Skip to content

Magnetic Resonance (MR) Guided Functional Ultrasound-Neurosurgery for Movement Disorders

MR-Guided Functional Ultrasound-Neurosurgery for Movement Disorders

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01698450
Enrollment
10
Registered
2012-10-03
Start date
2012-11-30
Completion date
2013-12-31
Last updated
2014-10-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dystonia, Essential Tremor, Parkinson's Disease

Keywords

FUS, focused ultrasound, functional brain disorder, neuropathic pain, movement disorders, malignant brain tumors

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to asses the efficacy and the clinical safety of the transcranial magnetic resonance guided high intensity focused ultrasound system ExAblate 4000, InSightec Ltd. for functional neurosurgery in the treatment of movement disorders. The treatments to be conducted in this study are non-invasive, i.e. without opening the skull, and will create microthalamotomies in specific target areas such as thalamus, subthalamus and pallidum. The data obtained in this study will be used to evaluate the basic safety aspects of this new treatment technology and will serve as a basis for the clinical introduction of MR-guided ultrasound neurosurgery.

Interventions

Non-invasive brain intervention using MR-guided focused ultrasound

Sponsors

University Children's Hospital, Zurich
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Men and women, between 18 and 80 years, inclusive. * Patients who are able and willing to give consent and able to attend all study visits. * A diagnosis of a MD, such as Essential Tremor (ET), Idiopathic Parkinson's diseases or primary Dystonia as confirmed from clinical history and examination by a movement disorder neurologist. * A MD refractory to adequate medical treatment, or in whom the indication for Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) would be given, but DBS cannot be performed because of medical comorbidities or medical reasons, or because the patient clearly confirms by written statement that he does not want to undergo DBS for personal reasons (PD: increasing motor fluctuations albeit optimal medical treatment & unbearable side effects of medication; ET: failure of adequate tremor control with Propranolol and Primidone alone and in combination; Dystonia: dystonia or pain not controlled by oral medication). An adequate medication trial is defined as a therapeutic dose of each medication or the development of side effects as the medication dose is titrated. * Either the medial thalamic nuclei or the subthalamic or pallidal areas can be target by the ExAblate device. The target region must be apparent on MRI such that targeting can be performed with either direct visualization or by measurement from landmarks, using the Stereotactic Atlas of the Human Thalamus and Basal Ganglia by Anne Morel, 39 analogous to our first clinical FUS study on patients with chronic pain 33. * Able to communicate sensations during the ExAblate MRgFUS treatment * Stable doses of all medications for 30 days prior to study entry and for the duration of the study. * Significant disability due to MD despite medical treatment (speaking, feeding other than liquids, bringing liquids to mouth, hygiene, dressing, writing, working, and social activities) * Inclusion and

Exclusion criteria

have been agreed upon by two members of the medical team.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Lesion Size3 monthsSize of lesion in the target area for each sonication as a function of applied energy/temperature.
Patient Safety3 monthsNumber of Patients with Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical efficacy and QOL3 monthsEfficacy and QOL will be quantified on respective rating scales (specified in protocol).

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026