Skip to content

Omega-3 Fatty Acids for Hyperactivity Treatment in Autism Spectrum Disorder

Effectiveness of Omega-3 Fatty Acids for the Reduction of Hyperactivity in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01694667
Enrollment
57
Registered
2012-09-27
Start date
2012-09-30
Completion date
2013-05-31
Last updated
2020-08-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Autism Spectrum Disorders, Hyperactivity

Brief summary

The proposed study is an internet-based, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial which will assess changes in hyperactivity in children ages five through eight with an autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and elevated levels of hyperactivity. In order to answer this question, this study will assess changes in hyperactivity as measured by the Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) in children with ASD and elevated baseline levels of hyperactivity who are randomly assigned to use 1.3 grams of omega-3 fatty acids daily compared to placebo. The overwhelming majority of study procedures, including recruitment, informed consent, assessment of inclusion and exclusion criteria, and collection of baseline and outcome measures will take place over the internet.

Detailed description

Families and caregivers of children enrolled in the IAN Research between the age 5-8 and with an established diagnosis of autism will be invited to participate in the study by e-mail. All of these families have previously given consent to be contacted about research opportunities. Families who respond to the e-mail recruitment letter will undergo a brief screening process to determine if the child has any exclusion criteria and to ensure the child is age 5-8, has an autism spectrum disorder, and has elevated baseline levels of hyperactivity. Families will undergo an on-line informed consent process including assent of the child. All participants will be given an opportunity to speak with a study team member should they have any questions about the study or the informed consent process. Participants will sign the informed consent using an electronic signature, a process that has been used previously in the IAN network and approved by the John's Hopkins Institutional Review Board (IRB). Families meeting all eligibility criteria will be randomly assigned and mailed the study medication (omega-3 or placebo) which will be administered to children by the parents twice daily for six weeks. Both the study medication and the matching placebo are an orange-flavored pudding that is specifically designed to be palatable for young children. Assessment of child hyperactivity, social functioning, and overall disease severity will be measured at baseline, three and six weeks by the parents, who will complete on-line standard questionnaires; ABC, Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS), clinical Global Impressions Scale (CGI). Side effects will be assessed every week by e-mail, and any report of a side effect will immediately be followed-up with telephone contact from the PI. Although omega-3 fatty acids are extremely safe in the prescribed doses, the PI or another study physician will still be on call 24-hours-a-day, 7-days-a-week to speak to participants about possible adverse events or new medical problems (all enrolled families are provided with this 24-hour emergency phone contact information). As part of the weekly e-mail reminder, parents will also be asked to log the medication that was provided to their children each day of the previous week to measure medication adherence.

Interventions

DRUGOmega-3 Fatty Acids

Omega-3 fatty acids will be delivered in orange-flavored pudding packets (Coromega®, Vista, CA). Each packet contains 650 mg of omega-3 fatty acids, 350mg of eicosapentanoic acid (EPA), 230mg of docosahexanoic acid (DHA) and 2,000 mg of fish oil 18/12, and will be given twice daily for a daily dose of 1.3 grams of omega-3 fatty acids (and 1.1 grams of DHA + EPA).

OTHERPlacebo

Placebo packets will have same orange-flavored pudding as active Omega-3 fatty acids comparator with an identical appearance and taste, but will include safflower oil instead of the fish oil. One placebo packet will be given twice daily.

Sponsors

University of California, San Francisco
CollaboratorOTHER
Hugo W. Moser Research Institute at Kennedy Krieger, Inc.
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
5 Years to 8 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Children who are participating in Interactive Autism Network (IAN) Research Families 2. Diagnosis of (Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) by a professional and Social Communication Question (SCQ) score\>12 3. Age 5-8 4. Aberrant Behavior Checklist - Hyperactivity subscale (ABC-H)\>20

Exclusion criteria

1. Children in foster care and each parent must affirm that they are the biological or adoptive parent of the child 2. Allergy to fish 3. Bleeding disorder, current use of anticoagulant or anti-platelet therapy, or recent or planned surgery 4. Any major medical illness that interferes with regular school attendance 5. Current or recent (past six months) use of omega-3 fatty acid 6. Siblings with ASD

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Aberrant Behavior Checklist - Hyperactivity Subscale (ABC-H) ScoreBaseline, 6 weeks (3 week value to be collected)The Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) is a 58-item survey. Items are rated on a 4-point scale from 0=no problem to 3=major problem. Higher scores indicate greater severity. Scores can be computed for five subscales: hyperactivity, lethargy, stereotypical behavior, irritability, and inappropriate speech. The hyperactivity subscale is comprised of 16 items. The outcome measure is the change from baseline to 6 weeks. The total score ranges from 0 to 48.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Aberrant Behavior Checklist - Stereotypy Subscale ScoreBaseline, Week 6The Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) is a 58-item survey. Items are rated on a 4-point scale from 0=no problem to 3=major problem. Higher scores indicate greater severity. Scores can be computed for five subscales: hyperactivity, lethargy, stereotypical behavior, irritability, and inappropriate speech. The stereotypy subscale is comprised of 7 items. The outcome measure is the change from baseline to six weeks in the scale. Total score ranges from 0 to 21.
Aberrant Behavior Checklist - Irritability Subscale ScoreBaseline, Week 6The Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) is a 58-item survey. Items are rated on a 4-point scale from 0=no problem to 3=major problem. Higher scores indicate greater severity. Scores can be computed for five subscales: hyperactivity, lethargy, stereotypical behavior, irritability, and inappropriate speech. The irritability subscale is comprised of 15 items. The outcome measure is the change from baseline to six weeks in the scale. Total score ranges from 0 to 45.
Change in Aberrant Behavior Checklist - Lethargy Subscale ScoreBaseline, Week 6The Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) is a 58-item survey. Items are rated on a 4-point scale from 0=no problem to 3=major problem. Higher scores indicate greater severity. Scores can be computed for five subscales: hyperactivity, lethargy, stereotypical behavior, irritability, and inappropriate speech. The lethargy subscale is comprised of 16 items. The outcome measure is the change from baseline to six weeks in the scale. Total score ranges from 0 to 48.
Change in Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) ScoreBaseline, Week 6Social interaction will be assessed with the SRS. This scale examines the presence and extent of autistic social impairment and is administered by parents or teachers of children with ASD. Higher scores are indicative of greater severity. Normative data have been derived from a sample of over 1,600 children. A total Total-score of 76 or higher is considered severe and strongly associated with a clinical diagnosis of Autistic Disorder. T-scores of 66 through 75 are interpreted as indicating Moderate deficiencies in reciprocal social behavior that are clinically significant and lead to substantial interference in everyday social interactions, whereas T-scores of 60 to 65 are in the Mild range and indicate mild to moderate deficits in social interaction. T scores of 59 and below are considered to be within typical limits and generally not associated with clinically significant ASD.
Change in Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreBaseline, Week 6Measures the clinical impression of improvement on a 7-point Likert scale (ranging from 1 - very much improved - to 7 - very much worse) is a commonly used measure of overall improvement in intervention studies of children with ASD. This tool will be completed by the parent and caregiver, and is therefore considered a modified version of the instrument, which is normally completed by a clinician. This is considered an exploratory analysis of this outcome tool since it is being used in a non-standard fashion. The number of participants who responded in each group is the number where the parents reported that their child was improved, much improved, or very much improved.
Aberrant Behavior Checklist - Inappropriate Speech Subscale ScoreBaseline, Week 6The Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) is a 58-item survey. Items are rated on a 4-point scale from 0=no problem to 3=major problem. Higher scores indicate greater severity. Scores can be computed for five subscales: hyperactivity, lethargy, stereotypical behavior, irritability, and inappropriate speech. The inappropriate speech subscale is comprised of 4 items. The outcome measure is the change from baseline to six weeks in the scale. Total score ranges from 0 to 12.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment was limited to children between the ages of 5 and 8 with ASD and some verbal ability. E-mail invitations were sent to the 863 registered IAN members who met the above criteria and had given prior consent to be contacted about research opportunities between September 18, 2012 and October 31, 2012.

Pre-assignment details

During the six-week recruitment period, 118 families expressed interest and completed the on-line screening form. Fifty-seven children from 28 states were deemed eligible and randomly assigned to study treatment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Omega-3
Participants randomized to omega-3
29
Placebo
Participants randomized to placebo
28
Total57

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalPlaceboOmega-3
ABC-Hyperactivity28.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
28.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.6
28.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.4
ABC-Inappropriate Speech6.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.2
5.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.8
7.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.4
ABC-Irritability18.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.7
16.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3
20.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.9
ABC-Lethargy10.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.1
8.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.2
12.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.8
ABC-Stereotypy6.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.5
5.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.7
8.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
Age, Continuous86.6 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.7
85.0 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.2
88.2 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
4 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
47 Participants23 Participants24 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants4 Participants3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
50 Participants24 Participants26 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
10 / 296 / 28
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 290 / 28

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Aberrant Behavior Checklist - Hyperactivity Subscale (ABC-H) Score

The Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) is a 58-item survey. Items are rated on a 4-point scale from 0=no problem to 3=major problem. Higher scores indicate greater severity. Scores can be computed for five subscales: hyperactivity, lethargy, stereotypical behavior, irritability, and inappropriate speech. The hyperactivity subscale is comprised of 16 items. The outcome measure is the change from baseline to 6 weeks. The total score ranges from 0 to 48.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks (3 week value to be collected)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Omega-3Change in Aberrant Behavior Checklist - Hyperactivity Subscale (ABC-H) Score-5.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.2
PlaceboChange in Aberrant Behavior Checklist - Hyperactivity Subscale (ABC-H) Score-3.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.5
Secondary

Aberrant Behavior Checklist - Inappropriate Speech Subscale Score

The Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) is a 58-item survey. Items are rated on a 4-point scale from 0=no problem to 3=major problem. Higher scores indicate greater severity. Scores can be computed for five subscales: hyperactivity, lethargy, stereotypical behavior, irritability, and inappropriate speech. The inappropriate speech subscale is comprised of 4 items. The outcome measure is the change from baseline to six weeks in the scale. Total score ranges from 0 to 12.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 6

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Omega-3Aberrant Behavior Checklist - Inappropriate Speech Subscale Score-0.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
PlaceboAberrant Behavior Checklist - Inappropriate Speech Subscale Score-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
Secondary

Aberrant Behavior Checklist - Irritability Subscale Score

The Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) is a 58-item survey. Items are rated on a 4-point scale from 0=no problem to 3=major problem. Higher scores indicate greater severity. Scores can be computed for five subscales: hyperactivity, lethargy, stereotypical behavior, irritability, and inappropriate speech. The irritability subscale is comprised of 15 items. The outcome measure is the change from baseline to six weeks in the scale. Total score ranges from 0 to 45.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 6

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Omega-3Aberrant Behavior Checklist - Irritability Subscale Score-2.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.9
PlaceboAberrant Behavior Checklist - Irritability Subscale Score-2.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.4
Secondary

Change in Aberrant Behavior Checklist - Lethargy Subscale Score

The Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) is a 58-item survey. Items are rated on a 4-point scale from 0=no problem to 3=major problem. Higher scores indicate greater severity. Scores can be computed for five subscales: hyperactivity, lethargy, stereotypical behavior, irritability, and inappropriate speech. The lethargy subscale is comprised of 16 items. The outcome measure is the change from baseline to six weeks in the scale. Total score ranges from 0 to 48.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 6

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Omega-3Change in Aberrant Behavior Checklist - Lethargy Subscale Score-2.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.2
PlaceboChange in Aberrant Behavior Checklist - Lethargy Subscale Score0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Secondary

Change in Aberrant Behavior Checklist - Stereotypy Subscale Score

The Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) is a 58-item survey. Items are rated on a 4-point scale from 0=no problem to 3=major problem. Higher scores indicate greater severity. Scores can be computed for five subscales: hyperactivity, lethargy, stereotypical behavior, irritability, and inappropriate speech. The stereotypy subscale is comprised of 7 items. The outcome measure is the change from baseline to six weeks in the scale. Total score ranges from 0 to 21.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 6

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Omega-3Change in Aberrant Behavior Checklist - Stereotypy Subscale Score-2.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.7
PlaceboChange in Aberrant Behavior Checklist - Stereotypy Subscale Score-0.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Secondary

Change in Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Score

Measures the clinical impression of improvement on a 7-point Likert scale (ranging from 1 - very much improved - to 7 - very much worse) is a commonly used measure of overall improvement in intervention studies of children with ASD. This tool will be completed by the parent and caregiver, and is therefore considered a modified version of the instrument, which is normally completed by a clinician. This is considered an exploratory analysis of this outcome tool since it is being used in a non-standard fashion. The number of participants who responded in each group is the number where the parents reported that their child was improved, much improved, or very much improved.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 6

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Omega-3Change in Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Score12 # parents reporting improvement
PlaceboChange in Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Score10 # parents reporting improvement
Secondary

Change in Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) Score

Social interaction will be assessed with the SRS. This scale examines the presence and extent of autistic social impairment and is administered by parents or teachers of children with ASD. Higher scores are indicative of greater severity. Normative data have been derived from a sample of over 1,600 children. A total Total-score of 76 or higher is considered severe and strongly associated with a clinical diagnosis of Autistic Disorder. T-scores of 66 through 75 are interpreted as indicating Moderate deficiencies in reciprocal social behavior that are clinically significant and lead to substantial interference in everyday social interactions, whereas T-scores of 60 to 65 are in the Mild range and indicate mild to moderate deficits in social interaction. T scores of 59 and below are considered to be within typical limits and generally not associated with clinically significant ASD.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 6

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Omega-3Change in Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) Score-2.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.3
PlaceboChange in Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) Score-6.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.8

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 21, 2026