Skip to content

A Study of Ixekizumab in Participants With Active Psoriatic Arthritis

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active and Placebo-Controlled 24-Week Study Followed by Long Term Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Ixekizumab (LY2439821) in Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug-Naive Patients With Active Psoriatic Arthritis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01695239
Acronym
SPIRIT-P1
Enrollment
417
Registered
2012-09-27
Start date
2012-12-31
Completion date
2017-09-30
Last updated
2019-01-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Psoriasis, Arthritic

Brief summary

This study will assess the safety and efficacy of ixekizumab (LY2439821) compared to placebo in participants with active psoriatic arthritis.

Interventions

DRUGIxekizumab

Administered SC

DRUGPlacebo

Administered SC

DRUGAdalimumab

Administered SC

Sponsors

Eli Lilly and Company
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Presents with established diagnosis of active psoriatic arthritis for at least 6 months, and currently meets Classification for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) criteria * Active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) defined as the presence of at least 3 tender and at least 3 swollen joints * Presence of active psoriatic skin lesion or a personal history of plaque psoriasis (Ps) * Men must agree to use a reliable method of birth control or remain abstinent during the study * Women must agree to use reliable birth control or remain abstinent during the study and for at least 12 weeks after stopping treatment

Exclusion criteria

* Current or prior use of biologic agents for treatment of Ps or PsA * Inadequate response to greater than or equal to 4 conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) * Current use of more than one conventional DMARD * Evidence of active inflammatory arthritic syndromes or spondyloarthropathies other than PsA * Have participated in any study with interleukin 17 (IL-17) antagonists, including ixekizumab * Serious disorder or illness other than psoriatic arthritis * Serious infection within the last 3 months * Breastfeeding or nursing (lactating) women

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Response at Week 24 (Efficacy of Ixekizumab in Participants With Active Psoriatic Arthritis. Measure: American College of Rheumatology 20 Index [ACR20])Week 24ACR20 response is defined as a ≥20% improvement from baseline for tender joint count (TJC) and swollen joint count (SJC) and in at least 3 of the following 5 criteria: Participant's assessment of Joint Pain visual analog scale (VAS), Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS (PatGA), Physician's Global Assessment of the Disease Activity VAS (PGA), Participant's Assessment of Physical Function using the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI), or Acute Phase Reactant as measured by high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50 (ACR50) ResponseWeek 24ACR50 response is defined as a ≥50% improvement from baseline for TJC and SJC and in at least 3 of the following 5 criteria: Participant's assessment of Joint Pain VAS, Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS, Physician's Global Assessment of the Disease Activity VAS, Participant's Assessment of Physical Function using the HAQ-DI, or hs-CRP.
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70 (ACR70) ScoreWeek 24ACR70 response is defined as a ≥70% improvement from baseline for TJC and SJC and in at least 3 of the following 5 criteria: Participant's assessment of Joint Pain VAS, Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS, Physician's Global Assessment of the Disease Activity VAS, Participant's Assessment of Physical Function using the HAQ-DI, or hs-CRP.
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Scores (Quality of Life and Outcome Assessments Measures: Participant Reported Outcomes [PRO])Baseline, Week 24HAQ-DI is a participant reported questionnaire that measures disease-associated disability (physical function). It consists of 24 questions with 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and other daily activities. The disability section scores the participant's self-perception on the degree of difficulty (0 = without any difficulty, 1 = with some difficulty, 2 = with much difficulty, and 3 = unable to do), covering the 8 domains. The HAQ-DI is a composite ranging from 0-3 with lower scores indicating less functional disability. The reported use of special aids or devices and/or the need for assistance of another person to perform these activities is assessed. Least Square (LS) mean was calculated using Mixed Model Repeated Measurements (MMRM) analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, baseline conventional disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (cDMARD) experience, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) (Efficacy of Ixekizumab in Participants With Active Psoriatic Arthritis. Measure: Modified Total Sharp Score [mTSS])Baseline, Week 24The mTSS measures the extent of bone erosions (20 joints per hand and 12 joints per foot) and joint space narrowing (20 joints per hand and 6 joints per foot), with higher scores representing greater damage. An increase from baseline represents disease progression and / or joint worsening. Scores range from 0-528. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, and baseline cDMARD experience, visit, treatment by visit interaction.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75%, 90%, 100% (PASI 75, 90, 100)Week 12The PASI is an index that combines assessments of the extent of body-surface involvement in 4 anatomical regions (head, trunk, arms, and legs) and the severity of desquamation, erythema, and plaque induration/infiltration (thickness) in each region, yielding an overall score of 0 for no psoriasis to 72 for the most severe disease. Participants achieving PASI 75 were defined as having an improvement of at least 75% in the PASI compared to their baseline measures. Participants achieving PASI 90 were defined as having an improvement of ≥90% in the PASI score compared to baseline. Participants achieving PASI 100 were defined as having an improvement of 100% in the PASI score compared to baseline.
Change From Baseline in Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI)Baseline, Week 12The LEI was developed specifically for use in PsA. It measures enthesitis at 6 sites (lateral epicondyle, left and right; medial femoral condyle, left and right; Achilles tendon insertion, left and right). Each site was assigned a score of 0 (absent) or 1 (present); the results from each site were then added to produce a total score (range 0 to 6). LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, baseline cDMARD experience, visit, treatment by visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in Itching Severity Using the Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (Quality of Life and Outcome Assessments Measures: Participant Reported Outcomes [PRO])Baseline, Week 12The Itch NRS is a participant-administered, 11-point horizontal scale anchored at 0 and 10, with 0 representing no itch and 10 representing worst itch imaginable. Overall severity of a participant's itching from psoriasis was indicated by circling the number that best described the worst level of itching in the past 24 hours. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, baseline cDMARD experience, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in Fatigue Severity NRS Score (Quality of Life and Outcome Assessments Measures: Participant Reported Outcomes [PRO])Baseline, Week 24The Fatigue Severity NRS is a participant-administered single-item 11-point horizontal scale anchored at 0 and 10, with 0 representing no fatigue and 10 representing as bad as you can imagine. Participants rated their fatigue (feeling tired or worn out) by circling the 1 number that described their worst level of fatigue during the past 24 hours. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, baseline cDMARD experience, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in Joint Space Narrowing Score (JSN) And Bone Erosion Score (BES)Baseline, Week 24JSN score (a component of the modified Total Sharp Score \[mTSS\]) measures the extent of joint space narrowing in peripheral joints. JSN (20 joints per hand and 6 joints per foot), with higher scores representing greater damage. JSN score range is 0 (no narrowing) to 208 (high narrowing). Increase from baseline represents disease progression and / or joint worsening. BES (a component of the \[mTSS\]) measures the extent of bone erosion in peripheral joints. BES measures the extent of joint erosions (20 joints per hand and 12 joints per foot), with higher scores representing greater damage. Erosion score range is from 0 (no erosion) to 320 (high erosion). LS mean was calculated using linear extrapolation for ANCOVA analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, and baseline cDMARD experience.
Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36): Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) (Quality of Life and Outcome Assessments Measures: Participant Reported Outcomes [PRO])Baseline, Week 24SF-36 is a standardized participant-administered measure designed to evaluate 8 domains of functional health and well being: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role (role-physical, role-emotional) limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health with 2 components (physical component score \[PCS\] and mental component score \[MCS\]). The PCS and MCS scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better levels of function and/or better health. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, baseline cDMARD experience, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Reported 16 Items (QIDS-SR16) (Quality of Life and Outcome Assessments. Measures: Patient Reported Outcomes [PRO])Baseline, Week 24The QIDS-SR16 is a self-administered 16-item instrument intended to assess the existence and severity of symptoms of depression. A participant is asked to consider each statement as it relates to the way they have felt for the past 7 days. Each item scaled from 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (all symptoms). The 16 items corresponding to 9 depression domains are summed to give a single score ranging from 0 to 27, with higher scores denoting greater symptom severity. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, baseline cDMARD experience, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (28 Diarthrodial Joint Count) Based on C-ReactiveProtein (DAS28-CRP) Measure: Non-Arthritic DiseaseBaseline, Week 24The DAS28-CRP is a measure of disease activity in 28 joints that consists of a composite numerical score with the following variables: TJC28, SJC28, hs-CRP measured in milligram/liter (mg/L), and Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity recorded by participants on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) VAS. For DAS28-CRP, the Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28) and Swollen Joint Count (SJC28) are a subset of TJC and SJC, and include 14 joints on each side of the body: 2 shoulders, 2 elbows, 2 wrists, 10 metacarpophalangeal joints, the 2 interphalangeal joints of the thumb, the 8 proximal interphalangeal joints, and the 2 knees. DAS28 values range from 0 to 9.4. Higher values indicate more severe symptoms and greater functional impairment. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, baseline cDMARD experience, visit, and treatment-by-visit.
Percentage of Participants Meeting the Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC Modified)Week 24The PsARC is a composite criteria reported in terms of the percentage of participants achieving response according to the following criterion: TJC, SJC, PGA, and PatGA. Overall response is defined by improvement from baseline assessment in 2 of 4 criteria, 1 of which must be a joint count; there must not be worsening in any of the 4 criteria: at least 30% reduction in TJC, at least 30% reduction in SJC, at least a 20 millimeter (mm) reduction in PGA and at least a 20 mm reduction in PatGA which is equivalent to 20 mm reduction. The results from the 2 VAS measures were assessed as a difference from baseline in mm.
Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR20 ResponseWeek 12ACR20 response is defined as a ≥20% improvement from baseline for TJC and SJC and in at least 3 of the following 5 criteria: Participant's assessment of Joint Pain VAS, Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS, Physician's Global Assessment of the Disease Activity VAS, Participant's Assessment of Physical Function using the HAQ-DI, or hs-CRP.
Percent Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA)Baseline, Week 24The investigator evaluated the percentage involvement of psoriasis on each participant's BSA on a continuous scale from 0% = no involvement to 100% = full involvement, where 1% corresponded to the size of the participant's handprint including the palm, fingers, and thumb. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, baseline cDMARD experience, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in the Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) Score Fingernail Involvement at BaselineBaseline, Week 24The NAPSI scale is used to evaluate the severity of fingernail bed Ps and fingernail matrix Ps by area of involvement. The fingernail is divided into quadrants. Each fingernail is given a score for fingernail bed Ps 0 (none) to 4 (Ps in 4 quadrants of the fingernail) and fingernail matrix Ps 0 (none) to 4 (Ps in 4 quadrants of the matrix), depending on the presence (score of 1) or absence (score of 0) of any of the features of fingernail bed or matrix Ps in each quadrant. The sum of all fingernails equals the total NAPSI score range is from 0 (no effect) to 80 (more severe psoriasis). LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, baseline cDMARD experience, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)Baseline, Week 24The BASDAI is a self-administered measure used to answer 6 questions with a 0 to 10 centimeter (cm) VAS pertaining to the 5 major symptoms of axial activity. To give each symptom equal weighting, the mean of the 2 scores relating to morning stiffness was taken. The resulting 0 to 50 score was divided by 5 to give a final 0 to 10 BASDAI Score. BASDAI ranges from 0-10. Higher scores represent greater disease activity. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, baseline cDMARD experience, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in Leeds Dactylitis Index-Basic (LDI-B)Baseline, Week 24The LDI-B measures the severity of dactylitis. In each digit, the ratio of the circumference of the affected digit to the circumference of the digit on the opposite hand or foot measured in mm. Each dactylitic digit was defined by a minimum increase of 10% in circumference over the contra-lateral digit. If the same digits on each hand or foot were thought to be involved, the clinician referred to a table of normative values for a value which was used to provide the comparison. The calculated ratio was multiplied by a tenderness score of 0 (not tender) or 1 (tender). Tenderness was assessed in the area between the joints. The results of each digit were then added to produce a total score. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, baseline cDMARD experience, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction.
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Anti-Ixekizumab Antibodies (TE-ADA) and Neutralizing Antibodies (NAb)Baseline to Week 24Number of participants with positive treatment emergent anti-ixekizumab antibodies and NAb was summarized by treatment group.
Percent Change in American College of Rheumatology-N (ACR-N) ScoreBaseline, 24 WeeksThe ACR-N score is a continuous measure of clinical, laboratory, and functional outcomes that characterizes the percentage of improvement from baseline in disease activity and the lowest of either a) the percent change in tender joint count (TJC) b) the percent change in swollen joint count (SJC), or c) the median percent change of the remaining 5 ACR core criteria. An ACR-N score of X has improvement of at least X% in both TJC and SJC and a median improvement of at least X% in 5 criteria: patient's assessment of arthritis pain, PatGA, PGA, HAQ-DI and hs-CRP. ACR-N is calculated by allowing for negative results which indicate worsening. LS mean was calculated using Mixed Model Repeated Measurements (MMRM) analysis with treatment, baseline, geographic region, baseline conventional disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (cDMARD) experience, visit, and treatment.
Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Counts (TJC)Baseline, Week 24TJC is calculated based on tenderness response of 68 joints. TJC possible values range from 0 to 68. A lower TJC indicated less joint tenderness. A higher TJC indicated more joint tenderness. TJC is the number of tender and painful joints determined for each participant by examination of 68 joints. Joints were assessed by pressure and joint manipulation on physical examination. Participants were asked for pain sensations on these manipulations and watched for spontaneous pain reactions. Any positive response on pressure, movement, or both was translated into a single tender-versus-nontender dichotomy. LS mean was calculated using Mixed Model Repeated Measurements (MMRM) analysis with treatment, baseline, geographic region, baseline conventional disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (cDMARD) experience, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Counts (SJC)Baseline, Week 24SJC is calculated based on swelling response of 66 joints. SJC possible values range from 0 to 66. A lower SJC indicated less joint swelling. A higher SJC indicated more joint swelling. SJC is the number of swollen joints determined for each participant by examination of 66 joints. Joints were classified as either swollen or not swollen. Swelling was defined as palpable fluctuating synovitis of the joint. LS mean was calculated using Mixed Model Repeated Measurements (MMRM) analysis with treatment, baseline, geographic region, baseline conventional disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (cDMARD) experience, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain VASBaseline, Week 24The VAS is an instrument used to measure a person's subjective quantitative evaluation of an item such as pain intensity. The VAS contains a continuous line between two end points whereby the respondent places a mark on the line to indicate his or her response. In this study, participants scored their pain intensity in the most affected joint of the gout flare on a 0 100 mm VAS. The scale ranged from 0 (no pain) to 100 (unbearable pain). The scores were measured to the nearest millimeter from the left. LS mean was calculated using Mixed Model Repeated Measurements (MMRM) analysis with treatment, baseline, geographic region, baseline conventional disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (cDMARD) experience, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Severity (PatGA) VASBaseline, Week 24Participants scored their overall assessment of their PsA activity on a 0 to 100 mm horizontal VAS. The scale ranged from 0 (no disease activity) to 100 (extremely active disease activity). The scores were measured to the nearest millimeter from the left. LS mean was calculated using Mixed Model Repeated Measurements (MMRM) analysis with treatment, baseline, geographic region, baseline conventional disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (cDMARD) experience, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VASBaseline, 24 WeeksThe investigator was asked to give an overall assessment of the severity of the participant's current PsA activity using a 0 to 100 mm horizontal VAS. The scale ranged from 0 no disease activity to 100 extremely active disease activity. The scores were measured to the nearest millimeter from the left. Least Square (LS) mean was calculated using Mixed Model Repeated Measurements (MMRM) analysis with treatment, baseline, geographic region, baseline conventional disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (cDMARD) experience, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP)Baseline, Week 24CRP milligram/liter (mg/L) was measured with a high sensitivity assay at a central laboratory to assess acute phase reactant. LS mean was calculated using Mixed Model Repeated Measurements (MMRM) analysis with treatment, baseline, geographic region, baseline conventional disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (cDMARD) experience, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction.
Change From Baseline in Itching Severity Using the Itch NRSBaseline, Week 24The Itch NRS is a participant-administered, 11-point horizontal scale anchored at 0 and 10, with 0 representing no itch and 10 representing worst itch imaginable. Overall severity of a participant's itching from psoriasis was indicated by circling the number that best described the worst level of itching in the past 24 hours. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, baseline cDMARD experience, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) of 0 or 1 and With at Least a 2-point Improvement From BaselineWeek 24The sPGA is the physician's determination of the severity of the participant's psoriasis lesions overall at a given time point. Overall lesions were categorized by descriptions for induration, erythema, and scaling. For the analysis of responses, the participant's psoriasis was assessed at a given time point on in which 0 = clear, 1 = minimal, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe, 5 = very severe.

Countries

Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Czechia, Estonia, France, Japan, Mexico, Netherlands, Poland, Russia, Spain, Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

The Double-Blind Treatment Period was Week 0 up to Week 24 (Inadequate responders (IR) Week 16-24) followed by the combined extension period and long-term extension period from Week 24 to Week 156.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Participants received placebo for ixekizumab as 2 SC injections and placebo for adalimumab as one SC injection for a total of 3 injections at Week 0. Placebo for ixekizumab and placebo for adalimumab were given as single SC injections Q2W from Week 2 to Week 24.
106
ADA Q2W
Participants received 40 mg of adalimumab as one SC injection and placebo for ixekizumab as 2 SC injections for a total of 3 injections at Week 0. Participants received one SC injection of 40 mg of adalimumab and one SC injection of placebo for ixekizumab Q2W from Week 2 to Week 24.
101
Ixe Q4W
Participants received a starting dose of 160 mg of ixekizumab given as 2 SC injections of 80 mg and placebo for adalimumab as one SC injection for a total of 3 injections at Week 0. Participants received one SC injection of 80 mg of ixekizumab or placebo for ixekizumab Q2W from Week 2 to Week 24. Participants received one SC injection of placebo for adalimumab Q2W from Week 2 to Week 24.
107
Ixe Q2W
Participants received a starting dose of 160 mg of ixekizumab given as 2 SC injections of 80 mg and placebo for adalimumab as one SC injection for a total of 3 injections at Week 0. Participants received one SC injection of 80 mg of ixekizumab Q2W from Week 2 to Week 24. Participants received one SC injection of placebo for adalimumab Q2W from Week 2 to Week 24.
103
Total417

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005FG006FG007FG008FG009FG010FG011FG012FG013
Double-Blind (DB) Treatment PeriodAdverse Event22230000000000
Double-Blind (DB) Treatment PeriodEntry Criteria Not Met11340000000000
Double-Blind (DB) Treatment PeriodLack of Efficacy40200000000000
Double-Blind (DB) Treatment PeriodLost to Follow-up10100000000000
Double-Blind (DB) Treatment PeriodProtocol Violation10000000000000
Double-Blind (DB) Treatment PeriodSponsor Decision30100000000000
Double-Blind (DB) Treatment PeriodWithdrawal by Subject31100000000000
Extension Long-Term Extension PeriodsAdverse Event0000000015210000
Extension Long-Term Extension PeriodsDeath00000000100000
Extension Long-Term Extension PeriodsLack of Efficacy0000000037310000
Extension Long-Term Extension PeriodsLost to Follow-up00000000210000
Extension Long-Term Extension PeriodsPhysician Decision00000000300000
Extension Long-Term Extension PeriodsSponsor Decision00000000210000
Extension Long-Term Extension PeriodsWithdrawal by Subject00000000670000
Placebo Washout (Week 24 Up To Week 32)Adverse Event00000001000000
Placebo Washout (Week 24 Up To Week 32)Entry Criteria Not Met00000001000000
Placebo Washout (Week 24 Up To Week 32)Lack of Efficacy00000009000000
Post-Treatment Follow-Up PeriodLost to Follow-up00000000000011
Post-Treatment Follow-Up PeriodPhysician Decision00000000000020
Post-Treatment Follow-Up PeriodProtocol Violation00000000000001
Post-Treatment Follow-Up PeriodWithdrawal by Subject00000000000163

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalIxe Q2WIxe Q4WPlaceboADA Q2W
Age, Continuous49.52 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.87
49.79 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.62
49.07 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.07
50.60 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.32
48.58 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.43
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
20 Participants4 Participants5 Participants6 Participants5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Hispanic or Latino
356 Participants87 Participants94 Participants92 Participants83 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown or Not Reported
41 Participants12 Participants8 Participants8 Participants13 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
9 Participants2 Participants2 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
15 Participants5 Participants2 Participants5 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
392 Participants96 Participants102 Participants99 Participants95 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
5 Participants1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Bulgaria
16 Participants4 Participants5 Participants3 Participants4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
4 Participants0 Participants2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Czechia
92 Participants22 Participants23 Participants22 Participants25 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Estonia
29 Participants8 Participants8 Participants6 Participants7 Participants
Region of Enrollment
France
3 Participants1 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Japan
12 Participants4 Participants2 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Mexico
12 Participants2 Participants3 Participants3 Participants4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
2 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
60 Participants15 Participants15 Participants16 Participants14 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Russia
34 Participants8 Participants10 Participants9 Participants7 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
13 Participants4 Participants3 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Ukraine
35 Participants10 Participants9 Participants9 Participants7 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
17 Participants4 Participants5 Participants3 Participants5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
83 Participants20 Participants20 Participants22 Participants21 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
225 Participants55 Participants62 Participants58 Participants50 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
192 Participants48 Participants45 Participants48 Participants51 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
EG007
affected / at risk
EG008
affected / at risk
EG009
affected / at risk
EG010
affected / at risk
EG011
affected / at risk
EG012
affected / at risk
EG013
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
16 / 10618 / 10133 / 10731 / 1020 / 240 / 240 / 97 / 8862 / 18766 / 1830 / 200 / 10 / 1650 / 171
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 1065 / 1016 / 1073 / 1020 / 240 / 240 / 91 / 8828 / 18719 / 1830 / 200 / 12 / 1652 / 171

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Response at Week 24 (Efficacy of Ixekizumab in Participants With Active Psoriatic Arthritis. Measure: American College of Rheumatology 20 Index [ACR20])

ACR20 response is defined as a ≥20% improvement from baseline for tender joint count (TJC) and swollen joint count (SJC) and in at least 3 of the following 5 criteria: Participant's assessment of Joint Pain visual analog scale (VAS), Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS (PatGA), Physician's Global Assessment of the Disease Activity VAS (PGA), Participant's Assessment of Physical Function using the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI), or Acute Phase Reactant as measured by high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP).

Time frame: Week 24

Population: All randomized participants. Nonresponder Imputation (NRI) is applied for inadequate responders at Week 16 and participants who had missing data at Week 24 for any reason including discontinuation.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Response at Week 24 (Efficacy of Ixekizumab in Participants With Active Psoriatic Arthritis. Measure: American College of Rheumatology 20 Index [ACR20])30.2 percentage of participants
Adalimumab Q2WPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Response at Week 24 (Efficacy of Ixekizumab in Participants With Active Psoriatic Arthritis. Measure: American College of Rheumatology 20 Index [ACR20])57.4 percentage of participants
Ixekizumab Q4WPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Response at Week 24 (Efficacy of Ixekizumab in Participants With Active Psoriatic Arthritis. Measure: American College of Rheumatology 20 Index [ACR20])57.9 percentage of participants
Ixekizumab Q2WPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Response at Week 24 (Efficacy of Ixekizumab in Participants With Active Psoriatic Arthritis. Measure: American College of Rheumatology 20 Index [ACR20])62.1 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.001Regression, Logistic
p-value: <0.001Regression, Logistic
p-value: <0.001Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP)

CRP milligram/liter (mg/L) was measured with a high sensitivity assay at a central laboratory to assess acute phase reactant. LS mean was calculated using Mixed Model Repeated Measurements (MMRM) analysis with treatment, baseline, geographic region, baseline conventional disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (cDMARD) experience, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: All randomized participants with baseline and post-baseline CRP data.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP)-3.873 milligram/liter (mg/L)Standard Error 1.4292
Adalimumab Q2WChange From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP)-7.512 milligram/liter (mg/L)Standard Error 1.2674
Ixekizumab Q4WChange From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP)-8.804 milligram/liter (mg/L)Standard Error 1.2602
Ixekizumab Q2WChange From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP)-8.942 milligram/liter (mg/L)Standard Error 1.2552
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (28 Diarthrodial Joint Count) Based on C-ReactiveProtein (DAS28-CRP) Measure: Non-Arthritic Disease

The DAS28-CRP is a measure of disease activity in 28 joints that consists of a composite numerical score with the following variables: TJC28, SJC28, hs-CRP measured in milligram/liter (mg/L), and Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity recorded by participants on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) VAS. For DAS28-CRP, the Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28) and Swollen Joint Count (SJC28) are a subset of TJC and SJC, and include 14 joints on each side of the body: 2 shoulders, 2 elbows, 2 wrists, 10 metacarpophalangeal joints, the 2 interphalangeal joints of the thumb, the 8 proximal interphalangeal joints, and the 2 knees. DAS28 values range from 0 to 9.4. Higher values indicate more severe symptoms and greater functional impairment. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, baseline cDMARD experience, visit, and treatment-by-visit.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: All randomized participants who had baseline and post baseline DAS28-CRP data.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (28 Diarthrodial Joint Count) Based on C-ReactiveProtein (DAS28-CRP) Measure: Non-Arthritic Disease-0.835 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1307
Adalimumab Q2WChange From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (28 Diarthrodial Joint Count) Based on C-ReactiveProtein (DAS28-CRP) Measure: Non-Arthritic Disease-1.743 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1215
Ixekizumab Q4WChange From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (28 Diarthrodial Joint Count) Based on C-ReactiveProtein (DAS28-CRP) Measure: Non-Arthritic Disease-1.955 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1206
Ixekizumab Q2WChange From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (28 Diarthrodial Joint Count) Based on C-ReactiveProtein (DAS28-CRP) Measure: Non-Arthritic Disease-2.036 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1225
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Fatigue Severity NRS Score (Quality of Life and Outcome Assessments Measures: Participant Reported Outcomes [PRO])

The Fatigue Severity NRS is a participant-administered single-item 11-point horizontal scale anchored at 0 and 10, with 0 representing no fatigue and 10 representing as bad as you can imagine. Participants rated their fatigue (feeling tired or worn out) by circling the 1 number that described their worst level of fatigue during the past 24 hours. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, baseline cDMARD experience, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: All randomized participants who had baseline and post baseline fatigue NRS data.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Fatigue Severity NRS Score (Quality of Life and Outcome Assessments Measures: Participant Reported Outcomes [PRO])-1.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.25
Adalimumab Q2WChange From Baseline in Fatigue Severity NRS Score (Quality of Life and Outcome Assessments Measures: Participant Reported Outcomes [PRO])-1.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.24
Ixekizumab Q4WChange From Baseline in Fatigue Severity NRS Score (Quality of Life and Outcome Assessments Measures: Participant Reported Outcomes [PRO])-1.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.24
Ixekizumab Q2WChange From Baseline in Fatigue Severity NRS Score (Quality of Life and Outcome Assessments Measures: Participant Reported Outcomes [PRO])-1.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.24
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Scores (Quality of Life and Outcome Assessments Measures: Participant Reported Outcomes [PRO])

HAQ-DI is a participant reported questionnaire that measures disease-associated disability (physical function). It consists of 24 questions with 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and other daily activities. The disability section scores the participant's self-perception on the degree of difficulty (0 = without any difficulty, 1 = with some difficulty, 2 = with much difficulty, and 3 = unable to do), covering the 8 domains. The HAQ-DI is a composite ranging from 0-3 with lower scores indicating less functional disability. The reported use of special aids or devices and/or the need for assistance of another person to perform these activities is assessed. Least Square (LS) mean was calculated using Mixed Model Repeated Measurements (MMRM) analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, baseline conventional disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (cDMARD) experience, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: All randomized participants with baseline and post baseline HAQ-DI data.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Scores (Quality of Life and Outcome Assessments Measures: Participant Reported Outcomes [PRO])-0.1797 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0524
Adalimumab Q2WChange From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Scores (Quality of Life and Outcome Assessments Measures: Participant Reported Outcomes [PRO])-0.3712 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.051
Ixekizumab Q4WChange From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Scores (Quality of Life and Outcome Assessments Measures: Participant Reported Outcomes [PRO])-0.4431 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0503
Ixekizumab Q2WChange From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Scores (Quality of Life and Outcome Assessments Measures: Participant Reported Outcomes [PRO])-0.4963 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0507
Secondary

Change From Baseline in in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)

The BASDAI is a self-administered measure used to answer 6 questions with a 0 to 10 centimeter (cm) VAS pertaining to the 5 major symptoms of axial activity. To give each symptom equal weighting, the mean of the 2 scores relating to morning stiffness was taken. The resulting 0 to 50 score was divided by 5 to give a final 0 to 10 BASDAI Score. BASDAI ranges from 0-10. Higher scores represent greater disease activity. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, baseline cDMARD experience, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: All randomized participants who had baseline axial involvement defined as baseline BASDAI score \>4, baseline BASDAI score and post baseline BASDAI score.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)-1.25 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.268
Adalimumab Q2WChange From Baseline in in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)-2.42 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.249
Ixekizumab Q4WChange From Baseline in in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)-2.74 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.234
Ixekizumab Q2WChange From Baseline in in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)-2.91 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.251
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Itching Severity Using the Itch NRS

The Itch NRS is a participant-administered, 11-point horizontal scale anchored at 0 and 10, with 0 representing no itch and 10 representing worst itch imaginable. Overall severity of a participant's itching from psoriasis was indicated by circling the number that best described the worst level of itching in the past 24 hours. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, baseline cDMARD experience, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: All randomized participants who had baseline psoriatic lesion(s) involving \>=3% BSA, baseline itch NRS score and post baseline itch NRS score.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Itching Severity Using the Itch NRS-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.32
Adalimumab Q2WChange From Baseline in Itching Severity Using the Itch NRS-1.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.29
Ixekizumab Q4WChange From Baseline in Itching Severity Using the Itch NRS-2.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.29
Ixekizumab Q2WChange From Baseline in Itching Severity Using the Itch NRS-2.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.31
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Itching Severity Using the Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (Quality of Life and Outcome Assessments Measures: Participant Reported Outcomes [PRO])

The Itch NRS is a participant-administered, 11-point horizontal scale anchored at 0 and 10, with 0 representing no itch and 10 representing worst itch imaginable. Overall severity of a participant's itching from psoriasis was indicated by circling the number that best described the worst level of itching in the past 24 hours. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, baseline cDMARD experience, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: All randomized participants who had baseline psoriatic lesion(s) involving \>=3% BSA, baseline itch NRS score and post baseline itch NRS score.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Itching Severity Using the Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (Quality of Life and Outcome Assessments Measures: Participant Reported Outcomes [PRO])0.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.27
Adalimumab Q2WChange From Baseline in Itching Severity Using the Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (Quality of Life and Outcome Assessments Measures: Participant Reported Outcomes [PRO])-1.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.28
Ixekizumab Q4WChange From Baseline in Itching Severity Using the Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (Quality of Life and Outcome Assessments Measures: Participant Reported Outcomes [PRO])-2.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.27
Ixekizumab Q2WChange From Baseline in Itching Severity Using the Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (Quality of Life and Outcome Assessments Measures: Participant Reported Outcomes [PRO])-2.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Joint Space Narrowing Score (JSN) And Bone Erosion Score (BES)

JSN score (a component of the modified Total Sharp Score \[mTSS\]) measures the extent of joint space narrowing in peripheral joints. JSN (20 joints per hand and 6 joints per foot), with higher scores representing greater damage. JSN score range is 0 (no narrowing) to 208 (high narrowing). Increase from baseline represents disease progression and / or joint worsening. BES (a component of the \[mTSS\]) measures the extent of bone erosion in peripheral joints. BES measures the extent of joint erosions (20 joints per hand and 12 joints per foot), with higher scores representing greater damage. Erosion score range is from 0 (no erosion) to 320 (high erosion). LS mean was calculated using linear extrapolation for ANCOVA analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, and baseline cDMARD experience.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: All randomized participants who had baseline and post baseline JSN data. All randomized participants who had baseline and post baseline BES data. Linear extrapolation was used to impute missing data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Joint Space Narrowing Score (JSN) And Bone Erosion Score (BES)Joint Space Narrowing Score0.07 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.031
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Joint Space Narrowing Score (JSN) And Bone Erosion Score (BES)Bone Erosion Score0.44 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.077
Adalimumab Q2WChange From Baseline in Joint Space Narrowing Score (JSN) And Bone Erosion Score (BES)Bone Erosion Score0.12 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.077
Adalimumab Q2WChange From Baseline in Joint Space Narrowing Score (JSN) And Bone Erosion Score (BES)Joint Space Narrowing Score0.01 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.031
Ixekizumab Q4WChange From Baseline in Joint Space Narrowing Score (JSN) And Bone Erosion Score (BES)Joint Space Narrowing Score0.04 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Ixekizumab Q4WChange From Baseline in Joint Space Narrowing Score (JSN) And Bone Erosion Score (BES)Bone Erosion Score0.15 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.075
Ixekizumab Q2WChange From Baseline in Joint Space Narrowing Score (JSN) And Bone Erosion Score (BES)Joint Space Narrowing Score0.01 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Ixekizumab Q2WChange From Baseline in Joint Space Narrowing Score (JSN) And Bone Erosion Score (BES)Bone Erosion Score0.08 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.075
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Leeds Dactylitis Index-Basic (LDI-B)

The LDI-B measures the severity of dactylitis. In each digit, the ratio of the circumference of the affected digit to the circumference of the digit on the opposite hand or foot measured in mm. Each dactylitic digit was defined by a minimum increase of 10% in circumference over the contra-lateral digit. If the same digits on each hand or foot were thought to be involved, the clinician referred to a table of normative values for a value which was used to provide the comparison. The calculated ratio was multiplied by a tenderness score of 0 (not tender) or 1 (tender). Tenderness was assessed in the area between the joints. The results of each digit were then added to produce a total score. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, baseline cDMARD experience, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: All randomized participants who had baseline dactylitis, baseline LDI-B score and post baseline LDI-B score.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Leeds Dactylitis Index-Basic (LDI-B)-25.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 6.53
Adalimumab Q2WChange From Baseline in Leeds Dactylitis Index-Basic (LDI-B)-57.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 7.84
Ixekizumab Q4WChange From Baseline in Leeds Dactylitis Index-Basic (LDI-B)-57.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 5.67
Ixekizumab Q2WChange From Baseline in Leeds Dactylitis Index-Basic (LDI-B)-48.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 6.31
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI)

The LEI was developed specifically for use in PsA. It measures enthesitis at 6 sites (lateral epicondyle, left and right; medial femoral condyle, left and right; Achilles tendon insertion, left and right). Each site was assigned a score of 0 (absent) or 1 (present); the results from each site were then added to produce a total score (range 0 to 6). LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, baseline cDMARD experience, visit, treatment by visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: All randomized participants who had baseline enthesitis, baseline LEI score and post baseline LEI score.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI)-0.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.24
Adalimumab Q2WChange From Baseline in Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI)-0.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.24
Ixekizumab Q4WChange From Baseline in Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI)-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.21
Ixekizumab Q2WChange From Baseline in Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI)-1.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.24
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI)

The LEI was developed specifically for use in PsA. It measures enthesitis at 6 sites (lateral epicondyle, left and right; medial femoral condyle, left and right; Achilles tendon insertion, left and right). Each site was assigned a score of 0 (absent) or 1 (present); the results from each site were then added to produce a total score (range 0 to 6). LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, baseline cDMARD experience, visit, treatment by visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: All randomized participants who had baseline enthesitis, baseline LEI score and post baseline LEI score.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI)-0.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.26
Adalimumab Q2WChange From Baseline in Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI)-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.23
Ixekizumab Q4WChange From Baseline in Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI)-1.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.21
Ixekizumab Q2WChange From Baseline in Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI)-1.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.24
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36): Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) (Quality of Life and Outcome Assessments Measures: Participant Reported Outcomes [PRO])

SF-36 is a standardized participant-administered measure designed to evaluate 8 domains of functional health and well being: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role (role-physical, role-emotional) limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health with 2 components (physical component score \[PCS\] and mental component score \[MCS\]). The PCS and MCS scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better levels of function and/or better health. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, baseline cDMARD experience, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: All randomized participants who had baseline and post baseline PCS data. All randomized participants who had baseline and post baseline MCS data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36): Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) (Quality of Life and Outcome Assessments Measures: Participant Reported Outcomes [PRO])PCS Score2.94 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.958
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36): Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) (Quality of Life and Outcome Assessments Measures: Participant Reported Outcomes [PRO])MCS Score2.67 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.013
Adalimumab Q2WChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36): Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) (Quality of Life and Outcome Assessments Measures: Participant Reported Outcomes [PRO])MCS Score4.22 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.943
Adalimumab Q2WChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36): Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) (Quality of Life and Outcome Assessments Measures: Participant Reported Outcomes [PRO])PCS Score6.78 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.904
Ixekizumab Q4WChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36): Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) (Quality of Life and Outcome Assessments Measures: Participant Reported Outcomes [PRO])PCS Score7.45 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.894
Ixekizumab Q4WChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36): Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) (Quality of Life and Outcome Assessments Measures: Participant Reported Outcomes [PRO])MCS Score4.86 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.933
Ixekizumab Q2WChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36): Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) (Quality of Life and Outcome Assessments Measures: Participant Reported Outcomes [PRO])PCS Score8.24 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.898
Ixekizumab Q2WChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36): Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) (Quality of Life and Outcome Assessments Measures: Participant Reported Outcomes [PRO])MCS Score3.39 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.936
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) (Efficacy of Ixekizumab in Participants With Active Psoriatic Arthritis. Measure: Modified Total Sharp Score [mTSS])

The mTSS measures the extent of bone erosions (20 joints per hand and 12 joints per foot) and joint space narrowing (20 joints per hand and 6 joints per foot), with higher scores representing greater damage. An increase from baseline represents disease progression and / or joint worsening. Scores range from 0-528. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, and baseline cDMARD experience, visit, treatment by visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: All randomized participants with baseline and post baseline mTSS data.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) (Efficacy of Ixekizumab in Participants With Active Psoriatic Arthritis. Measure: Modified Total Sharp Score [mTSS])0.49 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.086
Adalimumab Q2WChange From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) (Efficacy of Ixekizumab in Participants With Active Psoriatic Arthritis. Measure: Modified Total Sharp Score [mTSS])0.10 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.085
Ixekizumab Q4WChange From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) (Efficacy of Ixekizumab in Participants With Active Psoriatic Arthritis. Measure: Modified Total Sharp Score [mTSS])0.17 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.082
Ixekizumab Q2WChange From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) (Efficacy of Ixekizumab in Participants With Active Psoriatic Arthritis. Measure: Modified Total Sharp Score [mTSS])0.08 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.083
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain VAS

The VAS is an instrument used to measure a person's subjective quantitative evaluation of an item such as pain intensity. The VAS contains a continuous line between two end points whereby the respondent places a mark on the line to indicate his or her response. In this study, participants scored their pain intensity in the most affected joint of the gout flare on a 0 100 mm VAS. The scale ranged from 0 (no pain) to 100 (unbearable pain). The scores were measured to the nearest millimeter from the left. LS mean was calculated using Mixed Model Repeated Measurements (MMRM) analysis with treatment, baseline, geographic region, baseline conventional disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (cDMARD) experience, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: All randomized participants with baseline and post-baseline patient's assessment of pain data.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain VAS-14.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.68
Adalimumab Q2WChange From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain VAS-30.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.52
Ixekizumab Q4WChange From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain VAS-29.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.51
Ixekizumab Q2WChange From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain VAS-31.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.54
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Severity (PatGA) VAS

Participants scored their overall assessment of their PsA activity on a 0 to 100 mm horizontal VAS. The scale ranged from 0 (no disease activity) to 100 (extremely active disease activity). The scores were measured to the nearest millimeter from the left. LS mean was calculated using Mixed Model Repeated Measurements (MMRM) analysis with treatment, baseline, geographic region, baseline conventional disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (cDMARD) experience, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: All randomized participants with baseline and post-baseline patient's global assessment of disease activity data.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Severity (PatGA) VAS-14.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.65
Adalimumab Q2WChange From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Severity (PatGA) VAS-31.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.49
Ixekizumab Q4WChange From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Severity (PatGA) VAS-33.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.48
Ixekizumab Q2WChange From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Severity (PatGA) VAS-35.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.5
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS

The investigator was asked to give an overall assessment of the severity of the participant's current PsA activity using a 0 to 100 mm horizontal VAS. The scale ranged from 0 no disease activity to 100 extremely active disease activity. The scores were measured to the nearest millimeter from the left. Least Square (LS) mean was calculated using Mixed Model Repeated Measurements (MMRM) analysis with treatment, baseline, geographic region, baseline conventional disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (cDMARD) experience, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline, 24 Weeks

Population: All randomized participants with baseline and post-baseline physician's global assessment of disease activity data.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS-24.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.14
Adalimumab Q2WChange From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS-34.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.1
Ixekizumab Q4WChange From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS-38.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.06
Ixekizumab Q2WChange From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS-42.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.99
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Reported 16 Items (QIDS-SR16) (Quality of Life and Outcome Assessments. Measures: Patient Reported Outcomes [PRO])

The QIDS-SR16 is a self-administered 16-item instrument intended to assess the existence and severity of symptoms of depression. A participant is asked to consider each statement as it relates to the way they have felt for the past 7 days. Each item scaled from 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (all symptoms). The 16 items corresponding to 9 depression domains are summed to give a single score ranging from 0 to 27, with higher scores denoting greater symptom severity. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, baseline cDMARD experience, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: All randomized participants who had baseline and post baseline QIDS-SR16 data.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Reported 16 Items (QIDS-SR16) (Quality of Life and Outcome Assessments. Measures: Patient Reported Outcomes [PRO])-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.36
Adalimumab Q2WChange From Baseline in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Reported 16 Items (QIDS-SR16) (Quality of Life and Outcome Assessments. Measures: Patient Reported Outcomes [PRO])-1.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.33
Ixekizumab Q4WChange From Baseline in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Reported 16 Items (QIDS-SR16) (Quality of Life and Outcome Assessments. Measures: Patient Reported Outcomes [PRO])-0.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.32
Ixekizumab Q2WChange From Baseline in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Reported 16 Items (QIDS-SR16) (Quality of Life and Outcome Assessments. Measures: Patient Reported Outcomes [PRO])-0.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.32
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Counts (SJC)

SJC is calculated based on swelling response of 66 joints. SJC possible values range from 0 to 66. A lower SJC indicated less joint swelling. A higher SJC indicated more joint swelling. SJC is the number of swollen joints determined for each participant by examination of 66 joints. Joints were classified as either swollen or not swollen. Swelling was defined as palpable fluctuating synovitis of the joint. LS mean was calculated using Mixed Model Repeated Measurements (MMRM) analysis with treatment, baseline, geographic region, baseline conventional disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (cDMARD) experience, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: All randomized participants with baseline and post-baseline SJC data.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Swollen Joint Counts (SJC)-3.5 joint countsStandard Error 0.62
Adalimumab Q2WChange From Baseline in Swollen Joint Counts (SJC)-6.1 joint countsStandard Error 0.59
Ixekizumab Q4WChange From Baseline in Swollen Joint Counts (SJC)-7.0 joint countsStandard Error 0.59
Ixekizumab Q2WChange From Baseline in Swollen Joint Counts (SJC)-8.3 joint countsStandard Error 0.59
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Counts (TJC)

TJC is calculated based on tenderness response of 68 joints. TJC possible values range from 0 to 68. A lower TJC indicated less joint tenderness. A higher TJC indicated more joint tenderness. TJC is the number of tender and painful joints determined for each participant by examination of 68 joints. Joints were assessed by pressure and joint manipulation on physical examination. Participants were asked for pain sensations on these manipulations and watched for spontaneous pain reactions. Any positive response on pressure, movement, or both was translated into a single tender-versus-nontender dichotomy. LS mean was calculated using Mixed Model Repeated Measurements (MMRM) analysis with treatment, baseline, geographic region, baseline conventional disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (cDMARD) experience, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: All randomized participants with baseline and post-baseline TJC data.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Tender Joint Counts (TJC)-4.7 joint countsStandard Error 1.14
Adalimumab Q2WChange From Baseline in Tender Joint Counts (TJC)-10.1 joint countsStandard Error 1.1
Ixekizumab Q4WChange From Baseline in Tender Joint Counts (TJC)-11.9 joint countsStandard Error 1.08
Ixekizumab Q2WChange From Baseline in Tender Joint Counts (TJC)-13.6 joint countsStandard Error 1.09
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) Score Fingernail Involvement at Baseline

The NAPSI scale is used to evaluate the severity of fingernail bed Ps and fingernail matrix Ps by area of involvement. The fingernail is divided into quadrants. Each fingernail is given a score for fingernail bed Ps 0 (none) to 4 (Ps in 4 quadrants of the fingernail) and fingernail matrix Ps 0 (none) to 4 (Ps in 4 quadrants of the matrix), depending on the presence (score of 1) or absence (score of 0) of any of the features of fingernail bed or matrix Ps in each quadrant. The sum of all fingernails equals the total NAPSI score range is from 0 (no effect) to 80 (more severe psoriasis). LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, baseline cDMARD experience, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: All randomized participants who had baseline fingernail involvement, baseline NAPSI score and post baseline NAPSI score.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) Score Fingernail Involvement at Baseline-2.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.66
Adalimumab Q2WChange From Baseline in the Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) Score Fingernail Involvement at Baseline-10.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.49
Ixekizumab Q4WChange From Baseline in the Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) Score Fingernail Involvement at Baseline-14.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.54
Ixekizumab Q2WChange From Baseline in the Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) Score Fingernail Involvement at Baseline-15.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.49
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Anti-Ixekizumab Antibodies (TE-ADA) and Neutralizing Antibodies (NAb)

Number of participants with positive treatment emergent anti-ixekizumab antibodies and NAb was summarized by treatment group.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of ixe and had evaluable anti-ixekizumab antibody measurement at baseline and post baseline or had no evaluable baseline anti-ixekizumab antibody measurements. Immunogenicity data was not collected during the double-blind treatment period for participants in the adalimumab treatment group.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Anti-Ixekizumab Antibodies (TE-ADA) and Neutralizing Antibodies (NAb)Treatment Emergent (TE)0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Anti-Ixekizumab Antibodies (TE-ADA) and Neutralizing Antibodies (NAb)NAb0 participants
Adalimumab Q2WNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Anti-Ixekizumab Antibodies (TE-ADA) and Neutralizing Antibodies (NAb)Treatment Emergent (TE)6 participants
Adalimumab Q2WNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Anti-Ixekizumab Antibodies (TE-ADA) and Neutralizing Antibodies (NAb)NAb0 participants
Ixekizumab Q4WNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Anti-Ixekizumab Antibodies (TE-ADA) and Neutralizing Antibodies (NAb)Treatment Emergent (TE)5 participants
Ixekizumab Q4WNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Anti-Ixekizumab Antibodies (TE-ADA) and Neutralizing Antibodies (NAb)NAb0 participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR20 Response

ACR20 response is defined as a ≥20% improvement from baseline for TJC and SJC and in at least 3 of the following 5 criteria: Participant's assessment of Joint Pain VAS, Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS, Physician's Global Assessment of the Disease Activity VAS, Participant's Assessment of Physical Function using the HAQ-DI, or hs-CRP.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: All randomized participants. NRI is applied for inadequate responders at Week 16 and participants who had missing data at Week 24 for any reason including discontinuation.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving ACR20 Response31.1 percentage of participants
Adalimumab Q2WPercentage of Participants Achieving ACR20 Response51.5 percentage of participants
Ixekizumab Q4WPercentage of Participants Achieving ACR20 Response57.0 percentage of participants
Ixekizumab Q2WPercentage of Participants Achieving ACR20 Response60.2 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50 (ACR50) Response

ACR50 response is defined as a ≥50% improvement from baseline for TJC and SJC and in at least 3 of the following 5 criteria: Participant's assessment of Joint Pain VAS, Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS, Physician's Global Assessment of the Disease Activity VAS, Participant's Assessment of Physical Function using the HAQ-DI, or hs-CRP.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: All randomized participants. NRI is applied for inadequate responders at Week 16 and participants who had missing data at Week 24 for any reason including discontinuation.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50 (ACR50) Response15.1 percentage of participants
Adalimumab Q2WPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50 (ACR50) Response38.6 percentage of participants
Ixekizumab Q4WPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50 (ACR50) Response40.2 percentage of participants
Ixekizumab Q2WPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50 (ACR50) Response46.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70 (ACR70) Score

ACR70 response is defined as a ≥70% improvement from baseline for TJC and SJC and in at least 3 of the following 5 criteria: Participant's assessment of Joint Pain VAS, Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS, Physician's Global Assessment of the Disease Activity VAS, Participant's Assessment of Physical Function using the HAQ-DI, or hs-CRP.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: All randomized participants. NRI is applied for inadequate responders at Week 16 and participants who had missing data at Week 24 for any reason including discontinuation.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70 (ACR70) Score5.7 percentage of participants
Adalimumab Q2WPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70 (ACR70) Score25.7 percentage of participants
Ixekizumab Q4WPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70 (ACR70) Score23.4 percentage of participants
Ixekizumab Q2WPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70 (ACR70) Score34.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75%, 90%, 100% (PASI 75, 90, 100)

The PASI is an index that combines assessments of the extent of body-surface involvement in 4 anatomical regions (head, trunk, arms, and legs) and the severity of desquamation, erythema, and plaque induration/infiltration (thickness) in each region, yielding an overall score of 0 for no psoriasis to 72 for the most severe disease. Participants achieving PASI 75 were defined as having an improvement of at least 75% in the PASI compared to their baseline measures. Participants achieving PASI 90 were defined as having an improvement of ≥90% in the PASI score compared to baseline. Participants achieving PASI 100 were defined as having an improvement of 100% in the PASI score compared to baseline.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: All randomized participants with baseline psoriatic lesion(s) involving ≥3% BSA. NRI is applied for inadequate responders at Week 16 and participants who had missing data at Week 24 for any reason including discontinuation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75%, 90%, 100% (PASI 75, 90, 100)PASI 7510.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75%, 90%, 100% (PASI 75, 90, 100)PASI 1003.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75%, 90%, 100% (PASI 75, 90, 100)PASI 906.3 percentage of participants
Adalimumab Q2WPercentage of Participants Achieving Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75%, 90%, 100% (PASI 75, 90, 100)PASI 7555.2 percentage of participants
Adalimumab Q2WPercentage of Participants Achieving Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75%, 90%, 100% (PASI 75, 90, 100)PASI 10023.9 percentage of participants
Adalimumab Q2WPercentage of Participants Achieving Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75%, 90%, 100% (PASI 75, 90, 100)PASI 9037.3 percentage of participants
Ixekizumab Q4WPercentage of Participants Achieving Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75%, 90%, 100% (PASI 75, 90, 100)PASI 9056.2 percentage of participants
Ixekizumab Q4WPercentage of Participants Achieving Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75%, 90%, 100% (PASI 75, 90, 100)PASI 7571.2 percentage of participants
Ixekizumab Q4WPercentage of Participants Achieving Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75%, 90%, 100% (PASI 75, 90, 100)PASI 10042.5 percentage of participants
Ixekizumab Q2WPercentage of Participants Achieving Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75%, 90%, 100% (PASI 75, 90, 100)PASI 7580.4 percentage of participants
Ixekizumab Q2WPercentage of Participants Achieving Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75%, 90%, 100% (PASI 75, 90, 100)PASI 10053.6 percentage of participants
Ixekizumab Q2WPercentage of Participants Achieving Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75%, 90%, 100% (PASI 75, 90, 100)PASI 9067.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75%, 90%, 100% (PASI 75, 90, 100)

The PASI is an index that combines assessments of the extent of body-surface involvement in 4 anatomical regions (head, trunk, arms, and legs) and the severity of desquamation, erythema, and plaque induration/infiltration (thickness) in each region, yielding an overall score of 0 for no psoriasis to 72 for the most severe disease. Participants achieving PASI 75 were defined as having an improvement of at least 75% in the PASI compared to their baseline measures. Participants achieving PASI 90 were defined as having an improvement of ≥90% in the PASI score compared to baseline. Participants achieving PASI 100 were defined as having an improvement of 100% in the PASI score compared to baseline.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: All randomized participants with baseline psoriatic lesion(s) involving ≥3% BSA. NRI is applied for inadequate responders at Week 16 and participants who had missing data at Week 24 for any reason including discontinuation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75%, 90%, 100% (PASI 75, 90, 100)PASI 1001.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75%, 90%, 100% (PASI 75, 90, 100)PASI 757.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75%, 90%, 100% (PASI 75, 90, 100)PASI 901.5 percentage of participants
Adalimumab Q2WPercentage of Participants Achieving Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75%, 90%, 100% (PASI 75, 90, 100)PASI 9022.1 percentage of participants
Adalimumab Q2WPercentage of Participants Achieving Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75%, 90%, 100% (PASI 75, 90, 100)PASI 7533.8 percentage of participants
Adalimumab Q2WPercentage of Participants Achieving Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75%, 90%, 100% (PASI 75, 90, 100)PASI 10014.7 percentage of participants
Ixekizumab Q4WPercentage of Participants Achieving Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75%, 90%, 100% (PASI 75, 90, 100)PASI 10031.5 percentage of participants
Ixekizumab Q4WPercentage of Participants Achieving Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75%, 90%, 100% (PASI 75, 90, 100)PASI 7575.3 percentage of participants
Ixekizumab Q4WPercentage of Participants Achieving Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75%, 90%, 100% (PASI 75, 90, 100)PASI 9052.1 percentage of participants
Ixekizumab Q2WPercentage of Participants Achieving Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75%, 90%, 100% (PASI 75, 90, 100)PASI 9057.6 percentage of participants
Ixekizumab Q2WPercentage of Participants Achieving Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75%, 90%, 100% (PASI 75, 90, 100)PASI 7569.5 percentage of participants
Ixekizumab Q2WPercentage of Participants Achieving Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75%, 90%, 100% (PASI 75, 90, 100)PASI 10040.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) of 0 or 1 and With at Least a 2-point Improvement From Baseline

The sPGA is the physician's determination of the severity of the participant's psoriasis lesions overall at a given time point. Overall lesions were categorized by descriptions for induration, erythema, and scaling. For the analysis of responses, the participant's psoriasis was assessed at a given time point on in which 0 = clear, 1 = minimal, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe, 5 = very severe.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: All randomized participants who have plaque psoriasis and sPGA ≥3 at baseline. NRI is applied for inadequate responders at Week 16 and participants who had missing data at Week 24 for any reason including discontinuation.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) of 0 or 1 and With at Least a 2-point Improvement From Baseline17.1 percentage of participants
Adalimumab Q2WPercentage of Participants Achieving Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) of 0 or 1 and With at Least a 2-point Improvement From Baseline62.2 percentage of participants
Ixekizumab Q4WPercentage of Participants Achieving Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) of 0 or 1 and With at Least a 2-point Improvement From Baseline65.4 percentage of participants
Ixekizumab Q2WPercentage of Participants Achieving Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) of 0 or 1 and With at Least a 2-point Improvement From Baseline73.2 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Meeting the Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC Modified)

The PsARC is a composite criteria reported in terms of the percentage of participants achieving response according to the following criterion: TJC, SJC, PGA, and PatGA. Overall response is defined by improvement from baseline assessment in 2 of 4 criteria, 1 of which must be a joint count; there must not be worsening in any of the 4 criteria: at least 30% reduction in TJC, at least 30% reduction in SJC, at least a 20 millimeter (mm) reduction in PGA and at least a 20 mm reduction in PatGA which is equivalent to 20 mm reduction. The results from the 2 VAS measures were assessed as a difference from baseline in mm.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: All randomized participants. NRI is applied for inadequate responders at Week 16 and participants who had missing data at Week 24 for any reason including discontinuation.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Meeting the Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC Modified)32.1 percentage of participants
Adalimumab Q2WPercentage of Participants Meeting the Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC Modified)58.4 percentage of participants
Ixekizumab Q4WPercentage of Participants Meeting the Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC Modified)57.9 percentage of participants
Ixekizumab Q2WPercentage of Participants Meeting the Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC Modified)66.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA)

The investigator evaluated the percentage involvement of psoriasis on each participant's BSA on a continuous scale from 0% = no involvement to 100% = full involvement, where 1% corresponded to the size of the participant's handprint including the palm, fingers, and thumb. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, baseline cDMARD experience, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: All randomized participants who have plaque psoriasis at baseline and who had baseline and post baseline BSA data.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA)-2.7 percent change in BSAStandard Error 1.36
Adalimumab Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA)-9.5 percent change in BSAStandard Error 1.35
Ixekizumab Q4WPercent Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA)-12.0 percent change in BSAStandard Error 1.32
Ixekizumab Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA)-10.6 percent change in BSAStandard Error 1.39
Secondary

Percent Change in American College of Rheumatology-N (ACR-N) Score

The ACR-N score is a continuous measure of clinical, laboratory, and functional outcomes that characterizes the percentage of improvement from baseline in disease activity and the lowest of either a) the percent change in tender joint count (TJC) b) the percent change in swollen joint count (SJC), or c) the median percent change of the remaining 5 ACR core criteria. An ACR-N score of X has improvement of at least X% in both TJC and SJC and a median improvement of at least X% in 5 criteria: patient's assessment of arthritis pain, PatGA, PGA, HAQ-DI and hs-CRP. ACR-N is calculated by allowing for negative results which indicate worsening. LS mean was calculated using Mixed Model Repeated Measurements (MMRM) analysis with treatment, baseline, geographic region, baseline conventional disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (cDMARD) experience, visit, and treatment.

Time frame: Baseline, 24 Weeks

Population: All randomized participants with post-baseline ACR data.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercent Change in American College of Rheumatology-N (ACR-N) Score-4.182 percent changeStandard Error 6.1417
Adalimumab Q2WPercent Change in American College of Rheumatology-N (ACR-N) Score28.517 percent changeStandard Error 5.9189
Ixekizumab Q4WPercent Change in American College of Rheumatology-N (ACR-N) Score33.509 percent changeStandard Error 5.8905
Ixekizumab Q2WPercent Change in American College of Rheumatology-N (ACR-N) Score30.391 percent changeStandard Error 5.9736

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 12, 2026