Skip to content

Musical Dual Task Training to Improve Attention Control for Dementia

The Effects of Musical Dual Task Training on Attention Control and Associated Gait Stability of Patients With Mild to Moderate Dementia

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01709188
Enrollment
30
Registered
2012-10-18
Start date
2012-10-31
Completion date
2013-10-31
Last updated
2012-11-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dementia

Keywords

Musical Dual Task Training, dementia, attention control, dual task cost, gait stability

Brief summary

The purpose of this project is to determine if the Musical Dual Task Training program improves attention control that influences measures of gait performances under dual tasking, balance, fear of falling, and behavioral disturbance in patients with mild to moderate dementia. This Musical Dual Task Training protocol is structured with musical content and patients are required to do musical tasks including singing and playing instruments contingent on visual or auditory cues while walking. This paradigm is designed to include music making because it involves great demands on attention and memory that might elicit experience-dependent plasticity in the brain. Musical Dual Task Training is proposed to strengthen brain networking for attention control that consequently may improve the gait performances in patients with dementia, as indicated by reducing dual task cost on gait.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALMusical Dual Task Training
BEHAVIORALWalking and Talking

Sponsors

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
55 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* a mild to moderate dementia diagnosis with Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) score: .5, 1, or 2 * ability to walk 10 meters independently without the use of a walker or cane, or the assistance by another person

Exclusion criteria

* other known neurologic disorders such as stroke or Parkinson's disease * significant orthopedic, visual, and hearing impairment that hinders ambulation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from Baseline on the Trail Making Test at 2 monthsBaseline and at 2 monthsTrail Making Test Part A requires the participants to draw lines to connect a set of 25 circles as fast as possible following the sequential order of numbers (1,2,3…25) while still maintaining accuracy. Trail Making Test Part B is in a same format, but participants are required to alternates between numbers and letters (1, A, 2, B, etc.). The circles in Part B include both numbers (1 - 13) and letters (A - L). Results for both Part A and Part B are reported as the number of seconds required to complete the task. Higher scores indicate greater impairment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Change from Baseline on Walking Speed during Dual tasking at 2 MonthsBaseline and at 2 months
Change from Baseline on the Timed Up-and-Go test at 2 MonthsBaseline and 2 months
Change from Baseline on the 7-item Short Falls Efficacy Scale International at 2 MonthsBaseline and at 2 months
Change from Baseline on the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory scale at 2 monthsBaseline and at 2 months
Change from Baseline on Stride Lengths during Dual Tasking at 2 MonthsBaseline and at 2 months

Countries

Taiwan

Contacts

Primary ContactYu-Cheng Pei, MD, PhD
yspeii@gmail.com886-3-3281200
Backup ContactYu-Ling Chen, MA, MME
yuling1015@gmail.com886-922123809

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026