Skip to content

Compression Therapy Versus Surgery in the Treatment of Superficial Venous Reflux

Compression Therapy Versus Surgery in the Treatment of Superficial Venous Reflux - A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01701661
Enrollment
153
Registered
2012-10-05
Start date
2004-09-30
Completion date
2012-09-30
Last updated
2012-10-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Venous Insufficiency

Keywords

venous surgery, compression therapy

Brief summary

Randomized controlled trial, a method used to implement the random allocation sequence is numbered containers. The aim of the study is to compare compression therapy with compression stockings and surgery eliminating superficial venous reflux in patients with duplex ultrasound verified superficial venous reflux without skin changes or ulceration.

Detailed description

Superficial venous reflux is common in adult population. Uncomplicated disease, where there is no skin changes but varicose veins with or without leg swelling, can be totally asymptomatic but also cause various symptoms as pain, aching and discomfort of leg usually caused by increased venous pressure. Varicose veins may also cause cosmetic problem. Compression stockings relief the symptoms as they normalize venous pressure. In surgical treatment, axial reflux is treated usually by removing incompetent superficial veins. The aim of the study is to compare conservative treatment with compression stockings with surgical treatment of superficial venous reflux. In operative treatment the great saphenous vein or lesser saphenous vein are removed after flush ligation by femoral vein and stripping of the trunk. If the main trunk has been removes previously, axial refluating veins are removed or ligated according to the DUS finding. The patients in both groups are examined at the baseline and followed up to two years by ultrasound scanning. Patients clinical classification, venous disability score, venous disease severity score, anatomical path of reflux as well as quality of life are studied at the baseline, at one year follow-up and two years follow-up.

Interventions

stripping of main trunk or if previously removed, removal or ligating the refluating trunk

OTHERconservative treatment

Compression stockings class II

Sponsors

Helsinki University Central Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients with chronic superficial vein insufficiency * patient must be 20-70 years old * degree of difficulty of vein insufficiency C2-C3 * venous disability score 1-2 * patient is agreeable to the study

Exclusion criteria

* peripheral atherosclerotic occlusive disease * lymphoedema * severe concomitant disease (ASA 3-5) * venous ulcers or unclassified skin changes * BMI more than 35

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Symptom relieftwo yearsPatients are examined at the baseline, one and 2-year follow-up and the following measures are compared: clinical classification, venous disability score, venous disease severity score, reflux according to ultrasound examination.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of lifetwo yearsQuality of life is evaluated with two questionnaires: Aberdeen (which is a 13-item questionnaire with categories related specially to disadvantages caused by varicose veins) and 15D (a questionnaire with categories related to general quality of life).

Countries

Finland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026