Skip to content

OPtimal Type 2 dIabetes Management Including Benchmarking and Standard Treatment in CEEMEA

OPtimal Type 2 dIabetes Management Including Benchmarking and Standard Treatment in CEEMEA (OPTIMISE)

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01694758
Acronym
OPTIMISE
Enrollment
733
Registered
2012-09-27
Start date
2012-11-30
Completion date
2014-03-31
Last updated
2014-08-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Non-Insulin-Dependent

Keywords

Benchmarking could improve quality of patient care, ESC and ATP III Guidelines

Brief summary

OPTIMISE-CEEMEA is a multinational, multi-centre, observational, prospective study which will include patients suffering from diabetes type 2, treated or untreated, insulin dependent or not insulin dependent. In this study we aim to explore at a primary care level whether the use of benchmarking against a set of guideline-based reference values on a patient basis, may improve quality of patient care, in particular control of diabetes, lipids and blood pressure.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

AstraZeneca
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects suffering from diabetes type 2, * treated or untreated, * insulin dependent or not insulin dependent Able to read and send SMS (if SMS applicable)

Exclusion criteria

* Type 1 diabetes Pregnancy diabetes * Hospitalization at the moment of enrollment in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of patients in the benchmarking group achieving pre-set targets for HbA1c1after 12 months of follow-upTo investigate whether the use of benchmarking could improve quality of patient care, in particular the control of diabetes, lipids and blood pressure, expressed as the percentage of patients in the benchmarking group achieving pre-set targets for HbA1c1

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of patient care improvement, in particular the control of diabetes, lipids and blood pressureafter 12 months of follow-up versus baselineTo investigate whether the use of benchmarking could improve quality of patient care, in particular the control of diabetes, lipids and blood pressure
Markers of preventive screeningafter 12 months of follow-up versus baselineTo follow up evolution markers of preventive screening; retinopathy, neuropathy, dietary counseling, smoking habits, BMI, waist circumference, physical activity
The LDL cholesterol parameter of the primary and secondary objectives according to ATP III guidelinesafter 12 months of follow-up versus baselineTo investigate the LDL cholesterol parameter of the primary and secondary objectives according to ATP III guidelines

Countries

Bulgaria, Romania

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026