Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Nasal Filters on Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (Hay Fever)

Efficacy and Safety of Nasal Filters on Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis in a Double-blinded Randomized Placebo-controlled Crossover Pilot Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01699165
Enrollment
24
Registered
2012-10-03
Start date
2012-12-31
Completion date
2013-02-28
Last updated
2013-04-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal

Keywords

rhinitis, allergic, seasonal, double blind, doubleblind, randomized, randomised, placebo, crossover, clinical, nasal, filter, controlled, trial, hayfever, hay, fever, efficacy, safety, prevention, adult, grass, pollen, symptom, Total nasal symptom score, acoustic rhinometry

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the effect of reducing exposure to allergens in patients with hay fever by means of a nasal filter.

Interventions

DEVICENasal filter

Active nasal filter

DEVICEPlacebo nasal filter

Placebo nasal filter

Sponsors

Spirare ApS
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University of Aarhus
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* History of seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) for a minimum of 2 years before study entry. Documented by a positive skin test within 12 months of study enrollment. * Written informed consent * Reliable anticonception for fertile women * Must be able to complete the study * Forced Expiratory Volume at one second (FEV1) higher than 70 % of predicted value * Positive grass immunoglobulin-E (IgE) blood sample equal to or higher than 3,50 kU/L

Exclusion criteria

* Positive pregnancy test for fertile women * Asthma unless mild and only occurring in relation to the grass pollen season as assessed by the investigator * Inadequate washout periods in regards to Environmental Exposure Unit (EEU) appointments (intranasal or systemic corticosteroids (1month), intranasal cromolyn (2 weeks), intranasal or systemic decongestants (3 days), intranasal or systemic antihistamines (3 days), loratadine (10 days)) * Rhinitis medicamentosa * Use of long acting anti-histamines * Documented evidence of acute or chronic sinusitis as determined by individual investigator * FEV1 lower than 70 % of predicted value * Subjects with perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR) to e.g. house dust mites, cats, dogs moulds unless symptom free * Allergic rhinitis requiring medication caused by allergens other than grass unless symptom free * Subjects with nasal conditions likely to affect the outcome of the study in the opinion of the investigator, i.e. anterior nasal septum deviation, nasal septum perforations, nasal polyps, chronic nasal obstruction or other nasal diseases * Receipt of immunotherapy with grass pollen within the previous 10 years * Women who are breastfeeding

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Effect of active nasal filters compared to placebo filters in the same patient group as measured by difference in maximum Total Nasal Symptom ScoreDay 1 and day 15To assess the effects of active nasal filters on symptoms development in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) exposed to air-born allergens compared to the same patients in an exposed environment with a placebo nasal filter determined by their maximum Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) out of the nine samples taken during a trial day. The statistical analysis will be done using non-parametric paired Wilcoxon signed rank test.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Effect of active nasal filters compared to placebo filters as measured by acoustic rhinometryDay 1 and day 15To assess the effects of active nasal filters on intranasal volume in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) exposed to air-born allergens compared to the same patients in an exposed environment with a placebo nasal filter. The assessment will be based on the difference between minimum and maximum volume as determined by acoustic rhinometry measurements pre- and post-exposure on each study day. The statistical analysis will be a parametric paired t-test.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
To assess the effects on the lower airway via nitrogen oxide measurements during expiration.Day 1 and Day 15On each study day: pre-exposure, 30 minutes post exposure and 3 hours post exposure
To assess symptoms using a VAS Scale symptoms questionnaire (PC)Day 1 and Day 15On each study day: pre-exposure and post exposure: 30 minutes post and 3 hours post
Effect of active nasal filters compared to placebo filters in the same patient group as measured by difference in maximum Total Ocular Symptom Score (TOSS)Day 1 and day 15To assess the effects of active nasal filters on symptoms development in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) exposed to air-born allergens compared to the same patients in an exposed environment with a placebo nasal filter determined by their maximum Total Ocular Symptom Score (TOSS) out of the nine samples taken during a trial day. The statistical analysis will be done using non-parametric paired Wilcoxon signed rank test.
Spirometric lung functionDay 1 and Day 15On each study day: pre-exposure, 30 minute post exposure and in 3 hour intervals for 24 hours
To assess the tolerability and safety of nasal filtersDay 1 and Day 15By means of a product evaluation questionnaire. On each study day evaluated 30 minutes post exposure

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026