Skip to content

Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate vs. Entecavir in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients With Partial Virologic Response to Entecavir

Switching to Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate vs. Continuing Entecavir in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients With Partial Virologic Response During Entecavir Therapy: STEEP Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01711567
Acronym
STEEP
Enrollment
60
Registered
2012-10-22
Start date
2013-04-30
Completion date
2016-11-30
Last updated
2016-11-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Hepatitis B

Keywords

Chronic Hepatitis B, TENOFOVIR, ENTECAVIR, PARTIAL RESPONDER

Brief summary

Entecavir, a potent antiviral agent, has been widely used for treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis B patients. However, about 20% of patients showed partial virologic response after 2 year of entecavir therapy (33% in HBeAg positive, 10% in HBeAg negative patients). Tenofovir is a nucleotide analogue with more potent antiviral activity. In addition, there is no cross resistance between the two drugs. Therefore it is assumed that tenofovir would be effective in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B patients who shows partial virologic response (detectable HBV DNA by real time PCR after 12 months of treatment) despite treatment with entecavir. In this study, we will compare the efficacy of switching to tenofovir with continuing entecavir in patients who shows partial virologic response to entecavir.

Detailed description

The number of patients needed was calculated using PASS 2008. We hypothesized that two-thirds (65%) of the patients receiving TDF, and one-fifth (20%) of the patients receiving ETV, would achieve virologic response. We also assumed a 15% drop-out rate; thus, 22 patients were needed in each group to achieve 80% power to demonstrate a difference between the groups with a 5% level of significance. The primary efficacy end point will be analyzed on a per-protocol basis, including only those patients who had completed the treatment schedule of study. In contrast, the intention-to-treat analysis will include all randomized subjects, even those dropped-out from the study before 12 months, as cases of treatment failure.

Interventions

DRUGtenofovir

tenofovir 300 mg qd

DRUGentecavir

entecavir 0.5 mg qd

Sponsors

Gilead Sciences
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Korea University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. CHB patients (positive HBsAg more than 6 months) 2. Age 19 years old 3. HBeAg positive or negative patients 4. Patients receiving entecavir 0.5 mg more than 12 months 5. Detectable HBV DNA by real time PCR (HBV \> 60 IU/mL) 6. Compensated liver function (Child-Pugh-Turcotte score ≤7, prothrombin time 3 sec above ULN or INR ≤1.5, serum albumin \>3 g/dL, total bilirubin \<2.5 mg/dL, no history of variceal bleeding, diuretics or ascites requiring paracentesis, hepatic encephalopathy)

Exclusion criteria

1. History of treatment with nucleotide analogue other than 0.5 mg of ETV 2. Serum creatinine level \> 1.5 mg/dL or creatinine clearance \< 50 mL/min 3. Absolute neutrophil count ≤ 1000 cell/mL 4. Hemoglobin level ≤ 10 g/dL in men or ≤ 9 g/dL in women 5. Antiviral resistance mutations on rtT184, rtS202, or rtM250 + rtM204V/I 6. A positive antibody test for human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis C virus, or hepatitis D virus 7. Pregnancy or lactation 8. HCC (in cases where alfa-fetoprotein levels were over 100 ng/mL, abdominal computed tomography or magnetic resonance image was performed to exclude HCC) 9. Untreated malignancy other than HCC.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Virologic response rate at year 1 (12 months) (HBV DNA < 20 IU/mL)up to the end of year 1 (12 months)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
-Degree of HBV DNA reduction, mean HBV DNA, biochemical and serologic response rates, resistance, and adverse events at year 1up to the end of year 1 (12 months)

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026