Skip to content

Prospective Study of Mylotarg and G-CSF in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Treatment

Treatment of de Novo Acute Myeloid Leukemia With the Combination of Idarubicin, Cytarabine, and Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin (Mylotarg ®), Associated or Not Priming With G-CSF. Prospective Study of Efficacy and Toxicity

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01698879
Enrollment
46
Registered
2012-10-03
Start date
2009-10-31
Completion date
2016-09-26
Last updated
2021-01-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Novo Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Brief summary

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a neoplasm of immature hematopoietic cells (blasts) with altered ripening capacity. Due to excessive proliferation, the blasts displace normal hematopoietic cells and bone marrow failure appears. Leukemic cells also infiltrate extramedullary tissues. Following the standard chemotherapy treatment, the CR rate achieved is around 65-75% for all patients and 15% lower when considering only patients over 65 years. Modifications to the standard regimen consist of replacing the DNR for a cytotoxic one, modifying the dose of ara-C or adding a third drug. Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (Mylotarg ®) is an immunoconjugate between anti-CD33 antibody and a cytotoxic antitumor antibiotic, calicheamicin. Mylotarg ® antibody specifically binds to CD33, a sialic acid-dependent adhesion protein expressed in over 90% of LMA10. Mylotarg ® selectively transports the cytotoxic agent calicheamicin into leukemic cells and hematopoietic progenitors differentiated from the myelomonocytic line, while respecting the pluripotent hematopoietic stem cells. Calicheamicin is released only after the fixation of the antibody anti-CD33 and its internalization by the cell, after which binds to and damages the DNA. Mylotarg ® is approved in the U.S. for the treatment of CD33 positive AML in first relapse, for patients older than 60 years non-candidates for other intensive treatment modalities. Since the efficacy of Mylotarg ® is equivalent and its toxicity profile less than the conventional therapy, it is logical to conduct a phase II trial exploring the role of Mylotarg ® in the early stages of treatment of AML. Previous experience with gemtuzumab ozogamicin in relapsed patients led to its use combined with induction chemotherapy. The aim was to improve the CR rate reached with the latter and reduce relapse after achieving greater leukemic cytoreduction. Recent data from the HOVON group support that the administration of G-CSF before and during induction chemotherapy decreases the incidence of relapse in patients with AML, particularly those considered to have intermediate risk. Everything mentioned above justifies to investigate the combination of GO combined with chemotherapy with IDR and ara-C in standard 3x7 scheme and analyze the effect of sensitization with G-CSF in patients with AML de novo. If the treatment proposed here is effective and presents an acceptable toxicity it should be investigated.

Interventions

Cohort 1 version 1.0. GO: 6mg/m\^2 (maximum 10 mg), IV infusion, 2 hours, day 1. Idarubicin: 12 mg/m\^2, IV, 30 minutes, on days 2, 3, 4. Cytarabine: 100 mg/m\^2 IV days 1 to 7, to begin 4 hours after the administration of GO. Cohort 1.0 version 2.0: GO: 3 mg/m\^2 (maximum 5 mg), IV infusion, 2 hours, day 1. Idarubicin: 12 mg/m\^2, IV, 30 minutes, on days 2, 3, 4. Cytarabine: 100 mg/m\^2 IV days 1 to 7, to begin 4 hours after the administration of GO. Cohort 2: G-CSF: 150 mcg/m\^2, SC, days 0 to 7. GO: 3 mg/m\^2 (maximum 5 mg), IV infusion, 2 hours, day 1. Idarubicin: 12 mg/m\^2, IV, 30 minutes, on days 2, 3, 4. Cytarabine: 100 mg/m\^2 IV continuous infusion on days 1 to 7, to begin 4 hours later after the administration of GO.

Sponsors

Grupo Cooperativo de Estudio y Tratamiento de las Leucemias Agudas y Mielodisplasias
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients with primary or de novo AML, different than promyelocytic or M3 subtype. 2. Age 18 to 70 years. 3. Written informed consent form

Exclusion criteria

1. Acute leukemia appeared after a myeloproliferative process or a myelodysplastic syndrome longer than 6 months, AML arising after another cured malignant disease (e.g. Hodgkin's disease), and secondary AML treated with alkylating agents or radiation. 2. Acute promyelocytic leukemia. 3. Relevant history of liver disease. Significant impaired liver function (bilirubin, AST or ALT ≥ 2.5 times the normal value) not attributable to leukemic infiltration. 4. Patients with prior heart failure. 5. Symptomatic chronic respiratory failure. 6. Positive serology for HIV, hepatitis C virus or its surface antigen. 7. Estimated life expectancy less than 3 months, despite treatment. 8. Pregnancy or breastfeeding at the time of inclusion in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Complete Remission of the Disease28 days after chemotherapyRate of patients that have obtained complete remission. Complete remission is defined as, bone marrow normocellular or slightly hypocellular with proportion of blasts \<5%, including the erythroid cell count (and including promonocytes in case of M5), no Auer rods, no extramedullary leukemia, neutrophils and platelets rising. The persistence of minimal residual disease in immunophenotypic study will not invalidate the standard cytogenetic complete remission.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Secondary Toxicity to Mylotarg(R)Baseline, weekly during treatment and at month 3 and month 6 after first induction.Hematological toxicity, hepatic and gastrointestinal toxicity, fever and infections, pulmonary complications, duration of hospitalization
Mortality at InductionWeekly during treatment, at third month and at 6 months after last administration of Mylotargall deaths occurring after the first administration of MylotargTM until the time of transplantation with no leukemic relapse has occurred, and all deaths in the 6 first months after administration of the second dose of MylotargTM with no leukemic relapse occurred.
Capacity to Obtain Hematopoietic Progenitor Cells (HPC) for Autotransplantation - DATA NOT COLLECTEDOne month before transplant, expected at 9 months after end of treatment.Rate of patients with capacity to obtain hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPC) for autotransplantation. This analysis has not been performed, because data were not available in sites.
Relapse After 6 Months6 months from complete remissionRate of patients that have relapse after 6 months of obtained complete remission.
Survival After 6 Months6 months after complete remissionrate of patients alive within 6 months of obtained complete remission

Countries

Spain

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cohort 1, Version 1.0
Mylotarg: Cohort 1 version 1.0 (5 evaluable patients): GO: 6 mg/m\^2 (maximum 10 mg), IV infusion, 2 hours, day 1. Idarubicin: 12 mg/m\^2, IV, 30 minutes, on days 2, 3, 4. Cytarabine (cytosine arabinoside): 100 mg/m\^2 IV continuous infusion on days 1 to 7, to begin 4 hours after the administration of GO. If chemo-sensitivity is observed after a first course of treatment (50% or more reduction of blasts compared to baseline) a second identical cycle will be administered.
5
Cohort 1, Version 2.0
Mylotarg: Cohort 1 (20 evaluable patients): GO: 3 mg/m\^2 (maximum 5 mg), IV infusion, 2 hours, day 1. Idarubicin: 12 mg/m\^2, IV, 30 minutes, on days 2, 3, 4. Cytarabine (cytosine arabinoside): 100 mg/m\^2 IV continuous infusion on days 1 to 7, to begin 4 hours after the administration of GO.
20
Cohort 2
Cohort 2 (20 evaluable patients): G-CSF: 150 mcg/m\^2, SC, days 0 to 7, to begin 12 to 18 hours before treatment with Gemtuzumab. GO: 3 mg/m\^2 (maximum 5 mg), IV infusion, 2 hours, day 1. Idarubicin: 12 mg/m\^2, IV, 30 minutes, on days 2, 3, 4. Cytarabine (cytosine arabinoside): 100 mg/m\^2 IV continuous infusion on days 1 to 7, to begin 4 hours later after the administration of GO.
20
Total45

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject100

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCohort 1, Version 1.0Cohort 1, Version 2.0Cohort 2Total
Age, Continuous56 years49 years61 years61 years
Citogenetic
Adverse
1 Participants2 Participants5 Participants8 Participants
Citogenetic
Favorable
1 Participants5 Participants3 Participants9 Participants
Citogenetic
Intermediate
3 Participants13 Participants12 Participants28 Participants
Leucocites at diagnosis13.48 Cells x 10^9/L7.66 Cells x 10^9/L6.96 Cells x 10^9/L6.96 Cells x 10^9/L
Region of Enrollment
Spain
5 participants20 participants20 participants45 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants9 Participants5 Participants16 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants11 Participants15 Participants29 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 202 / 201 / 5
other
Total, other adverse events
20 / 2019 / 203 / 5
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 206 / 202 / 5

Outcome results

Primary

Complete Remission of the Disease

Rate of patients that have obtained complete remission. Complete remission is defined as, bone marrow normocellular or slightly hypocellular with proportion of blasts \<5%, including the erythroid cell count (and including promonocytes in case of M5), no Auer rods, no extramedullary leukemia, neutrophils and platelets rising. The persistence of minimal residual disease in immunophenotypic study will not invalidate the standard cytogenetic complete remission.

Time frame: 28 days after chemotherapy

Population: Initial 5 patients included in cohort 1 version 1.0 (closed due toxicity) have been evaluated for safety outcome but not evaluated for efficacy because the treatment is not feasible.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort 1, Version 1.0Complete Remission of the DiseasePartial ResponseNA Participants
Cohort 1, Version 1.0Complete Remission of the DiseaseComplete ResponseNA Participants
Cohort 1, Version 1.0Complete Remission of the DiseaseRefractoryNA Participants
Cohort 1, Version 2.0Complete Remission of the DiseasePartial Response1 Participants
Cohort 1, Version 2.0Complete Remission of the DiseaseComplete Response18 Participants
Cohort 1, Version 2.0Complete Remission of the DiseaseRefractory1 Participants
Cohort 2Complete Remission of the DiseaseComplete Response16 Participants
Cohort 2Complete Remission of the DiseaseRefractory2 Participants
Cohort 2Complete Remission of the DiseasePartial Response2 Participants
Secondary

Capacity to Obtain Hematopoietic Progenitor Cells (HPC) for Autotransplantation - DATA NOT COLLECTED

Rate of patients with capacity to obtain hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPC) for autotransplantation. This analysis has not been performed, because data were not available in sites.

Time frame: One month before transplant, expected at 9 months after end of treatment.

Population: Initial 5 patients included in cohort 1 version 1.0 (closed due toxicity) have been evaluated for safety outcome but not evaluated for efficacy because the treatment is not feasible. This analysis has not been performed because data were not available for any of the cohorts studied.

Secondary

Mortality at Induction

all deaths occurring after the first administration of MylotargTM until the time of transplantation with no leukemic relapse has occurred, and all deaths in the 6 first months after administration of the second dose of MylotargTM with no leukemic relapse occurred.

Time frame: Weekly during treatment, at third month and at 6 months after last administration of Mylotarg

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort 1, Version 1.0Mortality at Induction1 Participants
Cohort 1, Version 2.0Mortality at Induction0 Participants
Cohort 2Mortality at Induction2 Participants
Secondary

Relapse After 6 Months

Rate of patients that have relapse after 6 months of obtained complete remission.

Time frame: 6 months from complete remission

Population: Initial 5 patients included in cohort 1 version 1.0 (closed due toxicity) have been evaluated for safety outcome but not evaluated for efficacy because the treatment is not feasible.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1, Version 1.0Relapse After 6 Months30 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Version 2.0Relapse After 6 Months59 percentage of participants
Secondary

Secondary Toxicity to Mylotarg(R)

Hematological toxicity, hepatic and gastrointestinal toxicity, fever and infections, pulmonary complications, duration of hospitalization

Time frame: Baseline, weekly during treatment and at month 3 and month 6 after first induction.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1, Version 1.0Secondary Toxicity to Mylotarg(R)Grade III/IV Infection0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Version 1.0Secondary Toxicity to Mylotarg(R)Grade I/II Hepatic toxicity20 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Version 1.0Secondary Toxicity to Mylotarg(R)Grade I/II Infection0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Version 1.0Secondary Toxicity to Mylotarg(R)Grade IV Hematologic toxicity0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Version 1.0Secondary Toxicity to Mylotarg(R)Grade III/IV hepatic toxicity40 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Version 1.0Secondary Toxicity to Mylotarg(R)Grade II Hematologic toxicity0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Version 2.0Secondary Toxicity to Mylotarg(R)Grade III/IV hepatic toxicity5 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Version 2.0Secondary Toxicity to Mylotarg(R)Grade I/II Infection10 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Version 2.0Secondary Toxicity to Mylotarg(R)Grade II Hematologic toxicity0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Version 2.0Secondary Toxicity to Mylotarg(R)Grade III/IV Infection5 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Version 2.0Secondary Toxicity to Mylotarg(R)Grade IV Hematologic toxicity100 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Version 2.0Secondary Toxicity to Mylotarg(R)Grade I/II Hepatic toxicity10 percentage of participants
Cohort 2Secondary Toxicity to Mylotarg(R)Grade I/II Hepatic toxicity10 percentage of participants
Cohort 2Secondary Toxicity to Mylotarg(R)Grade IV Hematologic toxicity95 percentage of participants
Cohort 2Secondary Toxicity to Mylotarg(R)Grade II Hematologic toxicity5 percentage of participants
Cohort 2Secondary Toxicity to Mylotarg(R)Grade III/IV Infection30 percentage of participants
Cohort 2Secondary Toxicity to Mylotarg(R)Grade III/IV hepatic toxicity15 percentage of participants
Cohort 2Secondary Toxicity to Mylotarg(R)Grade I/II Infection25 percentage of participants
Secondary

Survival After 6 Months

rate of patients alive within 6 months of obtained complete remission

Time frame: 6 months after complete remission

Population: Initial 5 patients included in cohort 1 version 1.0 (closed due toxicity) have been evaluated for safety outcome but not evaluated for efficacy because the treatment is not feasible.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1, Version 1.0Survival After 6 Months80 percentage of participants
Cohort 1, Version 2.0Survival After 6 Months80 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026