Skip to content

Mid-HDF Randomized Controlled Study on Outcome

Mid-dilution Hemodiafiltration International Randomized Prospective Study on Incident Patients Focused on Outcome

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01693354
Acronym
MILESTONE
Enrollment
500
Registered
2012-09-26
Start date
2012-09-30
Completion date
2018-09-30
Last updated
2017-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

End Stage Renal Disease

Keywords

dialysis, mortality, cardiovascular stability, inflammation, quality of life

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether mid-dilution hemodiafiltration is effective in the reduction of the crude mortality risk in patients who have been undergoing renal replacement treatment for less than 1 year. Patients will be randomized since the beginning of the study in two groups: standard HF dialysis and mid-dilution HDF.

Detailed description

It is a matter of fact that in the last decades the Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) population has widely changed. In Italy, for example, more than 50% of the incident dialysis patients are more than 70 year old, with diabetic and hypertension being the major underlying diseases; moreover a great percentage of the patients starts dialysis with a burden of at least 1-2 comorbidities \[1\]. Online hemodiafiltration (online HDF) has been recently associated with better patient survival in comparison with standard hemodialysis in two large trials \[2,3\]; the overall relative risk of mortality was found to be approximately 33% lower in patients treated with online HDF \[2,3\]. These impressive results were not obtained anyway on the whole population, but in a sub-group analysis. A strong correlation was found between the total convective volume obtained and the mortality risk reduction; HDF was found to be significantly better than standard hemodialysis when a total convective volume of 19-22 L/session (in 4 hours sessions of post-dilution HDF) was achieved. These results support the importance of the adequate convective dose concept in order to improve the patient outcomes especially in frail patients, as recently demonstrated by a large randomised control trial, the MPO study \[4\], comparing High Flux versus Low Flux dialysis in patients with plasma albumin levels equal to or less than 4 gr/dl ( as a marker of patient comorbidities) and, in a post hoc analysis, in diabetic patients \[4\]. Mid-dilution HDF is a variant of classical HDF combining simultaneous pre- and post.-dilution in order to maximise middle and large solutes removal. The MILESTONE study would aim to fully demonstrate for mid-dilution HDF the significant mortality risk reduction observed in the recent mentioned studies.

Interventions

DEVICEMid-dilution HDF

Mid-dilution HDF is a special, newly developed variant of online HDF which is characterized by a dedicated high-flux hemodialyzer named OLPUR MD able to support simultaneous pre- and post-dilution

DEVICEHF dialysis

Standard hemodialyzers equipped with high permeability polyphenylene/polyethersulfone membranes

Sponsors

IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* On a thrice/week RRT for at least 3 months * Dialysis vintage \> 3 months * Signed informed consent * Blood flow \> 300 mL/min

Exclusion criteria

* On waiting list for living-donor transplant * Residual diuresis \> 500 mL/day * Inability, as judget by the investigator, to follow or understand the protocol instructions * Active neoplastic disease * Single needle treatment * Patients with expectancy life lower than 6 months * Inclusion to other studies * Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
crude, all-causes mortality5 yearsThe primary objective will be assessed by the incidence rate of fatal events

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cardiovascular morbidity5 yearsIt will be assessed by taking into consideration: * Number of hospital admissions related to non fatal major CV events * Length of stay during hospitalization
Quality of life and dialysis tolerance evaluated by questionnaire1 yearIt will be assessed by taking into consideration: \- Results of the SF-36 questionnaire given to the patients
Micro-inflammation evaluation1 yearIt will be assessed by measuring the pre-dialysis serum levels of: IL-6 CR Myoglobin RbP p-cresylsulfate beta2-microglobulin. The hospitals' laboratories will be in charge for the sample collection and analysis
Nutrition and anaemia management1 yearIt will be assessed by taking in consideration the pre-dialysis serum levels of: Hb albumin iron. ESAs and iron supplementation will be as well noted in apposite CRF.

Countries

Belgium, France, Italy, Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026