Knee Prosthesis, Knee Replacement Arthroplasty
Conditions
Keywords
Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA), in vivo mechanics, kinematics, fluoroscopy
Brief summary
Utilize previously developed mathematical model to determine in vivo knee mechanics (kinematics, forces, stresses, areas and sound) for subjects having a Sigma Posterior Stabilizing (PS) mobile bearing (MB) total knee arthroplasty (TKA). There are several hypotheses for this study, although the most prominent is: Subjects having a Sigma RP PS TKA will experience polyethylene bearing rotation at 10 years post-operative, similar to their previous evaluations at six months, two years and five years.
Detailed description
Additional hypotheses: * Subjects having a Sigma RP PS TKA will experience full ideal femorotibial contact mechanics. * Subjects having a Sigma RP PS TKA will experience optimal cam/post mechanics. * Subjects having a Sigma RP PS TKA will experience continuous axial rotation in deep flexion. * Subjects having a Sigma RP PS TKA will experience optimal distribution of tibio-femoral and cam/post contact forces over a broad area on the post. * Subjects having a Sigma RP PS TKA will experience a smooth transition of the cam on the post, not an abrupt slide as seen with fixed bearing PS TKA. * The use of the sound sensors will detect cam/post contact mechanics under in vivo conditions.
Interventions
Sigma PS RP TKA including a polyethylene insert with 4 beads
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* At least six months post-operative * Between 40-85 years of age * Have a body weight of less than 250 lbs. * Judged clinically successful with a AKS greater than 90 * Have the DePuy Sigma mobile bearing TKA * Good-to-excellent post-operative passive flexion * Must be willing to sign the IC and HIPAA forms.
Exclusion criteria
* Pregnant females * Those not willing to sign the IC and HIPAA forms
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| In Vivo Linear Knee Kinematics From Fluoroscopy Evaluation During Deep Knee Bend Activity | 10 yrs post-operative | The values that were reported indicate the motion of the contact point from full extension to patient's maximum flexion. Throughout flexion, if the point translated forward (anteriorly) atop the tibial tray, the number was reported as positive. If the point traveled backwards (posteriorly) atop the tibial tray, the number was reported as negative. |
| Femoral Axial Rotation With Respect to the Tibia During Deep Knee Bend Activity | 10 yrs post-operative | — |
| Range of Motion During Flexion of Deep Knee Bend Activity | 10 yrs post-operative | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| In Vivo Knee Force Values From Fluoroscopy Evaluation During Deep Knee Bend Activity | 10 yrs post-operative | The intended unit of measure is times Body Weight (or xBW), relating to a ratio. |
| Condyle Contact Area at Maximum Flexion During Deep Knee Bend Activity | 10 yrs post-operative | — |
| Condyle Contact Stress at Maximum Flexion During Deep Knee Bend Activity | 10 yrs post-operative | — |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
hospital, medical clinic
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Sigma Posterior Stabilizing Rotating Platform TKA Beaded Poly subjects implanted with the Sigma Posterior Stabilizing Rotating Platform TKA including a polyethylene insert with 4 beads that allow for determination of polyethylene rotation. | 8 |
| Total | 8 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Sigma Posterior Stabilizing Rotating Platform TKA Beaded Poly |
|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 7 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 1 Participants |
| Age, Continuous | 74 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6 |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 8 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 6 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 2 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 8 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 8 |
Outcome results
Femoral Axial Rotation With Respect to the Tibia During Deep Knee Bend Activity
Time frame: 10 yrs post-operative
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| In Vivo Knee Kinematics From Fluoroscopy Evaluation During Dee | Femoral Axial Rotation With Respect to the Tibia During Deep Knee Bend Activity | 6.1 degrees | Standard Deviation 5.8 |
In Vivo Linear Knee Kinematics From Fluoroscopy Evaluation During Deep Knee Bend Activity
The values that were reported indicate the motion of the contact point from full extension to patient's maximum flexion. Throughout flexion, if the point translated forward (anteriorly) atop the tibial tray, the number was reported as positive. If the point traveled backwards (posteriorly) atop the tibial tray, the number was reported as negative.
Time frame: 10 yrs post-operative
Population: Subjects implanted with the Sigma Posterior Stabilizing Rotating Platform TKA including a polyethylene insert with 4 beads that allow for determination of polyethylene rotation.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| In Vivo Knee Kinematics From Fluoroscopy Evaluation During Dee | In Vivo Linear Knee Kinematics From Fluoroscopy Evaluation During Deep Knee Bend Activity | Lateral Anterior Posterior Deep Knee Bend | -4.1 mm | Standard Deviation 2.4 |
| In Vivo Knee Kinematics From Fluoroscopy Evaluation During Dee | In Vivo Linear Knee Kinematics From Fluoroscopy Evaluation During Deep Knee Bend Activity | Medial Anterior Posterior Deep Knee Bend | 1.2 mm | Standard Deviation 2.8 |
Range of Motion During Flexion of Deep Knee Bend Activity
Time frame: 10 yrs post-operative
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| In Vivo Knee Kinematics From Fluoroscopy Evaluation During Dee | Range of Motion During Flexion of Deep Knee Bend Activity | 103 degrees | Standard Deviation 11.2 |
Condyle Contact Area at Maximum Flexion During Deep Knee Bend Activity
Time frame: 10 yrs post-operative
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| In Vivo Knee Kinematics From Fluoroscopy Evaluation During Dee | Condyle Contact Area at Maximum Flexion During Deep Knee Bend Activity | Medial | 109.16 mm^2 | Standard Deviation 2.82 |
| In Vivo Knee Kinematics From Fluoroscopy Evaluation During Dee | Condyle Contact Area at Maximum Flexion During Deep Knee Bend Activity | Lateral | 104.78 mm^2 | Standard Deviation 21.22 |
Condyle Contact Stress at Maximum Flexion During Deep Knee Bend Activity
Time frame: 10 yrs post-operative
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| In Vivo Knee Kinematics From Fluoroscopy Evaluation During Dee | Condyle Contact Stress at Maximum Flexion During Deep Knee Bend Activity | Average Lateral Condyle Contact Stress | 10.05 MPa | Standard Deviation 1.45 |
| In Vivo Knee Kinematics From Fluoroscopy Evaluation During Dee | Condyle Contact Stress at Maximum Flexion During Deep Knee Bend Activity | Average Medial Condyle Contact Stress | 10.66 MPa | Standard Deviation 1.75 |
In Vivo Knee Force Values From Fluoroscopy Evaluation During Deep Knee Bend Activity
The intended unit of measure is times Body Weight (or xBW), relating to a ratio.
Time frame: 10 yrs post-operative
Population: Subjects implanted with the Sigma Posterior Stabilizing Rotating Platform TKA including a polyethylene insert with 4 beads that allow for determination of polyethylene rotation
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| In Vivo Knee Kinematics From Fluoroscopy Evaluation During Dee | In Vivo Knee Force Values From Fluoroscopy Evaluation During Deep Knee Bend Activity | Medial Condyle Knee Force at Maximum Flexion | 1.57 times body weight | Standard Deviation 0.53 |
| In Vivo Knee Kinematics From Fluoroscopy Evaluation During Dee | In Vivo Knee Force Values From Fluoroscopy Evaluation During Deep Knee Bend Activity | Lateral Condyle Knee Force at Maximum Flexion | 1.39 times body weight | Standard Deviation 0.36 |