Skip to content

Normal Values in Ano-rectal 3D High Resolution Manometry

Ano-rectal 3D High Resolution Manometry: Normal Values and Comparison With Ultrasound Examination in Healthy Volunteers, Patients With Fecal Incontinence and Patients With Constipation

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01710579
Acronym
NOMAD
Enrollment
127
Registered
2012-10-19
Start date
2012-09-30
Completion date
2014-09-30
Last updated
2019-05-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anorectal Disorder, Constipation, Fecal Incontinence

Keywords

Primary esophageal achalasia, endoscopic myotomy, high resolution manometry

Brief summary

Ano-rectal manometry is indicative in patients with either fecal incontinence or constipation. Recently anorectal 3D- high resolution manometry has been developed. Pressure variations are measured circumferentially along the anal canal. It may allow a better understanding of anorectal disorders by displaying anal pressure asymmetry and it could be useful to assess the functional anatomy of the pelvic floor better than conventional manometry.

Interventions

PROCEDUREAnorectal 3D-high resolution manometry

Anorectal probe is used with a single-use protective sheath with an inflation balloon Control of balloon deflation Patient in left lateral decubitus position with hips flexed to 90° (this position is the most commonly use and the most convenient) Transanal insertion 2 minutes resting period: resting anal pressure will be evaluated the second minute of rest Sustained voluntary maximal squeeze for at least 30 seconds; the maneuver will be repeated once Valsalva Bear down maneuver; the maneuver will be repeated once Anorectal reflexes evaluation with 20-, 40- and 60-ml intra-rectal balloon inflation Probe removal

PROCEDUREAnorectal radial endosonography (rotative 360° probe)

Patient in left lateral decubitus position with hips flexed to 90° Transanal probe insertion Evaluation of internal and external anal sphincter integrity and puborectalis muscle at rest

PROCEDUREDynamic anorectal endosonography (sagittal and radial)

Patient in left lateral decubitus position with hips flexed to 90° Rectum is filled with 50-ml water Probe is covered with a water-filled balloon to maintain the acoustic window for the ultrasound wave Transanal probe insertion Slow and manual rotation of the linear probe through 360° to identify the various layers constituting the anal wall (mucosa, IAS, EAS), the layer forming the rectal wall and the perirectal tissues (puborectalis muscle, bladder, and vagina or prostate) After the initial examination, the patient will be asked to make a defecation effort with the probe left in the same position

Sponsors

Hospices Civils de Lyon
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Arm 1: 50 healthy volunteers Inclusions will be stratified on gender (10 males, 40 females), age (15 subjects under 40 years; 20 subjects between 40 and 60 years; and 15 subjects \>60 years) and parous (10 nullipara and 30 parous women). Inclusion criteria: Subject older than 18 years Absence of anorectal symptoms (no constipation, no fecal incontinence) Absence of pelvic floor disorders Vaizey score = 0 Kess score \< 9 Subject with health insurance Written informed consent Non inclusion criteria: Patient younger than 18 years Pregnancy Incapability to give consent No written informed consent Participation to another study at the same time Previous ano-rectal surgery Pelvic radiotherapy Neurological disorder Diabetes mellitus Arm 2: 50 patients with fecal incontinence Inclusion criteria: Subject older than 18 years Patient referred for anorectal manometry and/or ultrasound examination Fecal incontinence as main complain Vaizey score \> 6 Kess score \< 9 Subject with health insurance Written informed consent Non inclusion criteria: Patient younger than 18 years Pregnancy Incapability to give consent No written informed consent Participation to another study at the same time Rectal tumor Rectal stenosis Ileo-anal or ileo-rectal anastomosis Anal fissure Anal fistula Arm 3: 50 patients with constipation Inclusion criteria: Subject older than 18 years Patient referred for anorectal manometry and/or ultrasound examination Constipation as main complain Feeling of incomplete evacuation and/or manual disimpaction defined as needing to press in or around the anus to aid defecation Vaizey score \< 6 Kess score \< 9 Subject with health insurance Written informed consent Non inclusion criteria: Patient younger than 18 years Pregnancy Incapability to give consent No written informed consent Participation to another study at the same time Rectal tumor Rectal stenosis Ileo-anal or ileo-rectal anastomosis Anal fissure Anal fistula

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Anal pressure pattern at rest, during voluntary maximal squeezing and bear down Anal pressure pattern at rest, during voluntary maximal squeezing and bear downduring procedureFollowing parameters will be measured at the level of anal sphincter: * Minimal pressure (amplitude and location) * Maximal pressure (amplitude and location) * Mean pressure * Asymmetry

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
presence of ano-rectal reflex.during procedure
Ano-rectal radial endosonographyDuring procedureEvaluation of internal and external anal sphincter integrity and puborectalis muscle at rest
Dynamic ano-rectal endoconographyDuring procedurepresence of pelvic floor disorder (rectocele, enterocele)

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026