Skip to content

Evaluation of the Phased Radio Frequency Ablation System

Evaluation of Multielectrode Phased RF Technology in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01693120
Acronym
VICTORY-AF
Enrollment
199
Registered
2012-09-26
Start date
2013-11-30
Completion date
2017-02-07
Last updated
2025-02-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Keywords

ablation, atrial fibrillation, Radio frequency

Brief summary

VICTORY AF is an IDE, prospective global, multi-center, single arm, controlled, unblinded, investigational clinical study. The purpose of this clinical study is to evaluate the risk of procedure and/or device related strokes in subjects with persistent or long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing ablation with the Phased RF System.

Interventions

DEVICEMedtronic Phased RF Ablation System

Phased RF ablation

Sponsors

Medtronic Cardiac Ablation Solutions
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Treatment with Phased RF Ablation System

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* History of symptomatic persistent or long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation * Failure of at least one anti-arrhythmic drug

Exclusion criteria

* Structural heart disease * Prior ablation in left atrium for AF * Known sensitivities (or allergy) to heparin, warfarin, contrast media * Contraindicated for MRI * Invasive cardiovascular procedure performed or planned within 3 month period of ablation procedure

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Procedure and/or Device Related Stroke30 daysA stroke with with a symptom onset date within 30 days of an ablation procedure where at least one Phased RF ablation catheter was deployed into the left atrium considered related to the procedure and/or the investigational device by the independent clinical events committee

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
6-month Post-procedure Effectiveness6 monthsFor a participant, the 6-month effectiveness defined as meeting all of the following criteria: (1) acute procedural success, (2) greater than 90% reduction in atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter episodes lasting longer than 10 minutes as measured by 48-hour ambulatory ECG, (3) No amiodarone use for 90 days and no class I or class III antiarrhythmic drugs for at least 60 days prior to 6-month ambulatory ECG, and (4) free from direct current cardioversion for at least 60 days prior to the 6-month ambulatory ECG
Number of Participants With Acute Procedural Success30 minutesAcute procedural success defined as: (1) Only Phased RF ablation catheters used in the left atrium, (2) all targeted pulmonary veins isolated, (3) all complex fractionated atrial electrograms and high frequency intracardiac electrogram amplitudes were mapped and ablated, and (4) sinus rhythm was restored at the end of the ablation procedure (with or without cardioversion)
Number of Participants With Pulmonary Vein Stenosis3 monthsGreater than 70 percent reduction in the luminal diameter in any one or more of the pulmonary veins following a Phased RF ablation procedure

Countries

Canada, Hungary, Netherlands, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The first subject was enrolled on 05 November 2013 and the first Phased RF procedure occurred on 17 December 2013. Enrollment into the VICTORY AF study was closed on 26 June 2016 prior to reaching the target sample size due to slower than expected enrollment rate.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ablation
Phased RF ablation Medtronic Phased RF Ablation System: Phased RF ablation
129
Total129

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
EnrollmentAdverse Event1
EnrollmentLost to Follow-up1
EnrollmentOther1
EnrollmentPhysician Decision3
EnrollmentProtocol Violation46
EnrollmentStudy closed8
EnrollmentWithdrawal by Subject10
Phased RF Study Procedure and Follow-upLost to Follow-up1
Phased RF Study Procedure and Follow-upOther reasons7
Phased RF Study Procedure and Follow-upPhysician Decision3
Phased RF Study Procedure and Follow-upProtocol Violation1
Phased RF Study Procedure and Follow-upWithdrawal by Subject5

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAblation
Age, Continuous60.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.7
Atrial fibrillation type
long-term persistent atrial fibrillation
21 Participants
Atrial fibrillation type
persistent atrial fibrillation
108 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
123 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
10 participants
Region of Enrollment
Hungary
5 participants
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
13 participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
7 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
94 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
26 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
103 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 129
other
Total, other adverse events
38 / 129
serious
Total, serious adverse events
28 / 129

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Procedure and/or Device Related Stroke

A stroke with with a symptom onset date within 30 days of an ablation procedure where at least one Phased RF ablation catheter was deployed into the left atrium considered related to the procedure and/or the investigational device by the independent clinical events committee

Time frame: 30 days

Population: All subjects with a Phased RF ablation procedure who did not have a non-investigational catheter placed in the left atrium

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
AblationNumber of Participants With Procedure and/or Device Related Stroke2 Participants
Comparison: The null hypothesis was that the procedure or device related stroke rate within 30-days of a Phased RF ablation procedure was 3.5% or greater. The alternative hypothesis was that this rate was less than 3.5%. A sample size of 300 subjects provided 90% power to test the null hypothesis assuming the true stroke rate was 1.0% with a one-sided type I error rate of 0.05p-value: 0.175exact binomial test
Secondary

6-month Post-procedure Effectiveness

For a participant, the 6-month effectiveness defined as meeting all of the following criteria: (1) acute procedural success, (2) greater than 90% reduction in atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter episodes lasting longer than 10 minutes as measured by 48-hour ambulatory ECG, (3) No amiodarone use for 90 days and no class I or class III antiarrhythmic drugs for at least 60 days prior to 6-month ambulatory ECG, and (4) free from direct current cardioversion for at least 60 days prior to the 6-month ambulatory ECG

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Of the 129 subjects with an index Phased RF ablation procedure, 114 were evaluable for the 6-month efficacy objective. There were 15 subjects that were not included in the 6-month efficacy objective; 13 due to study exit prior to the 6-month visit and 2 due to no 6-month ambulatory ECG

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Ablation6-month Post-procedure Effectiveness60 Participants
95% CI: [43.1, 62.1]
Secondary

Number of Participants With Acute Procedural Success

Acute procedural success defined as: (1) Only Phased RF ablation catheters used in the left atrium, (2) all targeted pulmonary veins isolated, (3) all complex fractionated atrial electrograms and high frequency intracardiac electrogram amplitudes were mapped and ablated, and (4) sinus rhythm was restored at the end of the ablation procedure (with or without cardioversion)

Time frame: 30 minutes

Population: All subjects who underwent a Phased RF study procedure

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
AblationNumber of Participants With Acute Procedural Success117 Participants
Comparison: There was no prespecified hypothesis tested.95% CI: [84.3, 95.1]
Secondary

Number of Participants With Pulmonary Vein Stenosis

Greater than 70 percent reduction in the luminal diameter in any one or more of the pulmonary veins following a Phased RF ablation procedure

Time frame: 3 months

Population: Number of subjects selected for participation in the pulmonary vein assessment cohort with baseline and 3-month evaluable magnetic resonance imaging scans of the pulmonary veins

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
AblationNumber of Participants With Pulmonary Vein Stenosis0 Participants
Comparison: There was no pre-specified hypothesis to test95% CI: [0, 6.1]

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026