Skip to content

The Comparative Effectiveness of Hybrid Revascularization (MIDCAB Then PCI) With DES Versus Multivessel DES PCI or CABG

Prospective, Single-center, Randomized Trial, Intended to Compare Three Revascularization Strategies in Patients With Multi-vessel Coronary Artery Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01699048
Acronym
HREVS
Enrollment
150
Registered
2012-10-03
Start date
2012-12-01
Completion date
2017-09-16
Last updated
2017-09-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Disease, Heart Diseases, Myocardial Ischemia

Keywords

multivessel PCI,MIDCAB,CABG, Hybrid coronary revascularization

Brief summary

Minimally invasive revascularization of the left anterior descending artery followed by stent implantation versus percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass in patients with multi-vessel coronary disease

Detailed description

Prospective, single-center, randomized trial, intended to compare three revascularization strategies in patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease: 1. Hybrid approach (Minimally invasive off-pump revascularization of the left anterior descending artery (LAD) with left internal mammary artery (LIMA) bypass followed by consecutive percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the rest of the arteries with drug eluting stents (DES) (Hybrid group, n=50) 2. Multi-vessel PCI with DES (MV-PCI group, n=50) 3. Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) treatment (CABG group, n=50) PCI in Hybrid and MV-PCI group will be performed with the same 2nd generation clinically proven DES (Xience V, Xience Prime). Study objective Compare three different revascularization strategies in patients with multi-vessel coronary disease The endpoints: The primary endpoints: I. % ischemic myocardium on a 12-month follow-up scan with single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT); The secondary endpoints: I. Major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACCE), including (1) death, (2) non-fatal myocardial infarction (non-fatal MI), transitory ischemic attack (TIA) or stroke within 30 days, 12 months and 5-year follow-up; II. Target vessel/graft failure (for any of the target vessels in a given patient - stented or grafted) = a composite of cardiac death, MI attributable to the target vessel, or clinically-driven \[ie, not angio-driven\] Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR); III. Restenosis = angiographically-detected target lesion stenosis \>50% \[diameter stenosis\] or graft stenosis \>50%; IV. Procedural success: The treatment will be considered successful when a revascularisation in the absence of complications during the index hospitalization has been achieved; V. Procedural and post-procedural hemorrhagic complications \[ Time Frame: up to discharge from the hospital \]; VI. Recovery time \[ Time Frame: up to discharge from the hospital \];

Interventions

PROCEDUREPCI

Multi-vessel PCI with DES

PROCEDUREHybrid (MIDCAB+PCI)

Hybrid approach (Minimally invasive of-pump revascularization of the left anterior descending artery (LAD) via left internal mammary artery (LIMA) bypass with consecutive percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the rest arteries with drug eluting stents (DES). The revascularization will be performed in two stages within a 3-days interval

PROCEDURECABG

Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) treatment

Sponsors

Russian Academy of Medical Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Multi-vessel coronary artery disease with ≥ 70% and \<96% artery stenosis (according to QCA) 2. I-IV CCS functional class of angina 3. Asymptomatic patients with stress-test documented ischemia. 4. Patients at 1 month after acute myocardial infarction 5. Ability to perform either of revascularization methods (Hybrid, MVD-PCI, CABG). 6. Consensus on the treatment strategy between the members of the working group, including cardiologist, cardiac surgeon and interventional specialist. 7. Patients must have signed an informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

1. Pregnancy. 2. Acute coronary syndrome. 3. Previous CABG. 4. Previous stent thrombosis. 5. Severe comorbidity with high procedural risk for either of the studied strategies. 6. Severe peripheral artery disease. 7. Other serious diseases limiting life expectancy (e.g. oncology) 8. Inability for long-term follow-up. 9. Participation in other clinical trials. 10. Inability to take dual antithrombotic therapy. Angiographic

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Residual ischemia6 - to 18-month follow-up≥5% residual ischemia by single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Procedural successup to discharge from the hospitalProcedural success: The treatment will be considered successful when a complete hybrid revascularisation in the absence of complications during the index hospitalization has been achieved.
Procedural and post-procedural blood loss and number of transfusionsup to discharge from the hospitaldynamics of hemoglobin at admission and discharge, the number of blood transfusions (in units), classification of bleeding BARC
MACCEup to 5 yearsMajor adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACCE), including death,a composite of major cardiac and cerebrovascular events, i.e. the first occurrence of any of the following events: Death from any cause From cardiovascular causes From noncardiovascular causes Stroke or transitory ischemic attack (TIA) MI Hospitalization for repeat revascularization procedure, target (vessel) revascularization by means of PCI or CABG.
Target vessel/graft failure6- to 18-month follow-up(for any of the target vessels in a given patient - stented or grafted) = a composite of cardiac death, MI attributable to the target vessel, or clinically-driven \[ie, not angio-driven\] Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR);
Restenosis6- to 18-month follow-upangiographically-detected target lesion stenosis \>50% \[diameter stenosis\] or graft stenosis \>50%;
Recovery timeup to discharge from the hospitalTime Frame: from the end of the intervention up to discharge from the hospital. Total duration of hospital admission

Countries

Russia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 19, 2026