Skip to content

A Phase II Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Subcutaneous Plerixafor

A Phase II Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Subcutaneous Plerixafor for the Mobilization and Transplantation of HLA-Matched Sibling Donor Hematopoietic Stem Cells in Recipients With Hematological Malignancies

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01696461
Enrollment
127
Registered
2012-10-01
Start date
2013-05-31
Completion date
2016-08-31
Last updated
2023-09-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Acute Myelogenous Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia, Hodgkin's Disease, Myelodysplastic Syndrome, Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma, Related Donors Donating Peripheral Blood Stem Cells (PBSC) to a Family Member

Brief summary

This is a Phase II, open-label, two strata, multicenter, prospective study of plerixafor-mobilized HLA-identical sibling allografts in recipients with hematological malignancies. This study will establish the safety and efficacy of subcutaneous plerixafor for this purpose.

Detailed description

The primary objective is to determine the proportion of donors whose cells can be successfully mobilized and collected with a sufficient CD34+ cell dose using plerixafor as the mobilizing agent, using an intention-to-treat analysis. Donor mobilization following plerixafor will be considered successful if ≥ 2.0x10e6 CD34+ cells/kg recipient weight are collected in no more than two leukapheresis collections. All donors receiving plerixafor will be included in the analysis of the primary objective based on the intention-to-treat principle.Recipients will be classified into one of the two strata, myeloablative or reduced intensity, according to his/her conditioning regimen. The target enrollment is 64 donor/recipient pairs, 32 pairs per stratum.

Interventions

DRUGPlerixafor

Sponsors

Genzyme, a Sanofi Company
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Sanofi
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research
Lead SponsorNETWORK

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Donor: * Donor eligibility will be determined according to applicable federal, state and local regulations and institutional standards * 18-65 years of age * 6/6 HLA-matched sibling * Fulfill individual Transplant Center criteria to serve as a mobilized blood cell donor * Serum creatinine \<2.0mg/dl Recipient: * 18 to 65 years of age * 6/6 HLA antigen matched sibling willing to donate PBSC for transplant * Fulfill individual Transplant Center Criteria for transplant * One of the following diagnoses: * Acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) in 1st remission or beyond with \<5% marrow blasts and no circulating blasts. Marrow must be done within 30 days of the start of transplant conditioning regimen in alignment with other pre-transplant assessments. * Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in 1st remission or beyond with \<5% marrow blasts and no circulating blasts * Myelodysplastic syndrome, either intermediate-1,2, or high risk by International Prognostic Scoring System or transfusion dependent * Chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) failing or intolerant to tyrosine kinase inhibitor based therapy * Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) or Hodgkin's disease (HD) in 2nd or greater complete remission, partial remission, or in relapse (but with at least stable disease after most recent therapy) * Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), relapsing after at least one prior regimen, or in remission with 17p deletion * Serum creatinine must be \<2.0mg/dl * Total bilirubin and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) \<3x normal * Infectious disease marker (IDM) monitoring will be performed per institutional standards * Karnofsky performance status of 70% or greater. * Patients who have undergone a prior autologous transplantation are eligible for a reduced intensity transplant only

Exclusion criteria

Donor: * Donor unwilling or unable to give informed consent, or unable to comply with the protocol including required follow-up and testing * Donor already enrolled on another investigational agent study * Pregnant or breast feeding females, or females not willing or able to use adequate contraception if sexually active Recipient: * Patient unwilling or unable to give informed consent, or unable to comply with the protocol including required follow-up and testing * Patients with active, uncontrolled infection at the time of the transplant preparative regimen * Pregnant or breast feeding females, or females not willing or able to use adequate contraception if sexually active * Patients with a history of previous central nervous system (CNS) tumor involvement showing active symptoms or signs along with documented disease on lumbar puncture and MRI of the brain within 30 days of start of conditioning * A condition, which, in the opinion of the clinical investigator, would interfere with the evaluation of primary and secondary endpoints.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Donors Whose Cells Were Successfully Mobilized and Collected With a Sufficient CD34+ Cell Dose Using Plerixafor as the Mobilizing Agent, Using an Intention-to-treat Analysis.donationDonor mobilization following plerixafor was considered successful if ≥ 2.0x106 CD34+ cells/kg recipient weight was collected in no more than two leukapheresis collections.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adverse Effects30 minutes, 60 minutes, 120 minutes, 240 minutes, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months post donation for each subjectAdverse effects experienced by donors receiving plerixafor up to one year post donation. Number of participants with a maximum MTC \>0 reported at each individual time point. Adverse effects are graded according to the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. This outcome measure is descriptive. Participants can experience adverse effects at more than one time point evaluated. Higher grades denote worse outcomes. 0 = None, 1 = Mild, 2 = Moderate, 3 = severe.
Incidence of and Kinetics of Neutrophil and Platelet Recovery After Transplantation of Hematopoietic Cells Mobilized With PlerixaforDay +1 through neutrophil recovery or Day 21 (whichever is first)Incidence of and kinetics of neutrophil and platelet recovery by day 100 in recipients after transplantation of hematopoietic cells mobilized with plerixafor.
T-cell (CD3+) and Myeloid (CD33+) Chimerism After Transplantation of Hematopoietic Cells Mobilized With PlerixaforChimerism was evaluated at serial timepoints post HCT in patients in both RIC and MAC strata. Chimerism was assessed at Day +28, +100, +180, and +365T-cell (CD3+) and myeloid (CD33+) chimerism in recipients after transplantation of hematopoietic cells mobilized with plerixafor. This outcome measure is descriptive.
Primary Graft Failure After Transplantation of Hematopoietic Cells Mobilized With PlerixaforDay 28Incidence of primary graft failure in recipients after transplantation of hematopoietic cells mobilized with plerixafor. This outcome measure is descriptive.
Incidence of Acute Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD)Day 100Incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in recipients after transplantation of hematopoietic cells mobilized with plerixafor
Immune ReconstitutionDay 28, 100, 180, 365Rate and quality of immune reconstitution as evidenced by peripheral blood immunophenotype after transplantation of hematopoietic cells mobilized with plerixafor.
Incidence and Severity of Acute Toxicitiesbaseline, Day 1, Day 2, Day 3Incidence and severity of acute toxicities before and during apheresis experienced by donors receiving plerixafor. Acute toxicities are graded according to the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. This outcome measure is descriptive. Grade of maximum toxicity across all time points is reported. Higher grades denote worse outcomes. 0 = None, 1 = Mild, 2 = Moderate, 3 = severe.
Treatment-related Mortality and Disease Relapse/ProgressionDay 180, 365Incidence of treatment-related mortality and disease relapse/progression in recipients after transplantation of hematopoietic cells mobilized with plerixafor
Progression-free and Overall SurvivalDay 180, 365Probability of progression-free and overall survival after transplantation of hematopoietic cells mobilized with plerixafor
Cellular Composition of AllograftsdonationCellular composition of allografts mobilized with plerixafor (stem/progenitor cells, T/B/ (Natural killer) NK-cells)
Incidence of Chronic Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD)Day 365Incidence of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in recipients after transplantation of hematopoietic cells mobilized with plerixafor
Secondary Graft Failure After Transplantation of Hematopoietic Cells Mobilized With PlerixaforDay 365Incidence of secondary graft failure in recipients after transplantation of hematopoietic cells mobilized with plerixafor. This outcome measure is descriptive.
CD34+ Cell Count of AllograftsdonationCD34+ cell count of allografts mobilized with plerixafor
Incidence of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Reactivation After Transplantation With Cells Mobilized With Plerixafor.day 365Percentage of recipients with prior CMV infection whose CMV was reactivated after transplantation with cell mobilized with plerixafor

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Eligible donor-recipient pairs were recruited at 12 US hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) transplant centers between July 2013 and December 2014. Recipients who met eligibility criteria provided written informed consent prior to any study procedure being performed. In order for the recipient to proceed in the study, intended donors were required to consent as well.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Related Donors Receiving Plerixafor
Collection of sufficient CD34+ cells using plerixafor as the mobilizing agent. Eligible donors determined according to institutional standards * 18-65 years of age * 6/6 HLA-matched sibling * Fulfill individual Transplant Center criteria to serve as a mobilized blood cell donor * Serum creatinine \<1.5 x institution ULN or estimated creatinine clearance (CLCR) \>50 mL/min Treatment Description: * Receive subcutaneous plerixafor at 240 μg/kg and commence leukapheresis approximately 4 hours later. * Leukapheresis will be performed up to two consecutive days. The target CD34+ cell dose is \> 4.0 x 106/kg with a minimum of \> 2.0 x 10E6/kg.
64
Recipients, Myeloablative Conditioning Regimen
Myeloablative (one of four general regimens): Busulfan (\> 9 mg/kg po or iv total) with fludarabine Busulfan (\> 9 mg/kg po or iv total) with cyclophosphamide Total body irradiation (\> 1000 cGy) plus etoposide Total body irradiation (\> 500 cGy) plus cyclophosphamide
30
Recipients, Reduced Intensity Conditioning Regimen
Reduced Intensity (one of three general regimens): Busulfan (\< 9 mg/kg po or iv total) plus fludarabine Melphalan (100-140 mg/m2 iv total) plus fludarabine Fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide (\> 2000 mg/m2 total)
33
Total127

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRelated Donors Receiving PlerixaforRecipients, Myeloablative Conditioning RegimenRecipients, Reduced Intensity Conditioning RegimenTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
2 Participants0 Participants3 Participants5 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
61 Participants30 Participants30 Participants121 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
64 participants30 participants33 participants127 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
23 Participants14 Participants24 Participants61 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
41 Participants16 Participants9 Participants66 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
44 / 64
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 64

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Donors Whose Cells Were Successfully Mobilized and Collected With a Sufficient CD34+ Cell Dose Using Plerixafor as the Mobilizing Agent, Using an Intention-to-treat Analysis.

Donor mobilization following plerixafor was considered successful if ≥ 2.0x106 CD34+ cells/kg recipient weight was collected in no more than two leukapheresis collections.

Time frame: donation

Population: Recipients were not mobilized with plerixafor.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Related Donors Receiving PlerixaforPercentage of Donors Whose Cells Were Successfully Mobilized and Collected With a Sufficient CD34+ Cell Dose Using Plerixafor as the Mobilizing Agent, Using an Intention-to-treat Analysis.63 Participants
Secondary

Adverse Effects

Adverse effects experienced by donors receiving plerixafor up to one year post donation. Number of participants with a maximum MTC \>0 reported at each individual time point. Adverse effects are graded according to the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. This outcome measure is descriptive. Participants can experience adverse effects at more than one time point evaluated. Higher grades denote worse outcomes. 0 = None, 1 = Mild, 2 = Moderate, 3 = severe.

Time frame: 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 120 minutes, 240 minutes, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months post donation for each subject

Population: Recipients did not receive plerixafor and were not examined for this outcome.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Related Donors Receiving PlerixaforAdverse Effects30 minutes after administration of plerixafor23 Participants
Related Donors Receiving PlerixaforAdverse Effects60 minutes after administration of plerixafor28 Participants
Related Donors Receiving PlerixaforAdverse Effects120 minutes after administration of plerixafor27 Participants
Related Donors Receiving PlerixaforAdverse Effects240 minutes after administration of plerixafor24 Participants
Related Donors Receiving PlerixaforAdverse EffectsOne month after administration of plerixafor22 Participants
Related Donors Receiving PlerixaforAdverse EffectsSix months after administration of plerixafor7 Participants
Related Donors Receiving PlerixaforAdverse EffectsTwelve months after administration of plerixafor7 Participants
Secondary

CD34+ Cell Count of Allografts

CD34+ cell count of allografts mobilized with plerixafor

Time frame: donation

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Related Donors Receiving PlerixaforCD34+ Cell Count of Allografts4.68 cells*10^6/kg
Secondary

Cellular Composition of Allografts

Cellular composition of allografts mobilized with plerixafor (stem/progenitor cells, T/B/ (Natural killer) NK-cells)

Time frame: donation

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Related Donors Receiving PlerixaforCellular Composition of AllograftsCD3+5.96 cells*10^8/kg
Related Donors Receiving PlerixaforCellular Composition of AllograftsCD3+CD4+3.57 cells*10^8/kg
Related Donors Receiving PlerixaforCellular Composition of AllograftsCD3+CD8+2.18 cells*10^8/kg
Related Donors Receiving PlerixaforCellular Composition of AllograftsCD19+1.47 cells*10^8/kg
Related Donors Receiving PlerixaforCellular Composition of AllograftsCD56+0.38 cells*10^8/kg
Comparison: This outcome measure is descriptive.
Secondary

Immune Reconstitution

Rate and quality of immune reconstitution as evidenced by peripheral blood immunophenotype after transplantation of hematopoietic cells mobilized with plerixafor.

Time frame: Day 28, 100, 180, 365

Population: Donor population did not receive a transplant. Immune reconstitution was not measured in the donor population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Related Donors Receiving PlerixaforImmune ReconstitutionCD3+ (Day 28)589 Cells*10^3/mm^3
Related Donors Receiving PlerixaforImmune ReconstitutionCD4+ (Day 28)363 Cells*10^3/mm^3
Related Donors Receiving PlerixaforImmune ReconstitutionCD8+ (Day 28)197 Cells*10^3/mm^3
Related Donors Receiving PlerixaforImmune ReconstitutionCD3+ (Day100)647 Cells*10^3/mm^3
Related Donors Receiving PlerixaforImmune ReconstitutionCD4+ (Day 100)339 Cells*10^3/mm^3
Related Donors Receiving PlerixaforImmune ReconstitutionCD8+ (Day 100)242 Cells*10^3/mm^3
Related Donors Receiving PlerixaforImmune ReconstitutionCD3+ (Day 180)638 Cells*10^3/mm^3
Related Donors Receiving PlerixaforImmune ReconstitutionCD4+ (Day 180)352 Cells*10^3/mm^3
Related Donors Receiving PlerixaforImmune ReconstitutionCD8+ (Day 180)272 Cells*10^3/mm^3
Related Donors Receiving PlerixaforImmune ReconstitutionCD3+ (Day 365)794 Cells*10^3/mm^3
Related Donors Receiving PlerixaforImmune ReconstitutionCD4+ (Day 365)495 Cells*10^3/mm^3
Related Donors Receiving PlerixaforImmune ReconstitutionCD8+ (Day 365)264 Cells*10^3/mm^3
Recipients, Reduced Intensity Conditioning RegimenImmune ReconstitutionCD4+ (Day 365)457 Cells*10^3/mm^3
Recipients, Reduced Intensity Conditioning RegimenImmune ReconstitutionCD3+ (Day 28)478 Cells*10^3/mm^3
Recipients, Reduced Intensity Conditioning RegimenImmune ReconstitutionCD3+ (Day 180)699 Cells*10^3/mm^3
Recipients, Reduced Intensity Conditioning RegimenImmune ReconstitutionCD4+ (Day 28)214 Cells*10^3/mm^3
Recipients, Reduced Intensity Conditioning RegimenImmune ReconstitutionCD3+ (Day 365)1094 Cells*10^3/mm^3
Recipients, Reduced Intensity Conditioning RegimenImmune ReconstitutionCD8+ (Day 28)127 Cells*10^3/mm^3
Recipients, Reduced Intensity Conditioning RegimenImmune ReconstitutionCD4+ (Day 180)257 Cells*10^3/mm^3
Recipients, Reduced Intensity Conditioning RegimenImmune ReconstitutionCD3+ (Day100)529 Cells*10^3/mm^3
Recipients, Reduced Intensity Conditioning RegimenImmune ReconstitutionCD8+ (Day 365)460 Cells*10^3/mm^3
Recipients, Reduced Intensity Conditioning RegimenImmune ReconstitutionCD4+ (Day 100)265 Cells*10^3/mm^3
Recipients, Reduced Intensity Conditioning RegimenImmune ReconstitutionCD8+ (Day 180)219 Cells*10^3/mm^3
Recipients, Reduced Intensity Conditioning RegimenImmune ReconstitutionCD8+ (Day 100)162 Cells*10^3/mm^3
Secondary

Incidence and Severity of Acute Toxicities

Incidence and severity of acute toxicities before and during apheresis experienced by donors receiving plerixafor. Acute toxicities are graded according to the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. This outcome measure is descriptive. Grade of maximum toxicity across all time points is reported. Higher grades denote worse outcomes. 0 = None, 1 = Mild, 2 = Moderate, 3 = severe.

Time frame: baseline, Day 1, Day 2, Day 3

Population: Recipients were not analyzed for this outcome measure

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Related Donors Receiving PlerixaforIncidence and Severity of Acute ToxicitiesMax Modified toxicity criteria (MTC) = 019 Participants
Related Donors Receiving PlerixaforIncidence and Severity of Acute ToxicitiesMax Modified toxicity criteria (MTC) = 134 Participants
Related Donors Receiving PlerixaforIncidence and Severity of Acute ToxicitiesMax Modified toxicity criteria (MTC) = 210 Participants
Related Donors Receiving PlerixaforIncidence and Severity of Acute ToxicitiesMax Modified toxicity criteria (MTC) = 31 Participants
Secondary

Incidence of Acute Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD)

Incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in recipients after transplantation of hematopoietic cells mobilized with plerixafor

Time frame: Day 100

Population: Donor arm did not receive a transplant. This group was not analyzed for graft-vs-host disease

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Related Donors Receiving PlerixaforIncidence of Acute Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD)Grade 2-4 aGVHD by day 10053 Percentage of participants
Related Donors Receiving PlerixaforIncidence of Acute Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD)Grade 3-4 aGVHD by day 10017 Percentage of participants
Recipients, Reduced Intensity Conditioning RegimenIncidence of Acute Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD)Grade 2-4 aGVHD by day 10018 Percentage of participants
Recipients, Reduced Intensity Conditioning RegimenIncidence of Acute Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD)Grade 3-4 aGVHD by day 1003 Percentage of participants
Comparison: The cumulative incidence of acute graft-vs-host disease was examined in the RIC and MAC groups but was not directly compared with a statistical test.
Secondary

Incidence of and Kinetics of Neutrophil and Platelet Recovery After Transplantation of Hematopoietic Cells Mobilized With Plerixafor

Incidence of and kinetics of neutrophil and platelet recovery by day 100 in recipients after transplantation of hematopoietic cells mobilized with plerixafor.

Time frame: Day +1 through neutrophil recovery or Day 21 (whichever is first)

Population: Patients were classified to one of the two conditioning regimens - myeloablative (MAC) or reduced intensity conditioning (RIC). A total of 30 MAC and 33 RIC patients were analyzed for this outcome. Neutrophil engraftment was defined as time from day 0 of HCT to the first of 3 consecutive measurements of absolute neutrophil count ≥0.5 × 109/L. Platelet engraftment was defined as the number of days from day 0 of HCT to the first of 3 consecutive values of platelet count ≥20 × 109/L.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Related Donors Receiving PlerixaforIncidence of and Kinetics of Neutrophil and Platelet Recovery After Transplantation of Hematopoietic Cells Mobilized With PlerixaforNeutrophil engraftment100 Percentage probability of engraftment
Related Donors Receiving PlerixaforIncidence of and Kinetics of Neutrophil and Platelet Recovery After Transplantation of Hematopoietic Cells Mobilized With PlerixaforPlatelet engraftment100 Percentage probability of engraftment
Recipients, Reduced Intensity Conditioning RegimenIncidence of and Kinetics of Neutrophil and Platelet Recovery After Transplantation of Hematopoietic Cells Mobilized With PlerixaforNeutrophil engraftment100 Percentage probability of engraftment
Recipients, Reduced Intensity Conditioning RegimenIncidence of and Kinetics of Neutrophil and Platelet Recovery After Transplantation of Hematopoietic Cells Mobilized With PlerixaforPlatelet engraftment97 Percentage probability of engraftment
Secondary

Incidence of Chronic Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD)

Incidence of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in recipients after transplantation of hematopoietic cells mobilized with plerixafor

Time frame: Day 365

Population: Donor arm did not receive a transplant. This group was not analyzed for graft-versus-host disease.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Related Donors Receiving PlerixaforIncidence of Chronic Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD)52 Percentage of participants
Recipients, Reduced Intensity Conditioning RegimenIncidence of Chronic Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD)39 Percentage of participants
Comparison: The cumulative incidence of chronic graft-vs-host disease was examined in the RIC and MAC groups but was not directly compared with a statistical test.
Secondary

Incidence of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Reactivation After Transplantation With Cells Mobilized With Plerixafor.

Percentage of recipients with prior CMV infection whose CMV was reactivated after transplantation with cell mobilized with plerixafor

Time frame: day 365

Population: Donor population did not receive a transplant. Only those with prior infection were eligible to be analyzed for this outcome measure

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Related Donors Receiving PlerixaforIncidence of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Reactivation After Transplantation With Cells Mobilized With Plerixafor.3 Participants
Recipients, Reduced Intensity Conditioning RegimenIncidence of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Reactivation After Transplantation With Cells Mobilized With Plerixafor.6 Participants
Comparison: Groups were not directly compared using a statistical test.
Secondary

Primary Graft Failure After Transplantation of Hematopoietic Cells Mobilized With Plerixafor

Incidence of primary graft failure in recipients after transplantation of hematopoietic cells mobilized with plerixafor. This outcome measure is descriptive.

Time frame: Day 28

Population: Donor population did not receive a transplant

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Related Donors Receiving PlerixaforPrimary Graft Failure After Transplantation of Hematopoietic Cells Mobilized With Plerixafor0 Participants
Recipients, Reduced Intensity Conditioning RegimenPrimary Graft Failure After Transplantation of Hematopoietic Cells Mobilized With Plerixafor0 Participants
Secondary

Progression-free and Overall Survival

Probability of progression-free and overall survival after transplantation of hematopoietic cells mobilized with plerixafor

Time frame: Day 180, 365

Population: Donor population did not receive a transplantation and therefore was not analyzed for this outcome

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Related Donors Receiving PlerixaforProgression-free and Overall SurvivalProgression free survival (180 days)63 Percentage probability of outcome
Related Donors Receiving PlerixaforProgression-free and Overall SurvivalProgression free survival (365 days)53 Percentage probability of outcome
Related Donors Receiving PlerixaforProgression-free and Overall SurvivalOverall survival (180 days)87 Percentage probability of outcome
Related Donors Receiving PlerixaforProgression-free and Overall SurvivalOverall survival (365 days)63 Percentage probability of outcome
Recipients, Reduced Intensity Conditioning RegimenProgression-free and Overall SurvivalOverall survival (365 days)70 Percentage probability of outcome
Recipients, Reduced Intensity Conditioning RegimenProgression-free and Overall SurvivalProgression free survival (180 days)69 Percentage probability of outcome
Recipients, Reduced Intensity Conditioning RegimenProgression-free and Overall SurvivalOverall survival (180 days)79 Percentage probability of outcome
Recipients, Reduced Intensity Conditioning RegimenProgression-free and Overall SurvivalProgression free survival (365 days)64 Percentage probability of outcome
Comparison: The probability of progression free survival and overall survival were examined in the RIC and MAC cohorts but were not directly compared between the two groups using a statistical test.
Secondary

Secondary Graft Failure After Transplantation of Hematopoietic Cells Mobilized With Plerixafor

Incidence of secondary graft failure in recipients after transplantation of hematopoietic cells mobilized with plerixafor. This outcome measure is descriptive.

Time frame: Day 365

Population: Donor population did not receive a transplant.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Related Donors Receiving PlerixaforSecondary Graft Failure After Transplantation of Hematopoietic Cells Mobilized With Plerixafor0 Participants
Recipients, Reduced Intensity Conditioning RegimenSecondary Graft Failure After Transplantation of Hematopoietic Cells Mobilized With Plerixafor0 Participants
Secondary

T-cell (CD3+) and Myeloid (CD33+) Chimerism After Transplantation of Hematopoietic Cells Mobilized With Plerixafor

T-cell (CD3+) and myeloid (CD33+) chimerism in recipients after transplantation of hematopoietic cells mobilized with plerixafor. This outcome measure is descriptive.

Time frame: Chimerism was evaluated at serial timepoints post HCT in patients in both RIC and MAC strata. Chimerism was assessed at Day +28, +100, +180, and +365

Population: Chimerism is not evaluated in donor arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Related Donors Receiving PlerixaforT-cell (CD3+) and Myeloid (CD33+) Chimerism After Transplantation of Hematopoietic Cells Mobilized With PlerixaforMyeloid chimerism (Day 28)100 percentage of donor cell chimerism
Related Donors Receiving PlerixaforT-cell (CD3+) and Myeloid (CD33+) Chimerism After Transplantation of Hematopoietic Cells Mobilized With PlerixaforT-cell chimerism (Day 28)92 percentage of donor cell chimerism
Related Donors Receiving PlerixaforT-cell (CD3+) and Myeloid (CD33+) Chimerism After Transplantation of Hematopoietic Cells Mobilized With PlerixaforMyeloid chimerism (Day 100)99 percentage of donor cell chimerism
Related Donors Receiving PlerixaforT-cell (CD3+) and Myeloid (CD33+) Chimerism After Transplantation of Hematopoietic Cells Mobilized With PlerixaforT-cell chimerism (Day 100)97 percentage of donor cell chimerism
Related Donors Receiving PlerixaforT-cell (CD3+) and Myeloid (CD33+) Chimerism After Transplantation of Hematopoietic Cells Mobilized With PlerixaforMyeloid chimerism (Day 180)100 percentage of donor cell chimerism
Related Donors Receiving PlerixaforT-cell (CD3+) and Myeloid (CD33+) Chimerism After Transplantation of Hematopoietic Cells Mobilized With PlerixaforT-cell chimerism (Day 180)100 percentage of donor cell chimerism
Related Donors Receiving PlerixaforT-cell (CD3+) and Myeloid (CD33+) Chimerism After Transplantation of Hematopoietic Cells Mobilized With PlerixaforMyeloid chimerism (Day 365)100 percentage of donor cell chimerism
Related Donors Receiving PlerixaforT-cell (CD3+) and Myeloid (CD33+) Chimerism After Transplantation of Hematopoietic Cells Mobilized With PlerixaforT-cell chimerism (Day 365)100 percentage of donor cell chimerism
Recipients, Reduced Intensity Conditioning RegimenT-cell (CD3+) and Myeloid (CD33+) Chimerism After Transplantation of Hematopoietic Cells Mobilized With PlerixaforT-cell chimerism (Day 365)100 percentage of donor cell chimerism
Recipients, Reduced Intensity Conditioning RegimenT-cell (CD3+) and Myeloid (CD33+) Chimerism After Transplantation of Hematopoietic Cells Mobilized With PlerixaforMyeloid chimerism (Day 28)100 percentage of donor cell chimerism
Recipients, Reduced Intensity Conditioning RegimenT-cell (CD3+) and Myeloid (CD33+) Chimerism After Transplantation of Hematopoietic Cells Mobilized With PlerixaforMyeloid chimerism (Day 180)100 percentage of donor cell chimerism
Recipients, Reduced Intensity Conditioning RegimenT-cell (CD3+) and Myeloid (CD33+) Chimerism After Transplantation of Hematopoietic Cells Mobilized With PlerixaforT-cell chimerism (Day 28)80 percentage of donor cell chimerism
Recipients, Reduced Intensity Conditioning RegimenT-cell (CD3+) and Myeloid (CD33+) Chimerism After Transplantation of Hematopoietic Cells Mobilized With PlerixaforMyeloid chimerism (Day 365)100 percentage of donor cell chimerism
Recipients, Reduced Intensity Conditioning RegimenT-cell (CD3+) and Myeloid (CD33+) Chimerism After Transplantation of Hematopoietic Cells Mobilized With PlerixaforMyeloid chimerism (Day 100)100 percentage of donor cell chimerism
Recipients, Reduced Intensity Conditioning RegimenT-cell (CD3+) and Myeloid (CD33+) Chimerism After Transplantation of Hematopoietic Cells Mobilized With PlerixaforT-cell chimerism (Day 180)95 percentage of donor cell chimerism
Recipients, Reduced Intensity Conditioning RegimenT-cell (CD3+) and Myeloid (CD33+) Chimerism After Transplantation of Hematopoietic Cells Mobilized With PlerixaforT-cell chimerism (Day 100)84 percentage of donor cell chimerism
Secondary

Treatment-related Mortality and Disease Relapse/Progression

Incidence of treatment-related mortality and disease relapse/progression in recipients after transplantation of hematopoietic cells mobilized with plerixafor

Time frame: Day 180, 365

Population: Related donors did not receive a transplant and were not examined for this outcome.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Related Donors Receiving PlerixaforTreatment-related Mortality and Disease Relapse/ProgressionTreatment-related mortality (180 days)7 Percentage probability of outcome
Related Donors Receiving PlerixaforTreatment-related Mortality and Disease Relapse/ProgressionTreatment-related mortality (365 days)17 Percentage probability of outcome
Related Donors Receiving PlerixaforTreatment-related Mortality and Disease Relapse/ProgressionRelapse/progression of disease (180 days)30 Percentage probability of outcome
Related Donors Receiving PlerixaforTreatment-related Mortality and Disease Relapse/ProgressionRelapse/progression of disease (365 days)30 Percentage probability of outcome
Recipients, Reduced Intensity Conditioning RegimenTreatment-related Mortality and Disease Relapse/ProgressionRelapse/progression of disease (365 days)30 Percentage probability of outcome
Recipients, Reduced Intensity Conditioning RegimenTreatment-related Mortality and Disease Relapse/ProgressionTreatment-related mortality (180 days)3 Percentage probability of outcome
Recipients, Reduced Intensity Conditioning RegimenTreatment-related Mortality and Disease Relapse/ProgressionRelapse/progression of disease (180 days)28 Percentage probability of outcome
Recipients, Reduced Intensity Conditioning RegimenTreatment-related Mortality and Disease Relapse/ProgressionTreatment-related mortality (365 days)6 Percentage probability of outcome
Comparison: The probability of treatment-related mortality and disease relapse/progression were examined in the RIC and MAC cohorts but were not directly compared between the two groups using a statistical test.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 3, 2026