Skip to content

Radiofrequency Ablation Assisted Hepatectomy Versus Hepatectomy Alone for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Radiofrequency Ablation Assisted Hepatectomy and Hepatectomy Alone in the Treatment of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01713244
Enrollment
150
Registered
2012-10-24
Start date
2012-10-31
Completion date
2016-11-30
Last updated
2015-11-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Keywords

Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Radiofrequency Ablation, Hepatectomy, Recurrence

Brief summary

RFA has become a standard method in the treatment of small HCC(≤2 cm) due to its ease of use, safety, cost-effectiveness, and minimal invasiveness. It can ablated and blocked the small vessels while destroyed the tumor cell in situ. Surgical resection is the most widely accepted treatment for the patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in the Asian countries. But the effectiveness of hepatectomy was depressed because of the high recurrence rate. The spreading of the cancer cell along the portal vein or the hepatic vein system during the operation account for the tumor recurrence. Using RFA to ablate and block the small vessels around the tumor before resection will reduce the spreading of the cancer cell. Investigators hypothesized that the RFA assisted hepatectomy might result in lower recurrence rate than hepatectomy alone in the treatment of advanced HCC. Thus, the purpose of this study was to prospectively compare the effects of RFA assisted hepatectomy with hepatectomy alone for the treatment of advanced HCC.

Interventions

PROCEDURERFA assisted Hepatectomy

Using RFA to ablate and block the small vessels around the tumor before resection to reduce the spreading of the cancer cell.

PROCEDUREHepatectomy

Treat the advanced HCC with the hepatectomy only.

Sponsors

Southwest Hospital, China
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Diagnosis of HCC confirmed at our hospital. 2. Intrahepatic tumor count no higher than 3 and a minimum tumor diameter \> 3 cm, but no more than 8cm. 3. Liver function of Child-Pugh Class A or B. 4. Tumors lacked intrahepatic and extrahepatic metastasis. 5. Tumors had not invaded the portal vein, the hepatic vein trunk or the secondary branches. 6. Indocyanine green retention at 15 minutes (ICG-15) of \<10%. 7. No evidence of coagulopathy: platelet count \> 50 × 109/L and a prolonged prothrombin time of \< 5 seconds. 8. No other anti-tumor therapy received before the treatment. -

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients met the inclusion criteria but declined to participate. 2. Patients with severe portal hypertension, a history of esophageal variceal hemorrhage, severe hypersplenism syndrome, or refractory ascites. 3. Patients whose permanent pathology after treatment suggested metastatic liver cancer or primary liver cancer of another tissue type.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Recurrence-free Survival2 years

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Overall Survival2 years

Other

MeasureTime frame
Number of participants with adverse events2 years

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactKai Feng, M.D
fengkai7688@hotmail.com+86-23-13228683383

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026