Skip to content

Mechanics Analysis of Patients Having a Sigma Mobile Bearing TKA

In Vivo Mechanics Analysis of Patients Having a Sigma Mobile Bearing TKA

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01714492
Acronym
Sigma MB TKA
Enrollment
8
Registered
2012-10-26
Start date
2012-04-30
Completion date
2012-11-30
Last updated
2019-10-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Knee Prosthesis, Knee Replacement Arthroplasty

Keywords

Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA), in vivo mechanics, kinematics, fluoroscopy

Brief summary

Utilize previously developed mathematical model to determine in vivo knee mechanics (kinematics, forces, stresses, areas and sound) for subjects having a Sigma Posterior Stabilizing (PS) mobile bearing (MB) total knee arthroplasty (TKA). There are several hypotheses for this study, although the most prominent is: Subjects having a Sigma RP PS TKA will experience polyethylene bearing rotation at 10 years post-operative, similar to their previous evaluations at six months, two years and five years.

Detailed description

Additional hypotheses: * Subjects having a Sigma RP PS TKA will experience full ideal femorotibial contact mechanics. * Subjects having a Sigma RP PS TKA will experience optimal cam/post mechanics. * Subjects having a Sigma RP PS TKA will experience continuous axial rotation in deep flexion. * Subjects having a Sigma RP PS TKA will experience optimal distribution of tibio-femoral and cam/post contact forces over a broad area on the post. * Subjects having a Sigma RP PS TKA will experience a smooth transition of the cam on the post, not an abrupt slide as seen with fixed bearing PS TKA. * The use of the sound sensors will detect cam/post contact mechanics under in vivo conditions.

Interventions

DEVICESigma Posterior Stabilizing Rotating Platform TKA Beaded Poly

Sigma PS RP TKA including a polyethylene insert with 4 beads

Sponsors

DePuy Orthopaedics
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
The University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* At least six months post-operative * Between 40-85 years of age * Have a body weight of less than 250 lbs. * Judged clinically successful with a AKS greater than 90 * Have the DePuy Sigma mobile bearing TKA * Good-to-excellent post-operative passive flexion * Must be willing to sign the IC and HIPAA forms.

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant females * Those not willing to sign the IC and HIPAA forms

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
In Vivo Linear Knee Kinematics From Fluoroscopy Evaluation During Deep Knee Bend Activity10 yrs post-operativeThe values that were reported indicate the motion of the contact point from full extension to patient's maximum flexion. Throughout flexion, if the point translated forward (anteriorly) atop the tibial tray, the number was reported as positive. If the point traveled backwards (posteriorly) atop the tibial tray, the number was reported as negative.
Femoral Axial Rotation With Respect to the Tibia During Deep Knee Bend Activity10 yrs post-operative
Range of Motion During Flexion of Deep Knee Bend Activity10 yrs post-operative

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
In Vivo Knee Force Values From Fluoroscopy Evaluation During Deep Knee Bend Activity10 yrs post-operativeThe intended unit of measure is times Body Weight (or xBW), relating to a ratio.
Condyle Contact Area at Maximum Flexion During Deep Knee Bend Activity10 yrs post-operative
Condyle Contact Stress at Maximum Flexion During Deep Knee Bend Activity10 yrs post-operative

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

hospital, medical clinic

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Sigma Posterior Stabilizing Rotating Platform TKA Beaded Poly
subjects implanted with the Sigma Posterior Stabilizing Rotating Platform TKA including a polyethylene insert with 4 beads that allow for determination of polyethylene rotation.
8
Total8

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSigma Posterior Stabilizing Rotating Platform TKA Beaded Poly
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
7 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
1 Participants
Age, Continuous74 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6
Region of Enrollment
United States
8 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 8
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 8

Outcome results

Primary

Femoral Axial Rotation With Respect to the Tibia During Deep Knee Bend Activity

Time frame: 10 yrs post-operative

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
In Vivo Knee Kinematics From Fluoroscopy Evaluation During DeeFemoral Axial Rotation With Respect to the Tibia During Deep Knee Bend Activity6.1 degreesStandard Deviation 5.8
Primary

In Vivo Linear Knee Kinematics From Fluoroscopy Evaluation During Deep Knee Bend Activity

The values that were reported indicate the motion of the contact point from full extension to patient's maximum flexion. Throughout flexion, if the point translated forward (anteriorly) atop the tibial tray, the number was reported as positive. If the point traveled backwards (posteriorly) atop the tibial tray, the number was reported as negative.

Time frame: 10 yrs post-operative

Population: Subjects implanted with the Sigma Posterior Stabilizing Rotating Platform TKA including a polyethylene insert with 4 beads that allow for determination of polyethylene rotation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
In Vivo Knee Kinematics From Fluoroscopy Evaluation During DeeIn Vivo Linear Knee Kinematics From Fluoroscopy Evaluation During Deep Knee Bend ActivityLateral Anterior Posterior Deep Knee Bend-4.1 mmStandard Deviation 2.4
In Vivo Knee Kinematics From Fluoroscopy Evaluation During DeeIn Vivo Linear Knee Kinematics From Fluoroscopy Evaluation During Deep Knee Bend ActivityMedial Anterior Posterior Deep Knee Bend1.2 mmStandard Deviation 2.8
Primary

Range of Motion During Flexion of Deep Knee Bend Activity

Time frame: 10 yrs post-operative

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
In Vivo Knee Kinematics From Fluoroscopy Evaluation During DeeRange of Motion During Flexion of Deep Knee Bend Activity103 degreesStandard Deviation 11.2
Secondary

Condyle Contact Area at Maximum Flexion During Deep Knee Bend Activity

Time frame: 10 yrs post-operative

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
In Vivo Knee Kinematics From Fluoroscopy Evaluation During DeeCondyle Contact Area at Maximum Flexion During Deep Knee Bend ActivityMedial109.16 mm^2Standard Deviation 2.82
In Vivo Knee Kinematics From Fluoroscopy Evaluation During DeeCondyle Contact Area at Maximum Flexion During Deep Knee Bend ActivityLateral104.78 mm^2Standard Deviation 21.22
Secondary

Condyle Contact Stress at Maximum Flexion During Deep Knee Bend Activity

Time frame: 10 yrs post-operative

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
In Vivo Knee Kinematics From Fluoroscopy Evaluation During DeeCondyle Contact Stress at Maximum Flexion During Deep Knee Bend ActivityAverage Lateral Condyle Contact Stress10.05 MPaStandard Deviation 1.45
In Vivo Knee Kinematics From Fluoroscopy Evaluation During DeeCondyle Contact Stress at Maximum Flexion During Deep Knee Bend ActivityAverage Medial Condyle Contact Stress10.66 MPaStandard Deviation 1.75
Secondary

In Vivo Knee Force Values From Fluoroscopy Evaluation During Deep Knee Bend Activity

The intended unit of measure is times Body Weight (or xBW), relating to a ratio.

Time frame: 10 yrs post-operative

Population: Subjects implanted with the Sigma Posterior Stabilizing Rotating Platform TKA including a polyethylene insert with 4 beads that allow for determination of polyethylene rotation

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
In Vivo Knee Kinematics From Fluoroscopy Evaluation During DeeIn Vivo Knee Force Values From Fluoroscopy Evaluation During Deep Knee Bend ActivityMedial Condyle Knee Force at Maximum Flexion1.57 times body weightStandard Deviation 0.53
In Vivo Knee Kinematics From Fluoroscopy Evaluation During DeeIn Vivo Knee Force Values From Fluoroscopy Evaluation During Deep Knee Bend ActivityLateral Condyle Knee Force at Maximum Flexion1.39 times body weightStandard Deviation 0.36

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026