Skip to content

Neurobiological Basis of Response to Guanfacine Extended Release in Children and Adolescents With ADHD

Neurobiological Basis of Response to Guanfacine Extended Release in Children and Adolescents With Attention-deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): an Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging(fMRI) Study of Brain Activation Pre and Post Treatment

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01709695
Enrollment
27
Registered
2012-10-18
Start date
2011-03-31
Completion date
2013-12-31
Last updated
2018-02-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

ADHD, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Keywords

Intuniv, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, fMRI

Brief summary

This study proposes to evaluate the effects of guanfacine extended release on brain activation during fMRI in children and adolescents with ADHD between the ages 8-15 and ADHD subjects randomized to placebo treatment. This study also proposes to collect DNA on study participants, to examine the genetic underpinning of the observed fMRI activation profiles at baseline and in response to treatment. The purpose is to examine polymorphisms of the adrenergic 2A gene (and other related targets) for genetic biomarkers in association with the fMRI findings of this study.

Detailed description

This study proposes to evaluate the effects of guanfacine on brain activation during fMRI in 12 children and adolescents ages 8 - 15 with ADHD treated with once-daily INTUNIV(TM) (guanfacine; GXR) extended release tablets and 12 ADHD subjects randomized to placebo treatment. Children will be comprehensively assessed using a variety of clinical and neuropsychological measures. They will be scanned at baseline while performing both the go/no-go task (a well validated task for measuring inhibitory control (Durston et al., 2002, 2003)) and the Stay Alert task - a new task designed to measure the arousal component of attention, which was used successfully in a recent fMRI study of guanfacine in healthy adults (Clerkin et al., 2009). They will then be treated with GXR or placebo for 6 - 8 weeks in accordance with titration and dosing strategies used in recent Phase III dose optimization trials (e.g., up to 4 mg/day), and re-scanned while performing the same two tasks. The fMRI scans will be conducted using a dedicated research 3.0 T Siemens scanner.

Interventions

DRUGGuanfacine Hydrochloride XR

Weekly adjustments based on parent ratings of symptoms, side effects, and health status per vital signs up to 4mg maximum dose

DRUGPlacebo

Weekly adjustments based on parent ratings of symptoms, side effects, and health status per vital signs up to 4mg maximum dose

Sponsors

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
8 Years to 15 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of any subtype of ADHD * Normal findings on physical exam, laboratory studies, vital signs, and ECG * Weight = 60 kgs or less * Able to complete study procedures and swallow capsules; * Willing to commit to the entire visit schedule * Off treatment or have been discontinued from their previous medication for two weeks.

Exclusion criteria

* Psychiatric comorbidity except Oppositional Defiant Disorder \[ODD\], Simple Phobia, and dysthymia (unless ongoing medication treatment is required); * Currently a suicide risk, has previously made a suicide attempt or has a prior history of suicidal behavior; * Has failed treatment with an adequate trial of an alpha-2 adrenergic agonist; * Known or suspected allergy, hypersensitivity, or clinically significant intolerance to guanfacine hydrochloride. Children may not: * be treated with systemic medication for a medical or psychiatric illness that have CNS effects or affect cognitive function; * have a known history or presence of structural cardiac abnormalities, exercise-related cardiac events, or clinically significant bradycardia; * have orthostatic hypotension or a known history of hypertension; * have an abnormal ECG that is deemed clinically significant; * have a history of alcohol or other substance abuse or dependence within the last 6 months; * use any medications that affect BP or heart rate (excluding the subject's current ADHD medication at screening); * use another investigational medicinal product or participation in a clinical study within 30 days prior to the baseline visit; * be significantly overweight based on Center for Disease Control and Prevention Body Mass Index (BMI)-for-age gender specific charts; * have body weight of less than 25kg; * have a clinically important abnormality on urine drug and alcohol screen (excluding the subject's current ADHD stimulant, if applicable); * be female and currently pregnant or lactating; * have symptoms indicative of a primary sleep disorder. * have braces or other metal permanently placed within their body. * be too anxious to tolerate the fMRI procedure, or be claustrophobic.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Go/No-go Task Performance Correct InhibitionsBaseline and 8 weeksMeasures of go/no-go task performance during functional magnetic resonance imaging. Performance on a go-nogo task inside the scanner.
Go/No-go Task Reaction TimeBaseline and 8 weeksMeasures of go/no-go task performance during functional magnetic resonance imaging. Performance on a go-nogo task inside the scanner.
Go/No-go Task Performance Correct ResponsesBaseline and 8 weeksMeasures of go/no-go task performance during functional magnetic resonance imaging. Performance on a go-nogo task inside the scanner.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Digit SpanBaselineNeuropsychological assessment - Digit Span. The Digit Span test is either conducted verbally or using a computer program. A sequence of numbers is shown or read out to the participant. The participant is then told to repeat the numbers that were shown or read to them. This process continues until the participant can no longer remember either the full sequence of numbers or the correct order. This sequence is also continued until the participant makes an error. The Digit Span test is scored by the amount of numbers the participant was able to remember in each test. The scorer must add the total number of correct sequences, backwards and forwards. This test is also scored differently for a range of ages.
Clinical Global Impressions (CGI-I)up to 8 weeksClinical response was the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale (CGI-I). Lower CGI-I scores indicate greater improvement (1=very much improved; 2=much improved; 3=minimally improved; 4=no change; 5=minimally worse; 6= much worse; 7=very much worse.)
Continuous Performance Test - CommissionsBaselineNeuropsychological assessment - Continuous Performance Test - Commissions. CPT is a task-oriented computerized assessment of attention-related problems. Scores are compared with the normative scores for the age, group and gender of the person being tested. A t-score of 50 is equal to the mean, with higher values indicating more problematic behaviors and lower scores indicating less problematic behaviors.
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale IV (ADHDRS IV)baseline and 8 weeksNorm referenced parent interview to assess severity and frequency of ADHD symptoms. Scores are reported as sums 0 (no symptoms) to 54 (severe).
Percentage Change in Atomoxetine Stimulant Side Effects Rating Scale (ASSERS)up to 8 weeksSide effects rating scale. Assesses side effects known to occur in prior research using stimulant and non stimulant medications for treatment of ADHD. Scores range from 0 (not present) to 9 (severe side effects) and have been reported in aggregate as sum of severity responses on highest dose. This number is the sum of ASSERS, meaning it is the number and severity of side effects experienced. The percentage change in score from baseline.
Finger WindowsBaselineNeuropsychological assessment: Finger Windows - a measure of spatial working memory. The participant shows memory of a demonstrated visual pattern. The examiner models a given sequence of windows and ask the participant to imitate the sequence by placing their finger through the same windows in the correct order. The total number of correct sequences achieved determines the level of performance.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Guanfacine Hydrochloride XR
Flexible dose titration of guanfacine extended release - titrated in doses from 1 - 4 mg once daily
12
Placebo Group
Flexible dose titration of placebo
13
Total25

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGuanfacine Hydrochloride XRPlacebo GroupTotal
Age, Continuous10.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7
11.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.5
11.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.2
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) subtype
Combined
8 Participants9 Participants17 Participants
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) subtype
Inattentive
4 Participants4 Participants8 Participants
Clinical Global Impressions - Severity scale (CGI-S)4.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
5.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9
5.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9
Comorbid Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD)7 Participants4 Participants11 Participants
Full Scale IQ110.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.6
101.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.1
105.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.75
Prior stimulant treatment3 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants4 Participants7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants9 Participants18 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 120 / 13
other
Total, other adverse events
4 / 123 / 13
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 120 / 13

Outcome results

Primary

Go/No-go Task Performance Correct Inhibitions

Measures of go/no-go task performance during functional magnetic resonance imaging. Performance on a go-nogo task inside the scanner.

Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Guanfacine Hydrochloride XRGo/No-go Task Performance Correct Inhibitions8 Weeks Correct inhibitions94 percentage correct inhibitionsStandard Deviation 6
Guanfacine Hydrochloride XRGo/No-go Task Performance Correct InhibitionsBaseline Correct inhibitions91 percentage correct inhibitionsStandard Deviation 8
Placebo GroupGo/No-go Task Performance Correct InhibitionsBaseline Correct inhibitions89 percentage correct inhibitionsStandard Deviation 10
Placebo GroupGo/No-go Task Performance Correct Inhibitions8 Weeks Correct inhibitions92 percentage correct inhibitionsStandard Deviation 7
Primary

Go/No-go Task Performance Correct Responses

Measures of go/no-go task performance during functional magnetic resonance imaging. Performance on a go-nogo task inside the scanner.

Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Guanfacine Hydrochloride XRGo/No-go Task Performance Correct ResponsesBaseline Correct responses76 percentage correct responsesStandard Deviation 18
Guanfacine Hydrochloride XRGo/No-go Task Performance Correct Responses8 Weeks Correct responses79 percentage correct responsesStandard Deviation 15
Placebo GroupGo/No-go Task Performance Correct ResponsesBaseline Correct responses75 percentage correct responsesStandard Deviation 14
Placebo GroupGo/No-go Task Performance Correct Responses8 Weeks Correct responses74 percentage correct responsesStandard Deviation 15
Primary

Go/No-go Task Reaction Time

Measures of go/no-go task performance during functional magnetic resonance imaging. Performance on a go-nogo task inside the scanner.

Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Guanfacine Hydrochloride XRGo/No-go Task Reaction TimeBaseline Reaction time (RT)572 msStandard Deviation 144
Guanfacine Hydrochloride XRGo/No-go Task Reaction TimeBaseline Reaction time standard deviation (RTSD)187 msStandard Deviation 109
Guanfacine Hydrochloride XRGo/No-go Task Reaction Time8 weeks Reaction time (RT)562 msStandard Deviation 106
Guanfacine Hydrochloride XRGo/No-go Task Reaction Time8 weeks Reaction time standard deviation (RTSD)184 msStandard Deviation 93
Placebo GroupGo/No-go Task Reaction Time8 weeks Reaction time standard deviation (RTSD)166 msStandard Deviation 73
Placebo GroupGo/No-go Task Reaction TimeBaseline Reaction time (RT)543 msStandard Deviation 99
Placebo GroupGo/No-go Task Reaction Time8 weeks Reaction time (RT)550 msStandard Deviation 107
Placebo GroupGo/No-go Task Reaction TimeBaseline Reaction time standard deviation (RTSD)165 msStandard Deviation 76
Secondary

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale IV (ADHDRS IV)

Norm referenced parent interview to assess severity and frequency of ADHD symptoms. Scores are reported as sums 0 (no symptoms) to 54 (severe).

Time frame: baseline and 8 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Guanfacine Hydrochloride XRAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale IV (ADHDRS IV)Baseline36.67 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.01
Guanfacine Hydrochloride XRAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale IV (ADHDRS IV)End of treatment at 8 weeks9.42 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.96
Placebo GroupAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale IV (ADHDRS IV)Baseline39.15 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.08
Placebo GroupAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale IV (ADHDRS IV)End of treatment at 8 weeks22.69 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.9
Secondary

Clinical Global Impressions (CGI-I)

Clinical response was the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale (CGI-I). Lower CGI-I scores indicate greater improvement (1=very much improved; 2=much improved; 3=minimally improved; 4=no change; 5=minimally worse; 6= much worse; 7=very much worse.)

Time frame: up to 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Guanfacine Hydrochloride XRClinical Global Impressions (CGI-I)2.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Placebo GroupClinical Global Impressions (CGI-I)2.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Secondary

Continuous Performance Test - Commissions

Neuropsychological assessment - Continuous Performance Test - Commissions. CPT is a task-oriented computerized assessment of attention-related problems. Scores are compared with the normative scores for the age, group and gender of the person being tested. A t-score of 50 is equal to the mean, with higher values indicating more problematic behaviors and lower scores indicating less problematic behaviors.

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Guanfacine Hydrochloride XRContinuous Performance Test - Commissions48.62 t-scoresStandard Deviation 3.81
Placebo GroupContinuous Performance Test - Commissions46.99 t-scoresStandard Deviation 2.99
Secondary

Digit Span

Neuropsychological assessment - Digit Span. The Digit Span test is either conducted verbally or using a computer program. A sequence of numbers is shown or read out to the participant. The participant is then told to repeat the numbers that were shown or read to them. This process continues until the participant can no longer remember either the full sequence of numbers or the correct order. This sequence is also continued until the participant makes an error. The Digit Span test is scored by the amount of numbers the participant was able to remember in each test. The scorer must add the total number of correct sequences, backwards and forwards. This test is also scored differently for a range of ages.

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Guanfacine Hydrochloride XRDigit SpanDigit Span - F6.92 correct sequencesStandard Deviation 1.73
Guanfacine Hydrochloride XRDigit SpanDigit Span - B48.62 correct sequencesStandard Deviation 8.76
Placebo GroupDigit SpanDigit Span - F7.54 correct sequencesStandard Deviation 2.54
Placebo GroupDigit SpanDigit Span - B48.62 correct sequencesStandard Deviation 8.76
Secondary

Finger Windows

Neuropsychological assessment: Finger Windows - a measure of spatial working memory. The participant shows memory of a demonstrated visual pattern. The examiner models a given sequence of windows and ask the participant to imitate the sequence by placing their finger through the same windows in the correct order. The total number of correct sequences achieved determines the level of performance.

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Guanfacine Hydrochloride XRFinger WindowsFinger Windows - F12.5 correct sequencesStandard Deviation 6.52
Guanfacine Hydrochloride XRFinger WindowsFinger Windows -B11.35 correct sequencesStandard Deviation 5.45
Placebo GroupFinger WindowsFinger Windows - F10.75 correct sequencesStandard Deviation 4.63
Placebo GroupFinger WindowsFinger Windows -B8.00 correct sequencesStandard Deviation 5.14
Secondary

Percentage Change in Atomoxetine Stimulant Side Effects Rating Scale (ASSERS)

Side effects rating scale. Assesses side effects known to occur in prior research using stimulant and non stimulant medications for treatment of ADHD. Scores range from 0 (not present) to 9 (severe side effects) and have been reported in aggregate as sum of severity responses on highest dose. This number is the sum of ASSERS, meaning it is the number and severity of side effects experienced. The percentage change in score from baseline.

Time frame: up to 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Guanfacine Hydrochloride XRPercentage Change in Atomoxetine Stimulant Side Effects Rating Scale (ASSERS)78 percentage of mean effects improvement
Placebo GroupPercentage Change in Atomoxetine Stimulant Side Effects Rating Scale (ASSERS)65.18 percentage of mean effects improvement

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026