Skip to content

Outcomes and Discharge of Long-stay Psychiatric Patients

Epidemiological Study on Outcomes and Discharges of Psychiatric Patients Living in Italian Residential Facilities (PERDOVE)

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01701765
Acronym
PERDOVE
Enrollment
403
Registered
2012-10-05
Start date
2010-09-30
Completion date
2012-01-31
Last updated
2012-10-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mental Disorders

Keywords

Severe mental disorders, Discharge, Outcome evaluation

Brief summary

An increasing number of severely ill patients require long-term care in non-hospital Residential Facilities (RFs). Despite the magnitude of this development, only a few detailed longitudinal studies on fairly larger samples of residents have provided important information about this population. The PERDOVE study is the first study carried out in Italy aimed at obtaining comprehensive data about the course and outcome of patients living in RFs, and test whether discharge to independent accommodations is a real option for many patients. The major aims are three: (1) to describe the sociodemographic, clinical, and treatment-related characteristics of patients treated in RFs during an index period in 2010; (2) to identify predictors, and characteristics associated to discharge at 1-year follow-up; and (3) to evaluate clinicians' predictions about the likelihood of home discharge for each individual patient. The primary endpoint was discharge within one year as a measure of good outcome. The PERDOVE study is an observational cohort study, involving 23 RFs all belonging to the St John of God Order, located in Northern Italy. The first step involves the evaluation of all RFs with a Structure Schedule, which assesses the following areas: logistics structure, general organization: internal rules, meals, clothing and personal hygiene; staff and users' characteristics and meetings, documentation system and evaluation activities; rehabilitative activities provided inside the RF itself. In the second step a research assistant completed a standardised assessment of each resident with the manager and staff; clinical diagnoses were made by treating clinicians. A number of standardised instruments were administered. At one year follow-up, changes in clinical and life conditions of the patients were evaluated and selected rating scales were administered again. For patients discharged to the community or to other RFs, a research assistant contacted the patient's psychiatrist and asked him/her to fill out the follow-up documentation. With regard to residents' discharge, investigators hypothesised that the likelihood of community discharge would be associated both with the level of social support outside the facilities, and with the degree of patients' psychological and social impairment.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* psychiatric diagnosis * age \< 65 * staying in september 2010 in any of 23 RFs located in Northern Italy

Exclusion criteria

* elderly patients (over 65 yrs) * primary diagnosis of organic mental disorder * refusal of signing an informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Discharge1 yearPercentage of patients discharged home one year after the baseline assessment compared to patients staying in the same residential facility or transferred to other institutions (e.g., other residential facilities, nursing homes, jails, etc)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Scores of standardized rating scales1 yearClinical psychopathology (BPRS), psychosocial functioning (PSP, HONOS, SLOF), Quality of life (WHOQOL, WHOQOL-SRPB, SWBS), physical conditions (PHI)
Satisfaction assessed with the VSSS1 yearSatisfaction with the treatment received assessed with the Verona Service Satisfaction Scale.

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026