Skip to content

A Study to Evaluate the Tolerability of Botox and Topiramate or Botox and Placebo and Effect on Cognitive Efficiency

A Randomized, Pilot Study to Evaluate the Tolerability of OnabotulinumtoxinA Plus Topiramate vs. OnabotulinumtoxinA Plus Placebo and Long Term Effect of Treatment on Cognitive Efficiency and Continuation of Care

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01700387
Enrollment
20
Registered
2012-10-04
Start date
2012-10-31
Completion date
2014-08-31
Last updated
2020-08-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Migraine

Keywords

Migraine, Chronic Migraine, Cognitive Efficiency, Pilot Study, Long Term Effect

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate sustained tolerability, quality of life, and change in cognitive efficiency following treatment with OnabotulinumtoxinA and daily topiramate vs. OnabotulinumtoxinA and daily placebo (Group A vs. Group B).

Detailed description

Numerous migraine preventive medications are well known to be associated with cognitive impairment and disruption of mood. Clinvest would propose a pilot study of chronic migraine patients randomized 1:1 to onabotulinumtoxinA and daily topiramate or onabotulinumtoxinA and placebo. This pilot study will examine the degree to which subjects are able to tolerate and are satisfied with a migraine preventive medication in addition to onabotulinumtoxinA over an extended period of time and the effect of the subjects' quality of life compared with onabotulinumtoxinA as a single therapy. It will also assess short and long term effects of these two treatments on cognition. Cognitive performance will be measured by the Mental Efficiency Workload Test (MEWT), a repeated measures handheld neuropsychological test battery that measures mental efficiency via 4 sub-tests (Simple Reaction Time, Running Memory, Continuous Performance Task, Matching to Sample, and Mathematical Processing) to demonstrate short and long term changes in mental status compared to their baseline. The Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT) will be used to test verbal fluency and screen for anomic aphasia, a known side effect of several migraine prophylactic medications including topiramate. Visit 1 - Screening / Baseline Following Informed Consent a medical, headache, and medication history will be collected and a physical and neurological exam performed on all subjects. A urine pregnancy test will be collected from any subject of child-bearing potential. Vital signs and ECG (at the discretion of the investigator) will be completed. The Mental Efficiency Workload Test (MEWT) will be administered 3 times to establish a cognitive efficiency baseline. The COWAT will be completed. Subjects will be instructed regarding completion of the online 1-month Baseline Period Migraine Diary and be instructed to treat headaches during the 1-month Baseline Period with their usual acute migraine medication in their usual manner. Visit 2 - Randomization / Injection Following the 1-month Baseline Period, any change in medical or medication history since the previous visit will be collected and a pregnancy test collected if appropriate. Vital signs will be recorded. Subjects continuing to meet eligibility criteria will be instructed to complete the online Treatment Period Migraine Diary daily. The MEWT, HIT-6, Migraine Specific Questionnaire (MSQ) and COWAT will be completed. The coordinator will assess compliance with online headache diary and any deviation outside of 100% compliance should be documented at the site. If in the investigator's opinion, the subject maintained a high level of compliance with the online headache diary, subjects will then be randomized into the study. Eligible subjects will be randomized 1:1 in a blinded fashion to receive onabotulinumtoxinA at 31 fixed-site, fixed-dose injections across seven (7) specific head/neck muscle areas and daily topiramate (Group A) or onabotulinumtoxinA at 31 fixed-site, fixed-dose injections across seven (7) specific head/neck muscle areas and placebo to match topiramate (Group B). Daily study medication (topiramate or placebo) will be dispensed for the following 3 months. The Group A topiramate titration schedule will be as follows: Week 1: topiramate 25 mg qhs (every night at bedtime) Week 2: topiramate 25 mg bid (twice a day) Week 3: topiramate 25 mg q am (everyday before noon) + topiramate 50 mg qhs Week 4: topiramate 50mg bid Only one dosage adjustment (increase or decrease), based on efficacy or tolerability, may be made at the investigator's discretion. Subjects must maintain a dose of at least 50 mg/day to remain in the Treatment Period. The Group B placebo schedule will be as following: Week 1: 1 tab qhs Week 2: 1 tab bid Week 3: 1 tab q am + 2 tabs qhs Week 4: 2 tabs bid Subjects will be instructed to complete the online daily Treatment Period Migraine Diary during the next 3-month period. Following Visit 2, subjects will be phoned monthly and any adverse events collected. Subjects will also be sent weekly reminders for 8 weeks following Visit 2 via email to take study medication, complete online diary and contact their coordinator for any questions or concerns they may have. During the titration period, any subject in Group A experiencing an adverse event thought to be related to study medication dosage will return to the clinic at an Unscheduled Visit for dosage adjustment. Visit 3 Three months following Visit 2, subjects will return and complete the MEWT, HIT-6, MSQ, COWAT, and Subject's Global Impression of Change (SGIC). The Investigator will complete a Physician's Global Impression of Change (PGIC). Any change in medical or medication history since the previous visit will be collected and a pregnancy test collected if appropriate. Vital signs will be recorded. The coordinator will assess compliance with online headache diary and any deviation outside of 100% compliance should be documented at the site. If in the investigator's opinion, the subject maintained a high level of compliance with the online headache diary, subjects will be allowed to continue in the study. All subjects will be administered a dose of 155 U onabotulinumtoxinA at 31 fixed-site, fixed-dose injections across seven (7) specific head/neck muscle areas. Any unused study medication and used packaging will be collected, drug accountability will be performed, and daily study medication (topiramate or placebo) will be dispensed for the following 3 months. Subjects will be instructed to complete the online daily Treatment Period Migraine Diary during the next 3-month period. Following Visit 3, subjects will be phoned monthly and any adverse events collected. Visit 4 Three months following Visit 3, subjects will return and complete the MEWT, HIT-6, MSQ, COWAT, and Subject's Global Impression of Change (SGIC). The Investigator will complete a Physician's Global Impression of Change (PGIC). Any change in medical or medication history since the previous visit will be collected and a pregnancy test collected if appropriate. Vital signs will be recorded. The coordinator will assess compliance with online headache diary and any deviation outside of 100% compliance should be documented at the site. All subjects will be administered a dose of 155 U onabotulinumtoxinA at 31 fixed-site, fixed-dose injections across seven (7) specific head/neck muscle areas. Any unused study medication and used packaging will be collected, drug accountability will be performed, and daily study medication (topiramate or placebo) will be dispensed for the following 3 months. Subjects will be instructed to complete the online daily Treatment Period Migraine Diary during the next 3-month period. Following Visit 4, subjects will be phoned monthly and any adverse events collected. Visit 5 Three months following Visit 4, subjects will return and complete the MEWT, HIT-6, MSQ, COWAT, and Subject's Global Impression of Change (SGIC). The Investigator will complete a Physician's Global Impression of Change (PGIC). Any change in medical or medication history since the previous visit will be collected and a pregnancy test collected if appropriate. Vital signs will be recorded. The coordinator will assess compliance with online headache diary and any deviation outside of 100% compliance should be documented at the site. All subjects will be administered a dose of 155 U onabotulinumtoxinA at 31 fixed-site, fixed-dose injections across seven (7) specific head/neck muscle areas. Any unused study medication and used packaging will be collected, drug accountability will be performed, and daily study medication (topiramate or placebo) will be dispensed for the following 3 months. Subjects will be instructed to complete the online daily Treatment Period Migraine Diary during the next 3-month period. Following Visit 5, subjects will be phoned monthly and any adverse events collected. Visit 6 Three months following Visit 5, subjects will return and complete the MEWT, HIT-6, MSQ, COWAT, and Subject's Global Impression of Change. The Investigator will complete a Physician's Global Impression of Change. Any change in medical or medication history since the previous visit will be collected and a pregnancy test collected if appropriate. Vital signs will be recorded. The coordinator will assess compliance with online headache diary and any deviation outside of 100% compliance should be documented at the site. Any unused study medication and used packaging will be collected and drug accountability will be performed. Subjects will exit the study at Visit 6.

Interventions

DRUGonabotulinumtoxinA

All subjects will receive a minimum dose of 155 U Botulinum Toxin Type A Purified Neurotoxin Complex administered at 31 fixed-site, fixed-dose injections across seven (7) specific head/neck muscle areas at Visits 2-5.

DRUGTopiramate

Subjects randomized to the onabotulinumtoxinA + topiramate group will receive: Week 1: topiramate 25 mg qhs Week 2: topiramate 25 mg bid Week 3: topiramate 25 mg q am + topiramate 50 mg qhs Week 4: topiramate 50 mg bid Only one dosage adjustment (increase or decrease), based on efficacy or tolerability, may be made at the investigator's discretion. Subjects must maintain a dose of at least 50 mg/day to remain in the Treatment Period.

DRUGPlacebo

Subjects randomized to the onabotulinumtoxinA + placebo group will receive: Week 1: placebo 25 mg qhs Week 2: placebo 25 mg bid Week 3: placebo 25 mg q am + placebo 50 mg qhs Week 4: placebo 50 mg bid Only one dosage adjustment (increase or decrease), based on efficacy or tolerability, may be made at the investigator's discretion. Subjects must maintain a dose of at least 50 mg/day to remain in the Treatment Period.

Sponsors

Allergan
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Cady, Roger, M.D.
Lead SponsorINDIV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. must be outpatient, male or female, of any race, between 18 and 65 years of age. 2. if female of child bearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test result at the Screening Visit and practice a reliable method of contraception. A female is considered of childbearing potential unless she is post-menopausal for at least 12 months prior to administration of study drug, without a uterus and/or both ovaries or has been surgically sterilized for at least 6 months prior to study drug administration. Reliable methods of contraception are: Complete abstinence from intercourse from 2 weeks prior to administration of the investigational product. Throughout the study, and for a time interval (5 days) after completion or premature discontinuation from the study. History of bilateral tubal ligation Sterilization of male partner; or, Implants of levonorgestrel; or, Injectable progestogen, or, Oral contraceptive (combination therapy with ethinyl estradiol plus a progestin) with a placebo week every 1-3 months; or, Any intrauterine device (IUD) with published data showing that the highest expected failure rate is less than 1% per year (not all IUD's meet this criterion) in use at least 30 days prior to study drug administration; or, Spermicide plus a mechanical barrier (e.g., spermicide plus a male condom or a female diaphragm); or, Any other barrier methods (only is used in combination with any of the above acceptable methods) in use at least 14 days prior to study drug administration; or, Any other methods with published data showing that the highest expected failure rate for that method is less than 1% per year. 3. must have history of chronic migraine (with or without aura) according to the criteria proposed by the Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) for at least 3 months prior to enrollment. 4. must be able to understand the requirements of the study including maintaining a headache Diary, and signing informed consent. 5. must be in good general health as determined by investigator. 6. if taking migraine preventive, must be on a stable dose of preventive medication for at least 6 weeks prior to screening. 7. must have daily access to internet for completion of online daily headache diary.

Exclusion criteria

1. if female, is pregnant, planning to become pregnant during the study period, are breast feeding, or are of childbearing potential and not practicing a reliable form of birth control. 2. has headache disorders outside IHS-defined chronic migraine definition. 3. has evidence of underlying pathology contributing to their headaches. 4. has any medical condition that may increase their risk with exposure to OnabotulinumtoxinA including diagnosed myasthenia gravis, Eaton-Lambert syndrome, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or any other significant disease that might interfere with neuromuscular function. 5. has profound atrophy or weakness of muscles in the target areas of injection. 6. has skin conditions or infections at any injection site. 7. has allergy or sensitivities to any component of the test medication. 8. has previously received onabotulinumtoxinA for migraine prevention. 9. has previously received topiramate. 10. who in the opinion of the investigator, has active major psychiatric or depressive disorders including alcohol/drug abuse. 11. meets International Headache Society criteria for Medication Overuse Headache with opioid or butalbital containing products. 12. who in the opinion of the investigator, is taking opioid or butalbital containing products more than once a week that could be contributing to a pattern of increased headaches or cognitive decline. 13. is planning or requiring surgery during the study. 14. has a history of poor compliance with medical treatment. 15. is currently participating in an investigational drug study or has participated in an investigational drug study within the previous 30 days of the screening visit.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subject Attrition Post RandomizationCollected on Visit 2 (Day 29) through Visit 6 (Day 365)Count of subject attrition following randomization and reason for attrition (Consent withdrawn, Withdrawn due to adverse event, Lost to follow up)
Subject Global Impression of Change (SGIC)Collected on Visit 3 (Day 113), Visit 4 (Day 197), Visit 5 (281), and Visit 6 (Day 365)Score on Subject Global Impression of Change at Visits 3-6 (Day 113 and 365). Likert scale ranging from 1-7, where 1 = extremely worse and 7 = extremely better.
Physician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Collected on Visit 3 (Day 113), Visit 4 (Day 197), Visit 5 (281), and Visit 6 (Day 365)Score on Physician Global Impression of Change at Visits 3-6 (Day 113 and 365). Likert scale ranging from 1-7, where 1 = extremely worse and 7 = extremely better.
Subject's Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT) Score Percent Change Compared From Baseline to Visits 3-6Baseline, Visit 3 (Day 113) through Visit 6 (Day 365)The Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT) is a measure of verbal fluency. Raw COWAT scores have a lower bound of 0 with no upper bound. Higher scores indicate better verbal fluency. COWAT score percent change from baseline will be reported. Positive change scores represent better verbal fluency compared to baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
MEWT Matching to Sample Sub-test Score Percent Change Compared From Baseline to Visits 3-6Baseline, Visit 3 (Day 113), Visit 4 (Day 197), Visit 5 (281), and Visit 6 (Day 365)The Mental Efficiency Workload Test (MEWT) is a cognitive functioning scale with four sub-scales (Simple Reaction Time, Running Memory Continuous Performance Task, Matching to Sample, and Mathematical Processing). Each sub-scale has a minimum and maximum values of 1 to 10, 1 indicates the poorest level and 10 indicates the best level of cognitive functioning. MEWT sub-scale score percent change from baseline will be reported. Positive change scores represent better cognitive functioning compared to baseline.
MEWT Mathematical Processing Sub-test Score Percent Change Compared From Baseline to Visits 3-6Baseline, Visit 3 (Day 113), Visit 4 (Day 197), Visit 5 (281), and Visit 6 (Day 365)The Mental Efficiency Workload Test (MEWT) is a cognitive functioning scale with four sub-scales (Simple Reaction Time, Running Memory Continuous Performance Task, Matching to Sample, and Mathematical Processing). Each sub-scale has a minimum and maximum values of 1 to 10, 1 indicates the poorest level and 10 indicates the best level of cognitive functioning. MEWT sub-scale score percent change from baseline will be reported. Positive change scores represent better cognitive functioning compared to baseline.
Number of Headache DaysBaseline and Months 1-12Number of Headache Days reported in 30-day Baseline Period and Treatment Period Months 1-12
Number of Non-Serious Adverse Events Between Groups13 Months (Visit 1 to Visit 6)
Subject's Migraine Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) Scores at Baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 Months to Measure Subject's Quality of LifeBaseline, Months: 3, 6, 9 and 12The Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) is a scale that measures the impact of migraine across three aspects: role function-restrictive (RR), role function-preventive (RP), and emotional function (EF). Possible scores on each sub-scale range from a 0 to 100 scale such that higher scores indicate better quality of life.
Subject Estimation of Compliance With Daily Study DrugCollected on Visit 2 (Day 29), 3 (Day 113), Visit 4 (Day 197), and Visit 5 (281)Subject estimation of compliance with daily study drug during the study period. Compliance ranges from 0% to 100% with higher percentages indicating greater compliance with study drug.
Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) Scores at Visits 2-6 to Measure Effect of Headache in Subject's LifeCollected on Visit 2 (Day 29), 3 (Day 113), Visit 4 (Day 197), Visit 5 (281), and Visit 6 (Day 365)The Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) is a tool used to measure the impact headaches have on an individual's ability to function on the job, at school, at home and in social situations. The HIT-6 score range is from 36 to 78 with higher scores indicating greater impact (worse outcome).
MEWT Simple Reaction Time Sub-test Score Percent Change Compared From Baseline to Visits 3-6Baseline, Visit 3 (Day 113), Visit 4 (Day 197), Visit 5 (281), and Visit 6 (Day 365)The Mental Efficiency Workload Test (MEWT) is a cognitive functioning scale with four sub-scales (Simple Reaction Time, Running Memory Continuous Performance Task, Matching to Sample, and Mathematical Processing). Each sub-scale has a minimum and maximum values of 1 to 10, 1 indicates the poorest level and 10 indicates the best level of cognitive functioning. MEWT sub-scale score percent change from baseline will be reported. Positive change scores represent better cognitive functioning compared to baseline.
MEWT Running Memory Continuous Performance Task Sub-test Score Percent Change Compared From Baseline to Visits 3-6Baseline, Visit 3 (Day 113), Visit 4 (Day 197), Visit 5 (281), and Visit 6 (Day 365)The Mental Efficiency Workload Test (MEWT) is a cognitive functioning scale with four sub-scales (Simple Reaction Time, Running Memory Continuous Performance Task, Matching to Sample, and Mathematical Processing). Each sub-scale has a minimum and maximum values of 1 to 10, 1 indicates the poorest level and 10 indicates the best level of cognitive functioning. MEWT sub-scale score percent change from baseline will be reported. Positive change scores represent better cognitive functioning compared to baseline.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
OnabotulinumtoxinA + Topiramate
Subject will receive 155 U onabotulinumtoxinA injections at 31 sites every 3 months for 12 months and treat daily with topiramate. During the first month of the treatment period, subjects will titrate as follows: Week 1: topiramate 25 mg qhs Week 2: topiramate 25 mg bid Week 3: topiramate 25 mg q am + topiramate 50 mg qhs Week 4: topiramate 50 mg bid Only one dosage adjustment (increase or decrease), based on efficacy or tolerability, may be made at the investigator's discretion. Subjects must maintain a dose of at least 50 mg/day to remain in the Treatment Period. onabotulinumtoxinA: All subjects will receive a minimum dose of 155 U Botulinum Toxin Type A Purified Neurotoxin Complex administered at 31 fixed-site, fixed-dose injections across seven (7) specific head/neck muscle areas at Visits 2-5.
10
OnabotulinumtoxinA + Placebo
Subject will receive 155 U onabotulinumtoxinA injections at 31 sites every 3 months for 12 months and treat daily with placebo. During the first month of the treatment period, subjects will titrate as follows: Week 1: 1 tab qhs Week 2: 1 tab bid Week 3: 1 tab q am + 2 tabs qhs Week 4: 2 tabs bid onabotulinumtoxinA: All subjects will receive a minimum dose of 155 U Botulinum Toxin Type A Purified Neurotoxin Complex administered at 31 fixed-site, fixed-dose injections across seven (7) specific head/neck muscle areas at Visits 2-5.
10
Total20

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event11
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up21
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject12

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateOnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous40.84 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.98
39.51 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.99
40.18 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.02
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
10 Participants9 Participants19 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants10 Participants19 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
8 / 106 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 100 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

Physician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)

Score on Physician Global Impression of Change at Visits 3-6 (Day 113 and 365). Likert scale ranging from 1-7, where 1 = extremely worse and 7 = extremely better.

Time frame: Collected on Visit 3 (Day 113), Visit 4 (Day 197), Visit 5 (281), and Visit 6 (Day 365)

Population: Number of participants vary at each visit based on the number of those still enrolled in the study at the time of the visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramatePhysician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Visit 35.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.16
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramatePhysician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Visit 45.40 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.34
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramatePhysician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Visit 56.67 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.52
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramatePhysician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Visit 66.83 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.41
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboPhysician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Visit 65.83 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.47
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboPhysician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Visit 35.30 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.25
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboPhysician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Visit 55.83 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.94
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboPhysician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Visit 45.89 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.93
Primary

Subject Attrition Post Randomization

Count of subject attrition following randomization and reason for attrition (Consent withdrawn, Withdrawn due to adverse event, Lost to follow up)

Time frame: Collected on Visit 2 (Day 29) through Visit 6 (Day 365)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateSubject Attrition Post RandomizationConsent Withdrawn1 participants
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateSubject Attrition Post RandomizationWithdrawn Due to Adverse Event1 participants
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateSubject Attrition Post RandomizationLost to Follow Up2 participants
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboSubject Attrition Post RandomizationConsent Withdrawn2 participants
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboSubject Attrition Post RandomizationWithdrawn Due to Adverse Event1 participants
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboSubject Attrition Post RandomizationLost to Follow Up1 participants
Primary

Subject Global Impression of Change (SGIC)

Score on Subject Global Impression of Change at Visits 3-6 (Day 113 and 365). Likert scale ranging from 1-7, where 1 = extremely worse and 7 = extremely better.

Time frame: Collected on Visit 3 (Day 113), Visit 4 (Day 197), Visit 5 (281), and Visit 6 (Day 365)

Population: Number of participants vary at each visit based on the number of those still enrolled in the study at the time of the visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateSubject Global Impression of Change (SGIC)Visit 35.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.19
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateSubject Global Impression of Change (SGIC)Visit 46.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.82
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateSubject Global Impression of Change (SGIC)Visit 56.66 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.52
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateSubject Global Impression of Change (SGIC)Visit 67.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboSubject Global Impression of Change (SGIC)Visit 66.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.26
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboSubject Global Impression of Change (SGIC)Visit 35.30 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.25
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboSubject Global Impression of Change (SGIC)Visit 56.17 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.17
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboSubject Global Impression of Change (SGIC)Visit 45.77 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.09
Primary

Subject's Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT) Score Percent Change Compared From Baseline to Visits 3-6

The Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT) is a measure of verbal fluency. Raw COWAT scores have a lower bound of 0 with no upper bound. Higher scores indicate better verbal fluency. COWAT score percent change from baseline will be reported. Positive change scores represent better verbal fluency compared to baseline.

Time frame: Baseline, Visit 3 (Day 113) through Visit 6 (Day 365)

Population: Number of participants vary at each visit based on the number of those still enrolled in the study at the time of the visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateSubject's Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT) Score Percent Change Compared From Baseline to Visits 3-6Visit 3-17.06 percentage of change from baseline scoreStandard Deviation 9.47
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateSubject's Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT) Score Percent Change Compared From Baseline to Visits 3-6Visit 4-17.93 percentage of change from baseline scoreStandard Deviation 10.63
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateSubject's Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT) Score Percent Change Compared From Baseline to Visits 3-6Visit 5-12.63 percentage of change from baseline scoreStandard Deviation 12.24
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateSubject's Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT) Score Percent Change Compared From Baseline to Visits 3-6Visit 6-5.05 percentage of change from baseline scoreStandard Deviation 20.99
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboSubject's Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT) Score Percent Change Compared From Baseline to Visits 3-6Visit 6-4.99 percentage of change from baseline scoreStandard Deviation 19.04
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboSubject's Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT) Score Percent Change Compared From Baseline to Visits 3-6Visit 3-3.50 percentage of change from baseline scoreStandard Deviation 23.71
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboSubject's Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT) Score Percent Change Compared From Baseline to Visits 3-6Visit 51.48 percentage of change from baseline scoreStandard Deviation 17.32
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboSubject's Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT) Score Percent Change Compared From Baseline to Visits 3-6Visit 4-8.93 percentage of change from baseline scoreStandard Deviation 22.95
Secondary

Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) Scores at Visits 2-6 to Measure Effect of Headache in Subject's Life

The Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) is a tool used to measure the impact headaches have on an individual's ability to function on the job, at school, at home and in social situations. The HIT-6 score range is from 36 to 78 with higher scores indicating greater impact (worse outcome).

Time frame: Collected on Visit 2 (Day 29), 3 (Day 113), Visit 4 (Day 197), Visit 5 (281), and Visit 6 (Day 365)

Population: Number of participants vary at each visit based on the number of those still enrolled in the study at the time of the visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateHeadache Impact Test (HIT-6) Scores at Visits 2-6 to Measure Effect of Headache in Subject's LifeVisit 361.89 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.92
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateHeadache Impact Test (HIT-6) Scores at Visits 2-6 to Measure Effect of Headache in Subject's LifeVisit 552.83 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.44
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateHeadache Impact Test (HIT-6) Scores at Visits 2-6 to Measure Effect of Headache in Subject's LifeVisit 266.40 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.19
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateHeadache Impact Test (HIT-6) Scores at Visits 2-6 to Measure Effect of Headache in Subject's LifeVisit 652.57 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.2
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateHeadache Impact Test (HIT-6) Scores at Visits 2-6 to Measure Effect of Headache in Subject's LifeVisit 454.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.39
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboHeadache Impact Test (HIT-6) Scores at Visits 2-6 to Measure Effect of Headache in Subject's LifeVisit 654.17 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.81
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboHeadache Impact Test (HIT-6) Scores at Visits 2-6 to Measure Effect of Headache in Subject's LifeVisit 266.50 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.84
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboHeadache Impact Test (HIT-6) Scores at Visits 2-6 to Measure Effect of Headache in Subject's LifeVisit 359.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.77
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboHeadache Impact Test (HIT-6) Scores at Visits 2-6 to Measure Effect of Headache in Subject's LifeVisit 460.44 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.19
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboHeadache Impact Test (HIT-6) Scores at Visits 2-6 to Measure Effect of Headache in Subject's LifeVisit 558.71 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.85
Secondary

MEWT Matching to Sample Sub-test Score Percent Change Compared From Baseline to Visits 3-6

The Mental Efficiency Workload Test (MEWT) is a cognitive functioning scale with four sub-scales (Simple Reaction Time, Running Memory Continuous Performance Task, Matching to Sample, and Mathematical Processing). Each sub-scale has a minimum and maximum values of 1 to 10, 1 indicates the poorest level and 10 indicates the best level of cognitive functioning. MEWT sub-scale score percent change from baseline will be reported. Positive change scores represent better cognitive functioning compared to baseline.

Time frame: Baseline, Visit 3 (Day 113), Visit 4 (Day 197), Visit 5 (281), and Visit 6 (Day 365)

Population: Number of participants vary at each visit based on the number of those still enrolled in the study at the time of the visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateMEWT Matching to Sample Sub-test Score Percent Change Compared From Baseline to Visits 3-6Visit 319.06 percentage of change from baseline scoreStandard Deviation 44.13
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateMEWT Matching to Sample Sub-test Score Percent Change Compared From Baseline to Visits 3-6Visit 415.04 percentage of change from baseline scoreStandard Deviation 47.59
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateMEWT Matching to Sample Sub-test Score Percent Change Compared From Baseline to Visits 3-6Visit 518.49 percentage of change from baseline scoreStandard Deviation 45.11
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateMEWT Matching to Sample Sub-test Score Percent Change Compared From Baseline to Visits 3-6Visit 640.86 percentage of change from baseline scoreStandard Deviation 42.88
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboMEWT Matching to Sample Sub-test Score Percent Change Compared From Baseline to Visits 3-6Visit 624.75 percentage of change from baseline scoreStandard Deviation 49.32
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboMEWT Matching to Sample Sub-test Score Percent Change Compared From Baseline to Visits 3-6Visit 321.74 percentage of change from baseline scoreStandard Deviation 27.86
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboMEWT Matching to Sample Sub-test Score Percent Change Compared From Baseline to Visits 3-6Visit 512.72 percentage of change from baseline scoreStandard Deviation 23.34
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboMEWT Matching to Sample Sub-test Score Percent Change Compared From Baseline to Visits 3-6Visit 48.59 percentage of change from baseline scoreStandard Deviation 25.34
Secondary

MEWT Mathematical Processing Sub-test Score Percent Change Compared From Baseline to Visits 3-6

The Mental Efficiency Workload Test (MEWT) is a cognitive functioning scale with four sub-scales (Simple Reaction Time, Running Memory Continuous Performance Task, Matching to Sample, and Mathematical Processing). Each sub-scale has a minimum and maximum values of 1 to 10, 1 indicates the poorest level and 10 indicates the best level of cognitive functioning. MEWT sub-scale score percent change from baseline will be reported. Positive change scores represent better cognitive functioning compared to baseline.

Time frame: Baseline, Visit 3 (Day 113), Visit 4 (Day 197), Visit 5 (281), and Visit 6 (Day 365)

Population: Number of participants vary at each visit based on the number of those still enrolled in the study at the time of the visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateMEWT Mathematical Processing Sub-test Score Percent Change Compared From Baseline to Visits 3-6Visit 3-11.23 percentage of change from baseline scoreStandard Deviation 22.61
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateMEWT Mathematical Processing Sub-test Score Percent Change Compared From Baseline to Visits 3-6Visit 4-22.90 percentage of change from baseline scoreStandard Deviation 16.48
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateMEWT Mathematical Processing Sub-test Score Percent Change Compared From Baseline to Visits 3-6Visit 5-23.81 percentage of change from baseline scoreStandard Deviation 16.26
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateMEWT Mathematical Processing Sub-test Score Percent Change Compared From Baseline to Visits 3-6Visit 61.52 percentage of change from baseline scoreStandard Deviation 8.91
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboMEWT Mathematical Processing Sub-test Score Percent Change Compared From Baseline to Visits 3-6Visit 629.44 percentage of change from baseline scoreStandard Deviation 50.47
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboMEWT Mathematical Processing Sub-test Score Percent Change Compared From Baseline to Visits 3-6Visit 317.74 percentage of change from baseline scoreStandard Deviation 50.54
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboMEWT Mathematical Processing Sub-test Score Percent Change Compared From Baseline to Visits 3-6Visit 528.61 percentage of change from baseline scoreStandard Deviation 48.44
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboMEWT Mathematical Processing Sub-test Score Percent Change Compared From Baseline to Visits 3-6Visit 416.43 percentage of change from baseline scoreStandard Deviation 35.88
Secondary

MEWT Running Memory Continuous Performance Task Sub-test Score Percent Change Compared From Baseline to Visits 3-6

The Mental Efficiency Workload Test (MEWT) is a cognitive functioning scale with four sub-scales (Simple Reaction Time, Running Memory Continuous Performance Task, Matching to Sample, and Mathematical Processing). Each sub-scale has a minimum and maximum values of 1 to 10, 1 indicates the poorest level and 10 indicates the best level of cognitive functioning. MEWT sub-scale score percent change from baseline will be reported. Positive change scores represent better cognitive functioning compared to baseline.

Time frame: Baseline, Visit 3 (Day 113), Visit 4 (Day 197), Visit 5 (281), and Visit 6 (Day 365)

Population: Number of participants vary at each visit based on the number of those still enrolled in the study at the time of the visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateMEWT Running Memory Continuous Performance Task Sub-test Score Percent Change Compared From Baseline to Visits 3-6Visit 3-15.66 percentage of change from baseline scoreStandard Deviation 38.87
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateMEWT Running Memory Continuous Performance Task Sub-test Score Percent Change Compared From Baseline to Visits 3-6Visit 4-1.20 percentage of change from baseline scoreStandard Deviation 41.31
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateMEWT Running Memory Continuous Performance Task Sub-test Score Percent Change Compared From Baseline to Visits 3-6Visit 5-3.96 percentage of change from baseline scoreStandard Deviation 43.64
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateMEWT Running Memory Continuous Performance Task Sub-test Score Percent Change Compared From Baseline to Visits 3-6Visit 6-6.99 percentage of change from baseline scoreStandard Deviation 43.5
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboMEWT Running Memory Continuous Performance Task Sub-test Score Percent Change Compared From Baseline to Visits 3-6Visit 62.2 percentage of change from baseline scoreStandard Deviation 31.91
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboMEWT Running Memory Continuous Performance Task Sub-test Score Percent Change Compared From Baseline to Visits 3-6Visit 31.13 percentage of change from baseline scoreStandard Deviation 24.7
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboMEWT Running Memory Continuous Performance Task Sub-test Score Percent Change Compared From Baseline to Visits 3-6Visit 518.81 percentage of change from baseline scoreStandard Deviation 28.45
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboMEWT Running Memory Continuous Performance Task Sub-test Score Percent Change Compared From Baseline to Visits 3-6Visit 44.39 percentage of change from baseline scoreStandard Deviation 16.55
Secondary

MEWT Simple Reaction Time Sub-test Score Percent Change Compared From Baseline to Visits 3-6

The Mental Efficiency Workload Test (MEWT) is a cognitive functioning scale with four sub-scales (Simple Reaction Time, Running Memory Continuous Performance Task, Matching to Sample, and Mathematical Processing). Each sub-scale has a minimum and maximum values of 1 to 10, 1 indicates the poorest level and 10 indicates the best level of cognitive functioning. MEWT sub-scale score percent change from baseline will be reported. Positive change scores represent better cognitive functioning compared to baseline.

Time frame: Baseline, Visit 3 (Day 113), Visit 4 (Day 197), Visit 5 (281), and Visit 6 (Day 365)

Population: Number of participants vary at each visit based on the number of those still enrolled in the study at the time of the visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateMEWT Simple Reaction Time Sub-test Score Percent Change Compared From Baseline to Visits 3-6Visit 3-8.90 percentage of change from baseline scoreStandard Deviation 18.62
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateMEWT Simple Reaction Time Sub-test Score Percent Change Compared From Baseline to Visits 3-6Visit 4-3.20 percentage of change from baseline scoreStandard Deviation 17.15
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateMEWT Simple Reaction Time Sub-test Score Percent Change Compared From Baseline to Visits 3-6Visit 5-3.87 percentage of change from baseline scoreStandard Deviation 25.48
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateMEWT Simple Reaction Time Sub-test Score Percent Change Compared From Baseline to Visits 3-6Visit 6-3.16 percentage of change from baseline scoreStandard Deviation 24.15
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboMEWT Simple Reaction Time Sub-test Score Percent Change Compared From Baseline to Visits 3-6Visit 62.31 percentage of change from baseline scoreStandard Deviation 18.86
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboMEWT Simple Reaction Time Sub-test Score Percent Change Compared From Baseline to Visits 3-6Visit 314.22 percentage of change from baseline scoreStandard Deviation 30.32
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboMEWT Simple Reaction Time Sub-test Score Percent Change Compared From Baseline to Visits 3-6Visit 5-4.17 percentage of change from baseline scoreStandard Deviation 10.05
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboMEWT Simple Reaction Time Sub-test Score Percent Change Compared From Baseline to Visits 3-6Visit 44.76 percentage of change from baseline scoreStandard Deviation 8.44
Secondary

Number of Headache Days

Number of Headache Days reported in 30-day Baseline Period and Treatment Period Months 1-12

Time frame: Baseline and Months 1-12

Population: Number of participants vary at each visit based on the number of those still enrolled in the study at the time of the visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateNumber of Headache DaysMonth 912.02 Headache daysStandard Deviation 5.6
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateNumber of Headache DaysMonth 415.74 Headache daysStandard Deviation 8.09
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateNumber of Headache DaysMonth 118.41 Headache daysStandard Deviation 5.96
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateNumber of Headache DaysMonth 511.34 Headache daysStandard Deviation 7.17
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateNumber of Headache DaysMonth 118.36 Headache daysStandard Deviation 6.5
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateNumber of Headache DaysMonth 615.18 Headache daysStandard Deviation 6.07
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateNumber of Headache DaysMonth 216.50 Headache daysStandard Deviation 7.61
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateNumber of Headache DaysMonth 712.64 Headache daysStandard Deviation 6.39
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateNumber of Headache DaysBaseline22.95 Headache daysStandard Deviation 4.39
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateNumber of Headache DaysMonth 812.36 Headache daysStandard Deviation 5.16
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateNumber of Headache DaysMonth 316.83 Headache daysStandard Deviation 7.12
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateNumber of Headache DaysMonth 127.51 Headache daysStandard Deviation 5.04
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateNumber of Headache DaysMonth 106.93 Headache daysStandard Deviation 4.59
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboNumber of Headache DaysMonth 128.06 Headache daysStandard Deviation 5.34
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboNumber of Headache DaysMonth 108.02 Headache daysStandard Deviation 1.06
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboNumber of Headache DaysMonth 118.51 Headache daysStandard Deviation 6.09
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboNumber of Headache DaysMonth 99.96 Headache daysStandard Deviation 5.71
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboNumber of Headache DaysBaseline23.77 Headache daysStandard Deviation 4.64
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboNumber of Headache DaysMonth 121.67 Headache daysStandard Deviation 4.28
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboNumber of Headache DaysMonth 217.54 Headache daysStandard Deviation 6.81
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboNumber of Headache DaysMonth 318.37 Headache daysStandard Deviation 7.76
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboNumber of Headache DaysMonth 414.39 Headache daysStandard Deviation 10.05
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboNumber of Headache DaysMonth 513.47 Headache daysStandard Deviation 8.95
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboNumber of Headache DaysMonth 616.58 Headache daysStandard Deviation 7.68
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboNumber of Headache DaysMonth 712.54 Headache daysStandard Deviation 9.23
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboNumber of Headache DaysMonth 811.5 Headache daysStandard Deviation 7.26
Secondary

Number of Non-Serious Adverse Events Between Groups

Time frame: 13 Months (Visit 1 to Visit 6)

Population: All consenting participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateNumber of Non-Serious Adverse Events Between Groups8.60 Adverse EventsStandard Deviation 8.93
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboNumber of Non-Serious Adverse Events Between Groups4.60 Adverse EventsStandard Deviation 3.17
Secondary

Subject Estimation of Compliance With Daily Study Drug

Subject estimation of compliance with daily study drug during the study period. Compliance ranges from 0% to 100% with higher percentages indicating greater compliance with study drug.

Time frame: Collected on Visit 2 (Day 29), 3 (Day 113), Visit 4 (Day 197), and Visit 5 (281)

Population: Number of participants vary at each visit based on the number of those still enrolled in the study at the time of the visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateSubject Estimation of Compliance With Daily Study DrugVisit 2100 percentage of complianceStandard Deviation 0
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateSubject Estimation of Compliance With Daily Study DrugVisit 399.84 percentage of complianceStandard Deviation 0.46
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateSubject Estimation of Compliance With Daily Study DrugVisit 499.55 percentage of complianceStandard Deviation 1.1
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateSubject Estimation of Compliance With Daily Study DrugVisit 598.69 percentage of complianceStandard Deviation 1.61
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboSubject Estimation of Compliance With Daily Study DrugVisit 599.63 percentage of complianceStandard Deviation 2.35
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboSubject Estimation of Compliance With Daily Study DrugVisit 299.73 percentage of complianceStandard Deviation 0.58
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboSubject Estimation of Compliance With Daily Study DrugVisit 497.65 percentage of complianceStandard Deviation 3.09
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboSubject Estimation of Compliance With Daily Study DrugVisit 399.73 percentage of complianceStandard Deviation 0.56
Secondary

Subject's Migraine Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) Scores at Baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 Months to Measure Subject's Quality of Life

The Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) is a scale that measures the impact of migraine across three aspects: role function-restrictive (RR), role function-preventive (RP), and emotional function (EF). Possible scores on each sub-scale range from a 0 to 100 scale such that higher scores indicate better quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline, Months: 3, 6, 9 and 12

Population: Number of participants vary at each visit based on the number of those still enrolled in the study at the time of the visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateSubject's Migraine Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) Scores at Baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 Months to Measure Subject's Quality of LifeRole Function-Restrictive - Month 1281.90 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.21
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateSubject's Migraine Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) Scores at Baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 Months to Measure Subject's Quality of LifeRole Function-Preventive - Month 988.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.16
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateSubject's Migraine Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) Scores at Baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 Months to Measure Subject's Quality of LifeRole Function-Restrictive - Month 356.51 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.18
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateSubject's Migraine Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) Scores at Baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 Months to Measure Subject's Quality of LifeRole Function-Preventive - Month 1296.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.58
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateSubject's Migraine Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) Scores at Baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 Months to Measure Subject's Quality of LifeRole Function-Preventive - Baseline56.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.61
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateSubject's Migraine Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) Scores at Baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 Months to Measure Subject's Quality of LifeEmotional Function - Baseline39.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.7
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateSubject's Migraine Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) Scores at Baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 Months to Measure Subject's Quality of LifeRole Function-Restrictive - Month 979.52 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.21
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateSubject's Migraine Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) Scores at Baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 Months to Measure Subject's Quality of LifeEmotional Function - Month 357.78 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 36.67
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateSubject's Migraine Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) Scores at Baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 Months to Measure Subject's Quality of LifeRole Function-Preventive - Month 372.78 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.82
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateSubject's Migraine Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) Scores at Baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 Months to Measure Subject's Quality of LifeEmotional Function - Month 688.89 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.89
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateSubject's Migraine Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) Scores at Baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 Months to Measure Subject's Quality of LifeRole Function-Restrictive - Month 677.14 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.22
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateSubject's Migraine Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) Scores at Baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 Months to Measure Subject's Quality of LifeEmotional Function - Month 992.22 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.01
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateSubject's Migraine Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) Scores at Baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 Months to Measure Subject's Quality of LifeRole Function-Preventive - Month 690.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.37
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateSubject's Migraine Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) Scores at Baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 Months to Measure Subject's Quality of LifeEmotional Function - Month 1295.56 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.07
OnabotulinumtoxinA + TopiramateSubject's Migraine Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) Scores at Baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 Months to Measure Subject's Quality of LifeRole Function-Restrictive - Baseline32.14 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.62
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboSubject's Migraine Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) Scores at Baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 Months to Measure Subject's Quality of LifeEmotional Function - Month 1278.89 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.1
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboSubject's Migraine Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) Scores at Baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 Months to Measure Subject's Quality of LifeRole Function-Restrictive - Baseline29.71 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.77
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboSubject's Migraine Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) Scores at Baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 Months to Measure Subject's Quality of LifeRole Function-Restrictive - Month 356.29 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.16
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboSubject's Migraine Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) Scores at Baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 Months to Measure Subject's Quality of LifeRole Function-Restrictive - Month 659.37 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.94
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboSubject's Migraine Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) Scores at Baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 Months to Measure Subject's Quality of LifeRole Function-Restrictive - Month 960.41 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.52
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboSubject's Migraine Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) Scores at Baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 Months to Measure Subject's Quality of LifeRole Function-Restrictive - Month 1272.38 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.36
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboSubject's Migraine Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) Scores at Baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 Months to Measure Subject's Quality of LifeRole Function-Preventive - Baseline46.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.39
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboSubject's Migraine Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) Scores at Baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 Months to Measure Subject's Quality of LifeRole Function-Preventive - Month 365.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.28
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboSubject's Migraine Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) Scores at Baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 Months to Measure Subject's Quality of LifeRole Function-Preventive - Month 672.22 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.94
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboSubject's Migraine Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) Scores at Baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 Months to Measure Subject's Quality of LifeRole Function-Preventive - Month 972.86 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.28
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboSubject's Migraine Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) Scores at Baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 Months to Measure Subject's Quality of LifeRole Function-Preventive - Month 1280.83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.98
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboSubject's Migraine Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) Scores at Baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 Months to Measure Subject's Quality of LifeEmotional Function - Baseline22.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.04
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboSubject's Migraine Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) Scores at Baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 Months to Measure Subject's Quality of LifeEmotional Function - Month 356.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.15
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboSubject's Migraine Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) Scores at Baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 Months to Measure Subject's Quality of LifeEmotional Function - Month 656.30 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.51
OnabotulinumtoxinA + PlaceboSubject's Migraine Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) Scores at Baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 Months to Measure Subject's Quality of LifeEmotional Function - Month 970.48 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.02

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026