Skip to content

Fracture (FX) Improvement With Teriparatide: FiX-IT Study

Fracture (FX) Improvement With Teriparatide: FiX-IT Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01705587
Acronym
FiX-IT
Enrollment
13
Registered
2012-10-12
Start date
2012-12-31
Completion date
2016-09-30
Last updated
2017-12-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atypical Femoral Fracture, Osteoporosis

Keywords

osteoporosis, atypical femoral fractures, prior bisphosphonate treatment, postmenopausal women, bone loss

Brief summary

This open label comparison study examines the hypothesis that teriparatide given immediately following repair of an atypical subtrochanteric or diaphyseal femoral shaft fracture will enhance healing and improve bone mineral density compared to delayed treatment (after six months) with teriparatide or no treatment with teriparatide (patients who refuse therapy or for whom teriparatide is contraindicated). Patients with up-front teriparatide in addition will have greater quality of life measures and less pain compared to those with delayed or no therapy.

Detailed description

Up to 24 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis who have been on bisphosphonate therapy for one year or more at any point prior to fracture and have sustained an atypical subtrochanteric or diaphyseal fracture will be enrolled. Subjects randomized to the two intervention arms will self-administer a daily SQ injection of the study medication for 12 months. The primary objective is to demonstrate greater radiologic evidence of healing at 10 weeks in patients on immediate teriparatide compared to those on delayed teriparatide who receive therapy six months after fracture. Secondary end points include (1) radiologic healing at 2, 6, 24, and 46 weeks; (2) increased bone density at 6 and 12 months as assessed by dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the spine, contralateral hip, and femoral neck; (3) quality of life improvements at 10 weeks and 6 months as assessed by quality of life questionnaire and pain score; and (4) differences in biochemical markers of bone turnover in patient with upfront therapy compared to patients with delayed therapy and patients who refuse therapy or for whom teriparatide is contraindicated.

Interventions

DRUGteriparatide

20 microgram once-daily subcutaneous injection

Sponsors

University of Pittsburgh
CollaboratorOTHER
Eli Lilly and Company
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Susan L. Greenspan
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* postmenopausal women * with osteoporosis who have been on bisphosphonate therapy for one year or more (all bisphosphonates will be included such as alendronate, risdedronate, ibandronate, or zoledronic acid). * Patients will also be included if they are on glucocorticoids or other medications known to affect bone mineral metabolism as these are often found in patients with these types of fractures. * sustain an atypical subtrochanteric or diaphyseal femoral shaft fracture as defined by the the 2010 ASBMR task force. An atypical fracture must include all of the following: (1) a location in the femur distal to lesser trochanter; (2) no trauma or minimal trauma as a fall; (3) transverse or short oblique configuration; (4) noncomminuted; and (5) complete fracture extends through both cortices and may be associated with a medial spike; incomplete fractures involve only the lateral cortex. Patients who have an incomplete fracture can be included if they fall into the 2010 ASBMR task force definition.

Exclusion criteria

* men * children * those who have had radiation therapy * Paget's disease * treatment with teriparatide for two year in the past * metastatic bone disease * active cancer * hypercalcemia * hyperparathyroidism * metabolic disease other than osteoporosis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Radiologic Evidence of Bone Healing6, 12 months of treatmentThe radiologic indices of fracture healing included (1) cortical continuity on two of four cortices, (2) persistence of alignment, (3) decreased conspicuity of fracture line, and (4) increased callus formation. For each of these indices, healing was graded on a scale of 1 to 4 with 1 = no change (less than 25%), 2 = minimum healing (25-50%), 3 = moderate healing (50-75%), and 4 = complete healing (greater than 75%). A composite score was calculated by summing the subscale scores for the 4 indices. Composite score scale ranged from 4 to 16 with higher scores indicating more complete healing. The primary grading was performed by a radiologist with expertise in musculoskeletal radiology, then independently repeated by a second radiologist, both of whom were blinded to the study allocation.
Radiologic Evidence of Healingat 10 weeks for immediate teriparatide groupNumber of participants with persistence of alignment as determined by a radiologist.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Increased Bone Densityat 6 and 12 monthsPercent change in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) as assessed by dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the spine, contralateral hip, distal 1/3 radius, and femoral neck
Radiologic Healingat 2, 6, 24, and 48 weeks
Quality of Life Improvementsat 12 monthsAssessed by quality of life questionnaire (SF-36). There are 8 subscales each ranging from 0-100 with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
Difference in Biochemical Markers of Bone Turnoverintervals over 12-18 months depending on treatment groupupfront therapy group compared to delayed therapy group and no therapy group

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Immediate Teriparatide
Open label teriparatide given immediately following surgical repair of fracture teriparatide: 20 microgram once-daily subcutaneous injection
7
Delayed Teriparatide
Open label teriparatide given six months following surgical repair of fracture teriparatide: 20 microgram once-daily subcutaneous injection
6
Total13

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDelayed TeriparatideTotalImmediate Teriparatide
Age, Continuous69.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.085
74.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.094
78.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.66
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
4 Participants11 Participants7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants13 Participants7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 70 / 6
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 75 / 6
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 72 / 6

Outcome results

Primary

Radiologic Evidence of Bone Healing

The radiologic indices of fracture healing included (1) cortical continuity on two of four cortices, (2) persistence of alignment, (3) decreased conspicuity of fracture line, and (4) increased callus formation. For each of these indices, healing was graded on a scale of 1 to 4 with 1 = no change (less than 25%), 2 = minimum healing (25-50%), 3 = moderate healing (50-75%), and 4 = complete healing (greater than 75%). A composite score was calculated by summing the subscale scores for the 4 indices. Composite score scale ranged from 4 to 16 with higher scores indicating more complete healing. The primary grading was performed by a radiologist with expertise in musculoskeletal radiology, then independently repeated by a second radiologist, both of whom were blinded to the study allocation.

Time frame: 6, 12 months of treatment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Immediate TeriparatideRadiologic Evidence of Bone Healing6 mo12.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.6
Immediate TeriparatideRadiologic Evidence of Bone Healing12 mo15.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
Delayed TeriparatideRadiologic Evidence of Bone Healing6 mo11.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.3
Delayed TeriparatideRadiologic Evidence of Bone Healing12 mo13.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.2
Primary

Radiologic Evidence of Healing

Number of participants with persistence of alignment as determined by a radiologist.

Time frame: at 10 weeks for immediate teriparatide group

Population: Based on orthopedic surgeons' assessment, x-rays were not deemed necessary in over 30% of patients at week 10. Results presented are for those who had x-rays at 10 weeks to assess persistence of alignment for safety purposes.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Immediate TeriparatideRadiologic Evidence of Healing5 Participants
Delayed TeriparatideRadiologic Evidence of Healing4 Participants
Secondary

Difference in Biochemical Markers of Bone Turnover

upfront therapy group compared to delayed therapy group and no therapy group

Time frame: intervals over 12-18 months depending on treatment group

Population: Funding unavailable for sample analysis.

Secondary

Increased Bone Density

Percent change in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) as assessed by dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the spine, contralateral hip, distal 1/3 radius, and femoral neck

Time frame: at 6 and 12 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Immediate TeriparatideIncreased Bone DensityFemoral Neck (6 months)-1.8 percentage change in BMDStandard Error 2.1
Immediate TeriparatideIncreased Bone DensityTotal Hip (6 months)-1.6 percentage change in BMDStandard Error 1.5
Immediate TeriparatideIncreased Bone DensityFemoral Neck (12 months)-2.5 percentage change in BMDStandard Error 3
Immediate TeriparatideIncreased Bone DensitySpine-PA (6 months)2.1 percentage change in BMDStandard Error 1.5
Immediate TeriparatideIncreased Bone DensityDistal 1/3 Radius (6 months)-0.6 percentage change in BMDStandard Error 1.9
Immediate TeriparatideIncreased Bone DensityTotal Hip (12 months)-0.3 percentage change in BMDStandard Error 1.8
Immediate TeriparatideIncreased Bone DensityDistal 1/3 Radius (12 months)-1.9 percentage change in BMDStandard Error 1.7
Immediate TeriparatideIncreased Bone DensitySpine-PA (12 months)2.8 percentage change in BMDStandard Error 2
Delayed TeriparatideIncreased Bone DensityDistal 1/3 Radius (12 months)-6.1 percentage change in BMDStandard Error 2.1
Delayed TeriparatideIncreased Bone DensitySpine-PA (6 months)-0.6 percentage change in BMDStandard Error 1.3
Delayed TeriparatideIncreased Bone DensityTotal Hip (6 months)-0.8 percentage change in BMDStandard Error 0.7
Delayed TeriparatideIncreased Bone DensityTotal Hip (12 months)1.5 percentage change in BMDStandard Error 2.7
Delayed TeriparatideIncreased Bone DensityFemoral Neck (6 months)-2.7 percentage change in BMDStandard Error 1
Delayed TeriparatideIncreased Bone DensityFemoral Neck (12 months)-1.9 percentage change in BMDStandard Error 3.6
Delayed TeriparatideIncreased Bone DensityDistal 1/3 Radius (6 months)-0.7 percentage change in BMDStandard Error 1.1
Delayed TeriparatideIncreased Bone DensitySpine-PA (12 months)5.4 percentage change in BMDStandard Error 2.8
Secondary

Quality of Life Improvements

Assessed by quality of life questionnaire (SF-36). There are 8 subscales each ranging from 0-100 with higher scores indicating better quality of life.

Time frame: at 12 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Immediate TeriparatideQuality of Life ImprovementsPhysical functioning49.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 6.5
Immediate TeriparatideQuality of Life ImprovementsPhysical health limitations48.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 9.1
Immediate TeriparatideQuality of Life ImprovementsEmotional health limitations75.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 9.1
Immediate TeriparatideQuality of Life ImprovementsEnergy/Fatigue54.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 7.4
Immediate TeriparatideQuality of Life ImprovementsEmotional well-being80.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 4.1
Immediate TeriparatideQuality of Life ImprovementsSocial functioning92.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 4.6
Immediate TeriparatideQuality of Life ImprovementsPain72.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 9.7
Immediate TeriparatideQuality of Life ImprovementsGeneral health66.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 6.2
Delayed TeriparatideQuality of Life ImprovementsGeneral health67.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 12.1
Delayed TeriparatideQuality of Life ImprovementsPhysical functioning65.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 20.3
Delayed TeriparatideQuality of Life ImprovementsEmotional well-being70.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 9.1
Delayed TeriparatideQuality of Life ImprovementsPhysical health limitations68.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 21.2
Delayed TeriparatideQuality of Life ImprovementsPain59.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 21.2
Delayed TeriparatideQuality of Life ImprovementsEmotional health limitations72.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 19.7
Delayed TeriparatideQuality of Life ImprovementsSocial functioning65.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 23.6
Delayed TeriparatideQuality of Life ImprovementsEnergy/Fatigue59.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 15
Secondary

Radiologic Healing

Time frame: at 2, 6, 24, and 48 weeks

Population: Data not collected at 2 and 6 weeks. Twenty-Four week (6 months) data is presented in 6 month outcomes, and 48 week (12 months) data as 12 month outcomes (See primary outcomes section above).

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026