Skip to content

SR-WBV Training for Frail Elderly in the Skilling up Stage

Effects of Whole Body Vibration With Stochastic Resonance and Dance Therapy in the Elderly: Effects on Physical Functional Performance

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01704976
Enrollment
27
Registered
2012-10-12
Start date
2012-09-30
Completion date
2014-12-31
Last updated
2019-02-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Poor Performance Status, Muscle Weakness

Brief summary

This randomized controlled study aims to examine long term effects in the skilling up phase over 4 weeks on physical functional performance and strength of mechanical SR-WBV and dance therapy intervention in a frail elderly population.

Detailed description

This study is based on the guideline of falls management exercise programs (FaME; from Skelton and Dinan). The goals: Skilling up: improvement in neuromuscular control, postural control and strengthening of large muscle groups of the lower extremity. Training Gain: improvement of functional abilities. Maintaining the Gains: muscle growth, improvement of bone density and multi-sensory exercises. First, a pilot study was conducted with untrained elderly (Effects of stochastic resonance therapy on postural control in the elderly population (KEK Bern: No.228/09, Clinical Trial Registry: NCT01045746). Following, a second pilot study was conducted with frail elderly (Application of Whole-body Vibration With Stochastic Resonance in Frail Elderly: The Effects on Postural Control Clinical Trial Registry:NCT01543243). It was found that the selected chosen form of recruitment (presentation and advertisement) and the measurements methods are suitable for untrained elderly. But for frail elderly the chosen form of recruitment and the measurement methods are not sufficient. For this study, measurement parameters for functional performance and strength will be used. Goals of the study in the skilling up phase: 1. Feasibility 2. Study the effect on physical functional performance 3. Study the effects on muscle strength. The participants will be recruited in Canton Bern - Swizerland and will be randomly allocated to an intervention group or sham group.

Interventions

DEVICESR-WBV

Participants will undergo a training program set over four weeks, three times a week with 3 to 6 Hz, Noise 4.

Sponsors

Bern University of Applied Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) \>0 * live in canton Bern * in terms of training load be resistant.

Exclusion criteria

* acut joint disease, acut thrombosis, acute fractures, acute infections, acute tissue damage, or acute -- surgical scars * seniors with prosthesis. * alcoholic * acute joint disease, activated osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, acute lower limb * acute inflammation or infection tumors * fresh surgical wounds * severe migraine * epilepsy * acute severe pain

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Physical Functional Performanceafter 4 weeksShort physical performance battery (SPBB): The SPBB examines 3 areas of lower extremity function: standing balance (semi-tandem stand, side-by-side stand, full tandem stand), usual walking speed and ability to stand from a chair. These areas represent essential tasks important for independent living. The scores range from 0 (worst performance) to 12 (best performance). SPPB 0-6 is Poor performance; SPPB 7-9 is Intermediate performance; SPPB 10-12 is High Performance.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Isometric Maximum Voluntary Contraction (IMCV) in Newton (N) Right Knee-extensorafter 4 weeksIt will be evaluated by isometric MCV (Newton) at 90 degree angle in the knee joint.
Ismometric Maximal Voluntary Contraction (IMVC) Left Knee-extensionafter 4 weeksIt will be evaluated by isometric MCV (Newton) at 90 degree angle in the knee joint.
Isometric Rate of Force Development (IRFD) Right Knee-extensorafter 4 weeksIt will be evaluated by isometric RFD (Newton/seconds) at 90 degree angle in the knee joint.
Isometric Rate of Force Development (IRFD) Left Knee-extensorafter 4 weeksIt will be evaluated by isometric RFD (Newton/seconds) at 90 degree angle in the knee joint.

Countries

Switzerland

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Intervention
T0 - intervention 4 weeks - T1 Stochastic resonance whole-body vibration I: Participants will undergo a training program set over four weeks, three times a week with 3 to 6 Hz, Noise 4.
13
Sham
T0- Intervention 4 weeks- T1 Stochastic resonance whole-body vibration II: Participants will undergo a training program set over four weeks three times a week with 1 Hz, Noise 1.
11
Total24

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicInterventionShamTotal
Age, Continuous
Age
90.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.5
83.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3
87.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants7 Participants14 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants4 Participants10 Participants
Total sum score of the Short Physical Performance Battery Test3 sum of points4 sum of points3 sum of points

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 130 / 11
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 130 / 11

Outcome results

Primary

Physical Functional Performance

Short physical performance battery (SPBB): The SPBB examines 3 areas of lower extremity function: standing balance (semi-tandem stand, side-by-side stand, full tandem stand), usual walking speed and ability to stand from a chair. These areas represent essential tasks important for independent living. The scores range from 0 (worst performance) to 12 (best performance). SPPB 0-6 is Poor performance; SPPB 7-9 is Intermediate performance; SPPB 10-12 is High Performance.

Time frame: after 4 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
InterventionPhysical Functional PerformancePre-intervention3 units on a scale
InterventionPhysical Functional PerformancePost-intervention6 units on a scale
ShamPhysical Functional PerformancePre-intervention4 units on a scale
ShamPhysical Functional PerformancePost-intervention4 units on a scale
p-value: <0.05Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Ismometric Maximal Voluntary Contraction (IMVC) Left Knee-extension

It will be evaluated by isometric MCV (Newton) at 90 degree angle in the knee joint.

Time frame: after 4 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
InterventionIsmometric Maximal Voluntary Contraction (IMVC) Left Knee-extensionPre-intervention83.2 Newton
InterventionIsmometric Maximal Voluntary Contraction (IMVC) Left Knee-extensionPost-intervention154 Newton
ShamIsmometric Maximal Voluntary Contraction (IMVC) Left Knee-extensionPost-intervention129 Newton
ShamIsmometric Maximal Voluntary Contraction (IMVC) Left Knee-extensionPre-intervention115.8 Newton
p-value: <0.05Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Isometric Maximum Voluntary Contraction (IMCV) in Newton (N) Right Knee-extensor

It will be evaluated by isometric MCV (Newton) at 90 degree angle in the knee joint.

Time frame: after 4 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
InterventionIsometric Maximum Voluntary Contraction (IMCV) in Newton (N) Right Knee-extensorPre-intervention115.1 Newton
InterventionIsometric Maximum Voluntary Contraction (IMCV) in Newton (N) Right Knee-extensorPost-intervention127.1 Newton
ShamIsometric Maximum Voluntary Contraction (IMCV) in Newton (N) Right Knee-extensorPre-intervention141.4 Newton
ShamIsometric Maximum Voluntary Contraction (IMCV) in Newton (N) Right Knee-extensorPost-intervention128.7 Newton
p-value: <0.05Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Isometric Rate of Force Development (IRFD) Left Knee-extensor

It will be evaluated by isometric RFD (Newton/seconds) at 90 degree angle in the knee joint.

Time frame: after 4 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
InterventionIsometric Rate of Force Development (IRFD) Left Knee-extensorPre-intervention284.7 Newton/seconds
InterventionIsometric Rate of Force Development (IRFD) Left Knee-extensorPost-intervention580.3 Newton/seconds
ShamIsometric Rate of Force Development (IRFD) Left Knee-extensorPre-intervention546.2 Newton/seconds
ShamIsometric Rate of Force Development (IRFD) Left Knee-extensorPost-intervention521 Newton/seconds
p-value: <0.05Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Isometric Rate of Force Development (IRFD) Right Knee-extensor

It will be evaluated by isometric RFD (Newton/seconds) at 90 degree angle in the knee joint.

Time frame: after 4 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
InterventionIsometric Rate of Force Development (IRFD) Right Knee-extensorPre-intervention489.8 Newton/seconds
InterventionIsometric Rate of Force Development (IRFD) Right Knee-extensorPost-intervention510 Newton/seconds
ShamIsometric Rate of Force Development (IRFD) Right Knee-extensorPre-intervention558.5 Newton/seconds
ShamIsometric Rate of Force Development (IRFD) Right Knee-extensorPost-intervention560 Newton/seconds
p-value: <0.05Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026