Skip to content

Multicentric Comparative Randomized Study of the Single-incision Sling Ajust® Versus Suburethral Transobturator Slings.

Multicentric Comparative Randomized Study of the Single-incision Sling Ajust® Versus Suburethral Transobturator Slings.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01699425
Enrollment
60
Registered
2012-10-03
Start date
2013-03-31
Completion date
2016-05-31
Last updated
2017-03-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Female Stress Urinary Incontinence

Keywords

Stress urinary incontinence., Suburethral sling., Single-incision suburethral sling., Ajust., Transobturator tape.

Brief summary

The transobturator tension-free vaginal tape (TOT) procedure has demonstrated high cure rates comparable to those obtained by retropubic suburethral tape, becoming the first line treatment for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in many cases. The TOT procedure is not exempt from complications such as bleeding, bladder injuries and pain in the thigh/groin. In addition it is commonly performed under general or regional anesthesia1-3. The single-incision mini-slings (SIMS) were developed to reduce the risk of complications by avoiding the blind passage of the trocars through the obturator space. In addition, the use of SIMS could enable surgeons to perform the procedure truly under local anesthesia. Different devices for SIMS procedure are available. However, the evidence about their efficacy is controversial4-7. The main limitation of these devices could be the predetermined length of the mesh and the weakness on its fixation. The design of the SIMS Ajust® allows adjusting the length of the sling to each individual woman and provides a robust fixation into the obturator membrane. Recent prospective studies on the efficacy and safety of the sling Ajust® have obtained promising results8,9. Even so, the NICE guidelines advise to use SIMS in the context of research studies10. The objective of this study is to establish if the effectiveness of the SIMS Ajust® is non-inferior to that of a standard TOT, as well as to compare the comorbidity of both procedures. Owing to the new appearance and fast evolution of these procedures, randomized comparative studies with SIMS are required in order to determine its place in the treatment of SUI.

Interventions

DEVICEAjust sling
DEVICEClassical transobturator sling

Control group

Sponsors

Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge
CollaboratorOTHER
Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Girona Dr. Josep Trueta
CollaboratorOTHER
Hospital de Viladecans
CollaboratorOTHER
Serveis de Salut Integrats Baix Empordà
CollaboratorOTHER
Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Stress urinary incontinence with urethral hypermobility.

Exclusion criteria

* Incapacity to understand the information or give their consent. * Previous anti-incontinence surgery with slings. * Urethral hypomobility (Q-tip test \<30º). * Low pressure urethra (MUCP \< 20cmH2O). * Detrusor overactivity.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparison of the cure rates between the single incision sling Ajust and classical transobturator tapes.Up to one yearPercentage of patients who are regarded as cured or improved based on the following criteria: * Improvement on the International consultation on Incontinence Urinary Questionnaire-Short Form 1 year after the surgery. * Negative Cough Stress test 1 year after surgery.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of participants with adverse events0, 1, 6 and 12 months after surgeryComparison of the intra- and postoperative complications between procedures

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in the Maximal Urethral Closure Pressure.One year after surgery.Comparison of the changes in the Maximal Urethral Closure Pressure (cmH2O) measured preoperatively and 1 year after surgery.

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026