Skip to content

Evaluation of Left Ventricular Filling Pressures During Exercise

Evaluation of Left Ventricular Filling Pressures During Exercise: Comparative Study, Catheterization Versus Echocardiography

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01714752
Acronym
PREFFORT
Enrollment
60
Registered
2012-10-26
Start date
2012-12-31
Completion date
2013-09-30
Last updated
2013-09-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFPEF), Left Ventricular End Diastolic Pressure (LVEDP)

Keywords

Diagnosis, Left ventricular end diastolic pressure (LVEDP), Exercise echocardiography, Left atrial remodeling

Brief summary

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF) is common and is a real public health issue. Diagnosis, especially when there are no congestive signs, is difficult. It has been shown that many patients with suspected HFPEF had left ventricular (LV) filling pressures elevated only at exercise (normal at rest). Using stress echocardiography and taking into account left atrial (LA) remodeling at rest as a memory of chronic elevation of filling pressures. We believe that it is possible to improve the noninvasive diagnosis of exercise elevation of the LV end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP).

Detailed description

Purpose Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF) is common and is a real public health issue. Diagnosis, especially when there are no congestive signs, is difficult. It has been shown that many patients with suspected HFPEF had left ventricular (LV) filling pressures elevated only at exercise (normal at rest). Hypothesis Using stress echocardiography and taking into account left atrial (LA) remodeling at rest as a memory of chronic elevation of filling pressures. We believe that it is possible to improve the noninvasive diagnosis of exercise elevation of the LV end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP). Methods Prospective, monocentric and comparative study: catheterization versus echocardiography. 60 patients referred for coronary angiography will be recruited consecutively during their hospitalization. Patients should perform a low intensity and short duration exercise, in both catheterization and echo labs (pedaling 3 minutes at 25Watts then, 3 minutes at 50W) The LVEDP will be measured invasively with a pigtail, at rest and at both levels of exercise. Echocardiography will be performed within 24 hours after catheterization, after a full examination at rest, an identical exercise (same intensity, same duration, same position of the patient) than made in catheterization lab will be done. Following parameters will be recorded at both stress levels: trans mitral flow, mitral annular pulsed tissue Doppler imaging (both lateral and septal) and tricuspid regurgitation flow. The doctor who will perform the echocardiographic acquisitions will not be informed of the results of catheterization. The acquisitions will be analyzed in a second time still blinded to the catheterization data. The following echocardiographic parameters will be collected and compared to the invasive measurement of LVEDP: * Ratio between pulsed Doppler peak E velocity and peak Ea velocity obtained with tissue Doppler imaging (E/Ea ratio) at rest and exercise, * maximal LA volume indexed to body area * (maximal LA volume) to (maximal LV volume) ratio. * LA distensibility defined by: (maximal LA volume - minimal LA volume) / (minimal LA volume) * LA Global longitudinal strain Finally, it will be investigated whether the combined use of E/Ea ratio at exercise with LA remodeling indices (of morphology and/or function) improves the performance characteristics of diagnostic test, compared to a separate use of these parameters.

Interventions

PROCEDUREmeasure of left ventricular and diastolic pressure at exercise

Sponsors

French Federation of Cardiology
CollaboratorOTHER
French Cardiology Society
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients hospitalized for coronary angiography * Sinus Rhythm * Left ventricular Ejection Fraction \> 50%

Exclusion criteria

* Age \< 18years * Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy * Cardiac transplantation * Mitral stenosis * Mitral insufficiency \>2/4 * Severe calcification of mitral annulus * Mitral prothesis or mitral repair * aortic prothesis * Severe aortic stenosis * Atrial fibrillation * Acute coronary syndrom \< 3 months * Left ventricular thrombus * Severe renal Failure * failure of radial way for coronary angiography * coronary lesion indicating an angioplasty * impossibility to perform an exercise * refusal or inability to sign informed consent * no French medical insurance

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
E/Ea ratioDay 1E/Ea ratio as a non-invasive index of Left Ventricular and diastolic pressure (LVEDP) at exercise

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
left atrial (LA) morphologyDay 1To evaluate left atrial (LA) morphology at rest (maximal LA volume indexed to body area, maximal LA volume to maximal LV volume ratio) as an index of Left Ventricular end diastolic pressure (LVEDP) at exercise.
LA function at restDay 1To evaluate LA function at rest (distensibility, global longitudinal strain) as an index of Left Ventricular end diastolic pressure (LVEDP) at exercise.
E/Ea ratio at exercise with LA remodeling indices at restDay 1To investigate whether the combined use of E/Ea ratio at exercise with LA remodeling indices at rest (of morphology and/or function) improves the performance characteristics of diagnostic test compared to a separate use of these parameters.

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 12, 2026