Skip to content

Replacement Gastrostomy Tubes: Technical and Clinical Comparison of Five Commercial Models

Replacement Gastrostomy Tubes: Technical and Clinical Comparison of Five Commercial Models

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01698827
Enrollment
100
Registered
2012-10-03
Start date
2012-01-31
Completion date
2012-08-31
Last updated
2012-10-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gastrostomy Tube Convenience, Gastrostomy Tube Durability, Gastrostomy Tube Rupture

Keywords

gastrostomy, tube, endoscopic, replacement, tube rupture, durability, tube loss, balloon rupture

Brief summary

Multiple models of replacement tubes for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy are available in the market, however durability is variable. In a prospective randomized study, five commercial devices available in the market will be tested in 20 consecutive patients each. Tube performance will be observed during 6 months and durability will be assessed by Kaplan-Meier curves as well as Cox regression analysis.It is hypothesized that tube design and material will influence outcome.

Detailed description

Multiple models of replacement tubes for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy are available in the market, however durability is variable. In a prospective randomized study, five commercial devices available in the market will be tested in 20 consecutive patients each,in patients submitted to long-term outpatient nutritional support. Tube performance will be observed during 6 months and durability will be assessed by Kaplan-Meier curves as well as Cox regression analysis.It is hypothesized that tube design and material will influence outcome.This study is important because tube dysfunction and unscheduled changes are expensive troubles that disrupt the nutritional protocol and are responsible for multiple inconveniences to the patient and the caretaker.

Interventions

OTHERTube assessment visits

Patients will return every 2 months for clinical questionnaire about leaks, obstructions or other dysfunctions of the tube. Objective tube examination for cracks, rupture, obstruction or dislodgement, along with replacement if necessary, will be carried out (total of 3 visits/6 months)

Sponsors

University of Sao Paulo
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults undergoing long-term home enteral nutrition via percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy due to neurologic conditions or dysphagia. * registered at the outpatient endoscopy service * clinical stable and with the possibility of returning for scheduled visits * expected duration of enteral feeding \> 6 months

Exclusion criteria

* Sepsis, * shock, * coma, * other types of digestive access (surgical gastrostomy, jejunostomy) * terminal disease, * lack of cooperation, * refusal to participate in the protocol

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Tube durability6 monthsDurability of the tube will be calculated as days in use till need for replacement, within the time frame of 6 months of observation. 180 days of continuous use will correspond to 100% durability, and 18 days of use as 10% durability.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Tube rupture6 monthsCauses for replacement within the 6 months will be documented, with emphasis on tube or ballooon rupture

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of previous tube changes6 monthsTube outcome will be analyzed in the light of number of previous tube changes in the patients (first tube/no previous change vs. patients on long-term treatment with multiple tube changes)

Countries

Brazil

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 23, 2026