Skip to content

Assessment of the Efficacy of an Intradiscal Injection of Corticoids in Modic I Discopathies.

Assessment of the Efficacy of an Intradiscal Injection of Corticoids in Modic I Discopathies.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01694134
Acronym
MODISC
Enrollment
50
Registered
2012-09-26
Start date
2012-07-12
Completion date
2017-03-20
Last updated
2020-02-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Low Back Pain, Lumbago, Modic I Discopathy

Keywords

Discopathy, Modic I, Corticoids, Local Anaesthetic, Intradiscal injection

Brief summary

The treatment of chronic low back pain is a major objective of public healthcare, because it causes an important number of sick leaves. A correlation between clinical observations and an inflammatory discopathy has been underlined, but there is currently any reference treatment. In this study, the main objective is to assess the efficacy of an intradiscal injection of corticoids versus local anaesthetic on the treatment of pain of patients with low back pain associated to a Modic I discopathy.

Detailed description

This is a randomized, controlled, single-blind with two arms (anaesthetic versus corticoids) trial.

Interventions

DRUGHydrocortancyl.

Patients will receive an intradiscal injection of hydrocortancyl.

DRUGLidocaine

Sponsors

University Hospital, Montpellier
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age between 18 and 80 years * Signed Informed consent * Low back pain for more than 6 months associated with Modic I discopathy (diagnosed by MRI)

Exclusion criteria

* Past history of lumbar surgery * Patient under anticoagulant or antisludge treatment, or with coagulation troubles * Patient with unbalanced diabetes mellitus (blood glucose \> 1.30 g/l) * Patient with unstabilized high blood pressure (\> 160/95 mmHg) * Patient with evolving infection * Patient with iodine allergy or one of the Hydrocortancyl® or Lidocaine components * Porphyria, hypersensitivity to local anaesthetic * Patient with sphincter troubles showing a cauda equine syndrome * Untreated psychotic state * Pregnant women or of childbearing age without effective contraception means * Impossible 6 months follow-up * Participation to another trial * Vulnerable persons protected by the law * Persons under guardianship * Persons unable to express their consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain assessment: VAS1 monthThe pain will be assessed by the visual analog scale (VAS).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain assessment: VAS1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, 3 months, 6 monthsThe pain will be assessed by the visual analog scale (VAS).
Quality of life assessment: SF-361 month, 3 months, 6 monthsQuality of life will be assessed by the self-questionnaire SF-36.
Consumption of analgesics and NSAIDs assessment1 month, 3 months,6 months
Specific low back pain parameters assessment1 month, 3 months,6 monthsLow back pain parameters will be assessed by the Dallas scale.The Dallas Pain Questionnaire (DPQ) assesses the impact of low back pain (LBP) on four components (0-100) of daily life .
Employment status1 month, 3 months,6 monthsEmployment or non-employment status will be noted

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026