Skip to content

Ex-combatant Reintegration in Liberia

Evaluating a Landmine Action Ex-combatant Reintegration Program in Liberia

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01703936
Enrollment
1330
Registered
2012-10-11
Start date
2009-05-31
Completion date
2011-07-31
Last updated
2012-10-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Poverty, Social Instability

Keywords

economic intervention, ex-combatant, agriculture, life skills

Brief summary

This project is an evaluation of an agricultural training and resettlement program for high-risk young adults in Liberia, especially poorly integrated male ex-combatants. The primary aim is to see to what extent an intensive economic and life skills intervention can rehabilitate high-risk individuals and reduce aggression and armed violence.

Detailed description

Poor and unemployed youth are widely considered a threat to political stability, often blamed for everything from fights to crime, riots and revolutions. Ex-combatants cause special worry. Not only do they have professional experience in warfare, and hence some comparative advantage in violence, but their social networks may also be dense with potential recruiters. War may also have left them poorer or more traumatized than their peers. Each of these factors could elevate the risk of rebellion, crime, or other aggression, risks greatest in weak states and uncertain economic climates like that of Liberia. In response, policymakers commonly turn to employment and other poverty alleviation programs, including cash grants, vocational training, small business development, and microfinance. Underlying these programs is the belief that with economic opportunities come stability. When dealing with organized populations, such as former combatants, gang members, or criminal organizations, policymakers are also anxious to break down risky social networks, especially the links between commanders and foot soldiers. Interventions often go beyond simple employment programs, and seek to relocate, resettle, or otherwise remove high-risk individuals from risky networks. This project evaluates a rehabilitation program for ex-combatants and other high-risk youth in Liberia, a unique case where it was both politically and practically feasible to establish and follow a random control group. The program we study, which was designed and implemented by the international non-governmental organization (NGO) Action on Armed Violence, is among the best of its class. The program is targeted towards ex-combatants and other high-risk populations in resource enclaves and other hotspots around the country. It provides extensive agricultural skills training and inputs alongside life skills training and resettlement assistance. Its objective is to reduce the risk of violence and aggression by providing an alternative, stable livelihood in civilian communities to youth otherwise engaged in illicit activities or thought to be easily mobilized into crime or violence. After observing two highly promising courses and classes of graduates, the researchers collaborated with the NGO to randomly evaluate their next round of classes at two training sites. The program implementers confirmed that the number of youth eligible for the program exceeded program capacity by a factor of at least two. The sample size was limited to 2.5 times the number of spots in the program, for a total of 1500. In order to give all eligible youth an equal opportunity to participate, the program implementers determined entry into the program using a computerized randomization of eligible youth. Respondents were assigned to treatment and control using a randomization program coded in Stata. The sample was stratified by gender, commander status, and community of registration. The study has two principal rounds of data collection among both treatment and control groups: a baseline prior to the intervention and a follow-up survey approximately one year following completion of the program.

Interventions

OTHERAgricultural and life skills training program

Sponsors

United Nations
CollaboratorOTHER
World Bank
CollaboratorOTHER
Columbia University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

(determined by program): * ex-combatant * not served by previous reintegration programs * engaged in illicit activities such as mining and rubber tapping

Exclusion criteria

(determined by program): * pregnant women * individuals deemed physically incapable of agriculture * foreigners unwilling to settle in Liberia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Potential for Social Instability1 year after completion of programThis outcome includes engagement in illicit activities, ease of mobilization, political attitudes, violence and aggression, how settled they are, integration into mainstream society, and mental health symptoms.
Economic Stability1 year after completion of programThis outcome includes employment and poverty level.
Preferences1 year after completion of programThis outcome includes risk and time preferences.
Interest in Agriculture1 year after completion of the programThis outcome measures level of interest in agriculture, attempts to engage in agriculture, perceptions of agriculture, and level of willingness to invest in agriculture.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Aspirations and Future Planning1 year after completion of the programThis outcome measures aspirations for the future and thinking about the future.
Empowerment1 year after completion of the studyThe outcome includes locus of control and making their own decisions.
Level of Social Support and Quality of Social Relations1 year after completion of the studyThe outcome includes aggregate level of social support, quality of relationship with family and elders, advising, and peer groups.

Countries

Liberia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026