Skip to content

Novel Device to Assess Endotracheal Tube Migration

Novel Device (AirWave™) to Assess Endotracheal Tube Migration.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01697215
Enrollment
42
Registered
2012-10-02
Start date
2012-04-30
Completion date
2012-06-30
Last updated
2025-05-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mechanically Ventilated Patients Admitted to a MICU

Brief summary

To evaluate the ability of the SonarMed AirWave to provide clinicians with information that enables them to confirm continuous proper placement of the endotracheal tube. This initial study is prospective, observational, looking at CXR results, and comparing those to AirWave system output data.

Interventions

OTHERAirWave

Sponsors

The Cleveland Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Subjects will be eligible for inclusion in the study if they meet ALL of the following criteria: * Oral or nasal endotracheal intubation, anticipated to last at least 48 hours * Adults that require ETT internal diameter sizes of 6.5 - 9.0 mm * Subject must be at least 18 years old (no upper age limitation) * English speaking patients/decision makers.

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects ventilated through a tracheostomy * Subjects under 18 years of age

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Endotracheal Tube Displacement Bias Measured by a Novel Device (AirWave) Compared to CXR24 hoursComparison of migration at 24 hours as measured by the AirWave system and portable CXR using a Bland-Altman analysis.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

During the study period, 42 patients were enrolled. Subjects had the AirWave system placed within 24 hours of endotracheal intubation. A total of 19 patients had measurements of ETT migration at 24 hours by the three methodologies used in this study.

Pre-assignment details

Inclusion Criteria: subjects were eligible for the study if they met all of the following criteria: (1) age \> 18 years old; (2) oral endotracheal intubation within 24 hours of recruitment; (3) expected duration of mechanical ventilation \> 24 hours; (4) ETT internal diameter sizes from 6.5 to 9.0 mm. Exclusion criteria: subjects were excluded from participation if (1) ventilated through a tracheostomy, (2) unable to obtain consent, or (3) pregnancy.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
(ETT) Migration During Routine Care Among Critically Ill Patients
A total of 42 patients (age: 61 \[SD ±13\] years, men: 52%) were recruited. A total of 19 patients had measurements of ETT migration at 24 hours by the 3 methodologies used in this study.
42
Total42

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyCXR not available9
Overall StudyMalfunction9
Overall StudyPhysician Decision5

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic(ETT) Migration During Routine Care Among Critically Ill Patients
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
12 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
30 Participants
Age, Continuous61 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
Region of Enrollment
United States
42 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
20 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
22 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 42
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 42
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 42

Outcome results

Primary

Endotracheal Tube Displacement Bias Measured by a Novel Device (AirWave) Compared to CXR

Comparison of migration at 24 hours as measured by the AirWave system and portable CXR using a Bland-Altman analysis.

Time frame: 24 hours

Population: A total of 19 patients had measurements of ETT migration at 24 hours by the three methodologies used in this study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oral or Nasal Endotracheal IntubationEndotracheal Tube Displacement Bias Measured by a Novel Device (AirWave) Compared to CXRMigration measured by CXR-0.06 cmStandard Deviation 1.3
Oral or Nasal Endotracheal IntubationEndotracheal Tube Displacement Bias Measured by a Novel Device (AirWave) Compared to CXRMigration measured by EET lip distance-0.29 cmStandard Deviation 0.93
Oral or Nasal Endotracheal IntubationEndotracheal Tube Displacement Bias Measured by a Novel Device (AirWave) Compared to CXRMigration measured by AirWave System0.39 cmStandard Deviation 1.5

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026