Earlobe Keloids
Conditions
Brief summary
The objective of the study is to actively gather additional information on safety, device performance and possible emergent risks following the use of Celotres in a post-market setting when used to reduce the recurrence rate, volume, appearance and/or symptoms associated with keloid scarring in subjects undergoing surgical excision of keloids as compared to the scientific literature.
Interventions
Celotres following surgical removal of earlobe keloid.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Patients electing to undergo keloid excision procedure * Patients able and willing to give written informed consent
Exclusion criteria
* Patients with a known or potential risk of allergy or sensitivity to products or substances containing porcine gelatin.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| The incidence of device related adverse events | Assessed at treatment, suture removal, Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 | Device safety is defined as the incidence of device related adverse events. |
| Recurrence of keloid post scar excision | Assessed at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months | Proportion of subjects with recurrence of keloid scar post excision defined as the presence of scar tissue volume \>0.3cc |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) | Assessed at Pre-treatment, Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 | — |
| Subject Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) | Assessed at Pre-treatment, Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 | — |
| Device Performance Evaluation | Assessed at Day 1 | Questions related to packaging integrity and successful administration of product as assessed by the Principal Investigator. |
Countries
Poland, The Bahamas, United Kingdom