Skip to content

Study to Compare Safety and Efficacy of HX575 Epoetin Alfa and US-licensed Epoetin Alfa

Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of HX575 Epoetin Alfa vs. US Licensed Epoetin Alfa (Epogen®/Procrit®) in the Treatment of Anemia Associated With Chronic Kidney Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01693029
Acronym
ACCESS
Enrollment
435
Registered
2012-09-26
Start date
2012-09-30
Completion date
2015-03-31
Last updated
2017-07-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anemia, Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD)

Keywords

erythropoietin alfa, CKD 5d

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to show biosimilarity of HX575 epoetin alfa with the US licensed reference product Epogen®/Procrit® when applied subcutaneously. This study is intended to generate data supporting that the efficacy and safety under treatment with HX575 and Epogen®/Procrit® are comparable.

Detailed description

This is a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HX575 epoetin alfa vs. US-licensed epoetin alfa (Epogen®/Procrit®) in the treatment of anemia associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD).

Interventions

DRUGHX575 epoetin alfa

Solution for subcutaneous injection. The drug is administered subcutaneously at least once per week over 52 weeks. The dose will be individually titrated to maintain hemoglobin levels between 10 to 11 g/dL.

DRUGUS-licensed epoetin alfa

Solution for subcutaneous injection.

Sponsors

Sandoz
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with end stage renal disease (stage CKD 5d), receiving stable subcutaneous maintenance therapy with Epogen® or Procrit® at least once per week * Mean hemoglobin level between 9.0 - 11.5 g/dL during the screening period * Adequate iron substitution

Exclusion criteria

* Contraindications for Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agent (ESA) therapy * History of Pure Red Cell Aplasia (PRCA), or anti-erythropoietin (EPO) antibodies * Known Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) or Hepatitis B infection * Hepatitis C infection on an active treatment * Symptomatic congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association \[NYHA\] class III and IV) * Unstable angina pectoris, or cardiac infarction during the last 6 months prior to randomization * Percutaneous coronary intervention, or coronary artery bypass grafting during the last 6 months prior to randomization * History of malignancy of any organ system * Systemic lupus erythematous * Immunocompromized patients Other In-/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Absolute Change in Hemoglobin Levels Between the Screening/Baseline Period (Week -4 to Day 1) and the Evaluation Period (Week 21-28)Week -4 to Day1 and Week 21-28Response to epoetin alfa in anemic patients with chronic renal failure is manifested by increased hematocrit, hemoglobin, reduced transfusion requirements and increase in quality of life. Hemoglobin (laboratory haematology parameter) is the primary endpoint of the study .
Change in Mean Hb Level Between Baseline (Week -4 to Day1) and Evaluation Period (Week 21-28)Week -4 to Day1 and Week 21-28Response to epoetin alfa in anemic patients with chronic renal failure is manifested by increased hematocrit, hemoglobin, reduced transfusion requirements and increase in quality of life. Hemoglobin (laboratory haematology parameter) is the primary endpoint of the study .

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Weekly Dose During Evaluation Period (Week 21-28)Week 21-28Mean weekly study drug dose during evaluation period (Week 21-28)
Incidence of Antibody Formation Against Epoetin52 weeksNumber of patients with positive antidrug antibody (ADA) finding at any time during their treatment period. Count includes 2 patients (1 in each arm) that already had a positive ADA Baseline finding. ADA testing performed by by Radio-Immuno-Precipitation assay. No patient developed neutralizing antibodies.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
HX575 Epoetin Alfa
HX575, recombinant human epoetin alfa HX575 epoetin alfa: Solution for subcutaneous injection. The drug is administered subcutaneously at least once per week over 52 weeks. The dose will be individually titrated to maintain hemoglobin levels between 10 to 11 g/dL.
217
US-licensed Epoetin Alfa
US-licensed recombinant human epoetin alfa US-licensed epoetin alfa: Solution for subcutaneous injection.
218
Total435

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event16
Overall StudyBindinging anti-EPO antibodies62
Overall StudyChange in dialysis modality21
Overall StudyDeath58
Overall StudyKidney transplantation77
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up01
Overall StudyNon-compliance21
Overall StudyPhysician Decision02
Overall StudyProtocol Violation67
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1522

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHX575 Epoetin AlfaTotalUS-licensed Epoetin Alfa
Age, Continuous59.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.76
58.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.61
57.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4
BMI29.55 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.872
30.48 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.933
31.41 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.783
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
95 Participants188 Participants93 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
122 Participants247 Participants125 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Height167.2 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.17
166.6 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.26
166.0 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.33
Method of dialysis at Baseline
Hemodialysis
192 Participants384 Participants192 Participants
Method of dialysis at Baseline
Peritoneal dialysis
25 Participants51 Participants26 Participants
Primary cause of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD)
Amyloidosis
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Primary cause of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD)
Chronic glomerulonephritis
13 Participants29 Participants16 Participants
Primary cause of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD)
Diabetes mellitus
115 Participants237 Participants122 Participants
Primary cause of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD)
Hypertension
65 Participants117 Participants52 Participants
Primary cause of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD)
Kidney abnormalities
8 Participants19 Participants11 Participants
Primary cause of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD)
Other
3 Participants7 Participants4 Participants
Primary cause of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD)
Polycystic kidney disease
5 Participants9 Participants4 Participants
Primary cause of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD)
Unknown
3 Participants12 Participants9 Participants
Primary cause of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD)
Urinary tract obstruction
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Primary cause of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD)
Vasculitis
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
11 Participants16 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
6 Participants19 Participants13 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
57 Participants129 Participants72 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
4 Participants4 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
139 Participants267 Participants128 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
217 participants435 participants218 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
82 Participants185 Participants103 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
135 Participants250 Participants115 Participants
Time since start of dialysis36.11 months38.60 months41.08 months
Time since start of ESA therapy30.59 months32.95 months36.24 months
Type of last Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agent (ESA) therapy prior
Epogen
217 Participants432 Participants215 Participants
Type of last Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agent (ESA) therapy prior
Procrit
0 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
Weight82.8 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.75
84.6 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.66
86.5 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.32

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
5 / 21711 / 218
other
Total, other adverse events
112 / 217123 / 218
serious
Total, serious adverse events
91 / 21790 / 218

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Mean Hb Level Between Baseline (Week -4 to Day1) and Evaluation Period (Week 21-28)

Response to epoetin alfa in anemic patients with chronic renal failure is manifested by increased hematocrit, hemoglobin, reduced transfusion requirements and increase in quality of life. Hemoglobin (laboratory haematology parameter) is the primary endpoint of the study .

Time frame: Week -4 to Day1 and Week 21-28

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population consists of all randomized patients who were exposed to treatment with study drug for at least four weeks and have at least one Hb value available at week 4 or later. Following the intent-to-treat principle, patients are analyzed according to the treatment they were assigned to at randomization.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HX575 Epoetin AlfaChange in Mean Hb Level Between Baseline (Week -4 to Day1) and Evaluation Period (Week 21-28)Baseline period10.53 g/dLStandard Deviation 0.635
HX575 Epoetin AlfaChange in Mean Hb Level Between Baseline (Week -4 to Day1) and Evaluation Period (Week 21-28)Evaluation period10.42 g/dLStandard Deviation 0.826
HX575 Epoetin AlfaChange in Mean Hb Level Between Baseline (Week -4 to Day1) and Evaluation Period (Week 21-28)Change from baseline period to evaluation period-0.11 g/dLStandard Deviation 1.011
US-licensed Epoetin AlfaChange in Mean Hb Level Between Baseline (Week -4 to Day1) and Evaluation Period (Week 21-28)Baseline period10.50 g/dLStandard Deviation 0.615
US-licensed Epoetin AlfaChange in Mean Hb Level Between Baseline (Week -4 to Day1) and Evaluation Period (Week 21-28)Evaluation period10.51 g/dLStandard Deviation 0.873
US-licensed Epoetin AlfaChange in Mean Hb Level Between Baseline (Week -4 to Day1) and Evaluation Period (Week 21-28)Change from baseline period to evaluation period0.01 g/dLStandard Deviation 0.953
Primary

Mean Absolute Change in Hemoglobin Levels Between the Screening/Baseline Period (Week -4 to Day 1) and the Evaluation Period (Week 21-28)

Response to epoetin alfa in anemic patients with chronic renal failure is manifested by increased hematocrit, hemoglobin, reduced transfusion requirements and increase in quality of life. Hemoglobin (laboratory haematology parameter) is the primary endpoint of the study .

Time frame: Week -4 to Day1 and Week 21-28

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population consists of all randomized patients who were exposed to treatment with study drug for at least four weeks and have at least one Hb value available at week 4 or later. Following the intent-to-treat principle, patients are analyzed according to the treatment they were assigned to at randomization.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
HX575 Epoetin AlfaMean Absolute Change in Hemoglobin Levels Between the Screening/Baseline Period (Week -4 to Day 1) and the Evaluation Period (Week 21-28)-0.0960 g/dLStandard Error 0.0575
US-licensed Epoetin AlfaMean Absolute Change in Hemoglobin Levels Between the Screening/Baseline Period (Week -4 to Day 1) and the Evaluation Period (Week 21-28)-0.0035 g/dLStandard Error 0.0573
90% CI: [-0.2264, 0.0413]
Secondary

Incidence of Antibody Formation Against Epoetin

Number of patients with positive antidrug antibody (ADA) finding at any time during their treatment period. Count includes 2 patients (1 in each arm) that already had a positive ADA Baseline finding. ADA testing performed by by Radio-Immuno-Precipitation assay. No patient developed neutralizing antibodies.

Time frame: 52 weeks

Population: All patients treated with study drug with a post-baseline antibody assessment

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
HX575 Epoetin AlfaIncidence of Antibody Formation Against Epoetin7 Participants
US-licensed Epoetin AlfaIncidence of Antibody Formation Against Epoetin2 Participants
Secondary

Mean Weekly Dose During Evaluation Period (Week 21-28)

Mean weekly study drug dose during evaluation period (Week 21-28)

Time frame: Week 21-28

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population consists of all randomized patients who were exposed to treatment with study drug for at least four weeks and have at least one Hb value available at week 4 or later. Following the intent-to-treat principle, patients are analyzed according to the treatment they were assigned to at randomization.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HX575 Epoetin AlfaMean Weekly Dose During Evaluation Period (Week 21-28)5876.5 international unitsStandard Deviation 5785.5
US-licensed Epoetin AlfaMean Weekly Dose During Evaluation Period (Week 21-28)5804.0 international unitsStandard Deviation 6343.7

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 8, 2026