Skip to content

Investigation Into the Effects of Krill Oil vs. Fish Oil on Markers of Cardiovascular Disease

An Investigation Into the Effects of Krill Oil vs. Fish Oil on Markers of Cardiovascular Disease in Males With Metabolic Syndrome

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01705678
Enrollment
19
Registered
2012-10-12
Start date
2009-05-31
Completion date
2012-03-31
Last updated
2012-10-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Metabolic Syndrome

Keywords

Males, Metabolic syndrome, Otherwise healthy

Brief summary

There is some evidence that dietary supplementation with fish oil has health benefits, especially in respect of some of the known risk factors for cardiovascular (heart) disease such as cardiac arrhythmia. However, supplies of fish oil are limited, and it is desirable to validate alternative sustainable sources of the important omega-3 fatty acid components. It has been suggested that oil from krill, which are small marine crustaceans, may be as effective or possibly more beneficial than fish oil, and may provide a more effective and beneficial supplement. Dietary management of cardiovascular health parameters (such as blood lipids)is becoming more and more important as the rising trends in obesity nationally and worldwide are leading to escalating incidence of diabetes and heart disease. The investigators propose to use some specific novel lipid measurements of cardiovascular risk to test this possibility in a group of men who, although generally healthy, show some risk factors in terms of their weight and metabolic profile.This pilot study will provide preliminary data to show whether krill oil has similar or different effects from fish oil on the cardiovascular health of overweight but otherwise healthy men, and in particular will provide detailed information on alterations in novel lipid markers of cardiovascular disease, which may be a better diagnostic tool than classical lipid measurements (e.g. serum cholesterol). The investigators have been developing and validating new techniques to measure emerging lipid markers of cardiovascular risk accurately and will continue to develop and investigate these techniques during the course of this project. The investigators hypothesise that krill oil will be more efficacious in reducing markers of risk relating to cardiovascular disease.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTKrill oil

Krill oil 300 mg DHA/EPA daily for 6 weeks

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTFish oil

Fish oil 500 mg DHA/EPA daily for 6 weeks

Sponsors

Liverpool John Moores University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
35 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* waist circumference ≥ 94cm Plus any two of the below: * Raised triglycerides : ≥ 150 mg/dL (1.7 mmol/L) * Reduced HDL cholesterol: \< 40 mg/dL (1.03 mmol/L) * Raised blood pressure: ≥ 130/85 mm Hg * Raised fasting plasma glucose: ≥ 100 mg/dL (5.6 mmol/L)

Exclusion criteria

* Drug treatment for cardiovascular disease or diabetes, * currently taking fish oil supplements * Individuals who would require carers or guardians to make decisions * Known history of liver disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline high density lipoprotein cholesterol at 6 weeksChange from baseline at 6 weeksChange in high density lipoprotein cholesterol from baseline to endpoint
Change in Plasma Triglycerides at 3 weeksChange from baseline at 3 weeksChange in plasma triglycerides from baseline to midpoint
Change in plasma high density lipoprotein cholesterol at 3 weeksChange from baseline at 3 weeksChange in plasma High density lipoprotein cholesterol from baseline to midpoint
Change in plasma glucose at 3 weeksChange from baseline at 3 weeksChange in plasma glucose from baseline to midpoint
Change in waist circumferenceChange from baseline at 6 weeksChange in waist circumference from baseline to endpoint
Change in systolic blood pressureChange from baseline at 6 weeksChange in systolic blood pressure from baseline to endpoint
Change in Diastolic blood pressureChange from baseline at 6 weeksChange in diastolic blood pressure from baseline to endpoint
Change in plasma triglycerides at 6 weeksChange from baseline at 6 weeksChange in plasma triglycerides at baseline to endpoint
Change in plasma glucose at 6 weeksChange from baseline at 6 weeksChange in plasma glucose from baseline to endpoint

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Body massChange from baseline at 6 weeksChange in body mass measured at baseline to endpoint
Change in plasma total cholesterolChange from baseline at 3 weeksChange in plasma cholesterol from baseline to midpoint
Change in body mass indexChange from baseline at 6 weeksChange in body mass index at baseline to endpoint
Change in plasma cholesterol at 6 weeksChange from baseline at 6 weeksChange in plasma cholesterol from baseline to endpoint
Change in plasma insulin at 3 weeksChange from baseline at 3 weeksChange in plasma insulin from baseline to midpoint
Change in plasma insulin at 6 weeksChange from baseline at 6 weeksChange in plasma insulin from baseline to endpoint
Change in small, dense low density lipoprotein cholesterol at 6 weeksChange from baseline at 6 weeksChange in small, dense low density lipoprotein cholesterol from baseline to endpoint
Change in plasma low density lipoprotein cholesterol at 3 weeksChange from baseline at 3 weeksChange in plasma low density lipoprotein cholesterol from baseline to midpoint
Change in plasma low density lipoprotein cholesterol at 6 weeksChange from baseline at 6 weeksChange in plasma low density lipoprotein cholesterol from baseline to endpoint

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026