Skip to content

Tacrolimus, Sirolimus and Ustekinumab vs. Tacrolimus and Sirolimus for the Prevention of Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease

Tacrolimus, Sirolimus and Ustekinumab vs. Tacrolimus and Sirolimus for the Prevention of Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease Following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01713400
Acronym
Ustekinumab
Enrollment
54
Registered
2012-10-24
Start date
2013-02-25
Completion date
2018-06-14
Last updated
2020-03-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Graft vs. Host Disease

Keywords

Acute Graft vs. Host Disease (aGVHD), Graft vs. Host Disease (GVHD)

Brief summary

To determine whether treatment with ustekinumab will alter the ratio of T Regulatory Cell (Treg)/total cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4)+ cells in peripheral blood at day 30 post-hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT).

Detailed description

This is a comparative study to assess the biologic and clinical activity of the agent ustekinumab when given in concert with our established regimen of SIR/TAC. Patients will be randomly assigned between the standard regimen of tacrolimus/sirolimus (TAC/SIR + placebo) vs. the investigational regimen of tacrolimus/sirolimus/ustekinumab (TAC/SIR/U) in a 1:1 scheme.

Interventions

DRUGUstekinumab

One subcutaneous injection administered on day -1 and repeated on day +20 after transplant

DRUGPlacebo

Subcutaneous injection of sterile saline (identical volume to that of ustekinumab) administered via the identical route and schedule as ustekinumab.

Administered starting day -3 according to Blood and Marrow Transplant (BMT) Program standard operating procedures. TAC levels to be monitored and maintained at a target range of 3-7 given concurrent administration with sirolimus. Specific dose adjustments within this therapeutic range to be determined by the treating physician.

DRUGSirolimus

Administered initially as an oral loading dose on day -1. Thereafter, SIR to be administered as an oral regimen daily. The dose for both loading and ongoing administration to be dictated by the standard operating procedures of the BMT program. SIR levels to be monitored according to standard procedures. Dose adjustments to be made according to drug levels, with target range of 5-14ng/mL (therapeutic range by Abbott Architect instrument at Moffitt).

Sponsors

Gateway for Cancer Research
CollaboratorOTHER
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Hematologic disorder requiring allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation * Adequate vital organ function: * Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) \>/= 45% by multigated acquisition (MUGA) scan * FEV1, FVC, and diffusing lung capacity oxygenation (DLCO) \>/= 50% of predicted values on pulmonary function tests * Transaminases (AST, ALT) \< 3 times upper limit of normal values * Creatinine clearance \>/= 50 cc/min. * Performance status: Karnofsky Performance Status Score \>/= 60%.

Exclusion criteria

* Active infection not controlled with appropriate antimicrobial therapy * HIV, hepatitis B, or hepatitis C infection * Sorror's co-morbidity factors with total score \> 3 * Important modification to co-morbidity index calculation: DLCO will not be included in assessment of pulmonary risk, excepting those with DLCO \< 50%, who will merit a score of 3 and thereby be excluded from the trial. * Anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) as part of the conditioning regimen * Cyclophosphamide as part of the conditioning regimens

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
T Regulatory Cell (Treg)/Total Cluster of Differentiation 4 (CD4)+ Ratio30 days post transplantMedian Blood Treg/Total CD4+ Ratio at day 30 following hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Comparison between study arms: Ustekinumab vs. Placebo. From NCI Dictionary: T reg - A type of immune cell that blocks the actions of some other types of lymphocytes, to keep the immune system from becoming over-active. T regs are being studied in the treatment of cancer. A T reg is a type of white blood cell and a type of lymphocyte. Also called regulatory T cell, suppressor T cell, and T-regulatory cell.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of Acute Graft vs. Host Disease (AGVHD)100 days post transplantCumulative incidence of Grade II - IV AGVHD to be characterized weekly from day of transplant to day 100 using the 1995 updated grading scheme for Graft vs. Host Disease (GVHD) developed by Glucksberg, et al.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

54 participants (potential donors and recipients) were enrolled at Moffitt Cancer Center from 3/15/2013 through 5/22/2014.

Pre-assignment details

30 eligible recipients were randomly assigned 1:1 (Ustekinumab n=15, Placebo n=15) with stratification for donor type. Results Data pertains to recipients only.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ustekinumab
Ustekinumab, Tacrolimus and Sirolimus. Ustekinumab: 45 mg for adults who weight 100 kg or less; 90 mg for adults who weight greater than 100 kg. Tacrolimus: Level determined according to Blood and Marrow Transplant (BMT) Program standard operating procedures. Sirolimus: The dose for both loading and ongoing administration to be dictated by the standard operating procedures of the BMT program.
15
Placebo
Placebo, Tacrolimus, and Sirolimus. Placebo: Identical volume to that of ustekinumab. Tacrolimus: Level determined according to Blood and Marrow Transplant (BMT) Program standard operating procedures. Sirolimus: The dose for both loading and ongoing administration to be dictated by the standard operating procedures of the BMT program.
15
Total30

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicUstekinumabPlaceboTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
2 Participants4 Participants6 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
13 Participants11 Participants24 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
15 participants15 participants30 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants4 Participants11 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants11 Participants19 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
8 / 158 / 15
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 154 / 15

Outcome results

Primary

T Regulatory Cell (Treg)/Total Cluster of Differentiation 4 (CD4)+ Ratio

Median Blood Treg/Total CD4+ Ratio at day 30 following hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Comparison between study arms: Ustekinumab vs. Placebo. From NCI Dictionary: T reg - A type of immune cell that blocks the actions of some other types of lymphocytes, to keep the immune system from becoming over-active. T regs are being studied in the treatment of cancer. A T reg is a type of white blood cell and a type of lymphocyte. Also called regulatory T cell, suppressor T cell, and T-regulatory cell.

Time frame: 30 days post transplant

Population: All participating recipients

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
UstekinumabT Regulatory Cell (Treg)/Total Cluster of Differentiation 4 (CD4)+ Ratio13 ratio
PlaceboT Regulatory Cell (Treg)/Total Cluster of Differentiation 4 (CD4)+ Ratio11 ratio
Secondary

Incidence of Acute Graft vs. Host Disease (AGVHD)

Cumulative incidence of Grade II - IV AGVHD to be characterized weekly from day of transplant to day 100 using the 1995 updated grading scheme for Graft vs. Host Disease (GVHD) developed by Glucksberg, et al.

Time frame: 100 days post transplant

Population: All participating recipients

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
UstekinumabIncidence of Acute Graft vs. Host Disease (AGVHD)33.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboIncidence of Acute Graft vs. Host Disease (AGVHD)40.0 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 5, 2026