Skip to content

A Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Glimepiride, Gliclazide, Repaglinide or Acarbose When Added to Sitagliptin + Metformin Combination Therapy in Chinese Participants With Diabetes (MK-0431-313)

A Multicenter, Randomized, Active-Controlled, Open-label Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Glimepiride, Gliclazide, Repaglinide or Acarbose as a Third OAHA on Top of Sitagliptin+Metformin Combination Therapy in Chinese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01709305
Enrollment
5570
Registered
2012-10-18
Start date
2012-11-08
Completion date
2015-04-17
Last updated
2018-08-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Brief summary

To assess the effect of adding acarbose or repaglinide or gliclazide to sitagliptin plus metformin, compared to adding glimepiride, on glycemic improvements in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) participants who require the addition of a third oral anti-hyperglycemic agent (OAHA) according to China Guideline for Type 2 Diabetes. The three co-primary hypotheses are that after 24 weeks of treatment in phase 2, the mean change from baseline in hemoglobin A1c (A1c) in participants receiving either (1)acarbose or (2)repaglinide or (3)gliclazide added to sitagliptin and metformin combination is non-inferior to that of participants receiving glimepiride added to sitagliptin and metformin combination. The study would be declared successful if at least one of the three primary hypotheses was met.

Detailed description

Participants coming on study will be stabilized to a standardized metformin dose: this may take about 10 weeks, and then combination therapy with metformin + sitagliptin will begin during Phase 1 (Week 0 through Week 20). If a participant has already been on a stabilized metformin dose, they will start immediately on combination therapy with metformin + sitagliptin for 20 weeks (Phase 1). In Phase 2, participants who have failed to achieve adequate glycemic control (A1c ≥ 7% and ≤ 10% at Week 16 and fasting finger stick glucose ≥130 mg/dL and ≤280 mg/dL at Week 20) will be randomized to receive add-on therapy with glimepiride, repaglinide, acarbose, or gliclazide for 24 weeks (Week 20 through Week 44).

Interventions

DRUGMetformin

Metformin, 500 mg or 850 mg oral tablets, twice or three times a day (BID or TID) for a total dose of at least 1500 mg daily; administered with food.

DRUGSitagliptin

Sitagliptin, 100 mg oral tablet, once daily (QD); administered with or without food

DRUGAcarbose

Acarbose, 50 mg oral tablets, TID (150 mg total daily dose); administered with the first bite of each main meal.

DRUGRepaglinide

Repaglinide, 0.5 mg and/or 1 mg oral tablets, TID (up to 16 mg daily); administered within 30 minutes of each meal.

DRUGGlimepiride

Glimepiride, 1 mg and/or 2 mg oral tablets, QD (up to 6 mg daily); administered before the first main meal of the day

DRUGGliclazide

Gliclazide, 30 mg oral tablets, QD or BID (30 mg to 120 mg total daily dose); administered with meal.

Sponsors

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Has Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus; * Agrees to use an effective method of contraception or must not otherwise be at risk of becoming pregnant (female participants).

Exclusion criteria

* Has a history of type 1 diabetes mellitus or a history of ketoacidosis; * Has been treated with insulin, a dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitor, a Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) mimetic or analogue before; * Is on a weight loss program (not in maintenance phase), has started a weight loss medication, or has undergone bariatric surgery within 12 months; * Has undergone a surgical procedure within 4 weeks; * Has had new or worsening signs or symptoms of coronary heart disease or congestive heart failure within past 3 months, or has acute coronary syndrome, coronary artery intervention, or stroke or transient ischemic neurological disorder; * Has a medical history of active liver disease, including chronic active hepatitis B or C, primary biliary cirrhosis, or symptomatic gallbladder disease; * Has poorly controlled hypertension; * Has severe peripheral vascular disease; * Has human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); * Has had a clinically important hematological disorder; * Routinely consumes \>2 alcoholic drinks per day or \>14 alcoholic drinks per week, or engages in binge drinking; * Has a history of intolerance or hypersensitivity or any contraindication to study medications (including sitagliptin, metformin, glimepiride, repaglinide, acarbose or gliclazide) based upon the Chinese label; * Is on or likely to require treatment with ≥2 consecutive weeks or repeated courses of pharmacologic doses of corticosteroids (other than inhaled, nasal, or topical corticosteroids); * Is pregnant or breast feeding or is expecting to conceive or donate eggs during the study, including 14 days following the last dose of study drug (female participants).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Phase 2 Baseline to Week 44 in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Levels (Phase 2)Phase 2 Baseline (Week 20) and Week 44HbA1c is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time and is reported as a percentage (%). Change from baseline reflects the Week 44 A1C minus baseline A1C. Baseline is defined as Visit 6/Week 20. If this measurement was unavailable, the Week 16 value was used. Change from baseline was based on the constrained longitudinal data analysis (cLDA) model including all available measurements from baseline through the last visit. The terms in the cLDA model include treatment, time in weeks (categorical), regions, and treatment-by-time interaction.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Hypoglycemia Events (Phase 2)From Week 20 through Week 44Hypoglycemia events represent epidsodes symptomatic of hypoglycemia (e.g., weakness, dizziness, shakiness, increased sweating, palpitations, or confusion) and/or finger stick glucose values of ≤70 mg/dL (3.9 mmol/L). The percentage of participants with hypoglycemia events was reported.
Percentage of Participants With a Gastrointestinal (GI) AE of Nausea (Phase 2)From Week 20 through Week 44The percentage of participants with a GI AE of nausea was reported.
Change From Phase 2 Baseline to Week 44 in Participant Body Weight (Phase 2)Phase 2 Baseline (Week 20), Week 44Change from baseline in body weight in Phase 2 was reported. Change from baseline reflects the Week 44 body weight minus baseline body weight. Baseline is defined as Visit 6/Week 20. If this measurement was unavailable, the Week 16 value was used.
Percentage of Participants With a GI AE of Diarrhea (Phase 2)From Week 20 through Week 44The percentage of participants with a GI AE of diarrhea was reported.
Percentage of Participants With a GI AE of Abdominal Pain (Phase 2)From Week 20 through Week 44The percentage of participants with a GI AE of abdominal pain was reported.
Percentage of Participants With a GI AE of Vomiting (Phase 2)From Week 20 through Week 44The percentage of participants with a GI AE of vomiting was reported.

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Adult Chinese participants (≥18 and ≤75 years of age) with a diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) and inadequate glycemic control were selected to participate in this study.

Pre-assignment details

There were 2344 participants who achieved A1C\<7% in Phase 1; they completed Phase 1 and did not enter Phase 2. Of the remaining 2589 participants, 377 participants did not meet randomization criteria to enter Phase 2.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Overall Study
During Phase 1, participants received sitagliptin 100 mg + metformin (Week 0 through Week 20).
5,535
Total5,535

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004
Phase 1Clinical Adverse Event800000
Phase 1Death20000
Phase 1Hyperglycemia (lack of efficacy)130000
Phase 1Laboratory Adverse Event160000
Phase 1Lost to Follow-up1470000
Phase 1Physician Decision130000
Phase 1Protocol Violation1180000
Phase 1Travel, moving, etc.300000
Phase 1Withdrawal by Subject2180000
Phase 2Clinical Adverse Event01010611
Phase 2Death00100
Phase 2Hyperglycemia (lack of efficacy)00002
Phase 2Laboratory Adverse Event01011
Phase 2Lost to Follow-up010695
Phase 2Physician Decision02012
Phase 2Protocol Violation01919139
Phase 2Travel, moving, etc.02335
Phase 2Withdrawal by Subject0861512

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOverall Study
Age, Continuous53.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2240 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3295 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
66 / 5,5273 / 55133 / 54520 / 55048 / 549
serious
Total, serious adverse events
63 / 5,52711 / 5519 / 54510 / 5508 / 549

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Phase 2 Baseline to Week 44 in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Levels (Phase 2)

HbA1c is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time and is reported as a percentage (%). Change from baseline reflects the Week 44 A1C minus baseline A1C. Baseline is defined as Visit 6/Week 20. If this measurement was unavailable, the Week 16 value was used. Change from baseline was based on the constrained longitudinal data analysis (cLDA) model including all available measurements from baseline through the last visit. The terms in the cLDA model include treatment, time in weeks (categorical), regions, and treatment-by-time interaction.

Time frame: Phase 2 Baseline (Week 20) and Week 44

Population: Per-Protocol (PP) population - excluded those participants who were identified as protocol violators and those who were non-compliant with Good Clinical Practice (GCP) requirements.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Phase 2: Metformin + Sitagliptin + GlimepirideChange From Phase 2 Baseline to Week 44 in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Levels (Phase 2)-0.65 Percent95% Confidence Interval 0.84
Phase 2: Metformin + Sitagliptin + RepaglinideChange From Phase 2 Baseline to Week 44 in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Levels (Phase 2)-0.62 Percent95% Confidence Interval 0.84
Phase 2: Metformin + Sitagliptin + AcarboseChange From Phase 2 Baseline to Week 44 in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Levels (Phase 2)-0.46 Percent95% Confidence Interval 0.83
Phase 2: Metformin + Sitagliptin + GliclazideChange From Phase 2 Baseline to Week 44 in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Levels (Phase 2)-0.69 Percent95% Confidence Interval 0.9
Comparison: Pairwise Comparison98.34% CI: [0.02, 0.36]
Comparison: Pairwise Comparison98.34% CI: [-0.15, 0.21]
Comparison: Pairwise Comparison98.34% CI: [-0.23, 0.14]
Secondary

Change From Phase 2 Baseline to Week 44 in Participant Body Weight (Phase 2)

Change from baseline in body weight in Phase 2 was reported. Change from baseline reflects the Week 44 body weight minus baseline body weight. Baseline is defined as Visit 6/Week 20. If this measurement was unavailable, the Week 16 value was used.

Time frame: Phase 2 Baseline (Week 20), Week 44

Population: All Participants as Treated (APaT) - all randomized participants who received at least one (1) dose of study treatment and were compliant with GCP requirements.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Phase 2: Metformin + Sitagliptin + GlimepirideChange From Phase 2 Baseline to Week 44 in Participant Body Weight (Phase 2)0.4 kgStandard Deviation 2.6
Phase 2: Metformin + Sitagliptin + RepaglinideChange From Phase 2 Baseline to Week 44 in Participant Body Weight (Phase 2)0.2 kgStandard Deviation 2.5
Phase 2: Metformin + Sitagliptin + AcarboseChange From Phase 2 Baseline to Week 44 in Participant Body Weight (Phase 2)-0.9 kgStandard Deviation 2.5
Phase 2: Metformin + Sitagliptin + GliclazideChange From Phase 2 Baseline to Week 44 in Participant Body Weight (Phase 2)0.2 kgStandard Deviation 2.4
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a Gastrointestinal (GI) AE of Nausea (Phase 2)

The percentage of participants with a GI AE of nausea was reported.

Time frame: From Week 20 through Week 44

Population: All Participants as Treated (APaT) - all randomized participants who received at least one (1) dose of study treatment and were compliant with GCP requirements.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Phase 2: Metformin + Sitagliptin + GlimepiridePercentage of Participants With a Gastrointestinal (GI) AE of Nausea (Phase 2)0 Percentage of Participants
Phase 2: Metformin + Sitagliptin + RepaglinidePercentage of Participants With a Gastrointestinal (GI) AE of Nausea (Phase 2)0 Percentage of Participants
Phase 2: Metformin + Sitagliptin + AcarbosePercentage of Participants With a Gastrointestinal (GI) AE of Nausea (Phase 2)0.4 Percentage of Participants
Phase 2: Metformin + Sitagliptin + GliclazidePercentage of Participants With a Gastrointestinal (GI) AE of Nausea (Phase 2)0.2 Percentage of Participants
Comparison: Difference in % vs. Glimepiridep-value: 0.15895% CI: [-0.3, 1.3]Miettinen & Nurminen
Comparison: Difference in % vs. Glimepiridep-value: >0.99995% CI: [-0.7, 0.7]Miettinen & Nurminen
Comparison: Difference in % vs. Glimepiridep-value: 0.31895% CI: [-0.5, 1]Miettinen & Nurminen
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a GI AE of Abdominal Pain (Phase 2)

The percentage of participants with a GI AE of abdominal pain was reported.

Time frame: From Week 20 through Week 44

Population: All Participants as Treated (APaT) - all randomized participants who received at least one (1) dose of study treatment and were compliant with GCP requirements.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Phase 2: Metformin + Sitagliptin + GlimepiridePercentage of Participants With a GI AE of Abdominal Pain (Phase 2)0 Percentage of Participants
Phase 2: Metformin + Sitagliptin + RepaglinidePercentage of Participants With a GI AE of Abdominal Pain (Phase 2)0 Percentage of Participants
Phase 2: Metformin + Sitagliptin + AcarbosePercentage of Participants With a GI AE of Abdominal Pain (Phase 2)0.4 Percentage of Participants
Phase 2: Metformin + Sitagliptin + GliclazidePercentage of Participants With a GI AE of Abdominal Pain (Phase 2)0.2 Percentage of Participants
Comparison: Difference in % vs. Glimepiridep-value: 0.15895% CI: [-0.3, 1.3]Miettinen & Nurminen
Comparison: Difference in % vs. Glimepiridep-value: >0.99995% CI: [-0.7, 0.7]Miettinen & Nurminen
Comparison: Difference in % vs. Glimepiridep-value: 0.31895% CI: [-0.5, 1]Miettinen & Nurminen
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a GI AE of Diarrhea (Phase 2)

The percentage of participants with a GI AE of diarrhea was reported.

Time frame: From Week 20 through Week 44

Population: All Participants as Treated (APaT) - all randomized participants who received at least one (1) dose of study treatment and were compliant with GCP requirements.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Phase 2: Metformin + Sitagliptin + GlimepiridePercentage of Participants With a GI AE of Diarrhea (Phase 2)0.5 Percentage of Participants
Phase 2: Metformin + Sitagliptin + RepaglinidePercentage of Participants With a GI AE of Diarrhea (Phase 2)0.4 Percentage of Participants
Phase 2: Metformin + Sitagliptin + AcarbosePercentage of Participants With a GI AE of Diarrhea (Phase 2)0.4 Percentage of Participants
Phase 2: Metformin + Sitagliptin + GliclazidePercentage of Participants With a GI AE of Diarrhea (Phase 2)0.9 Percentage of Participants
Comparison: Difference in % vs. Glimepiridep-value: 0.65195% CI: [-1.3, 0.8]Miettinen & Nurminen
Comparison: Difference in % vs. Glimepiridep-value: 0.6695% CI: [-1.3, 0.8]Miettinen & Nurminen
Comparison: Difference in % vs. Glimepiridep-value: 0.4895% CI: [-0.8, 1.6]Miettinen & Nurminen
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a GI AE of Vomiting (Phase 2)

The percentage of participants with a GI AE of vomiting was reported.

Time frame: From Week 20 through Week 44

Population: All Participants as Treated (APaT) - all randomized participants who received at least one (1) dose of study treatment and were compliant with GCP requirements.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Phase 2: Metformin + Sitagliptin + GlimepiridePercentage of Participants With a GI AE of Vomiting (Phase 2)0.2 Percentage of Participants
Phase 2: Metformin + Sitagliptin + RepaglinidePercentage of Participants With a GI AE of Vomiting (Phase 2)0 Percentage of Participants
Phase 2: Metformin + Sitagliptin + AcarbosePercentage of Participants With a GI AE of Vomiting (Phase 2)0.2 Percentage of Participants
Phase 2: Metformin + Sitagliptin + GliclazidePercentage of Participants With a GI AE of Vomiting (Phase 2)0.2 Percentage of Participants
Comparison: Difference in % vs. Glimepiridep-value: 0.99895% CI: [-0.9, 0.9]Miettinen & Nurminen
Comparison: Difference in % vs. Glimepiridep-value: 0.31995% CI: [-1, 0.5]Miettinen & Nurminen
Comparison: Difference in % vs. Glimepiridep-value: 0.99995% CI: [-0.9, 0.9]Miettinen & Nurminen
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Hypoglycemia Events (Phase 2)

Hypoglycemia events represent epidsodes symptomatic of hypoglycemia (e.g., weakness, dizziness, shakiness, increased sweating, palpitations, or confusion) and/or finger stick glucose values of ≤70 mg/dL (3.9 mmol/L). The percentage of participants with hypoglycemia events was reported.

Time frame: From Week 20 through Week 44

Population: All Participants as Treated (APaT) - all randomized participants who received at least one (1) dose of study treatment and were compliant with GCP requirements.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Phase 2: Metformin + Sitagliptin + GlimepiridePercentage of Participants With Hypoglycemia Events (Phase 2)8.9 Percentage of Participants
Phase 2: Metformin + Sitagliptin + RepaglinidePercentage of Participants With Hypoglycemia Events (Phase 2)6.1 Percentage of Participants
Phase 2: Metformin + Sitagliptin + AcarbosePercentage of Participants With Hypoglycemia Events (Phase 2)0.5 Percentage of Participants
Phase 2: Metformin + Sitagliptin + GliclazidePercentage of Participants With Hypoglycemia Events (Phase 2)3.6 Percentage of Participants
Comparison: Difference in % vs. Glimepiridep-value: <0.00195% CI: [-11.1, -6.1]Miettinen & Nurminen
Comparison: Difference in % vs. Glimepiridep-value: 0.07295% CI: [-6.1, 0.3]Miettinen & Nurminen
Comparison: Difference in % vs. Glimepiridep-value: <0.00195% CI: [-8.3, -2.5]Miettinen & Nurminen

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026