Skip to content

Safety Evaluation of Aline HA, an Implanted Cross-Linked HA Device

A Multi-center, Open-label, Prospective Study of Implanted Cross-linked HA Device, Aline HA, for Soft Tissue Augmentation, to Treat Only One Anatomic Feature in up to 100 Subjects for 6 Months

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01708213
Enrollment
72
Registered
2012-10-16
Start date
2012-10-31
Completion date
2013-12-31
Last updated
2014-12-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Disorder of Soft Tissue

Keywords

soft tissue, augmentation, correction, wrinkles

Brief summary

The protocol hypothesis is that treatment with Aline HA™ will be safe through 6 months as determined by clinical assessment of treatment sites and routine tracking of adverse events.

Detailed description

A multi-center, open-label, prospective study of implanted cross-linked HA device, Aline HA, for soft tissue augmentation, to treat only one anatomic feature in up to 100 subjects for 6 months.

Interventions

DEVICEAline HA

Implantable dermal filler

Sponsors

TauTona Group
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. The patient must be ≥ 21 and ≤ 70 years of age. 2. The patient must be willing and able to provide informed consent. 3. The patient must be able to read. 4. The patient is willing and able to comply with the study protocol. 5. The patient is seeking soft tissue augmentation 6. The patient has a pre-treatment Wrinkle Severity Score (WSS) ≥ 2 for any NLF to be treated. 7. The patient agrees to follow-up examinations out to 6 months post final treatment.

Exclusion criteria

*

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assessment of Treatment Site Responses Post Procedure6 monthsThe primary endpoint of this study is to assess treatment site responses and adverse events through 6 months post procedure.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With a Decrease in the Wrinkle Severity Scale for Nasolabial Folds6 monthsFor this study, a decrease (at least one point) in the rating, relative to pre-treatment rating, when assessed by Investigators at the 1-Month, 3-Month, and 6-Month visits was considered clinically significant (P value less than 0.05). WSS: (0) - No wrinkle 1. \- Just perceptible wrinkle 2. \- Shallow wrinkle 3. \- Moderately deep wrinkle 4. \- Deep wrinkle, well-defined edges 5. \- Very deep wrinkle, redundant fold
Percentage of Participants That Were Satisfied With the Treatment as Rated by GAIS6 monthsThis was measured using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS). With the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS Scale) results of 1, 2 and 3 at 6 months were considered satisfied in this study.

Countries

Canada

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Dermal Filler - Aline HA
Single armed study Aline HA: Implantable dermal filler
72
Total72

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDermal Filler - Aline HA
Age, Continuous50.5 years
Region of Enrollment
Canada
72 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
64 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
56 / 72
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 72

Outcome results

Primary

Assessment of Treatment Site Responses Post Procedure

The primary endpoint of this study is to assess treatment site responses and adverse events through 6 months post procedure.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Dermal Filler - Aline HAAssessment of Treatment Site Responses Post Procedure78 percentage of participants with any AE
Secondary

Number of Participants With a Decrease in the Wrinkle Severity Scale for Nasolabial Folds

For this study, a decrease (at least one point) in the rating, relative to pre-treatment rating, when assessed by Investigators at the 1-Month, 3-Month, and 6-Month visits was considered clinically significant (P value less than 0.05). WSS: (0) - No wrinkle 1. \- Just perceptible wrinkle 2. \- Shallow wrinkle 3. \- Moderately deep wrinkle 4. \- Deep wrinkle, well-defined edges 5. \- Very deep wrinkle, redundant fold

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Wrinkle Severity Score (WSS) assessment values of the Nasolabial Folds treatment area for the Per Protocol population (N=10) is a subgroup of the N=43 per protocol subjects treated. Reporting on the subjects with a 1 point improvement on the WSS at 6 months time.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Dermal Filler - Aline HANumber of Participants With a Decrease in the Wrinkle Severity Scale for Nasolabial Folds5 participants
p-value: <0.05Parametric testing
Secondary

Percentage of Participants That Were Satisfied With the Treatment as Rated by GAIS

This was measured using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS). With the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS Scale) results of 1, 2 and 3 at 6 months were considered satisfied in this study.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Dermal Filler - Aline HAPercentage of Participants That Were Satisfied With the Treatment as Rated by GAIS60 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026