than 85% of the lesser of the values at screening or randomization (Day 1); UPCR \< 0.5 OR 50% reduced from baseline and \< 1 if baseline value was \< 3, OR 50% reduced from baseline and \< 3 if baseline value was greater than or equal to 3; Urine sediment: no cellular casts; daily corticosteroid dose no greater than 10 mg/day prednisone or prednisone equivalent for at least 28 days prior to assessment. No Renal Response or No Response (NR): defined as not meeting criteria for CR or PR or withdrawn
Median Percent Change From Baseline in UPCR Over TimeDay 365, Day 729A repeated measure mixed model that included the baseline UPCR value, randomization stratification factors, time, and time by treatment interaction as fixed effects and subject as a random effect was used. % Change from Baseline = (post baseline - baseline value) / baseline value x 100
Median Time to Complete Renal Response During the Double-blind Period in All ParticipantsDay 365, Day 729The estimate of median time to Complete Renal Response is based on Kaplan-Meier analysis. Complete renal response (CR): defined as meeting ALL of the following criteria: eGFR normal OR no less than 85% of the baseline value; Urine protein/creatinine ratio (UPCR) \< 0.5; Urine sediment: No cellular casts; Daily corticosteroid dose must be no greater than 10 mg prednisone or equivalent for at least 28 days prior to assessment.
Median Time to Complete Renal Response During the Double-blind Period in Nephrotic ParticipantsDay 365, Day 729The estimate of median time to Complete Renal Response in nephrotic participants is based on Kaplan-Meier analysis. Complete renal response (CR): defined as meeting ALL of the following criteria: eGFR normal OR no less than 85% of the baseline value; Urine protein/creatinine ratio (UPCR) \< 0.5; Urine sediment: No cellular casts; Daily corticosteroid dose must be no greater than 10 mg prednisone or equivalent for at least 28 days prior to assessment.
Median Time to Partial Renal Response During the Double-blind Period in All ParticipantsDay 365, Day 729The estimate of median time to Partial Response (PR) is based on Kaplan-Meier analysis. Partial renal response (PR): defined as meeting ALL of the following criteria: Participant does not meet criteria for CR; eGFR no less than 85% of the lesser of the values at screening or randomization (Day 1); UPCR \< 0.5 OR 50% reduced from baseline and \< 1 if baseline value was \< 3, OR 50% reduced from baseline and \< 3 if baseline value was 3; Urine sediment: no cellular casts; daily corticosteroid dose no greater than 10 mg/day prednisone or prednisone equivalent for at least 28 days prior to assessment
Median Time to Partial Renal Response During the Double-blind Period in Nephrotic ParticipantsDay 365, Day 729The estimate of median time to Partial Response (PR) in nephrotic participants is based on Kaplan-Meier analysis. Partial renal response (PR): defined as meeting ALL of the following criteria: Participant does not meet criteria for CR; eGFR no less than 85% of the lesser of the values at screening or randomization (Day 1); UPCR \< 0.5 OR 50% reduced from baseline and \< 1 if baseline value was \< 3, OR 50% reduced from baseline and \< 3 if baseline value was 3; Urine sediment: no cellular casts; daily corticosteroid dose no greater than 10 mg/day prednisone or prednisone equivalent for at least 28 days prior to assessment
Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in eGFR Over TimeDay 365, Day 729Estimated glomerular filtration rate(eGFR), will be calculated by the CKD-EPI formula shown below.50 eGFR is expressed as mL/min per 1.73m2. For the purpose of this study lower limit of normal eGFR is defined as 90mL/min per 1.73m2 eGFR = 141 X min (Scr/k, 1)α X max (Scr/k, 1)-1.209 X 0.993Age X (1.018 \[if female\]) X (1.159 \[if black\]) Where Scr is serum creatinine (mg/dL), k is 0.7 for females and 0.9 for males, α is -0.329 for females and -0.411 for males, min indicates the minimum of Scr/k or 1, and max indicates the maximum of Scr/k or 1, age in years.
Median Time to First Sustained Change to No Response During the Double-blind PeriodDay 365, Day 729Sustained response defined as response present at 2 consecutive visits approximately 4 weeks apart. No renal response (NR): defined as not meeting criteria for CR or PR or withdrawn The estimate of median time is based on Kaplan-Meier analysis
Number of Participants With Sustained Change From Higher Level of Response to no Response During the Double-blind PeriodDay 365, Day 729Sustained change to no response is defined as going from CR (or PR) to NR and remaining in NR for at least 2 consecutive visits; visits should be approximately 4 weeks apart. This analysis will be based on time from response CR (or PR) to the first visit in which the no response (NR) was achieved and sustained to the next visit.
Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Disease Activity as Measured by BILAG 2004 Over Time During the Double-blind PeriodDay 1 to Day 729; Day 365 to Day 729BILAG index measures and reports disease activity in different organs/systems separately. The BILAG score is calculated for each of nine systems depending on the clinical features present and whether they are new (4 points), worse (3 points), the same (2 points), improving (1 point) or not present (0 points) in the last 4 weeks compared with previously. A BILAG A represents the presence of one or more serious features of lupus. A BILAG B represents more moderate features of the disease. A BILAG C includes only mild symptomatic features. A BILAG D represents only prior activity with no current symptoms due to active lupus. A BILAG E represents an organ that has never been involved. Overall BILAG score ranges from 0-108, with higher scores reflecting a worse outcome.
Cmin (ug/mL): Trough Level Serum Concentration of Abatacept Prior to the Administration of the IV InfusionDays 1 to 365Trough level serum concentration of abatacept prior to the administration of the IV infusion on Days 1 to 365
Cmax: Maximum Observed Serum Concentration Following Participants Receiving Active Abatacept IVat 1 hour post Day 1 dose and 30 minutes post Day 337 doseCmax: Maximum observed serum concentration following participants receiving active abatacept IV
AUC (TAU): Area Under the Serum Concentration Time Curve Over a Dosing IntervalDays 337 to 365AUC (TAU): Area under the serum concentration time curve over a dosing interval between Days 337 to 365.
Summary Statistics for Systolic Blood PressureDay 1 to Day 729Summary statistics for systolic blood pressure
Summary Statistics for Diastolic Blood PressureDay 1 to Day 729Summary statistics for diastolic blood pressure
Summary Statistics for Heart RateDay 1 to Day 729Summary statistics for Heart Rate
Mean Change From Baseline in Laboratory Analytes During the Double-blind Period (U/L)Day 729Laboratory assessments were analyzed centrally, with the exception of pregnancy testing. Blood draws and urine collections were performed at visits specified in the protocol. Change from Baseline = Post-baseline - Baseline value.
Mean Change From Baseline in Laboratory Analytes During the Double-blind Period (g/L)Day 729Laboratory assessments were analyzed centrally, with the exception of pregnancy testing. Blood draws and urine collections were performed at visits specified in the protocol. Change from Baseline = Post-baseline - Baseline value.
Mean Change From Baseline in Laboratory Analytes During the Double-blind Period (Percentage of Blood)Day 729Laboratory assessments were analyzed centrally, with the exception of pregnancy testing. Blood draws and urine collections were performed at visits specified in the protocol. Change from Baseline = Post-baseline - Baseline value.
Mean Change From Baseline in Laboratory Analytes During the Double-blind Period (Umol/L)Day 729Laboratory assessments were analyzed centrally, with the exception of pregnancy testing. Blood draws and urine collections were performed at visits specified in the protocol. Change from Baseline = Post-baseline - Baseline value.
Mean Change From Baseline in Laboratory Analytes During the Double-blind Period (mmol/L)Day 729Laboratory assessments were analyzed centrally, with the exception of pregnancy testing. Blood draws and urine collections were performed at visits specified in the protocol. Change from Baseline = Post-baseline - Baseline value.
Mean Change From Baseline in Laboratory Analytes During the Double-blind Period (x10^9 Cells/L)Day 729Laboratory assessments were analyzed centrally, with the exception of pregnancy testing. Blood draws and urine collections were performed at visits specified in the protocol. Change from Baseline = Post-baseline - Baseline value.
Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodDay 1 to Day 365; includes data up to 56 days post last dose in year 1 of double-blind period or first dose date in the year 2 of double-blind period, whichever is earlierLLN= Lower limit of normals ULN= Upper limit of normals Pre RX = Baseline value HEMOGLOBIN g/L 4.0 HB \>3 G/DL DECREASE FROM PRE RX HEMATOCRIT vol 6.3 HCT \<0.75X PRE RX ERYTHROCYTES x10\*12 c/L 5.2 RBC \<0.75X PRE RX PLATELET COUNT x10\*9 c/L 5.0 PLAT \<0.67X LLN OR \>1.5X ULN, OR IF PRE RX\<LLN THEN USE 0.5X PRE RX AND \<100,000/MM3 LEUKOCYTES x10\*9 c/L 6.2 WBC \<0.75X LLN OR \>1.25X ULN, OR IF PRE RX\<LLN THEN USE \<0.8X PRE RX OR \>ULN, OR IF PRE RX\>ULN THEN USE \>1.2X PRE RX OR \<LLN EOSINOPHILS (ABSOLUTE) x10\*9 c/L 8.3 EOSA IF VALUE \> .750 X10\*3 c/uL BASOPHILS (ABSOLUTE) x10\*9 c/L 8.3 BASOA IF VALUE \> 400/MM3 MONOCYTES (ABSOLUTE) x10\*9 c/L 8.3 MONOA IF VALUE \> 2000/MM3 LYMPHOCYTES (ABSOLUTE) x10\*9 c/L 8.3 LYMPA IF VALUE \< .750 X10\*3 c/uL OR IF VALUE \> 7.50 X10\*3 c/uL N = the number of participants with at least 1 on treatment lab result for each analyte
Number of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodDay 1 to Day 365; includes data up to 56 days post last dose in year 1 of double-blind period or first dose date in the year 2 of double-blind period, whichever is earlierLLN= Lower limit of normals ULN= Upper limit of normals Pre RX = Baseline value ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE (ALP) U/L 5.0 ALP \>2X ULN, OR IF PRE RX\>ULN THEN USE \>3X PRE RX ASPARTATE AMINOTRANSFERASE (AST) U/L 5.0 AST \>3X ULN, OR IF PRE RX\>ULN THEN USE \>4X PRE RX ALANINE AMINOTRANSFERASE (ALT) U/L 5.0 ALT \>3X ULN, OR IF PRE RX\>ULN THEN USE \>4X PRE RX G-GLUTAMYL TRANSFERASE (GGT) U/L 5.0 GGT \>2X ULN, OR IF PRE RX\>ULN THEN USE \>3X PRE RX BILIRUBIN, TOTAL umol/L 5.1 TBILI \>2X ULN, OR IF PRE RX\>ULN THEN USE \>4X PRE RX BILIRUBIN, DIRECT umol/L 5.1 DBILI \>1.5X ULN, OR IF PRE RX\>ULN THEN USE \>2X PRE RX BLOOD UREA NITROGEN mmol/L 5.1 BUN \>2X PRE RX CREATININE umol/L 5.0 CREAT \>1.5X PRE RX N = the number of participants with at least 1 on treatment lab result for each analyte
Number of Participants With Marked Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodDay 1 to Day 365; includes data up to 56 days post last dose in year 1 of double-blind period or first dose date in the year 2 of double-blind period, whichever is earlierLLN= Lower limit of normals ULN= Upper limit of normals Pre RX = Baseline value SODIUM, SERUM mmol/L 4.0 NA \<0.95X LLN OR \>1.05X ULN, OR IF PRE RX\<LLN THEN USE \<0.95X PRE RX OR \>ULN, OR IF PRE RX\>ULN THEN USE \>1.05X PRE RX OR \<LLN POTASSIUM, SERUM mmol/L 4.1 K \<0.9X LLN OR \>1.1X ULN, OR IF PRE RX\<LLN THEN USE \<0.9X PRE RX OR \>ULN, OR IF PRE RX\>ULN THEN USE \>1.1X PRE RX OR \<LLN CHLORIDE, SERUM mmol/L 5.0 CL \<0.9X LLN OR \>1.1X ULN, OR IF PRE RX\<LLN THEN USE \<0.9X PRE RX OR \>ULN, OR IF PRE RX\>ULN THEN USE \>1.1X PRE RX OR \<LLN N = the number of participants with at least 1 on treatment lab result for each analyte
Number of Participants With Marked Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodDay 1 to Day 365; includes data up to 56 days post last dose in year 1 of double-blind period or first dose date in the year 2 of double-blind period, whichever is earlierLLN= Lower limit of normals ULN= Upper limit of normals Pre RX = Baseline value PROTEIN, URINE Unknown UPRO IF MISSING PRE THEN USE \>=2, OR IF VALUE \>=4, OR IF PRE RX =0 OR 0.5 THEN USE \>=2, OR IF PRE RX =1 THEN USE \>=3, OR IF PRE RX =2 OR 3 THEN USE \>=4 GLUCOSE, URINE N/A UGLU IF MISSING PRE THEN USE \>=2, OR IF VALUE \>=4, OR IF PRE RX =0 OR 0.5 THEN USE \>=2, OR IF PRE RX =1 THEN USE \>=3, OR IF PRE RX =2 OR 3 THEN USE \>=4 BLOOD, URINE N/A UBLD IF MISSING PRE THEN USE \>=2, OR IF VALUE \>=4, OR IF PRE RX =0 OR 0.5 THEN USE \>=2, OR IF PRE RX =1 THEN USE \>=3, OR IF PRE RX =2 OR 3 THEN USE \>=4 RBC, URINE hpf 5.0 URBC IF MISSING PRE THEN USE \>=2, OR IF VALUE \>=4, OR IF PRE RX =0 OR 0.5 THEN USE \>=2, OR IF PRE RX =1 THEN USE \>=3, OR IF PRE RX =2 OR 3 THEN USE \>=4 WBC, URINE hpf 5.0 UWBC IF MISSING PRE THEN USE \>=2, OR IF VALUE \>=4, OR IF PRE RX =0 OR 0.5 THEN USE \>=2, OR IF PRE RX =1 THEN USE \>=3, OR IF PRE RX =2 OR 3 THEN USE \>=4
Number of Participants With Other Marked Chemistry Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodDay 1 to Day 365; includes data up to 56 days post last dose in year 1 of double-blind period or first dose date in the year 2 of double-blind period, whichever is earlierLLN= Lower limit of normals ULN= Upper limit of normals Pre RX = Baseline value CALCIUM, TOTAL mmol/L 5.2 CA \<0.8X LLN OR \>1.2X ULN, OR IF PRE RX\<LLN THEN USE \<0.75X PRE RX OR \>ULN, OR IF PRE RX\>ULN THEN USE \>1.25X PRE RX OR \<LLN PHOSPHORUS, INORGANIC mmol/L 5.2 PHOS \<0.75X LLN OR \>1.25X ULN, OR IF PRE RX\<LLN THEN USE \<0.67X PRE RX OR \>ULN GLUCOSE, SERUM mmol/L 4.1 GLUC \<65 mg/dL, OR \>220 mg/dL PROTEIN, TOTAL g/L 5.0 TPRO \<0.9X LLN OR \>1.1X ULN, OR IF PRE RX\<LLN THEN USE 0.9X PRE RX OR \>ULN, OR IF PRE RX\>ULN THEN USE 1.1X PRE RX OR \<LLN ALBUMIN g/L 3.0 ALB \<0.9X LLN, OR IF PRE RX\<LLN THEN USE \<0.75X PRE RX CHOLESTEROL, TOTAL (TC) mmol/L 5.2 CHOL \>2X PRE R N = the number of participants with at least 1 on treatment lab result for each analyte
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AEs) During Year 2 of the Double-blind Period and Long-term ExtensionFrom the first dose in Year 2 of the double-blind period up to 56 days post last doseAll AEs were coded and grouped into preferred terms (PT) by system organ class (SOC), using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA, version 21.0). Investigators determined the intensity of each AE as mild, moderate, severe, or very severe and assessed the relationship to study drug.
Percentage of Participants in Treatment Failure Over Time During the Double-blind PeriodDay 365, Day 729Lupus treatment failure is defined as any of the following: Death, unless due to physical trauma or violence; Renal Flare; sustained doubling of creatinine from baseline (greater of Screening or Study Day 1 value); initiation of rescue therapy for treatment of active lupus nephritis after Study Week 20. Overall treatment failure is defined as lupus treatment failure plus discontinuation of study drug for any reason except death due to physical trauma or violence, pregnancy or administrative decision by Sponsor.
Median Time to First Treatment Failure and Overall Treatment Failure During the Double-blind PeriodDay 365, Day 729First treatment failure (or Lupus treatment failure) is defined as any of the following: Death, unless due to physical trauma or violence; Renal Flare; sustained doubling of creatinine from baseline (greater of Screening or Study Day 1 value); initiation of rescue therapy for treatment of active lupus nephritis after Study Week 20. Overall treatment failure is defined as lupus treatment failure plus discontinuation of study drug for any reason except death due to physical trauma or violence, pregnancy or administrative decision by Sponsor. The hazard ratio is estimated using the Cox proportional hazards model which includes treatment group, stratification variables (baseline ACEis/ARBs use, RACE) and baseline UPCR. The estimate of median time is based on Kaplan-Meier analysis
Percentage of Nephrotic Participants in Complete Renal Response of Lupus Glomerulonephritis at Day 729 of the Double-blind PeriodDay 729Number of participants achieving CR was divided by total participants in that arm, expressed as a percentage. CR is defined the following criteria: eGFR is normal or no \<85% of the baseline value; eGFR is based on mean creatinine value from day 358 and 365. Proteinuria: UPCR\<0.5 mg/mg. Urine sediment: No cellular casts. Corticosteroid dose: Daily dose must be no \>10 mg prednisone or equivalent for at least 28 days prior. Subjects with \>10mg/day prednisone or equivalent for non-renal disease within 28 days prior to day 365 will be imputed as CR if the following are true: Met all criteria for CR at day 337 and all criteria for CR except corticosteroid dose at day 365; Investigator confirms increase in steroid dose is not related to renal disease. Adjusted odds ratio is estimated from logistic regression model which includes treatment group, baseline ACEi/ARBs use, race and baseline UPCR as a continuous variable.
Number of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodDay 1 to Day 729LLN= Lower limit of normals ULN= Upper limit of normals Pre RX = Baseline value ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE (ALP) U/L 5.0 ALP \>2X ULN, OR IF PRE RX\>ULN THEN USE \>3X PRE RX ASPARTATE AMINOTRANSFERASE (AST) U/L 5.0 AST \>3X ULN, OR IF PRE RX\>ULN THEN USE \>4X PRE RX ALANINE AMINOTRANSFERASE (ALT) U/L 5.0 ALT \>3X ULN, OR IF PRE RX\>ULN THEN USE \>4X PRE RX G-GLUTAMYL TRANSFERASE (GGT) U/L 5.0 GGT \>2X ULN, OR IF PRE RX\>ULN THEN USE \>3X PRE RX BILIRUBIN, TOTAL umol/L 5.1 TBILI \>2X ULN, OR IF PRE RX\>ULN THEN USE \>4X PRE RX BILIRUBIN, DIRECT umol/L 5.1 DBILI \>1.5X ULN, OR IF PRE RX\>ULN THEN USE \>2X PRE RX BLOOD UREA NITROGEN mmol/L 5.1 BUN \>2X PRE RX CREATININE umol/L 5.0 CREAT \>1.5X PRE RX N = the number of participants with at least 1 on treatment lab result for each analyte
Percentage of Participants in Overall Population in Complete Renal Response of Lupus Glomerulonephritis at Day 729 of the Double-blind PeriodDay 729Number of participants achieving CR was divided by total participants in that arm, expressed as a percentage. CR is defined the following criteria: eGFR is normal or no \<85% of the baseline value; eGFR is based on mean creatinine value from day 358 and 365. Proteinuria: UPCR\<0.5 mg/mg. Urine sediment: No cellular casts. Corticosteroid dose: Daily dose must be no \>10 mg prednisone or equivalent for at least 28 days prior. Subjects with \>10mg/day prednisone or equivalent for non-renal disease within 28 days prior to day 365 will be imputed as CR if the following are true: Met all criteria for CR at day 337 and all criteria for CR except corticosteroid dose at day 365; Investigator confirms increase in steroid dose is not related to renal disease. Adjusted odds ratio is estimated from logistic regression model which includes treatment group, baseline ACEi/ARBs use, race and baseline UPCR as a continuous variable.
Percentage of Nephrotic Participants in Complete Renal Response of Lupus Glomerulonephritis at Day 365 of the Double-blind PeriodDay 365Number of participants achieving CR was divided by total participants in that arm, expressed as a percentage. CR is defined the following criteria: eGFR is normal or no \<85% of the baseline value; eGFR is based on mean creatinine value from day 358 and 365. Proteinuria: UPCR\<0.5 mg/mg. Urine sediment: No cellular casts. Corticosteroid dose: Daily dose must be no \>10 mg prednisone or equivalent for at least 28 days prior. Subjects with \>10mg/day prednisone or equivalent for non-renal disease within 28 days prior to day 365 will be imputed as CR if the following are true: Met all criteria for CR at day 337 and all criteria for CR except corticosteroid dose at day 365; Investigator confirms increase in steroid dose is not related to renal disease. Adjusted odds ratio is estimated from logistic regression model which includes treatment group, baseline ACEi/ARBs use, race and baseline UPCR as a continuous variable.
Number of Participants With Marked Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodDay 1 to Day 729LLN= Lower limit of normals ULN= Upper limit of normals Pre RX = Baseline value SODIUM, SERUM mmol/L 4.0 NA \<0.95X LLN OR \>1.05X ULN, OR IF PRE RX\<LLN THEN USE \<0.95X PRE RX OR \>ULN, OR IF PRE RX\>ULN THEN USE \>1.05X PRE RX OR \<LLN POTASSIUM, SERUM mmol/L 4.1 K \<0.9X LLN OR \>1.1X ULN, OR IF PRE RX\<LLN THEN USE \<0.9X PRE RX OR \>ULN, OR IF PRE RX\>ULN THEN USE \>1.1X PRE RX OR \<LLN CHLORIDE, SERUM mmol/L 5.0 CL \<0.9X LLN OR \>1.1X ULN, OR IF PRE RX\<LLN THEN USE \<0.9X PRE RX OR \>ULN, OR IF PRE RX\>ULN THEN USE \>1.1X PRE RX OR \<LLN N = the number of participants with at least 1 on treatment lab result for each analyte
Number of Participants With Marked Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodDay 1 to Day 729LLN= Lower limit of normals ULN= Upper limit of normals Pre RX = Baseline value PROTEIN, URINE Unknown UPRO IF MISSING PRE THEN USE \>=2, OR IF VALUE \>=4, OR IF PRE RX =0 OR 0.5 THEN USE \>=2, OR IF PRE RX =1 THEN USE \>=3, OR IF PRE RX =2 OR 3 THEN USE \>=4 GLUCOSE, URINE N/A UGLU IF MISSING PRE THEN USE \>=2, OR IF VALUE \>=4, OR IF PRE RX =0 OR 0.5 THEN USE \>=2, OR IF PRE RX =1 THEN USE \>=3, OR IF PRE RX =2 OR 3 THEN USE \>=4 BLOOD, URINE N/A UBLD IF MISSING PRE THEN USE \>=2, OR IF VALUE \>=4, OR IF PRE RX =0 OR 0.5 THEN USE \>=2, OR IF PRE RX =1 THEN USE \>=3, OR IF PRE RX =2 OR 3 THEN USE \>=4 RBC, URINE hpf 5.0 URBC IF MISSING PRE THEN USE \>=2, OR IF VALUE \>=4, OR IF PRE RX =0 OR 0.5 THEN USE \>=2, OR IF PRE RX =1 THEN USE \>=3, OR IF PRE RX =2 OR 3 THEN USE \>=4 WBC, URINE hpf 5.0 UWBC IF MISSING PRE THEN USE \>=2, OR IF VALUE \>=4, OR IF PRE RX =0 OR 0.5 THEN USE \>=2, OR IF PRE RX =1 THEN USE \>=3, OR IF PRE RX =2 OR 3 THEN USE \>=4
Number of Participants With Other Marked Chemistry Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodDay 1 to Day 729LLN= Lower limit of normals ULN= Upper limit of normals Pre RX = Baseline value CALCIUM, TOTAL mmol/L 5.2 CA \<0.8X LLN OR \>1.2X ULN, OR IF PRE RX\<LLN THEN USE \<0.75X PRE RX OR \>ULN, OR IF PRE RX\>ULN THEN USE \>1.25X PRE RX OR \<LLN PHOSPHORUS, INORGANIC mmol/L 5.2 PHOS \<0.75X LLN OR \>1.25X ULN, OR IF PRE RX\<LLN THEN USE \<0.67X PRE RX OR \>ULN GLUCOSE, SERUM mmol/L 4.1 GLUC \<65 mg/dL, OR \>220 mg/dL PROTEIN, TOTAL g/L 5.0 TPRO \<0.9X LLN OR \>1.1X ULN, OR IF PRE RX\<LLN THEN USE 0.9X PRE RX OR \>ULN, OR IF PRE RX\>ULN THEN USE 1.1X PRE RX OR \<LLN ALBUMIN g/L 3.0 ALB \<0.9X LLN, OR IF PRE RX\<LLN THEN USE \<0.75X PRE RX CHOLESTEROL, TOTAL (TC) mmol/L 5.2 CHOL \>2X PRE R N = the number of participants with at least 1 on treatment lab result for each analyte
Number of Participants With Abatacept Induced Antibody Response Over Time in the Double-blind PeriodDay 365, Day 729Participants who experienced a positive antibody response relative to baseline (ECL Assay)
Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodDay 1 to Day 729LLN= Lower limit of normals ULN= Upper limit of normals Pre RX = Baseline value HEMOGLOBIN g/L 4.0 HB \>3 G/DL DECREASE FROM PRE RX HEMATOCRIT vol 6.3 HCT \<0.75X PRE RX ERYTHROCYTES x10\*12 c/L 5.2 RBC \<0.75X PRE RX PLATELET COUNT x10\*9 c/L 5.0 PLAT \<0.67X LLN OR \>1.5X ULN, OR IF PRE RX\<LLN THEN USE 0.5X PRE RX AND \<100,000/MM3 LEUKOCYTES x10\*9 c/L 6.2 WBC \<0.75X LLN OR \>1.25X ULN, OR IF PRE RX\<LLN THEN USE \<0.8X PRE RX OR \>ULN, OR IF PRE RX\>ULN THEN USE \>1.2X PRE RX OR \<LLN EOSINOPHILS (ABSOLUTE) x10\*9 c/L 8.3 EOSA IF VALUE \> .750 X10\*3 c/uL BASOPHILS (ABSOLUTE) x10\*9 c/L 8.3 BASOA IF VALUE \> 400/MM3 MONOCYTES (ABSOLUTE) x10\*9 c/L 8.3 MONOA IF VALUE \> 2000/MM3 LYMPHOCYTES (ABSOLUTE) x10\*9 c/L 8.3 LYMPA IF VALUE \< .750 X10\*3 c/uL OR IF VALUE \> 7.50 X10\*3 c/uL N = the number of participants with at least 1 on treatment lab result for each analyte

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, China, Colombia, Czechia, Hong Kong, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Peru, Puerto Rico, Romania, Russia, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, Turkey (Türkiye), United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Overall, 695 participants were enrolled; 406 randomized; and 405 received treatment. 289 participants were screen failures and never treated with study medication; 233 were due to no longer meeting study criteria; 19 withdrew consent; 4 due to Adverse Events; 1 due to death; 1 due to poor/non-compliance; 1 was lost to follow up; and 30 were other.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Abatacept IV
Abatacept 30 mg/kg injection by intravenous on Days 1,15, 29, and 57, followed by a weight-tiered dose approximating 10mg/kg injection by intravenous every 4 weeks, Mycophenolate mofetil 1.5 g tablet by mouth and Prednisone up to 60 mg tablet by mouth Daily for 104 weeks
202
Placebo IV
Placebo matching with Abatacept injection by intravenous on Days 1,15, 29, and 57, followed by every 4 weeks, Mycophenolate mofetil 1.5 g tablet by mouth and Prednisone up to 60 mg tablet by mouth Daily for 104 Weeks
203
Total405

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Long-Term Extension (LTE) PeriodAbsence of renal response01
Long-Term Extension (LTE) PeriodAdministrative reason by Sponsor2721
Long-Term Extension (LTE) PeriodAdverse Event unrelated to study drug10
Long-Term Extension (LTE) PeriodCompleted Year 2, did not enter LTE3338
Long-Term Extension (LTE) PeriodDisease progression14
Long-Term Extension (LTE) PeriodInvestigator decision, study termination01
Long-Term Extension (LTE) PeriodLost to Follow-up01
Long-Term Extension (LTE) PeriodNot effective01
Long-Term Extension (LTE) PeriodParticipant no longer meets criteria10
Long-Term Extension (LTE) PeriodParticipant request to stop treatment11
Long-Term Extension (LTE) PeriodParticipant withdrew consent11
Long-Term Extension (LTE) PeriodPregnancy10
Long-Term Extension (LTE) PeriodStudy drug toxicity10
Long-Term Extension (LTE) PeriodStudy was terminated01
Year 1 PeriodAdverse Event2017
Year 1 PeriodAntiproteinuric changed/dose increased01
Year 1 PeriodChange in Concomitant Medication01
Year 1 PeriodDeath11
Year 1 PeriodHypersensitivity to the medication01
Year 1 PeriodLack of Efficacy119
Year 1 PeriodLost to Follow-up02
Year 1 PeriodNeed of use of Prohibited Medications10
Year 1 PeriodNot treated- received ACE inhibition10
Year 1 PeriodParticipant no longer meets criteria62
Year 1 PeriodPoor / non-compliance01
Year 1 PeriodPregnancy20
Year 1 PeriodWithdrawal by Subject67
Year 2 PeriodAdministrative reason by Sponsor43
Year 2 PeriodAdverse Event76
Year 2 PeriodCompleted Year 1, did not enter Year 221
Year 2 PeriodGiven cyclophosphamide, corticosteroids01
Year 2 PeriodLack of Efficacy412
Year 2 PeriodLost to Follow-up20
Year 2 PeriodParticipant no longer meets criteria14
Year 2 PeriodParticipant request to stop treatment44
Year 2 PeriodParticipant went to US stopped treatment01
Year 2 PeriodParticipant withdrew consent15
Year 2 PeriodPregnancy11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAbatacept IVPlacebo IVTotal
Age, Continuous33.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.75
33.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.48
33.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African American
15 Participants15 Participants30 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
71 Participants74 Participants145 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
85 Participants71 Participants156 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
31 Participants43 Participants74 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
182 Participants178 Participants360 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
20 Participants25 Participants45 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
7 / 2026 / 203
other
Total, other adverse events
164 / 202179 / 203
serious
Total, serious adverse events
62 / 20258 / 203

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants in Complete Renal Response (CR) of Lupus Glomerulonephritis at Day 365 of the Double-blind Period

Number of participants achieving CR was divided by the total number of participants in that arm and expressed as a percentage. CR defined as: eGFR is normal or no \<85% of the baseline; eGFR based on mean creatinine value from day 358 and 365. Proteinuria: UPCR\<0.5 mg/mg. Urine sediment: No cellular casts. Corticosteroid dose: Daily dose must be no \>10 mg prednisone or equiv. for at least 28 days prior to assessment. Participants with \>10mg/day prednisone or equivalent for non-renal disease within 28 days prior to day 365 will be imputed as having achieved CR if the following are true: Met all criteria for CR at day 337 and all criteria for CR except corticosteroid dose at day 365; Investigator confirms increase in steroid dose is not related to renal disease. Adjusted odds ratio is estimated from logistic regression model which includes treatment group, baseline ACEi/ARBs use (Yes/No), race (Asian/ Black/Caucasian/Other) and baseline UPCR as a continuous variable.

Time frame: Day 365

Population: All randomized and treated participants

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Abatacept IVPercentage of Participants in Complete Renal Response (CR) of Lupus Glomerulonephritis at Day 365 of the Double-blind Period35.1 Percentage
Placebo IVPercentage of Participants in Complete Renal Response (CR) of Lupus Glomerulonephritis at Day 365 of the Double-blind Period33.5 Percentage
p-value: 0.726495% CI: [0.7077, 1.6421]Stratified logistic regression
Secondary

Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Disease Activity as Measured by BILAG 2004 Over Time During the Double-blind Period

BILAG index measures and reports disease activity in different organs/systems separately. The BILAG score is calculated for each of nine systems depending on the clinical features present and whether they are new (4 points), worse (3 points), the same (2 points), improving (1 point) or not present (0 points) in the last 4 weeks compared with previously. A BILAG A represents the presence of one or more serious features of lupus. A BILAG B represents more moderate features of the disease. A BILAG C includes only mild symptomatic features. A BILAG D represents only prior activity with no current symptoms due to active lupus. A BILAG E represents an organ that has never been involved. Overall BILAG score ranges from 0-108, with higher scores reflecting a worse outcome.

Time frame: Day 1 to Day 729; Day 365 to Day 729

Population: All randomized and treated participants with both post-baseline and baseline measurements

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Abatacept IVAdjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Disease Activity as Measured by BILAG 2004 Over Time During the Double-blind PeriodDay 1 to Day 729-9.31 Scores on a ScaleStandard Error 0.56
Abatacept IVAdjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Disease Activity as Measured by BILAG 2004 Over Time During the Double-blind PeriodDay 365 to Day 729-0.95 Scores on a ScaleStandard Error 0.538
Placebo IVAdjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Disease Activity as Measured by BILAG 2004 Over Time During the Double-blind PeriodDay 1 to Day 729-8.53 Scores on a ScaleStandard Error 0.56
Placebo IVAdjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Disease Activity as Measured by BILAG 2004 Over Time During the Double-blind PeriodDay 365 to Day 729-0.40 Scores on a ScaleStandard Error 0.53
Secondary

Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Disease Activity as Measured by BILAG 2004 Over Time During Year 1 of the Double-blind Period

Adjusted mean change from baseline in British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) score over time during Year 1 of the double-blind period based on a repeated measure mixed model and presented at each visit in the first 12-month of the double-blind period. BILAG index measures disease activity in different organs/systems separately. BILAG score is calculated for each of 9 systems depending on the clinical features present and whether they are new (4 points), worse (3 points), the same (2 points), improving (1 point) or not present (0 points) in the last 4 weeks compared with previously. BILAG A represents the presence of serious features of lupus. BILAG B represents more moderate features of the disease. BILAG C includes only mild symptomatic features. BILAG D represents prior activity with no current symptoms due to active lupus. BILAG E represents an organ that has never been involved. Overall BILAG score ranges from 0-108, with higher scores reflecting a worse outcome.

Time frame: Day 1 to Day 365

Population: All randomized and treated participants with both post-baseline and baseline measurements

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Abatacept IVAdjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Disease Activity as Measured by BILAG 2004 Over Time During Year 1 of the Double-blind Period-8.22 Scores on a Scale
Placebo IVAdjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Disease Activity as Measured by BILAG 2004 Over Time During Year 1 of the Double-blind Period-7.60 Scores on a Scale
Secondary

Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in eGFR Over Time

Estimated glomerular filtration rate(eGFR), will be calculated by the CKD-EPI formula shown below.50 eGFR is expressed as mL/min per 1.73m2. For the purpose of this study lower limit of normal eGFR is defined as 90mL/min per 1.73m2 eGFR = 141 X min (Scr/k, 1)α X max (Scr/k, 1)-1.209 X 0.993Age X (1.018 \[if female\]) X (1.159 \[if black\]) Where Scr is serum creatinine (mg/dL), k is 0.7 for females and 0.9 for males, α is -0.329 for females and -0.411 for males, min indicates the minimum of Scr/k or 1, and max indicates the maximum of Scr/k or 1, age in years.

Time frame: Day 365, Day 729

Population: All randomized and treated participants with both post-baseline and baseline measurements

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Abatacept IVAdjusted Mean Change From Baseline in eGFR Over TimeDay 3656.85 mL/min per 1.73m2
Abatacept IVAdjusted Mean Change From Baseline in eGFR Over TimeDay 7297.20 mL/min per 1.73m2
Placebo IVAdjusted Mean Change From Baseline in eGFR Over TimeDay 3655.85 mL/min per 1.73m2
Placebo IVAdjusted Mean Change From Baseline in eGFR Over TimeDay 7297.91 mL/min per 1.73m2
Secondary

Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in UPCR at Day 365 of the Double-blind Period in Overall Population

Adjusted Mean Change from Baseline in Urine protein/creatinine ratio (UPCR) at Day 365 of the double-blind period in the overall population

Time frame: Day 1 and Day 365

Population: All randomized and treated participants with both post-baseline and baseline measurements

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Abatacept IVAdjusted Mean Change From Baseline in UPCR at Day 365 of the Double-blind Period in Overall Population-2.99 UPCR (mg/mg)Standard Error 0.17
Placebo IVAdjusted Mean Change From Baseline in UPCR at Day 365 of the Double-blind Period in Overall Population-2.90 UPCR (mg/mg)Standard Error 0.16
p-value: 0.56195% CI: [-0.41, 0.22]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in UPCR Over Time

A repeated measure mixed model that included the baseline UPCR value, randomization stratification factors, time, and time by treatment interaction as fixed effects and subject as a random effect was used.

Time frame: Day 365; Day 729, includes data up to July 1st 2017 when double-blind therapy ended

Population: All randomized and treated participants with both post-baseline and baseline measurements

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Abatacept IVAdjusted Mean Change From Baseline in UPCR Over TimeDay 365-2.95 UPCR (mg/mg)Standard Error 0.17
Abatacept IVAdjusted Mean Change From Baseline in UPCR Over TimeDay 729-3.13 UPCR (mg/mg)Standard Error 0.18
Placebo IVAdjusted Mean Change From Baseline in UPCR Over TimeDay 365-2.68 UPCR (mg/mg)Standard Error 0.17
Placebo IVAdjusted Mean Change From Baseline in UPCR Over TimeDay 729-2.72 UPCR (mg/mg)Standard Error 0.18
Secondary

Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Urine Protein/Creatinine Ratio (UPCR) at Day 365 of the Double-blind Period in Nephrotic Participants

Adjusted Mean Change from Baseline in UPCR at Day 365 of the double-blind period in nephrotic participants

Time frame: Baseline and Day 365

Population: All randomized and treated nephrotic participants with both post-baseline and baseline measurements

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Abatacept IVAdjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Urine Protein/Creatinine Ratio (UPCR) at Day 365 of the Double-blind Period in Nephrotic Participants-5.01 UPCR (mg/mg)Standard Error 0.33
Placebo IVAdjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Urine Protein/Creatinine Ratio (UPCR) at Day 365 of the Double-blind Period in Nephrotic Participants-4.84 UPCR (mg/mg)Standard Error 0.35
p-value: 0.57195% CI: [-0.76, 0.42]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

AUC (TAU): Area Under the Serum Concentration Time Curve Over a Dosing Interval

AUC (TAU): Area under the serum concentration time curve over a dosing interval between Days 337 to 365.

Time frame: Days 337 to 365

Population: All participants who received at least 1 Abatacept Infusion and have at least 1 Cmin value during Year 1 of the double-blind period

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Abatacept IVAUC (TAU): Area Under the Serum Concentration Time Curve Over a Dosing Interval36480.24 ug*h/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 29.2
Secondary

Cmax: Maximum Observed Serum Concentration Following Participants Receiving Active Abatacept IV

Cmax: Maximum observed serum concentration following participants receiving active abatacept IV

Time frame: at 1 hour post Day 1 dose and 30 minutes post Day 337 dose

Population: All participants who received at least 1 Abatacept Infusion and have at least 1 Cmin value during Year 1 of the double-blind period

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Abatacept IVCmax: Maximum Observed Serum Concentration Following Participants Receiving Active Abatacept IVDay 1527.43 ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 59.6
Abatacept IVCmax: Maximum Observed Serum Concentration Following Participants Receiving Active Abatacept IVDay 337203.51 ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 30.6
Secondary

Cmin (ug/mL): Trough Level Serum Concentration of Abatacept Prior to the Administration of the IV Infusion

Trough level serum concentration of abatacept prior to the administration of the IV infusion on Days 1 to 365

Time frame: Days 1 to 365

Population: All participants who received at least 1 Abatacept Infusion and have at least 1 Cmin value during Year 1 of the double-blind period.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Abatacept IVCmin (ug/mL): Trough Level Serum Concentration of Abatacept Prior to the Administration of the IV InfusionDay 1569.97 ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 91.4
Abatacept IVCmin (ug/mL): Trough Level Serum Concentration of Abatacept Prior to the Administration of the IV InfusionDay 2990.46 ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 56.8
Abatacept IVCmin (ug/mL): Trough Level Serum Concentration of Abatacept Prior to the Administration of the IV InfusionDay 5736.43 ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 84.4
Abatacept IVCmin (ug/mL): Trough Level Serum Concentration of Abatacept Prior to the Administration of the IV InfusionDay 8534.46 ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 55.4
Abatacept IVCmin (ug/mL): Trough Level Serum Concentration of Abatacept Prior to the Administration of the IV InfusionDay 11316.42 ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 69.2
Abatacept IVCmin (ug/mL): Trough Level Serum Concentration of Abatacept Prior to the Administration of the IV InfusionDay 16913.98 ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 64.5
Abatacept IVCmin (ug/mL): Trough Level Serum Concentration of Abatacept Prior to the Administration of the IV InfusionDay 28114.44 ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 54.7
Abatacept IVCmin (ug/mL): Trough Level Serum Concentration of Abatacept Prior to the Administration of the IV InfusionDay 33714.99 ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 73.6
Abatacept IVCmin (ug/mL): Trough Level Serum Concentration of Abatacept Prior to the Administration of the IV InfusionDay 36513.62 ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 51.7
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Laboratory Analytes During the Double-blind Period (g/L)

Laboratory assessments were analyzed centrally, with the exception of pregnancy testing. Blood draws and urine collections were performed at visits specified in the protocol. Change from Baseline = Post-baseline - Baseline value.

Time frame: Day 729

Population: All treated participants with both post-baseline and baseline measurements

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Abatacept IVMean Change From Baseline in Laboratory Analytes During the Double-blind Period (g/L)ALBUMIN (g/L)9.2 g/L
Abatacept IVMean Change From Baseline in Laboratory Analytes During the Double-blind Period (g/L)HEMOGLOBIN (g/L)8.8 g/L
Abatacept IVMean Change From Baseline in Laboratory Analytes During the Double-blind Period (g/L)PROTEIN, TOTAL (g/L)9.9 g/L
Placebo IVMean Change From Baseline in Laboratory Analytes During the Double-blind Period (g/L)PROTEIN, TOTAL (g/L)10.1 g/L
Placebo IVMean Change From Baseline in Laboratory Analytes During the Double-blind Period (g/L)ALBUMIN (g/L)8.1 g/L
Placebo IVMean Change From Baseline in Laboratory Analytes During the Double-blind Period (g/L)HEMOGLOBIN (g/L)9.0 g/L
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Laboratory Analytes During the Double-blind Period (mmol/L)

Laboratory assessments were analyzed centrally, with the exception of pregnancy testing. Blood draws and urine collections were performed at visits specified in the protocol. Change from Baseline = Post-baseline - Baseline value.

Time frame: Day 729

Population: All treated participants with both post-baseline and baseline measurements

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Abatacept IVMean Change From Baseline in Laboratory Analytes During the Double-blind Period (mmol/L)CHLORIDE, SERUM (mmol/L)-1.1 mmol/L
Abatacept IVMean Change From Baseline in Laboratory Analytes During the Double-blind Period (mmol/L)PHOSPHORUS, INORGANIC (mmol/L)-0.077 mmol/L
Abatacept IVMean Change From Baseline in Laboratory Analytes During the Double-blind Period (mmol/L)CALCIUM, TOTAL (mmol/L)0.097 mmol/L
Abatacept IVMean Change From Baseline in Laboratory Analytes During the Double-blind Period (mmol/L)POTASSIUM, SERUM (mmol/L)-0.02 mmol/L
Abatacept IVMean Change From Baseline in Laboratory Analytes During the Double-blind Period (mmol/L)GLUCOSE, SERUM (mmol/L)-0.23 mmol/L
Abatacept IVMean Change From Baseline in Laboratory Analytes During the Double-blind Period (mmol/L)SODIUM, SERUM (mmol/L)-0.2 mmol/L
Abatacept IVMean Change From Baseline in Laboratory Analytes During the Double-blind Period (mmol/L)BLOOD UREA NITROGEN (mmol/L)-2.31 mmol/L
Placebo IVMean Change From Baseline in Laboratory Analytes During the Double-blind Period (mmol/L)SODIUM, SERUM (mmol/L)-0.5 mmol/L
Placebo IVMean Change From Baseline in Laboratory Analytes During the Double-blind Period (mmol/L)BLOOD UREA NITROGEN (mmol/L)-2.25 mmol/L
Placebo IVMean Change From Baseline in Laboratory Analytes During the Double-blind Period (mmol/L)CALCIUM, TOTAL (mmol/L)0.108 mmol/L
Placebo IVMean Change From Baseline in Laboratory Analytes During the Double-blind Period (mmol/L)CHLORIDE, SERUM (mmol/L)-0.5 mmol/L
Placebo IVMean Change From Baseline in Laboratory Analytes During the Double-blind Period (mmol/L)GLUCOSE, SERUM (mmol/L)-0.58 mmol/L
Placebo IVMean Change From Baseline in Laboratory Analytes During the Double-blind Period (mmol/L)PHOSPHORUS, INORGANIC (mmol/L)-0.037 mmol/L
Placebo IVMean Change From Baseline in Laboratory Analytes During the Double-blind Period (mmol/L)POTASSIUM, SERUM (mmol/L)-0.10 mmol/L
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Laboratory Analytes During the Double-blind Period (Percentage of Blood)

Laboratory assessments were analyzed centrally, with the exception of pregnancy testing. Blood draws and urine collections were performed at visits specified in the protocol. Change from Baseline = Post-baseline - Baseline value.

Time frame: Day 729

Population: All treated participants with both post-baseline and baseline measurements

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Abatacept IVMean Change From Baseline in Laboratory Analytes During the Double-blind Period (Percentage of Blood)0.0328 Percentage
Placebo IVMean Change From Baseline in Laboratory Analytes During the Double-blind Period (Percentage of Blood)0.0325 Percentage
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Laboratory Analytes During the Double-blind Period (U/L)

Laboratory assessments were analyzed centrally, with the exception of pregnancy testing. Blood draws and urine collections were performed at visits specified in the protocol. Change from Baseline = Post-baseline - Baseline value.

Time frame: Day 729

Population: All treated participants with both post-baseline and baseline measurements

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Abatacept IVMean Change From Baseline in Laboratory Analytes During the Double-blind Period (U/L)ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE (ALP) (U/L)8.2 U/L
Abatacept IVMean Change From Baseline in Laboratory Analytes During the Double-blind Period (U/L)ALANINE AMINOTRANSFERASE (ALT) (U/L)-2.2 U/L
Abatacept IVMean Change From Baseline in Laboratory Analytes During the Double-blind Period (U/L)ASPARTATE AMINOTRANSFERASE (AST) (U/L)0.3 U/L
Abatacept IVMean Change From Baseline in Laboratory Analytes During the Double-blind Period (U/L)G-GLUTAMYL TRANSFERASE (GGT) (U/L)-5.3 U/L
Placebo IVMean Change From Baseline in Laboratory Analytes During the Double-blind Period (U/L)G-GLUTAMYL TRANSFERASE (GGT) (U/L)-4.1 U/L
Placebo IVMean Change From Baseline in Laboratory Analytes During the Double-blind Period (U/L)ALANINE AMINOTRANSFERASE (ALT) (U/L)-3.4 U/L
Placebo IVMean Change From Baseline in Laboratory Analytes During the Double-blind Period (U/L)ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE (ALP) (U/L)11.7 U/L
Placebo IVMean Change From Baseline in Laboratory Analytes During the Double-blind Period (U/L)ASPARTATE AMINOTRANSFERASE (AST) (U/L)0.3 U/L
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Laboratory Analytes During the Double-blind Period (Umol/L)

Laboratory assessments were analyzed centrally, with the exception of pregnancy testing. Blood draws and urine collections were performed at visits specified in the protocol. Change from Baseline = Post-baseline - Baseline value.

Time frame: Day 729

Population: All treated participants with both post-baseline and baseline measurements

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Abatacept IVMean Change From Baseline in Laboratory Analytes During the Double-blind Period (Umol/L)BILIRUBIN, TOTAL (umol/L)1.77 umol/L
Abatacept IVMean Change From Baseline in Laboratory Analytes During the Double-blind Period (Umol/L)CREATININE (umol/L)-5.6 umol/L
Placebo IVMean Change From Baseline in Laboratory Analytes During the Double-blind Period (Umol/L)BILIRUBIN, TOTAL (umol/L)1.00 umol/L
Placebo IVMean Change From Baseline in Laboratory Analytes During the Double-blind Period (Umol/L)CREATININE (umol/L)-6.2 umol/L
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Laboratory Analytes During the Double-blind Period (x10^9 Cells/L)

Laboratory assessments were analyzed centrally, with the exception of pregnancy testing. Blood draws and urine collections were performed at visits specified in the protocol. Change from Baseline = Post-baseline - Baseline value.

Time frame: Day 729

Population: All treated participants with both post-baseline and baseline measurements

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Abatacept IVMean Change From Baseline in Laboratory Analytes During the Double-blind Period (x10^9 Cells/L)EOSINOPHILS (ABSOLUTE) (x10^9 cells/L)0.034 x10^9 cells/L
Abatacept IVMean Change From Baseline in Laboratory Analytes During the Double-blind Period (x10^9 Cells/L)NEUTROPHILS (ABSOLUTE) (x10^9 cells/L)-2.259 x10^9 cells/L
Abatacept IVMean Change From Baseline in Laboratory Analytes During the Double-blind Period (x10^9 Cells/L)LYMPHOCYTES (ABSOLUTE) (x10^9 cells/L)0.141 x10^9 cells/L
Abatacept IVMean Change From Baseline in Laboratory Analytes During the Double-blind Period (x10^9 Cells/L)PLATELET COUNT (x10^9 cells/L)-4.9 x10^9 cells/L
Abatacept IVMean Change From Baseline in Laboratory Analytes During the Double-blind Period (x10^9 Cells/L)MONOCYTES (ABSOLUTE) (x10^9 cells/L)-0.018 x10^9 cells/L
Placebo IVMean Change From Baseline in Laboratory Analytes During the Double-blind Period (x10^9 Cells/L)PLATELET COUNT (x10^9 cells/L)-9.1 x10^9 cells/L
Placebo IVMean Change From Baseline in Laboratory Analytes During the Double-blind Period (x10^9 Cells/L)EOSINOPHILS (ABSOLUTE) (x10^9 cells/L)0.010 x10^9 cells/L
Placebo IVMean Change From Baseline in Laboratory Analytes During the Double-blind Period (x10^9 Cells/L)MONOCYTES (ABSOLUTE) (x10^9 cells/L)-0.050 x10^9 cells/L
Placebo IVMean Change From Baseline in Laboratory Analytes During the Double-blind Period (x10^9 Cells/L)NEUTROPHILS (ABSOLUTE) (x10^9 cells/L)-2.289 x10^9 cells/L
Placebo IVMean Change From Baseline in Laboratory Analytes During the Double-blind Period (x10^9 Cells/L)LYMPHOCYTES (ABSOLUTE) (x10^9 cells/L)-0.149 x10^9 cells/L
Secondary

Median Percent Change From Baseline in UPCR Over Time

A repeated measure mixed model that included the baseline UPCR value, randomization stratification factors, time, and time by treatment interaction as fixed effects and subject as a random effect was used. % Change from Baseline = (post baseline - baseline value) / baseline value x 100

Time frame: Day 365, Day 729

Population: All randomized and treated participants with both post-baseline and baseline measurements

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Abatacept IVMedian Percent Change From Baseline in UPCR Over TimeDay 365-83.77 Percent
Abatacept IVMedian Percent Change From Baseline in UPCR Over TimeDay 729-89.83 Percent
Placebo IVMedian Percent Change From Baseline in UPCR Over TimeDay 365-84.12 Percent
Placebo IVMedian Percent Change From Baseline in UPCR Over TimeDay 729-87.28 Percent
Secondary

Median Time to Complete Renal Response During the Double-blind Period in All Participants

The estimate of median time to Complete Renal Response is based on Kaplan-Meier analysis. Complete renal response (CR): defined as meeting ALL of the following criteria: eGFR normal OR no less than 85% of the baseline value; Urine protein/creatinine ratio (UPCR) \< 0.5; Urine sediment: No cellular casts; Daily corticosteroid dose must be no greater than 10 mg prednisone or equivalent for at least 28 days prior to assessment.

Time frame: Day 365, Day 729

Population: All randomized and treated participants, as observed, calculated per modified criteria (UPCR and eGFR only)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Abatacept IVMedian Time to Complete Renal Response During the Double-blind Period in All ParticipantsDay 365280.0 Days
Abatacept IVMedian Time to Complete Renal Response During the Double-blind Period in All ParticipantsDay 729170.0 Days
Placebo IVMedian Time to Complete Renal Response During the Double-blind Period in All ParticipantsDay 365309.0 Days
Placebo IVMedian Time to Complete Renal Response During the Double-blind Period in All ParticipantsDay 729282.0 Days
Secondary

Median Time to Complete Renal Response During the Double-blind Period in Nephrotic Participants

The estimate of median time to Complete Renal Response in nephrotic participants is based on Kaplan-Meier analysis. Complete renal response (CR): defined as meeting ALL of the following criteria: eGFR normal OR no less than 85% of the baseline value; Urine protein/creatinine ratio (UPCR) \< 0.5; Urine sediment: No cellular casts; Daily corticosteroid dose must be no greater than 10 mg prednisone or equivalent for at least 28 days prior to assessment.

Time frame: Day 365, Day 729

Population: All randomized and treated nephrotic participants, as observed, calculated per modified criteria (UPCR and eGFR only); Nephrotic is defined as screening UPCR \>= 3.0 mg/mg (\>=339mg/mmol)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Abatacept IVMedian Time to Complete Renal Response During the Double-blind Period in Nephrotic ParticipantsDay 729365.0 Days
Abatacept IVMedian Time to Complete Renal Response During the Double-blind Period in Nephrotic ParticipantsDay 365366.0 Days
Placebo IVMedian Time to Complete Renal Response During the Double-blind Period in Nephrotic ParticipantsDay 365368.0 Days
Placebo IVMedian Time to Complete Renal Response During the Double-blind Period in Nephrotic ParticipantsDay 729368.0 Days
Secondary

Median Time to First Sustained Change to No Response During the Double-blind Period

Sustained response defined as response present at 2 consecutive visits approximately 4 weeks apart. No renal response (NR): defined as not meeting criteria for CR or PR or withdrawn The estimate of median time is based on Kaplan-Meier analysis

Time frame: Day 365, Day 729

Population: All randomized and treated participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Abatacept IVMedian Time to First Sustained Change to No Response During the Double-blind PeriodDay 365NA Days
Abatacept IVMedian Time to First Sustained Change to No Response During the Double-blind PeriodDay 729NA Days
Placebo IVMedian Time to First Sustained Change to No Response During the Double-blind PeriodDay 365NA Days
Placebo IVMedian Time to First Sustained Change to No Response During the Double-blind PeriodDay 729NA Days
Secondary

Median Time to First Treatment Failure and Overall Treatment Failure During the Double-blind Period

First treatment failure (or Lupus treatment failure) is defined as any of the following: Death, unless due to physical trauma or violence; Renal Flare; sustained doubling of creatinine from baseline (greater of Screening or Study Day 1 value); initiation of rescue therapy for treatment of active lupus nephritis after Study Week 20. Overall treatment failure is defined as lupus treatment failure plus discontinuation of study drug for any reason except death due to physical trauma or violence, pregnancy or administrative decision by Sponsor. The hazard ratio is estimated using the Cox proportional hazards model which includes treatment group, stratification variables (baseline ACEis/ARBs use, RACE) and baseline UPCR. The estimate of median time is based on Kaplan-Meier analysis

Time frame: Day 365, Day 729

Population: All randomized and treated participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Abatacept IVMedian Time to First Treatment Failure and Overall Treatment Failure During the Double-blind PeriodFirst treatment failure (FTF) - Day 365NA Days
Abatacept IVMedian Time to First Treatment Failure and Overall Treatment Failure During the Double-blind PeriodOverall treatment failure (OTF) - Day 365NA Days
Abatacept IVMedian Time to First Treatment Failure and Overall Treatment Failure During the Double-blind PeriodFTF - Day 729NA Days
Abatacept IVMedian Time to First Treatment Failure and Overall Treatment Failure During the Double-blind PeriodOTF - Day 729NA Days
Placebo IVMedian Time to First Treatment Failure and Overall Treatment Failure During the Double-blind PeriodOTF - Day 729NA Days
Placebo IVMedian Time to First Treatment Failure and Overall Treatment Failure During the Double-blind PeriodFirst treatment failure (FTF) - Day 365NA Days
Placebo IVMedian Time to First Treatment Failure and Overall Treatment Failure During the Double-blind PeriodFTF - Day 729NA Days
Placebo IVMedian Time to First Treatment Failure and Overall Treatment Failure During the Double-blind PeriodOverall treatment failure (OTF) - Day 365NA Days
Secondary

Median Time to Partial Renal Response During the Double-blind Period in All Participants

The estimate of median time to Partial Response (PR) is based on Kaplan-Meier analysis. Partial renal response (PR): defined as meeting ALL of the following criteria: Participant does not meet criteria for CR; eGFR no less than 85% of the lesser of the values at screening or randomization (Day 1); UPCR \< 0.5 OR 50% reduced from baseline and \< 1 if baseline value was \< 3, OR 50% reduced from baseline and \< 3 if baseline value was 3; Urine sediment: no cellular casts; daily corticosteroid dose no greater than 10 mg/day prednisone or prednisone equivalent for at least 28 days prior to assessment

Time frame: Day 365, Day 729

Population: All randomized and treated participants, as observed, calculated per modified criteria (UPCR and eGFR only)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Abatacept IVMedian Time to Partial Renal Response During the Double-blind Period in All ParticipantsDay 365226.0 Days
Abatacept IVMedian Time to Partial Renal Response During the Double-blind Period in All ParticipantsDay 72959.0 Days
Placebo IVMedian Time to Partial Renal Response During the Double-blind Period in All ParticipantsDay 365253.0 Days
Placebo IVMedian Time to Partial Renal Response During the Double-blind Period in All ParticipantsDay 72958.0 Days
Secondary

Median Time to Partial Renal Response During the Double-blind Period in Nephrotic Participants

The estimate of median time to Partial Response (PR) in nephrotic participants is based on Kaplan-Meier analysis. Partial renal response (PR): defined as meeting ALL of the following criteria: Participant does not meet criteria for CR; eGFR no less than 85% of the lesser of the values at screening or randomization (Day 1); UPCR \< 0.5 OR 50% reduced from baseline and \< 1 if baseline value was \< 3, OR 50% reduced from baseline and \< 3 if baseline value was 3; Urine sediment: no cellular casts; daily corticosteroid dose no greater than 10 mg/day prednisone or prednisone equivalent for at least 28 days prior to assessment

Time frame: Day 365, Day 729

Population: All randomized and treated nephrotic participants, as observed, calculated per modified criteria (UPCR and eGFR only); Nephrotic is defined as screening UPCR \>= 3.0 mg/mg (\>=339mg/mmol)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Abatacept IVMedian Time to Partial Renal Response During the Double-blind Period in Nephrotic ParticipantsDay 365225.0 Days
Abatacept IVMedian Time to Partial Renal Response During the Double-blind Period in Nephrotic ParticipantsDay 72958.5 Days
Placebo IVMedian Time to Partial Renal Response During the Double-blind Period in Nephrotic ParticipantsDay 72956.0 Days
Placebo IVMedian Time to Partial Renal Response During the Double-blind Period in Nephrotic ParticipantsDay 365196.0 Days
Secondary

Number of Participants With Abatacept Induced Antibody Response Over Time in the Double-blind Period

Participants who experienced a positive antibody response relative to baseline (ECL Assay)

Time frame: Day 365, Day 729

Population: All treated participants in the immunogenicity analysis population for Year 1.~Note: Study terminated, Year 2 data not collected

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Abatacept Induced Antibody Response Over Time in the Double-blind PeriodDay 365, overall7 Participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Abatacept Induced Antibody Response Over Time in the Double-blind PeriodDay 365, overall9 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AEs) During Year 1 of the Double-blind Period

All AEs were coded and grouped into preferred terms (PT) by system organ class (SOC), using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA, version 21.0). Investigators determined the intensity of each AE as mild, moderate, severe, or very severe and assessed the relationship to study drug.

Time frame: From Day 1 up to 56 days post last dose in Year 1 of the double-blind period

Population: All treated participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AEs) During Year 1 of the Double-blind PeriodParticipants with peri-infusional Adverse Events7 Participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AEs) During Year 1 of the Double-blind PeriodParticipants with Adverse Events188 Participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AEs) During Year 1 of the Double-blind PeriodParticipants with Serious Adverse Events49 Participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AEs) During Year 1 of the Double-blind PeriodParticipants with infection Adverse Events150 Participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AEs) During Year 1 of the Double-blind PeriodParticipants with malignancies2 Participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AEs) During Year 1 of the Double-blind PeriodParticipants with autoimmune events10 Participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AEs) During Year 1 of the Double-blind PeriodParticipants with acute infusional Adverse Events2 Participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AEs) During Year 1 of the Double-blind PeriodParticipants with peri-infusional Adverse Events9 Participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AEs) During Year 1 of the Double-blind PeriodParticipants with malignancies1 Participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AEs) During Year 1 of the Double-blind PeriodParticipants with Adverse Events194 Participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AEs) During Year 1 of the Double-blind PeriodParticipants with acute infusional Adverse Events4 Participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AEs) During Year 1 of the Double-blind PeriodParticipants with Serious Adverse Events39 Participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AEs) During Year 1 of the Double-blind PeriodParticipants with autoimmune events9 Participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AEs) During Year 1 of the Double-blind PeriodParticipants with infection Adverse Events147 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AEs) During Year 2 of the Double-blind Period and Long-term Extension

All AEs were coded and grouped into preferred terms (PT) by system organ class (SOC), using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA, version 21.0). Investigators determined the intensity of each AE as mild, moderate, severe, or very severe and assessed the relationship to study drug.

Time frame: From the first dose in Year 2 of the double-blind period up to 56 days post last dose

Population: All treated participants in Year 2

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AEs) During Year 2 of the Double-blind Period and Long-term ExtensionParticipants with malignancies0 Participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AEs) During Year 2 of the Double-blind Period and Long-term ExtensionParticipants with autoimmune events7 Participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AEs) During Year 2 of the Double-blind Period and Long-term ExtensionParticipants with Adverse Events127 Participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AEs) During Year 2 of the Double-blind Period and Long-term ExtensionParticipants with Serious Adverse Events15 Participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AEs) During Year 2 of the Double-blind Period and Long-term ExtensionParticipants with infection Adverse Events100 Participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AEs) During Year 2 of the Double-blind Period and Long-term ExtensionParticipants with infection Adverse Events107 Participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AEs) During Year 2 of the Double-blind Period and Long-term ExtensionParticipants with Serious Adverse Events25 Participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AEs) During Year 2 of the Double-blind Period and Long-term ExtensionParticipants with autoimmune events11 Participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AEs) During Year 2 of the Double-blind Period and Long-term ExtensionParticipants with malignancies1 Participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AEs) During Year 2 of the Double-blind Period and Long-term ExtensionParticipants with Adverse Events137 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Marked Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind Period

LLN= Lower limit of normals ULN= Upper limit of normals Pre RX = Baseline value SODIUM, SERUM mmol/L 4.0 NA \<0.95X LLN OR \>1.05X ULN, OR IF PRE RX\<LLN THEN USE \<0.95X PRE RX OR \>ULN, OR IF PRE RX\>ULN THEN USE \>1.05X PRE RX OR \<LLN POTASSIUM, SERUM mmol/L 4.1 K \<0.9X LLN OR \>1.1X ULN, OR IF PRE RX\<LLN THEN USE \<0.9X PRE RX OR \>ULN, OR IF PRE RX\>ULN THEN USE \>1.1X PRE RX OR \<LLN CHLORIDE, SERUM mmol/L 5.0 CL \<0.9X LLN OR \>1.1X ULN, OR IF PRE RX\<LLN THEN USE \<0.9X PRE RX OR \>ULN, OR IF PRE RX\>ULN THEN USE \>1.1X PRE RX OR \<LLN N = the number of participants with at least 1 on treatment lab result for each analyte

Time frame: Day 1 to Day 365; includes data up to 56 days post last dose in year 1 of double-blind period or first dose date in the year 2 of double-blind period, whichever is earlier

Population: All treated participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodPHOSPHORUS, INORGANIC, low9 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodSODIUM, SERUM, low1 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodSODIUM, SERUM, high2 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodPOTASSIUM, SERUM, low3 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodPOTASSIUM, SERUM, high7 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodCHLORIDE, SERUM, low0 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodCHLORIDE, SERUM, high0 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodCALCIUM, TOTAL, low1 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodCALCIUM, TOTAL, high2 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodPHOSPHORUS, INORGANIC, high13 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodCALCIUM, TOTAL, low1 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodPHOSPHORUS, INORGANIC, low7 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodCHLORIDE, SERUM, low1 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodSODIUM, SERUM, low1 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodPHOSPHORUS, INORGANIC, high13 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodSODIUM, SERUM, high2 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodCHLORIDE, SERUM, high0 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodPOTASSIUM, SERUM, low5 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodCALCIUM, TOTAL, high0 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodPOTASSIUM, SERUM, high7 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Marked Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind Period

LLN= Lower limit of normals ULN= Upper limit of normals Pre RX = Baseline value SODIUM, SERUM mmol/L 4.0 NA \<0.95X LLN OR \>1.05X ULN, OR IF PRE RX\<LLN THEN USE \<0.95X PRE RX OR \>ULN, OR IF PRE RX\>ULN THEN USE \>1.05X PRE RX OR \<LLN POTASSIUM, SERUM mmol/L 4.1 K \<0.9X LLN OR \>1.1X ULN, OR IF PRE RX\<LLN THEN USE \<0.9X PRE RX OR \>ULN, OR IF PRE RX\>ULN THEN USE \>1.1X PRE RX OR \<LLN CHLORIDE, SERUM mmol/L 5.0 CL \<0.9X LLN OR \>1.1X ULN, OR IF PRE RX\<LLN THEN USE \<0.9X PRE RX OR \>ULN, OR IF PRE RX\>ULN THEN USE \>1.1X PRE RX OR \<LLN N = the number of participants with at least 1 on treatment lab result for each analyte

Time frame: Day 1 to Day 729

Population: All treated participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodPOTASSIUM, SERUM, low2 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodCHLORIDE, SERUM, high0 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodSODIUM, SERUM, high0 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodCALCIUM, TOTAL, low0 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodPOTASSIUM, SERUM, high3 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodCALCIUM, TOTAL, high1 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodSODIUM, SERUM, low0 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodPHOSPHORUS, INORGANIC, low3 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodPHOSPHORUS, INORGANIC, high6 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodCHLORIDE, SERUM, low0 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodPHOSPHORUS, INORGANIC, high3 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodSODIUM, SERUM, low0 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodSODIUM, SERUM, high1 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodPOTASSIUM, SERUM, low2 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodPOTASSIUM, SERUM, high2 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodCHLORIDE, SERUM, low1 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodCHLORIDE, SERUM, high0 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodCALCIUM, TOTAL, low0 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodCALCIUM, TOTAL, high0 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodPHOSPHORUS, INORGANIC, low4 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind Period

LLN= Lower limit of normals ULN= Upper limit of normals Pre RX = Baseline value HEMOGLOBIN g/L 4.0 HB \>3 G/DL DECREASE FROM PRE RX HEMATOCRIT vol 6.3 HCT \<0.75X PRE RX ERYTHROCYTES x10\*12 c/L 5.2 RBC \<0.75X PRE RX PLATELET COUNT x10\*9 c/L 5.0 PLAT \<0.67X LLN OR \>1.5X ULN, OR IF PRE RX\<LLN THEN USE 0.5X PRE RX AND \<100,000/MM3 LEUKOCYTES x10\*9 c/L 6.2 WBC \<0.75X LLN OR \>1.25X ULN, OR IF PRE RX\<LLN THEN USE \<0.8X PRE RX OR \>ULN, OR IF PRE RX\>ULN THEN USE \>1.2X PRE RX OR \<LLN EOSINOPHILS (ABSOLUTE) x10\*9 c/L 8.3 EOSA IF VALUE \> .750 X10\*3 c/uL BASOPHILS (ABSOLUTE) x10\*9 c/L 8.3 BASOA IF VALUE \> 400/MM3 MONOCYTES (ABSOLUTE) x10\*9 c/L 8.3 MONOA IF VALUE \> 2000/MM3 LYMPHOCYTES (ABSOLUTE) x10\*9 c/L 8.3 LYMPA IF VALUE \< .750 X10\*3 c/uL OR IF VALUE \> 7.50 X10\*3 c/uL N = the number of participants with at least 1 on treatment lab result for each analyte

Time frame: Day 1 to Day 365; includes data up to 56 days post last dose in year 1 of double-blind period or first dose date in the year 2 of double-blind period, whichever is earlier

Population: All treated participants~NA (not available) indicates not-calculated as it was not a relevant pre-specified marked abnormality.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodLEUKOCYTES, high29 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodHEMOGLOBIN, highNA participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodEOSINOPHILS (ABSOLUTE), lowNA participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodERYTHROCYTES, highNA participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodEOSINOPHILS (ABSOLUTE), high2 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodHEMOGLOBIN, low6 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodBASOPHILS (ABSOLUTE), lowNA participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodPLATELET COUNT, low4 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodBASOPHILS (ABSOLUTE), high1 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodHEMATOCRIT, low12 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodMONOCYTES (ABSOLUTE), lowNA participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodPLATELET COUNT, high0 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodMONOCYTES (ABSOLUTE), high0 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodHEMATOCRIT, highNA participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodLYMPHOCYTES (ABSOLUTE), low81 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodLEUKOCYTES, low35 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodLYMPHOCYTES (ABSOLUTE), high1 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodERYTHROCYTES, low7 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodLYMPHOCYTES (ABSOLUTE), high2 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodHEMOGLOBIN, low10 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodHEMOGLOBIN, highNA participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodHEMATOCRIT, highNA participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodERYTHROCYTES, low10 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodERYTHROCYTES, highNA participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodPLATELET COUNT, low3 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodPLATELET COUNT, high0 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodLEUKOCYTES, low21 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodLEUKOCYTES, high25 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodEOSINOPHILS (ABSOLUTE), lowNA participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodEOSINOPHILS (ABSOLUTE), high6 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodBASOPHILS (ABSOLUTE), lowNA participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodBASOPHILS (ABSOLUTE), high1 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodMONOCYTES (ABSOLUTE), lowNA participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodMONOCYTES (ABSOLUTE), high1 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodLYMPHOCYTES (ABSOLUTE), low104 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodHEMATOCRIT, low12 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind Period

LLN= Lower limit of normals ULN= Upper limit of normals Pre RX = Baseline value HEMOGLOBIN g/L 4.0 HB \>3 G/DL DECREASE FROM PRE RX HEMATOCRIT vol 6.3 HCT \<0.75X PRE RX ERYTHROCYTES x10\*12 c/L 5.2 RBC \<0.75X PRE RX PLATELET COUNT x10\*9 c/L 5.0 PLAT \<0.67X LLN OR \>1.5X ULN, OR IF PRE RX\<LLN THEN USE 0.5X PRE RX AND \<100,000/MM3 LEUKOCYTES x10\*9 c/L 6.2 WBC \<0.75X LLN OR \>1.25X ULN, OR IF PRE RX\<LLN THEN USE \<0.8X PRE RX OR \>ULN, OR IF PRE RX\>ULN THEN USE \>1.2X PRE RX OR \<LLN EOSINOPHILS (ABSOLUTE) x10\*9 c/L 8.3 EOSA IF VALUE \> .750 X10\*3 c/uL BASOPHILS (ABSOLUTE) x10\*9 c/L 8.3 BASOA IF VALUE \> 400/MM3 MONOCYTES (ABSOLUTE) x10\*9 c/L 8.3 MONOA IF VALUE \> 2000/MM3 LYMPHOCYTES (ABSOLUTE) x10\*9 c/L 8.3 LYMPA IF VALUE \< .750 X10\*3 c/uL OR IF VALUE \> 7.50 X10\*3 c/uL N = the number of participants with at least 1 on treatment lab result for each analyte

Time frame: Day 1 to Day 729

Population: All treated participants~NA (not available) indicates not-calculated as it was not a relevant pre-specified marked abnormality.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodHEMOGLOBIN, low8 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodHEMOGLOBIN, highNA participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodHEMATOCRIT, low6 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodHEMATOCRIT, highNA participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodERYTHROCYTES, low4 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodERYTHROCYTES, highNA participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodPLATELET COUNT, low2 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodPLATELET COUNT, high1 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodLEUKOCYTES, low19 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodLEUKOCYTES, high3 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodEOSINOPHILS (ABSOLUTE), lowNA participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodEOSINOPHILS (ABSOLUTE), high11 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodBASOPHILS (ABSOLUTE), lowNA participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodBASOPHILS (ABSOLUTE), high0 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodMONOCYTES (ABSOLUTE), lowNA participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodMONOCYTES (ABSOLUTE), high0 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodLYMPHOCYTES (ABSOLUTE), low43 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodLYMPHOCYTES (ABSOLUTE), high0 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodBASOPHILS (ABSOLUTE), high0 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodHEMOGLOBIN, low9 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodLEUKOCYTES, high5 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodHEMOGLOBIN, highNA participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodLYMPHOCYTES (ABSOLUTE), high0 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodHEMATOCRIT, low2 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodEOSINOPHILS (ABSOLUTE), lowNA participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodHEMATOCRIT, highNA participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodMONOCYTES (ABSOLUTE), lowNA participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodERYTHROCYTES, low2 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodEOSINOPHILS (ABSOLUTE), high6 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodERYTHROCYTES, highNA participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodLYMPHOCYTES (ABSOLUTE), low62 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodPLATELET COUNT, low4 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodBASOPHILS (ABSOLUTE), lowNA participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodPLATELET COUNT, high0 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodMONOCYTES (ABSOLUTE), high0 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodLEUKOCYTES, low24 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind Period

LLN= Lower limit of normals ULN= Upper limit of normals Pre RX = Baseline value ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE (ALP) U/L 5.0 ALP \>2X ULN, OR IF PRE RX\>ULN THEN USE \>3X PRE RX ASPARTATE AMINOTRANSFERASE (AST) U/L 5.0 AST \>3X ULN, OR IF PRE RX\>ULN THEN USE \>4X PRE RX ALANINE AMINOTRANSFERASE (ALT) U/L 5.0 ALT \>3X ULN, OR IF PRE RX\>ULN THEN USE \>4X PRE RX G-GLUTAMYL TRANSFERASE (GGT) U/L 5.0 GGT \>2X ULN, OR IF PRE RX\>ULN THEN USE \>3X PRE RX BILIRUBIN, TOTAL umol/L 5.1 TBILI \>2X ULN, OR IF PRE RX\>ULN THEN USE \>4X PRE RX BILIRUBIN, DIRECT umol/L 5.1 DBILI \>1.5X ULN, OR IF PRE RX\>ULN THEN USE \>2X PRE RX BLOOD UREA NITROGEN mmol/L 5.1 BUN \>2X PRE RX CREATININE umol/L 5.0 CREAT \>1.5X PRE RX N = the number of participants with at least 1 on treatment lab result for each analyte

Time frame: Day 1 to Day 365; includes data up to 56 days post last dose in year 1 of double-blind period or first dose date in the year 2 of double-blind period, whichever is earlier

Population: All treated participants~NA (not available) indicates not-calculated as it was not a relevant pre-specified marked abnormality.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodBILIRUBIN, TOTAL, high0 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodALKALINE PHOSPHATASE (ALP), lowNA participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodALKALINE PHOSPHATASE (ALP), high1 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodASPARTATE AMINOTRANSFERASE (AST), lowNA participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodASPARTATE AMINOTRANSFERASE (AST), high5 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodALANINE AMINOTRANSFERASE (ALT), lowNA participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodALANINE AMINOTRANSFERASE (ALT), high8 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodG-GLUTAMYL TRANSFERASE (GGT), lowNA participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodG-GLUTAMYL TRANSFERASE (GGT), high17 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodBILIRUBIN, TOTAL, lowNA participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodBILIRUBIN, DIRECT, lowNA participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodBILIRUBIN, DIRECT, high0 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodBLOOD UREA NITROGEN, lowNA participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodBLOOD UREA NITROGEN, high20 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodCREATININE, lowNA participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodCREATININE, high24 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodCREATININE, high20 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodBILIRUBIN, TOTAL, high0 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodG-GLUTAMYL TRANSFERASE (GGT), high15 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodALKALINE PHOSPHATASE (ALP), lowNA participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodBLOOD UREA NITROGEN, lowNA participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodALKALINE PHOSPHATASE (ALP), high1 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodBILIRUBIN, TOTAL, lowNA participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodASPARTATE AMINOTRANSFERASE (AST), lowNA participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodCREATININE, lowNA participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodASPARTATE AMINOTRANSFERASE (AST), high0 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodBILIRUBIN, DIRECT, lowNA participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodALANINE AMINOTRANSFERASE (ALT), lowNA participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodBLOOD UREA NITROGEN, high12 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodALANINE AMINOTRANSFERASE (ALT), high2 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodBILIRUBIN, DIRECT, high0 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodG-GLUTAMYL TRANSFERASE (GGT), lowNA participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind Period

LLN= Lower limit of normals ULN= Upper limit of normals Pre RX = Baseline value ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE (ALP) U/L 5.0 ALP \>2X ULN, OR IF PRE RX\>ULN THEN USE \>3X PRE RX ASPARTATE AMINOTRANSFERASE (AST) U/L 5.0 AST \>3X ULN, OR IF PRE RX\>ULN THEN USE \>4X PRE RX ALANINE AMINOTRANSFERASE (ALT) U/L 5.0 ALT \>3X ULN, OR IF PRE RX\>ULN THEN USE \>4X PRE RX G-GLUTAMYL TRANSFERASE (GGT) U/L 5.0 GGT \>2X ULN, OR IF PRE RX\>ULN THEN USE \>3X PRE RX BILIRUBIN, TOTAL umol/L 5.1 TBILI \>2X ULN, OR IF PRE RX\>ULN THEN USE \>4X PRE RX BILIRUBIN, DIRECT umol/L 5.1 DBILI \>1.5X ULN, OR IF PRE RX\>ULN THEN USE \>2X PRE RX BLOOD UREA NITROGEN mmol/L 5.1 BUN \>2X PRE RX CREATININE umol/L 5.0 CREAT \>1.5X PRE RX N = the number of participants with at least 1 on treatment lab result for each analyte

Time frame: Day 1 to Day 729

Population: All treated participants~NA (not available) indicates not-calculated as it was not a relevant pre-specified marked abnormality.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodASPARTATE AMINOTRANSFERASE (AST), lowNA participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodBILIRUBIN, TOTAL, lowNA participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodASPARTATE AMINOTRANSFERASE (AST), high2 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodBILIRUBIN, TOTAL, high0 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodALANINE AMINOTRANSFERASE (ALT), lowNA participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodBILIRUBIN, DIRECT, lowNA participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodCREATININE, lowNA participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodBILIRUBIN, DIRECT, high1 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodALANINE AMINOTRANSFERASE (ALT), high4 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodBLOOD UREA NITROGEN, lowNA participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodALKALINE PHOSPHATASE (ALP), high4 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodBLOOD UREA NITROGEN, high10 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodG-GLUTAMYL TRANSFERASE (GGT), lowNA participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodALKALINE PHOSPHATASE (ALP), lowNA participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodCREATININE, high17 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodG-GLUTAMYL TRANSFERASE (GGT), high17 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodCREATININE, high16 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodASPARTATE AMINOTRANSFERASE (AST), high3 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodALKALINE PHOSPHATASE (ALP), lowNA participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodALKALINE PHOSPHATASE (ALP), high0 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodALANINE AMINOTRANSFERASE (ALT), lowNA participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodALANINE AMINOTRANSFERASE (ALT), high3 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodG-GLUTAMYL TRANSFERASE (GGT), lowNA participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodG-GLUTAMYL TRANSFERASE (GGT), high11 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodBILIRUBIN, TOTAL, lowNA participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodBILIRUBIN, TOTAL, high0 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodBILIRUBIN, DIRECT, lowNA participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodBILIRUBIN, DIRECT, high0 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodBLOOD UREA NITROGEN, lowNA participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodBLOOD UREA NITROGEN, high9 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodCREATININE, lowNA participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodASPARTATE AMINOTRANSFERASE (AST), lowNA participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Marked Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind Period

LLN= Lower limit of normals ULN= Upper limit of normals Pre RX = Baseline value PROTEIN, URINE Unknown UPRO IF MISSING PRE THEN USE \>=2, OR IF VALUE \>=4, OR IF PRE RX =0 OR 0.5 THEN USE \>=2, OR IF PRE RX =1 THEN USE \>=3, OR IF PRE RX =2 OR 3 THEN USE \>=4 GLUCOSE, URINE N/A UGLU IF MISSING PRE THEN USE \>=2, OR IF VALUE \>=4, OR IF PRE RX =0 OR 0.5 THEN USE \>=2, OR IF PRE RX =1 THEN USE \>=3, OR IF PRE RX =2 OR 3 THEN USE \>=4 BLOOD, URINE N/A UBLD IF MISSING PRE THEN USE \>=2, OR IF VALUE \>=4, OR IF PRE RX =0 OR 0.5 THEN USE \>=2, OR IF PRE RX =1 THEN USE \>=3, OR IF PRE RX =2 OR 3 THEN USE \>=4 RBC, URINE hpf 5.0 URBC IF MISSING PRE THEN USE \>=2, OR IF VALUE \>=4, OR IF PRE RX =0 OR 0.5 THEN USE \>=2, OR IF PRE RX =1 THEN USE \>=3, OR IF PRE RX =2 OR 3 THEN USE \>=4 WBC, URINE hpf 5.0 UWBC IF MISSING PRE THEN USE \>=2, OR IF VALUE \>=4, OR IF PRE RX =0 OR 0.5 THEN USE \>=2, OR IF PRE RX =1 THEN USE \>=3, OR IF PRE RX =2 OR 3 THEN USE \>=4

Time frame: Day 1 to Day 365; includes data up to 56 days post last dose in year 1 of double-blind period or first dose date in the year 2 of double-blind period, whichever is earlier

Population: All treated participants~N = the number of participants with at least 1 on treatment lab result for each analyte~NA (not available) indicates not-calculated as it was not a relevant pre-specified marked abnormality.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodGLUCOSE, URINE, high0 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodPROTEIN, URINE, lowNA participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodPROTEIN, URINE, high0 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodGLUCOSE, URINE, lowNA participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodBLOOD, URINE, lowNA participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodBLOOD, URINE, high0 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodRed blood cells (RBC), URINE, lowNA participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodRed blood cells (RBC), URINE, high93 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodWhite blood cells (WBC), URINE, lowNA participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodWhite blood cells (WBC), URINE, high91 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodRed blood cells (RBC), URINE, high103 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodBLOOD, URINE, high0 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodPROTEIN, URINE, lowNA participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodWhite blood cells (WBC), URINE, high98 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodPROTEIN, URINE, high0 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodRed blood cells (RBC), URINE, lowNA participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodGLUCOSE, URINE, lowNA participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodGLUCOSE, URINE, high0 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodWhite blood cells (WBC), URINE, lowNA participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodBLOOD, URINE, lowNA participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Marked Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind Period

LLN= Lower limit of normals ULN= Upper limit of normals Pre RX = Baseline value PROTEIN, URINE Unknown UPRO IF MISSING PRE THEN USE \>=2, OR IF VALUE \>=4, OR IF PRE RX =0 OR 0.5 THEN USE \>=2, OR IF PRE RX =1 THEN USE \>=3, OR IF PRE RX =2 OR 3 THEN USE \>=4 GLUCOSE, URINE N/A UGLU IF MISSING PRE THEN USE \>=2, OR IF VALUE \>=4, OR IF PRE RX =0 OR 0.5 THEN USE \>=2, OR IF PRE RX =1 THEN USE \>=3, OR IF PRE RX =2 OR 3 THEN USE \>=4 BLOOD, URINE N/A UBLD IF MISSING PRE THEN USE \>=2, OR IF VALUE \>=4, OR IF PRE RX =0 OR 0.5 THEN USE \>=2, OR IF PRE RX =1 THEN USE \>=3, OR IF PRE RX =2 OR 3 THEN USE \>=4 RBC, URINE hpf 5.0 URBC IF MISSING PRE THEN USE \>=2, OR IF VALUE \>=4, OR IF PRE RX =0 OR 0.5 THEN USE \>=2, OR IF PRE RX =1 THEN USE \>=3, OR IF PRE RX =2 OR 3 THEN USE \>=4 WBC, URINE hpf 5.0 UWBC IF MISSING PRE THEN USE \>=2, OR IF VALUE \>=4, OR IF PRE RX =0 OR 0.5 THEN USE \>=2, OR IF PRE RX =1 THEN USE \>=3, OR IF PRE RX =2 OR 3 THEN USE \>=4

Time frame: Day 1 to Day 729

Population: All treated participants~N = the number of participants with at least 1 on treatment lab result for each analyte~NA (not available) indicates not-calculated as it was not a relevant pre-specified marked abnormality.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodWhite blood cells (WBC), URINE, high46 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodRed blood cells (RBC), URINE, lowNA participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodPROTEIN, URINE, lowNA participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodGLUCOSE, URINE, lowNA participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodGLUCOSE, URINE, high0 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodBLOOD, URINE, lowNA participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodBLOOD, URINE, high0 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodRed blood cells (RBC), URINE, high58 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodWhite blood cells (WBC), URINE, lowNA participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Marked Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodPROTEIN, URINE, high0 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodBLOOD, URINE, high0 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodBLOOD, URINE, lowNA participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodGLUCOSE, URINE, high0 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodWhite blood cells (WBC), URINE, lowNA participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodWhite blood cells (WBC), URINE, high59 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodRed blood cells (RBC), URINE, lowNA participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodPROTEIN, URINE, lowNA participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodPROTEIN, URINE, high0 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodRed blood cells (RBC), URINE, high55 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Marked Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodGLUCOSE, URINE, lowNA participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Other Marked Chemistry Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind Period

LLN= Lower limit of normals ULN= Upper limit of normals Pre RX = Baseline value CALCIUM, TOTAL mmol/L 5.2 CA \<0.8X LLN OR \>1.2X ULN, OR IF PRE RX\<LLN THEN USE \<0.75X PRE RX OR \>ULN, OR IF PRE RX\>ULN THEN USE \>1.25X PRE RX OR \<LLN PHOSPHORUS, INORGANIC mmol/L 5.2 PHOS \<0.75X LLN OR \>1.25X ULN, OR IF PRE RX\<LLN THEN USE \<0.67X PRE RX OR \>ULN GLUCOSE, SERUM mmol/L 4.1 GLUC \<65 mg/dL, OR \>220 mg/dL PROTEIN, TOTAL g/L 5.0 TPRO \<0.9X LLN OR \>1.1X ULN, OR IF PRE RX\<LLN THEN USE 0.9X PRE RX OR \>ULN, OR IF PRE RX\>ULN THEN USE 1.1X PRE RX OR \<LLN ALBUMIN g/L 3.0 ALB \<0.9X LLN, OR IF PRE RX\<LLN THEN USE \<0.75X PRE RX CHOLESTEROL, TOTAL (TC) mmol/L 5.2 CHOL \>2X PRE R N = the number of participants with at least 1 on treatment lab result for each analyte

Time frame: Day 1 to Day 365; includes data up to 56 days post last dose in year 1 of double-blind period or first dose date in the year 2 of double-blind period, whichever is earlier

Population: All treated participants~NA (not available) indicates not-calculated as it was not a relevant pre-specified marked abnormality.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Other Marked Chemistry Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodGLUCOSE, SERUM, low33 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Other Marked Chemistry Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodGLUCOSE, SERUM, high10 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Other Marked Chemistry Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodPROTEIN, TOTAL, low44 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Other Marked Chemistry Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodPROTEIN, TOTAL, high0 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Other Marked Chemistry Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodALBUMIN, low10 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Other Marked Chemistry Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodALBUMIN, highNA participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Other Marked Chemistry Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodALBUMIN, low11 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Other Marked Chemistry Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodGLUCOSE, SERUM, low29 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Other Marked Chemistry Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodPROTEIN, TOTAL, high1 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Other Marked Chemistry Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodGLUCOSE, SERUM, high5 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Other Marked Chemistry Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodALBUMIN, highNA participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Other Marked Chemistry Laboratory Abnormalities During Year 1 of the Double Blind PeriodPROTEIN, TOTAL, low26 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Other Marked Chemistry Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind Period

LLN= Lower limit of normals ULN= Upper limit of normals Pre RX = Baseline value CALCIUM, TOTAL mmol/L 5.2 CA \<0.8X LLN OR \>1.2X ULN, OR IF PRE RX\<LLN THEN USE \<0.75X PRE RX OR \>ULN, OR IF PRE RX\>ULN THEN USE \>1.25X PRE RX OR \<LLN PHOSPHORUS, INORGANIC mmol/L 5.2 PHOS \<0.75X LLN OR \>1.25X ULN, OR IF PRE RX\<LLN THEN USE \<0.67X PRE RX OR \>ULN GLUCOSE, SERUM mmol/L 4.1 GLUC \<65 mg/dL, OR \>220 mg/dL PROTEIN, TOTAL g/L 5.0 TPRO \<0.9X LLN OR \>1.1X ULN, OR IF PRE RX\<LLN THEN USE 0.9X PRE RX OR \>ULN, OR IF PRE RX\>ULN THEN USE 1.1X PRE RX OR \<LLN ALBUMIN g/L 3.0 ALB \<0.9X LLN, OR IF PRE RX\<LLN THEN USE \<0.75X PRE RX CHOLESTEROL, TOTAL (TC) mmol/L 5.2 CHOL \>2X PRE R N = the number of participants with at least 1 on treatment lab result for each analyte

Time frame: Day 1 to Day 729

Population: All treated participants~NA (not available) indicates not-calculated as it was not a relevant pre-specified marked abnormality.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Other Marked Chemistry Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodPROTEIN, TOTAL, low10 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Other Marked Chemistry Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodGLUCOSE, SERUM, low15 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Other Marked Chemistry Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodPROTEIN, TOTAL, high2 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Other Marked Chemistry Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodGLUCOSE, FASTING SERUM, low3 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Other Marked Chemistry Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodALBUMIN, low4 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Other Marked Chemistry Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodGLUCOSE, FASTING SERUM, high3 participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Other Marked Chemistry Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodALBUMIN, highNA participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Other Marked Chemistry Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodGLUCOSE, SERUM, high3 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Other Marked Chemistry Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodALBUMIN, highNA participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Other Marked Chemistry Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodGLUCOSE, SERUM, low24 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Other Marked Chemistry Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodGLUCOSE, SERUM, high2 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Other Marked Chemistry Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodGLUCOSE, FASTING SERUM, high1 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Other Marked Chemistry Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodPROTEIN, TOTAL, low7 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Other Marked Chemistry Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodPROTEIN, TOTAL, high3 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Other Marked Chemistry Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodALBUMIN, low5 participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Other Marked Chemistry Laboratory Abnormalities in the Double Blind PeriodGLUCOSE, FASTING SERUM, low1 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Sustained Change From Higher Level of Response to no Response During the Double-blind Period

Sustained change to no response is defined as going from CR (or PR) to NR and remaining in NR for at least 2 consecutive visits; visits should be approximately 4 weeks apart. This analysis will be based on time from response CR (or PR) to the first visit in which the no response (NR) was achieved and sustained to the next visit.

Time frame: Day 365, Day 729

Population: All randomized and treated participants, as observed, calculated per modified criteria (UPCR and eGFR only)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Sustained Change From Higher Level of Response to no Response During the Double-blind PeriodDay 3655 Participants
Abatacept IVNumber of Participants With Sustained Change From Higher Level of Response to no Response During the Double-blind PeriodDay 72952 Participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Sustained Change From Higher Level of Response to no Response During the Double-blind PeriodDay 3653 Participants
Placebo IVNumber of Participants With Sustained Change From Higher Level of Response to no Response During the Double-blind PeriodDay 72956 Participants
95% CI: [0.3251, 6.2849]
95% CI: [-8.4, 15.1]
Secondary

Percentage of Nephrotic Participants in Complete Renal Response of Lupus Glomerulonephritis at Day 365 of the Double-blind Period

Number of participants achieving CR was divided by total participants in that arm, expressed as a percentage. CR is defined the following criteria: eGFR is normal or no \<85% of the baseline value; eGFR is based on mean creatinine value from day 358 and 365. Proteinuria: UPCR\<0.5 mg/mg. Urine sediment: No cellular casts. Corticosteroid dose: Daily dose must be no \>10 mg prednisone or equivalent for at least 28 days prior. Subjects with \>10mg/day prednisone or equivalent for non-renal disease within 28 days prior to day 365 will be imputed as CR if the following are true: Met all criteria for CR at day 337 and all criteria for CR except corticosteroid dose at day 365; Investigator confirms increase in steroid dose is not related to renal disease. Adjusted odds ratio is estimated from logistic regression model which includes treatment group, baseline ACEi/ARBs use, race and baseline UPCR as a continuous variable.

Time frame: Day 365

Population: All randomized and treated nephrotic participants. Nephrotic is defined as screening UPCR \>= 3.0mg/mg (\>=339mg/mmol)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Abatacept IVPercentage of Nephrotic Participants in Complete Renal Response of Lupus Glomerulonephritis at Day 365 of the Double-blind Period27 Percentage
Placebo IVPercentage of Nephrotic Participants in Complete Renal Response of Lupus Glomerulonephritis at Day 365 of the Double-blind Period29.5 Percentage
95% CI: [0.4148, 1.5956]
Secondary

Percentage of Nephrotic Participants in Complete Renal Response of Lupus Glomerulonephritis at Day 729 of the Double-blind Period

Number of participants achieving CR was divided by total participants in that arm, expressed as a percentage. CR is defined the following criteria: eGFR is normal or no \<85% of the baseline value; eGFR is based on mean creatinine value from day 358 and 365. Proteinuria: UPCR\<0.5 mg/mg. Urine sediment: No cellular casts. Corticosteroid dose: Daily dose must be no \>10 mg prednisone or equivalent for at least 28 days prior. Subjects with \>10mg/day prednisone or equivalent for non-renal disease within 28 days prior to day 365 will be imputed as CR if the following are true: Met all criteria for CR at day 337 and all criteria for CR except corticosteroid dose at day 365; Investigator confirms increase in steroid dose is not related to renal disease. Adjusted odds ratio is estimated from logistic regression model which includes treatment group, baseline ACEi/ARBs use, race and baseline UPCR as a continuous variable.

Time frame: Day 729

Population: All randomized and treated nephrotic participants, as observed, calculated per modified criteria (UPCR and eGFR only). Nephrotic is defined as screening UPCR \>= 3.0mg/mg (\>=339mg/mmol)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Abatacept IVPercentage of Nephrotic Participants in Complete Renal Response of Lupus Glomerulonephritis at Day 729 of the Double-blind Period50.0 Percentage
Placebo IVPercentage of Nephrotic Participants in Complete Renal Response of Lupus Glomerulonephritis at Day 729 of the Double-blind Period49.0 Percentage
Secondary

Percentage of Participants in Overall Population in Complete Renal Response of Lupus Glomerulonephritis at Day 729 of the Double-blind Period

Number of participants achieving CR was divided by total participants in that arm, expressed as a percentage. CR is defined the following criteria: eGFR is normal or no \<85% of the baseline value; eGFR is based on mean creatinine value from day 358 and 365. Proteinuria: UPCR\<0.5 mg/mg. Urine sediment: No cellular casts. Corticosteroid dose: Daily dose must be no \>10 mg prednisone or equivalent for at least 28 days prior. Subjects with \>10mg/day prednisone or equivalent for non-renal disease within 28 days prior to day 365 will be imputed as CR if the following are true: Met all criteria for CR at day 337 and all criteria for CR except corticosteroid dose at day 365; Investigator confirms increase in steroid dose is not related to renal disease. Adjusted odds ratio is estimated from logistic regression model which includes treatment group, baseline ACEi/ARBs use, race and baseline UPCR as a continuous variable.

Time frame: Day 729

Population: All randomized and treated participants, as observed, calculated per modified criteria (UPCR and eGFR only)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Abatacept IVPercentage of Participants in Overall Population in Complete Renal Response of Lupus Glomerulonephritis at Day 729 of the Double-blind Period61.9 Percentage
Placebo IVPercentage of Participants in Overall Population in Complete Renal Response of Lupus Glomerulonephritis at Day 729 of the Double-blind Period52.7 Percentage
Secondary

Percentage of Participants in Treatment Failure Over Time During the Double-blind Period

Lupus treatment failure is defined as any of the following: Death, unless due to physical trauma or violence; Renal Flare; sustained doubling of creatinine from baseline (greater of Screening or Study Day 1 value); initiation of rescue therapy for treatment of active lupus nephritis after Study Week 20. Overall treatment failure is defined as lupus treatment failure plus discontinuation of study drug for any reason except death due to physical trauma or violence, pregnancy or administrative decision by Sponsor.

Time frame: Day 365, Day 729

Population: All randomized and treated participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Abatacept IVPercentage of Participants in Treatment Failure Over Time During the Double-blind PeriodLupus treatment failure (LTF) - Day 3653.5 Percentage
Abatacept IVPercentage of Participants in Treatment Failure Over Time During the Double-blind PeriodLTF - Day 7294.5 Percentage
Abatacept IVPercentage of Participants in Treatment Failure Over Time During the Double-blind PeriodOverall treatment failure (OTF) - Day 3654.5 Percentage
Abatacept IVPercentage of Participants in Treatment Failure Over Time During the Double-blind PeriodOTF - Day 7295.2 Percentage
Placebo IVPercentage of Participants in Treatment Failure Over Time During the Double-blind PeriodOverall treatment failure (OTF) - Day 3654.9 Percentage
Placebo IVPercentage of Participants in Treatment Failure Over Time During the Double-blind PeriodLupus treatment failure (LTF) - Day 3654.4 Percentage
Placebo IVPercentage of Participants in Treatment Failure Over Time During the Double-blind PeriodOTF - Day 7298.4 Percentage
Placebo IVPercentage of Participants in Treatment Failure Over Time During the Double-blind PeriodLTF - Day 7295.3 Percentage
Comparison: Lupus treatment failure - Day 36595% CI: [-4.760178, 2.823876]
Comparison: Overall treatment failure - Day 36595% CI: [-4.588691, 3.647365]
95% CI: [-4.5, 6.1]
95% CI: [-3.3, 8.8]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Ranked Outcome of Complete Renal Response, Partial Renal Response (PR), and No Renal Response (NR) During the Double-blind Period

Complete Renal Response or Complete Response (CR): defined as meeting ALL of the following criteria: eGFR normal OR no less than 85% of the baseline value; UPCR \< 0.5; Urine sediment: No cellular casts; Daily corticosteroid dose must be no greater than 10 mg prednisone or equivalent for at least 28 days prior to assessment. Partial Renal Response or Partial Response (PR): defined as meeting ALL of the following criteria: Participant does not meet criteria for CR; eGFR no less than 85% of the lesser of the values at screening or randomization (Day 1); UPCR \< 0.5 OR 50% reduced from baseline and \< 1 if baseline value was \< 3, OR 50% reduced from baseline and \< 3 if baseline value was greater than or equal to 3; Urine sediment: no cellular casts; daily corticosteroid dose no greater than 10 mg/day prednisone or prednisone equivalent for at least 28 days prior to assessment. No Renal Response or No Response (NR): defined as not meeting criteria for CR or PR or withdrawn

Time frame: Day 365, Day 729

Population: All randomized and treated participants.~Year 1 data based on all elements of clinical response definition: UPCR, eGFR and cellular casts.~Study terminated and Year 2 data based on only two clinical response definition elements: UPCR and eGFR. Data presented for the as observed population (those that completed Day 729).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Abatacept IVPercentage of Participants With Ranked Outcome of Complete Renal Response, Partial Renal Response (PR), and No Renal Response (NR) During the Double-blind PeriodCR - Day 36535.1 Percentage
Abatacept IVPercentage of Participants With Ranked Outcome of Complete Renal Response, Partial Renal Response (PR), and No Renal Response (NR) During the Double-blind PeriodPR - Day 36520.8 Percentage
Abatacept IVPercentage of Participants With Ranked Outcome of Complete Renal Response, Partial Renal Response (PR), and No Renal Response (NR) During the Double-blind PeriodNR - Day 36544.1 Percentage
Abatacept IVPercentage of Participants With Ranked Outcome of Complete Renal Response, Partial Renal Response (PR), and No Renal Response (NR) During the Double-blind PeriodCR - Day 72960.7 Percentage
Abatacept IVPercentage of Participants With Ranked Outcome of Complete Renal Response, Partial Renal Response (PR), and No Renal Response (NR) During the Double-blind PeriodPR - Day 72925.9 Percentage
Abatacept IVPercentage of Participants With Ranked Outcome of Complete Renal Response, Partial Renal Response (PR), and No Renal Response (NR) During the Double-blind PeriodNR - Day 72913.4 Percentage
Placebo IVPercentage of Participants With Ranked Outcome of Complete Renal Response, Partial Renal Response (PR), and No Renal Response (NR) During the Double-blind PeriodPR - Day 72922.7 Percentage
Placebo IVPercentage of Participants With Ranked Outcome of Complete Renal Response, Partial Renal Response (PR), and No Renal Response (NR) During the Double-blind PeriodCR - Day 36533.5 Percentage
Placebo IVPercentage of Participants With Ranked Outcome of Complete Renal Response, Partial Renal Response (PR), and No Renal Response (NR) During the Double-blind PeriodCR - Day 72953.6 Percentage
Placebo IVPercentage of Participants With Ranked Outcome of Complete Renal Response, Partial Renal Response (PR), and No Renal Response (NR) During the Double-blind PeriodPR - Day 36521.7 Percentage
Placebo IVPercentage of Participants With Ranked Outcome of Complete Renal Response, Partial Renal Response (PR), and No Renal Response (NR) During the Double-blind PeriodNR - Day 72923.6 Percentage
Placebo IVPercentage of Participants With Ranked Outcome of Complete Renal Response, Partial Renal Response (PR), and No Renal Response (NR) During the Double-blind PeriodNR - Day 36544.8 Percentage
Comparison: CR - Day 36595% CI: [-7.595828, 10.897784]
Comparison: PR - Day 36595% CI: [-8.848056, 7.082461]
Comparison: NR - Day 36595% CI: [-10.446714, 8.910353]
Secondary

Summary Statistics for Diastolic Blood Pressure

Summary statistics for diastolic blood pressure

Time frame: Day 1 to Day 729

Population: All treated participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Abatacept IVSummary Statistics for Diastolic Blood PressureDay 729, end of observation67.5 mmHgStandard Deviation 9.6
Abatacept IVSummary Statistics for Diastolic Blood PressureDay 1, end of observation76.5 mmHgStandard Deviation 11.49
Abatacept IVSummary Statistics for Diastolic Blood PressureDay 365, end of observation73.5 mmHgStandard Deviation 10.75
Placebo IVSummary Statistics for Diastolic Blood PressureDay 1, end of observation77.0 mmHgStandard Deviation 11.19
Placebo IVSummary Statistics for Diastolic Blood PressureDay 365, end of observation77.5 mmHgStandard Deviation 10.61
Placebo IVSummary Statistics for Diastolic Blood PressureDay 729, end of observation72.7 mmHgStandard Deviation 9.45
Secondary

Summary Statistics for Heart Rate

Summary statistics for Heart Rate

Time frame: Day 1 to Day 729

Population: All treated participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Abatacept IVSummary Statistics for Heart RateDay 1, end of observation80.6 beats per minuteStandard Deviation 10.91
Abatacept IVSummary Statistics for Heart RateDay 365, end of observation78.5 beats per minuteStandard Deviation 9.57
Abatacept IVSummary Statistics for Heart RateDay 729, end of observation76.2 beats per minuteStandard Deviation 11.69
Placebo IVSummary Statistics for Heart RateDay 1, end of observation81.4 beats per minuteStandard Deviation 10.64
Placebo IVSummary Statistics for Heart RateDay 365, end of observation70.0 beats per minuteStandard Deviation 14.14
Placebo IVSummary Statistics for Heart RateDay 729, end of observation76.7 beats per minuteStandard Deviation 10.36
Secondary

Summary Statistics for Systolic Blood Pressure

Summary statistics for systolic blood pressure

Time frame: Day 1 to Day 729

Population: All treated participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Abatacept IVSummary Statistics for Systolic Blood PressureDay 1, end of observation122.0 mmHgStandard Deviation 15.48
Abatacept IVSummary Statistics for Systolic Blood PressureDay 365, end of observation112.3 mmHgStandard Deviation 18.45
Abatacept IVSummary Statistics for Systolic Blood PressureDay 729, end of observation108.6 mmHgStandard Deviation 13.29
Placebo IVSummary Statistics for Systolic Blood PressureDay 1, end of observation122.6 mmHgStandard Deviation 15.31
Placebo IVSummary Statistics for Systolic Blood PressureDay 365, end of observation115.0 mmHgStandard Deviation 7.07
Placebo IVSummary Statistics for Systolic Blood PressureDay 729, end of observation114.2 mmHgStandard Deviation 14.51

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026