Skip to content

Celotres for Improvement in Wound Healing and Resulting Scar Consequences Following Suturing of a Wound

A Post Market Clinical Study Evaluating the Safety, Device Performance and Possible Emergent Risks of Celotres in the Improvement of Wound Healing and the Resulting Scar Consequences Following Suturing of a Wound

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01706848
Acronym
PMCS EURO HEAL
Enrollment
60
Registered
2012-10-15
Start date
2012-09-30
Completion date
2014-05-31
Last updated
2014-05-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Scar

Brief summary

The objective of the study is to actively gather additional information on safety, device performance and possible emergent risks following the use of Celotres in a post-market setting when used to improve wound healing and the resulting scar consequences following suturing of a wound.

Interventions

Surgical procedure will be performed as per the standard of care. Scar halves randomized to treatment with device (Celotres), opposite side treated per standard of care.

OTHERSurgical Closure by Standard of Care

Surgical procedure will be performed as per the standard of care. Scar halves randomized to treatment with device (Celotres), opposite side treated per standard of care.

Sponsors

Halscion, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients electing to undergo a surgical procedure; * Patients able and willing to give written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with a known or potential risk of allergy or sensitivity to products or substances containing porcine gelatin

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
SafetyAssessed at treatment, suture removal, Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12Safety as defined by the incidence of device related adverse events.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
EffectivenessAssessed at Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS)
Device Performance EvaluationAssessed at Day 1Questions related to packaging integrity and successful administration of product as assessed by the Principal Investigator

Countries

Poland, United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026