Skip to content

The Efficacy & Safety of the UAS Immunotherapy Protocol

The Efficacy and Safety of the United Allergy Service (UAS) Immunotherapy Protocol

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01699659
Enrollment
60
Registered
2012-10-04
Start date
2012-04-30
Completion date
2012-09-30
Last updated
2012-10-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Perennial Allergic Rhinitis With Seasonal Variation

Keywords

Allergic Rhinitis, Allergen Immunotherapy

Brief summary

Hypothesis: The UAS Immunotherapy protocol is efficacious and at least as efficacious as protocols described in the Allergy literature.

Detailed description

Patients will be assessed for efficacy of the immunotherapy protocol by completing Consented-IRB approved clinical, medication, quality of life survey questions comparing current status while on therapy in contrast to 12 months before the inception of therapy.

Interventions

allergy shots

Sponsors

United Allergy Services
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Allergic rhinitis between 18 and 65 years old who have chosen to undergo immunotherapy.

Exclusion criteria

* No beta blocker use, * no pregnancy, * no systemic steroids, * no severe asthma/copd, * no severe collagen vascular disorders, * no neoplastic or uncontrolled seizure activity, * no previous anaphylaxis, no significant cardiovsacular disease.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
change in symptom scores from 12 months before therapy initiation in contrast to determination during 1 to 2 years of therapy (retrospective).Assessment contrasts current status (at 1 to 2 years of therapy) to a point 12 months prior to the onset of therapy.Enrolled patients completed surveys pertinent to symptom scores, contrasting current status on immunotherapy compared (by recall) to a 12 month time point prior to initiation of therapy.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in medication plus symptom aggregate score.Assessment contrasts current status (at 1 to 2 years of therapy) to a point 12 months prior to the onset of therapy.Aggregate Medication and Symptom surveys were compared to determine changes from a 12 month time point prior to inception of therapy to current time point of 1 to 2 years of therapy.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of Life (QOL) scoresAssessment contrasts current status (at 1 to 2 years of therapy) to a point 12 months prior to the onset of therapyQOL scores will be calculated after one to 2 years of therapy and contrasted with QOL reflecting status 12 months prior to initiation of therapy.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026