Skip to content

Study of Safety, Tolerability & Efficacy of CK-2017357 in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)

A Phase IIb, Multi-National, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of CK-2017357 in Patients With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) (BENEFIT-ALS)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01709149
Enrollment
711
Registered
2012-10-18
Start date
2012-10-31
Completion date
2014-03-31
Last updated
2020-03-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Brief summary

The purpose of this research study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of CK-2017357 when taken with or without riluzole (also called Rilutek®) in patients with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS).

Detailed description

The length of the study, including screening, dosing, and follow-up, is approximately 20 weeks. After a one-week open-label phase during which all patients will receive CK-2017357 125 milligrams (mg) twice daily, patients who tolerate the open-label 125 mg of CK-2017357 will be randomized one to one (fifty-fifty) to receive double-blind CK-2017357 or matching placebo. The CK-2017357/placebo dose will be increased no faster than weekly to each patient's highest tolerated daily dose, with a maximum of 250 mg twice daily. The dose may be decreased based on tolerability. Patients will continue treatment at the highest tolerated dose to complete a total of 12 weeks of double-blind treatment. Patients may be on riluzole or not on riluzole at study entry. Patients not on riluzole must stay off riluzole. Patients on riluzole who are getting double-blind CK-2017357 will be given riluzole at half the labeled dosage (50 mg once a day instead of 50 mg twice a day). Blood tests for safety will be performed. Information about any side effects that may occur will also be collected.

Interventions

CK-2017357 125 mg tablets twice daily

OTHERPlacebo tablets

Tablets

DRUGRiluzole

Tablets

Sponsors

Cytokinetics
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Able to comprehend and willing to sign an Informed Consent Form (ICF) 2. Male or female 18 years of age or older 3. A diagnosis of familial or sporadic ALS (defined as meeting the possible, laboratory-supported probable, probable, or definite criteria for a diagnosis of ALS according to the World Federation of Neurology El Escorial criteria) 4. Upright Slow Vital Capacity (SVC) \>50 % of predicted for age, height and sex 5. At least 4 of the 12 ALSFRS-R questions must be scored 2 or 3 6. Diminished but measurable maximum voluntary grip strength in at least one hand; i.e., between 10 and 50 pounds (females) and 10 and 70 pounds (males) 7. Able to swallow tablets without crushing 8. A caregiver (if one is needed) who can and will observe and report the patient's status 9. Pre-study clinical laboratory findings within normal range or, if outside of the normal range, deemed not clinically significant by the Investigator 10. Male patients must agree for the duration of the study and 10 weeks after the end of the study to use a condom during sexual intercourse with female partners who are of reproductive potential and to have female partners use an additional effective means of contraception (e.g., diaphragm plus spermicide, or oral contraceptives) or the male patient must agree to abstain from sexual intercourse during and for 10 weeks after the end of the study 11. Female patients must be post-menopausal (≥ 1 year) or sterilized, or, if of childbearing potential, not be breastfeeding, have a negative pregnancy test, have no intention to become pregnant during the course of the study, and use contraceptive drugs or devices as detailed in item 10 for the duration of the study and for 10 weeks after the end of the study 12. Patients must be either on a stable dose of riluzole 50 mg twice daily for at least 30 days prior to screening or have not taken riluzole for at least 30 days prior to screening and are willing not to begin riluzole use during the conduct of this study.

Exclusion criteria

1. Any use of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV, e.g. continuous positive airway pressure \[CPAP\] or bilevel positive airway pressure \[BiPAP\]) for any portion of the day, or mechanical ventilation via tracheostomy, or on any form of oxygen supplementation 2. Patients with a diaphragm pacing system (DPS) at study entry or who anticipate DPS placement during the course of the study 3. Body Mass Index (BMI) of 19.0 kg/m2 or lower 4. Unwilling to discontinue tizanidine and theophylline-containing medications during study participation 5. Serum chloride \< 100 mmol/L 6. Neurological impairment due to a condition other than ALS, including history of transient ischemic attack (TIA) within the past year 7. Presence at screening of any medically significant cardiac, pulmonary, gastrointestinal (GI), musculoskeletal, or psychiatric illness that might interfere with the patient's ability to comply with study procedures or that might confound the interpretation of clinical safety or efficacy data 8. Has taken any investigational study drug within 30 days or 5 half-lives of the prior agent, whichever is greater, prior to dosing 9. Previously received CK-2017357 in any previous clinical trial

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Change From Baseline in ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) Total Score to the Average of Values Obtained at the End of Weeks 8 and 12 of Double-blind TreatmentBaseline, 8 weeks, 12 weeksThe ALSFRS-R is used to measure the progression and severity of disease; it consists of 12 questions, assessing a patient's capability and independence in functional activities relevant to ALS, categorized in 4 domains: gross motor tasks, fine motor tasks, bulbar functions, and respiratory function. Each question is scored from 0 (indicating incapable or dependent) to 4 (normal). The total score ranges from 0 to 48, with higher scores reflecting more normal function and lower scores reflecting more impaired function.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Sniff Nasal Inspiratory Pressure (SNIP) to the Average of Values Obtained at the End of Weeks 8 and 12 of Double-blind TreatmentBaseline, 8 weeks, 12 weeksSNIP was measured at functional residual capacity, the bottom of the tidal breathing cycle, through 1 plugged nostril while the other remained open. Inspiratory pressure is a negative number where a larger negative number represents . . . A forceful, maximal inspiratory sniff was performed and a peak pressure value reported. The best result (ie, the highest number) from 5 tests was recorded as the SNIP.
Change From Baseline in Slow Vital Capacity (SVC) to the Average of Values Obtained at the End of Weeks 8 and 12 of Double-blind TreatmentBaseline, 8 weeks, 12 weeksSVC was measured using a spirometer (in units of liters). Following 3 to 5 breaths at rest, the patients were instructed to take as deep an inspiration as possible followed by a maximum exhalation (blowing out all the air in their lungs). Values obtained were converted to % predicted values (ie, the test result as a percent of predicted values for the patients of similar demographic and baseline characteristics \[eg, height, age, sex\]).
Change From Baseline in Maximum Voluntary Ventilation (MVV) to the Average of Values Obtained at the End of Weeks 8 and 12 of Double-blind TreatmentBaseline, 8 weeks, 12 weeksMVV was measured as the volume (in liters) of air that could be exhaled during 12 seconds of rapid deep breathing; for analysis purposes, the measured volume was extrapolated to 1 minute (to give units of L/min).
Change From Baseline in Handgrip Fatigability (at 60% of Target in the Weaker Hand) to the Average of Values Obtained at the End of Weeks 8 and 12 of Double-blind TreatmentBaseline, 8 weeks, 12 weeksHandgrip fatigability was measured immediately following determination of maximum handgrip strength (via an electronic hand dynamometer). Once maximum handgrip strength was achieved, the force of the grip was timed for 2 minutes or until the grip strength had dropped to 60% of the maximum, whichever came first.
Change From Baseline in Muscle Strength Mega-Score Based on Percent Change in Muscle Strength Measurements to the Average at the End of Weeks 8 and 12 of Double-blind TreatmentBaseline, 8 weeks, 12 weeksA hand-held dynamometer (HHD), with a scale of 0 to 300 pounds, was used to measure muscle strength and handgrip strength (bilateral); the muscle groups tested were: elbow flexion (bilateral), wrist extension (bilateral), knee extension (bilateral), and ankle dorsiflexion (bilateral). For each assessment time point, the percent change from baseline was calculated for each muscle group and handgrip strength. The muscle strength mega-score was calculated as the average of the changes (ie, percent change from baseline) observed for each muscle groups as well as handgrip strength. For this endpoint, negative values indicate a decline in muscle strength.
Change From Baseline in Maximum Handgrip Strength in the Weaker Hand to the Average of Values Obtained at the End of Weeks 8 and 12 of Double-blind TreatmentBaseline, 8 weeks, 12 weeksMaximum handgrip strength was measured using an electronic hand dynamometer; patients were asked to squeeze the device with the maximum possible force.

Countries

Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Netherlands, Spain, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients with familial or sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis were enrolled at 73 sites in Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Netherlands, Spain, the United Kingdom, and the United States. The first patient was screened on 23 October 2012 and the last subject completed follow-up on 21 March 2014.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 711 patients were enrolled in the study and began treatment with open-label tirasemtiv during the 7-day lead-in phase of the study. Patients who completed this phase were randomized (1:1) to receive either placebo (N=295) or tirasemtiv (N=301) in the double-blind treatment period.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Did Not Complete Open-label Lead-in Treatment
Tirasemtiv 125 mg oral capsules administered twice daily for 7 days. This group started open-label treatment but discontinued early and did not receive double-blind treatment.
115
Double-blind Treatment: Placebo
Placebo oral capsules administered twice daily for a total of 12 weeks of double-blind dosing.
295
Double-blind Treatment: Tirasemtiv
Tirasemtiv 125 mg oral capsules administered twice daily, which was up- or down-titrated over 3 to 4 weeks to the patient's maximum tolerated dose (MTD) to a maximum of 250 mg twice daily. Patients then remained at their MTD for an additional 9 weeks, for a total of 12 weeks of double-blind dosing.
301
Total711

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Double-blind, Placebo-controlled PhaseAdverse Event01278
Double-blind, Placebo-controlled PhaseDeath020
Double-blind, Placebo-controlled PhaseLost to Follow-up020
Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Phasenot defined012
Double-blind, Placebo-controlled PhasePhysician Decision025
Double-blind, Placebo-controlled PhaseWithdrawal by Subject0712
Open-label Lead-in PhaseAdverse Event10900
Open-label Lead-in PhaseDeath100
Open-label Lead-in PhaseProtocol Violation300
Open-label Lead-in PhaseWithdrawal by Subject200

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalDouble-blind Treatment: TirasemtivDouble-blind Treatment: PlaceboDid Not Complete Open-label Lead-in Treatment
Age, Continuous57.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.98
57.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.17
56.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1
60.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.83
El Escorial Diagnostic Criteria for ALS
Definite
240 Participants104 Participants91 Participants45 Participants
El Escorial Diagnostic Criteria for ALS
Possible
68 Participants31 Participants28 Participants9 Participants
El Escorial Diagnostic Criteria for ALS
Probable
268 Participants103 Participants119 Participants46 Participants
El Escorial Diagnostic Criteria for ALS
Probable, laboratory supported
135 Participants63 Participants57 Participants15 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
10 Participants6 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
20 Participants9 Participants8 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
68 Participants26 Participants34 Participants8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
611 Participants259 Participants250 Participants102 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
226 Participants86 Participants88 Participants52 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
485 Participants215 Participants207 Participants63 Participants
Site of symptom onset
Bulbar
95 Participants35 Participants40 Participants20 Participants
Site of symptom onset
Lower limb
269 Participants116 Participants110 Participants43 Participants
Site of symptom onset
Respiratory
2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Site of symptom onset
Upper limb
345 Participants149 Participants145 Participants51 Participants
Time since ALS symptom onset22.0 months23.0 months21.0 months24.0 months

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
2 / 7113 / 2952 / 301
other
Total, other adverse events
525 / 711258 / 295291 / 301
serious
Total, serious adverse events
13 / 71116 / 29527 / 301

Outcome results

Primary

The Change From Baseline in ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) Total Score to the Average of Values Obtained at the End of Weeks 8 and 12 of Double-blind Treatment

The ALSFRS-R is used to measure the progression and severity of disease; it consists of 12 questions, assessing a patient's capability and independence in functional activities relevant to ALS, categorized in 4 domains: gross motor tasks, fine motor tasks, bulbar functions, and respiratory function. Each question is scored from 0 (indicating incapable or dependent) to 4 (normal). The total score ranges from 0 to 48, with higher scores reflecting more normal function and lower scores reflecting more impaired function.

Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 12 weeks

Population: Modified Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboThe Change From Baseline in ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) Total Score to the Average of Values Obtained at the End of Weeks 8 and 12 of Double-blind Treatment-2.40 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.246
TirasemtivThe Change From Baseline in ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) Total Score to the Average of Values Obtained at the End of Weeks 8 and 12 of Double-blind Treatment-2.98 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.277
p-value: 0.11495% CI: [-1.3, 0.14]Repeated-measures mixed model
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Handgrip Fatigability (at 60% of Target in the Weaker Hand) to the Average of Values Obtained at the End of Weeks 8 and 12 of Double-blind Treatment

Handgrip fatigability was measured immediately following determination of maximum handgrip strength (via an electronic hand dynamometer). Once maximum handgrip strength was achieved, the force of the grip was timed for 2 minutes or until the grip strength had dropped to 60% of the maximum, whichever came first.

Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 12 weeks

Population: Modified Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Handgrip Fatigability (at 60% of Target in the Weaker Hand) to the Average of Values Obtained at the End of Weeks 8 and 12 of Double-blind Treatment1.76 secondsStandard Error 2.863
TirasemtivChange From Baseline in Handgrip Fatigability (at 60% of Target in the Weaker Hand) to the Average of Values Obtained at the End of Weeks 8 and 12 of Double-blind Treatment2.01 secondsStandard Error 3.331
p-value: 0.954695% CI: [-8.4, 8.9]Repeated-measures mixed model
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Maximum Handgrip Strength in the Weaker Hand to the Average of Values Obtained at the End of Weeks 8 and 12 of Double-blind Treatment

Maximum handgrip strength was measured using an electronic hand dynamometer; patients were asked to squeeze the device with the maximum possible force.

Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Maximum Handgrip Strength in the Weaker Hand to the Average of Values Obtained at the End of Weeks 8 and 12 of Double-blind Treatment-3.54 poundsStandard Error 0.64
TirasemtivChange From Baseline in Maximum Handgrip Strength in the Weaker Hand to the Average of Values Obtained at the End of Weeks 8 and 12 of Double-blind Treatment-2.78 poundsStandard Error 0.714
p-value: 0.432895% CI: [-1.13, 2.63]Repeated-measures mixed model
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Maximum Voluntary Ventilation (MVV) to the Average of Values Obtained at the End of Weeks 8 and 12 of Double-blind Treatment

MVV was measured as the volume (in liters) of air that could be exhaled during 12 seconds of rapid deep breathing; for analysis purposes, the measured volume was extrapolated to 1 minute (to give units of L/min).

Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 12 weeks

Population: Modified Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Maximum Voluntary Ventilation (MVV) to the Average of Values Obtained at the End of Weeks 8 and 12 of Double-blind Treatment-4.27 L/minStandard Error 1.332
TirasemtivChange From Baseline in Maximum Voluntary Ventilation (MVV) to the Average of Values Obtained at the End of Weeks 8 and 12 of Double-blind Treatment-3.79 L/minStandard Error 1.497
p-value: 0.808395% CI: [-3.38, 4.34]Repeated-measures mixed model
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Muscle Strength Mega-Score Based on Percent Change in Muscle Strength Measurements to the Average at the End of Weeks 8 and 12 of Double-blind Treatment

A hand-held dynamometer (HHD), with a scale of 0 to 300 pounds, was used to measure muscle strength and handgrip strength (bilateral); the muscle groups tested were: elbow flexion (bilateral), wrist extension (bilateral), knee extension (bilateral), and ankle dorsiflexion (bilateral). For each assessment time point, the percent change from baseline was calculated for each muscle group and handgrip strength. The muscle strength mega-score was calculated as the average of the changes (ie, percent change from baseline) observed for each muscle groups as well as handgrip strength. For this endpoint, negative values indicate a decline in muscle strength.

Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Muscle Strength Mega-Score Based on Percent Change in Muscle Strength Measurements to the Average at the End of Weeks 8 and 12 of Double-blind Treatment-10.71 percent changeStandard Error 2.108
TirasemtivChange From Baseline in Muscle Strength Mega-Score Based on Percent Change in Muscle Strength Measurements to the Average at the End of Weeks 8 and 12 of Double-blind Treatment-9.10 percent changeStandard Error 2.425
p-value: 0.616695% CI: [-4.7, 7.91]Repeated-measures mixed model
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Slow Vital Capacity (SVC) to the Average of Values Obtained at the End of Weeks 8 and 12 of Double-blind Treatment

SVC was measured using a spirometer (in units of liters). Following 3 to 5 breaths at rest, the patients were instructed to take as deep an inspiration as possible followed by a maximum exhalation (blowing out all the air in their lungs). Values obtained were converted to % predicted values (ie, the test result as a percent of predicted values for the patients of similar demographic and baseline characteristics \[eg, height, age, sex\]).

Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 12 weeks

Population: Modified Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Slow Vital Capacity (SVC) to the Average of Values Obtained at the End of Weeks 8 and 12 of Double-blind Treatment-7.24 % predictedStandard Error 0.691
TirasemtivChange From Baseline in Slow Vital Capacity (SVC) to the Average of Values Obtained at the End of Weeks 8 and 12 of Double-blind Treatment-2.98 % predictedStandard Error 0.78
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [2.23, 6.28]Repeated-measures mixed model
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Sniff Nasal Inspiratory Pressure (SNIP) to the Average of Values Obtained at the End of Weeks 8 and 12 of Double-blind Treatment

SNIP was measured at functional residual capacity, the bottom of the tidal breathing cycle, through 1 plugged nostril while the other remained open. Inspiratory pressure is a negative number where a larger negative number represents . . . A forceful, maximal inspiratory sniff was performed and a peak pressure value reported. The best result (ie, the highest number) from 5 tests was recorded as the SNIP.

Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 12 weeks

Population: Modified Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sniff Nasal Inspiratory Pressure (SNIP) to the Average of Values Obtained at the End of Weeks 8 and 12 of Double-blind Treatment-0.89 cm H2OStandard Error 1.103
TirasemtivChange From Baseline in Sniff Nasal Inspiratory Pressure (SNIP) to the Average of Values Obtained at the End of Weeks 8 and 12 of Double-blind Treatment-4.29 cm H2OStandard Error 1.243
p-value: 0.037295% CI: [-6.6, -0.2]Repeated-measures mixed model

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026