Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety Comparative Study of Sitagliptin,Vildagliptin and Saxagliptin

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind Comparative Study of Efficacy,Tolerance and Safety Between Sitagliptin ,Vildagliptin and Saxagliptin After 12-week Monotherapy in Drug-naive Adult Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01703637
Enrollment
300
Registered
2012-10-10
Start date
2012-10-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2016-03-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Keywords

Sitagliptin, Vildagliptin, Saxagliptin, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to explore the differences in efficacy and safety of sitagliptin,vildagliptin and saxagliptin and to find which one is more better in treating type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Interventions

DRUGSitagliptin

* before breakfast:a tablet of sitagliptin; a tablet of vildagliptin's dummy; a tablet of saxagliptin's dummy * before dinner:a tablet of sitagliptin's dummy; a tablet of vildagliptin's dummy; a tablet of saxagliptin's dummy

DRUGVildagliptin

* before breakfast:a tablet of vildagliptin; a tablet of sitagliptin's dummy; a tablet of saxagliptin's dummy * before dinner:a tablet of vildagliptin; a tablet of sitagliptin's dummy; a tablet of saxagliptin's dummy

DRUGSaxagliptin

* before breakfast:a tablet of saxagliptin; a tablet of vildagliptin's dummy; a tablet of sitagliptin's dummy * before dinner:a tablet of saxagliptin's dummy; a tablet of vildagliptin's dummy; a tablet of sitagliptin's dummy

Sponsors

Lin Liao
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 78 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* signed the informed consent * diagnosed with T2DM * women of childbearing potential were required to have a negative urine; pregnancy test,and agreed to use adequate contraception throughout the; study and for up to 4 weeks after completion * glycosylated hemoglobin ranged in 6.5-9.5%

Exclusion criteria

* patients in pregnancy or lactation period * ever received any kind of oral Hypoglycemic drug in recent 3 months * patients were currently receiving treatment with a cytochrome P450 3A4 inducer or depressor,a systemic corticosteroid,or a human immunodeficiency virus anti-viral medication * gastrointestinal surgery that could affect drug absorption * patients with haemoglobinopathy or rapidly progressing renal disease, or autoimmune skin disorder * a recent history of alcohol or drug abuse within the past 12 months * any contraindication listed in the package inserts of the study drugs * a history of acute or chronic Pancreatitis or currently * type 1 diabetes; a history of diabetic ketoacidosis or hyperosmolar nonketonic coma * New York Heart Association class III or IV congestive heart failure; left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 40%; a major cardiovascular event within the past 6 months * significant abnormal liver function, defined as aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase \> 2 times the upper limit of normal or total bilirubin \>34 µmol/L (\> 2 mg/dL); or a history of positive serologic evidence of infectious liver disease * clinical signs or symptoms of active liver disease and/or significant abnormal liver function * patients with any clinically significant abnormality identified on physical examination, electrocardiogram (ECG), or laboratory tests that, in the judgment of the investigator, would compromise the patients' safety or successful participation in the clinical study * fasting plasma glucose level \> 13.3mmol/l * creatinine clearance rate ≤ 90ml/min

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (A1C) Levels at Week 12Baseline and Week 12Change from baseline reflects the Week 12 value minus the baseline value. A1C represents the percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 12Baseline to Week 12
Change From Baseline in 2-hour Postprandial Glucose at Week 12Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline in Fasting Insulin at Week 12Baseline to Week 12
Change From Baseline in Fasting Glucagon at Week 12Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline in 2-hour Postprandial Insulin at Week 12Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline in 2-hour Postprandial Glucagon at Week 12Baseline and Week 12
The Proportion of Patients Achieving A1C < 7% and Achieving A1C<6.5% at Week12Baseline and Week 12
The side effect of each drug.Baseline to week 12
Change From Baseline in abdominal perimeter at Week 12Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 12Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Lipids at Week 12Baseline and Week 12fasting plasma lipid parameters including total cholesterol(TC), triglyceride(TG) and Low density lipoprotein(LDL)

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
gene polymorphism studybaseline and week 12We will choose 6 mutation types of CYP3A4 common in Chinese,and make blood medicinal concentration assay of participants with these gene types,and then analyse the association between different gene types and the change of glucose level or HbA1c or rate of adverse event.
change from baseline in content of NOSbaseline and week 12

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactLin Liao, MD
liaolin@medmail.com.cn8615168888260

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 3, 2026