Skip to content

Psoriatic Arthritis Treat to Target vs. Usual Care

A Trial of Active Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA): Randomizing to Treat to a Target vs. Usual Care

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01692912
Acronym
PRC-05-2011
Enrollment
0
Registered
2012-09-25
Start date
2012-10-31
Completion date
2014-11-30
Last updated
2017-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)

Keywords

Psoriatic Arthritis, Randomized, Single blind, Treat to target

Brief summary

Canadian Rheumatologists will be randomized to treat their participants with active Psoriatic Arthritis to a target (disease activity score \<2.6), or as per their routine care. The aim of this study is to determine whether treating to a target results in greater disease improvement than treating patients using routine care.

Detailed description

Canadian Rheumatologists will be randomized to treat their participants with active Psoriatic Arthritis to a target (disease activity score \<2.6), or as per their routine care. The aim of this study is to determine whether treating to a target results in greater disease improvement than treating patients using routine care.

Interventions

OTHERIntensive Care

Rheumatologist aims to treat participant in order to achieve a disease activity score improvement of DAS28\<2.6

Sponsors

Amgen
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Pope Research Corporation
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Psoriatic Arthritis as diagnosed by a rheumatologist and meeting ACR classification criteria for PsA or CASPAR criteria * The subject must provide written informed consent for participation in the study before any study specific procedures are performed * Subject has 3 or more SJC on 28 joint count * Age \>=18

Exclusion criteria

* Subject has a history of being non-compliant * Serious concomitant illnesses that in the investigator's opinion negate ability to optimally treat the patient * If treating with TNF inhibitor, positive PPD \> 5mm who have not received INH for recommended course or untreated TB (ie CXR evidence of latent infection). Usual screening is in place for standard of care. * Pregnancy, breast-feeding or considering pregnancy over the next 12 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of patients achieving low DASMonth 9 VisitThe primary outcome measure will be the percentage of patients achieving low Disease Activity Score (DAS\<2.6) in each patient group (Intensive Care vs. Routine Care) at the end of the study.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to achieving DAS28<2.6Month 3 Visit, Month 6 Visit, and Month 9 VisitCompares the effectiveness of Intensive Care and Routine Care groups, as measured by the time to achieving target of DAS28\<2.6
Absolute change in DAS28Month 3 Visit, Month 6 Visit, Month 9 VisitTo compare the effectiveness of Intensive Care and Routine Care in improving the patient DAS28.
Percentage of Patients achieving ACR 20, 50, and 70Month 3 Visit, Month 6 Visit, Month 9 VisitACR 20/50/70 defined as: * 20%, 50%, or 70% reduction in tender joint count, and * 20%, 50%, or 70% reduction in swollen joint count, and * a 20%, 50%, or 70% reduction in 3 of the following 5 measures: * Patient and physician global assessments (VAS) * Patient pain score (VAS) * HAQ-DI * ESR or CRP
Percentage of patients achieving PsARCMonth 3 Visit, Month 6 Visit, Month 9 VisitPsARC defined as improvement in at least 2 of the 4 following measures, one of which must be joint swelling or tenderness, and no worsening in any of the 4 measures: * MDGA (0-5 point scale): reduction by 1 point. * PGA (0-5 point scale): reduction by 1 point. * TJC (76 or 68): reduction by \>=30%. * SJC (76 or 68): reduction by \>=30%.
Absolute change in HAQ-DIMonth 3 Visit, Month 6 Visit, Month 9 VisitHAQ-DI is a self-administered questionnaire using the patient's functional ability during the last week. It consists of 20 items converging to 8 scales measuring dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and common daily activities. The patients rate each activity as 0 = without any difficulty, 1 = some difficulty, 2 = much difficulty and 4 = unable. The final score ranges from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating more disability.

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026